National Academy of Sciences | 150 Year Anniversary

Questions? Call 800-624-6242

| Items in cart [0]

The National Academies Press

Rights & Permissions

topleft topright

NCHRP Report 500 Volume 17: A Guide for Reducing Work Zone Collisions (2006)
National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP)

Citation Manager

Transportation Research Board. "Implementation Step 8: Develop a Plan of Action." NCHRP Report 500 Volume 17: A Guide for Reducing Work Zone Collisions. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2006.

Please select a format:

BibTeX EndNote RefMan


Page
152
bottomleft bottomright
Page
152
Front Matter (R1-R10)
General Description of the Problem (1-2)
Objectives of the Emphasis Area (3-5)
Section II - Introduction (6-6)
General Description of the Problem (7-8)
Specific Attributes of the Problem (9-10)
Key References (11-12)
Section IV - Index of Strategies by Implementation Timeframe and Relative Cost (13-14)
Objectives (15-16)
Types of Strategies (17-17)
Related Strategies for Creating a Truly Comprehensive Approach (18-19)
Objective 19.1 A - Reduce the Number, Duration, and Impact of Work Zones (20-54)
Objective 19.1 B - Improve Work Zone Traffic Control Devices (55-80)
Objective 19.1 C - Improve Work Zone Design Practices (81-92)
Objective 19.1 D - Improve Driver Compliance with Work Zone Traffic Controls (93-109)
Objective 19.1 E - Increase Knowledge and Awareness of Work Zones (110-122)
Objective 19.1 F - Develop Procedures to Effectively Manage Work Zones (123-134)
Outline for a Model Implementation Process (135-135)
Overview of the Model Process (136-138)
Implementation Step 1: Identify and Define the Problem (139-142)
Implementation Step 2: Recruit Appropriate Participants for the Program (143-144)
Implementation Step 3: Establish Crash Reduction Goals (145-145)
Implementation Step 4: Develop Program Policies, Guidelines, and Specifications (146-146)
Implementation Step 5: Develop Alternative Approaches to Addressing the Problem (147-148)
Implementation Step 6: Evaluate Alternatives and Select a Plan (149-150)
Implementation Step 7: Submit Recommendations for Action by Top Management (151-151)
Implementation Step 8: Develop a Plan of Action (152-153)
Implementation Step 9: Establish Foundations for Implementing the Program (154-154)
Implementation Step 10: Carry Out the Action Plan (155-155)
Implementation Step 11: Assess and Transition the Program (156-157)
Section VII - Key References (158-164)
Appendixes (165-166)
Abbreviations used without definitions in TRB publications (167-167)

Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 152
SECTION VI--GUIDANCE FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF THE AASHTO STRATEGIC HIGHWAY SAFETY PLAN Implementation Step 8: Develop a Plan of Action General Description At this stage, the working group will usually detail the program that has been selected for implementation. This step translates the program into an action plan, with all the details needed by both decision makers, who will have to commit to the investment of resources, and those charged with carrying it out. The effort involves defining resource requirements, organizational and institutional arrangements needed, schedules, etc. This is usually done in the form of a business plan, or plan of action. An example of a plan developed by a local community is shown in Appendix X. An evaluation plan should be designed at this point. It is an important part of the plan. This is something that should be in place before Step 9 is finished. It is not acceptable to wait until after the program is completed to begin designing an evaluation of it. This is because data are needed about conditions before the program starts, to allow comparison with conditions during its operation and after its completion. It also should be designed at this point, to achieve consensus among the stakeholders on what constitutes "success." The evaluation is used to determine just how well things were carried out and what effect the program had. Knowing this helps maintain the validity of what is being done, encourages future support from management, and provides good intelligence on how to proceed after the program is completed. For further details on performing evaluations, see Appendix L, Appendix M, and Appendix W. The plan of action should be developed jointly with the involvement of all desired participants in the program. It should be completed to the detail necessary to receive formal approval of each agency during the next step. The degree of detail and complexity required for this step will be a function of the size and scope of the program, as well as the number of independent agencies involved. Specific Elements 1. Translation of the selected program into key resource requirements 1.1. Agencies from which cooperation and coordination is required 1.2. Funding 1.3. Personnel 1.4. Data and information 1.5. Time 1.6. Equipment 1.7. Materials 1.8. Training 1.9. Legislation 2. Define organizational and institutional framework for implementing the program 2.1. Include high-level oversight group 2.2. Provide for involvement in planning at working levels 2.3. Provide mechanisms for resolution of issues that may arise and disagreements that may occur 2.4. Secure human and financial resources required VI-18

OCR for page 153
SECTION VI--GUIDANCE FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF THE AASHTO STRATEGIC HIGHWAY SAFETY PLAN 3. Detail a program evaluation plan 3.1. Goals and objectives 3.2. Process measures 3.3. Performance measures 3.3.1. Short-term, including surrogates, to allow early reporting of results 3.3.2. Long-term 3.4. Type of evaluation 3.5. Data needed 3.6. Personnel needed 3.7. Budget and time estimates 4. Definition of tasks to conduct the work 4.1. Develop diagram of tasks (e.g., PERT chart) 4.2. Develop schedule (e.g., Gantt chart) 4.3. For each task, define 4.3.1. Inputs 4.3.2. Outputs 4.3.3. Resource requirements 4.3.4. Agency roles 4.3.5. Sequence and dependency of tasks 5. Develop detailed budget 5.1. By task 5.2. Separate by source and agency/office (i.e., cost center) 6. Produce program action plan, or business plan document VI-19