Click for next page ( 58

The National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine
500 Fifth St. N.W. | Washington, D.C. 20001

Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
Terms of Use and Privacy Statement

Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 57
Appendix C Present System of U.S. Participation In International Standards Development From a U.S. national perspective, international standards are set by three principal mechanisms. First, certain standards are set by formal U.S. government action through bilateral or multilateral arrangements. Some of these standards are handled through intergovernmental organizations, such as the International Telecommunications Union, International Civil Avia- tion Organization, International Atomic Energy Agency, and International Bureau of Weights and Measures. Second, certain organizations both na- tional and internationalpromulgate documents that serve as international standards. The standards set by the American Society for Testing and Ma- terials (ASTM) and the Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE) often have this character. Table C-1 shows the diversity of U.S. nongovernmental orga- nizations involved in standard setting. Third, coordination and direction of international standards setting are the express function of two international organizations: the International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC), estate fished in 1906 to develop standards for electrical products and systems; and the International Organization for Standardization (ISO), founded in 1946 with the responsibility for standardization of many nonelectrical items. The lEC and the ISO are both headquartered in Geneva, have many members in common, and have worked together to a limited degree on certain standard-setting activities. They are, however, administered depen- dently and collect separate dues from members. Recently the division of work between them has become less clearly defined. Areas of overlap and competition have cleveloped, particularly in information technology. It is important to note that international standards developed by the lEC and the ISO are nongovernmental. They contrast with the mandatory standards issued by governmental agencies to implement legislation and s7

OCR for page 57
58 TABLE C-1 Top Twenty U.S. Nongovernment Standards Developers Organizations Number of Standards American Society for Testing and Materials Society of Automotive Engineers U.S. Pharmacopeia Aerospace Industries Association Association of Official Analytic Chemists Association of American Railways American National Standards Institute Cosmetic, Toiletry, & Fragrance Assoc. Factory Mutual American Society of Mechanical Engineers Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Electronic Industries Association Underwriters Laboratories American Railway Engineers Association American Petroleum Institute American Association of Cereal Chemists American Oil Chemists Association American Association of Blood Banks Technical Assoc. of the Pulp & Paper Industry National Fire Protection Association 7,200 4,200 2,900 2,800 1,500 1,350 1,330* 630 600 550 500 480 465* * 400 350 350 330 280 270 260 *Published and copyrighted by ANSI. **Does not include draft or unpublished standards. SOURCE: National Bureau of Standards, Standards Activities in the United States, (NBS Special Publication 681) (August 1984), p. 2. Other national requirements. Nonetheless, the nonbinding standards of the lEC and ISO have a major impact on international commerce. The lEC has 43 "National Committees" as its members. The ISO has approximately 90 "Member Bodies." Each country participating in international standard setting will have one lEC National Committee and one ISO Member Body, which is usually the national standards organization of that country. In most countries, the lEC National Committee and the ISO Member Body are separate organizations. The United States is an exception; the American National Standards Institute (ANSI), a private not-for-profit organization, serves as both the UeS. National Committee of the lEC and as the ISO Member Body. ANSI plays the major coordinating role in the U.S. voluntary standards system. This informal system seeks to meet needs for national standards by marshaling the competence and cooperation of commerce and industry, standards-developing organizations, and public and consumer interests. Al- though ANST is recognized by lEC and ISO, several U.S. organizations that

OCR for page 57
59 promulgate important standards do not recognize ANST as the sole U.S. representative in international standard setting. In most countries, work to support the lEC and ISO is at least partially funded by the government. In the Federal Republic of Germany, for exam- ple, approximately 20 percent of the funds to support the German Standards Association (DIN) come from the government. ANST, in contrast, does not receive direct government funding, but is supported by its members, primar- ily industrial companies and trade associations. In countries with centrally planned economies, the activities to support the lEC and the ISO are, of course, carried out by government organizations. Hence, in international st~ndard-setting activities, the U.S. participants are "volunteers," a status that presents advantages and disadvantages. Those individuals participating are usually genuinely interested in the outcome and are therefore informed and active. On the other hand, they are sometimes at a disadvantage in that representatives of other countries are often individuals whose primary responsibility is in standard setting and who have resources and support from their governments. Technical specialists who represent the United States through ANST in international standard setting come largely from industry, with some partic- ipation by government agency personnel and academia in particular fields. There can be considerable satisfaction to participants in developing interna- tional standards. Information at the leading edge of technology is exchanged in international working groups; meetings of ISO and lEC technical commit- tees are frequently illuminating from a technical standpoint and represent miniature scientific congresses. On the other hand, the status of activities and individuals dealing with standards is frequently at a relatively low leve! in individual U.S. companies. Instead of being close to critical facets of tech- nology, many engineers involved in standards development are far removed from technology-developing groups in their organizations. The role of U.S. government agencies in both domestic and nontreaty international standards is delineated by Office of Management and Budget Circular A119 "Federal Participation in the Development and Use of Volun- tary Standards" (October 1982~. In general, the federal government works on both domestic and international standards though agency personnel in standards activities carried out by the private standards organizations. The Secretary of Commerce has responsibility for interagency coordination and monitoring of activities of U.S. government personnel in voluntary standard setting. Table C-2 shows the extent of participation by federal agency in voluntary standards activities. The National Bureau of Standards (NBS), in the Department of Com- merce, is the federal organization most involved in setting technical stan- dards. The NBS is a nonregulatory agency that was established in 1901 to aid manufacturing, commerce, government, and academia by supplying the measurement foundationmeasurement standards for measuring length, light, time, and temperature for industry, science, and technology. NBS

OCR for page 57
60 TABLE C-2 Number of Domestic and International Voluntary Standards Organizations with Which Federal Agency Personnel are Involved, October 1985 Department/Agency U.S. Domestic International and Organizations Foreign Organizations Commerce Department 66 Defense Department 61 Health and Human Services Department 58 Transportation Department 43 Nuclear Regulatory Commission 24 Energy Department 17 Housing and Urban Development 17 Consumer Product Safety Commission 16 Veterans Administration 14 National Aeronautics and Space Admin. 13 General Services Administration 11 Interior Department 10 Agriculture Department 8 Labor Department Federal Communications Commission 5 Environmental Protection Agency 3 6 40 4 24 6 2 4 2 3 1 6 2 SOURCE: Report to OMB on the Implementation of OMB Circular A-119. Letter report from the Secretary of Commerce to the Director of the Office of Management and Budget, 1985. has significant research and testing facilities. The Office of Product Stan- dards Policy of the NBS is responsible for much national and international standards policy. This once is responsible (as are certain other government agencies in other fields) for U.S. participation in treaty-defined standards issues. For example, the office serves as the U.S. Inquiry Point for the Agree- ment on Technical Barriers to Trade ("Standards Code") of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) and furnishes technical assistance to industry and trade negotiators in addressing trade problems with other countries. In any given year between 400 and 500 of NBS's 1,600 profes- sional employees sit on a total of about 1,000 different national standards committees.