Click for next page ( 71


The National Academies | 500 Fifth St. N.W. | Washington, D.C. 20001
Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
Terms of Use and Privacy Statement



Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 70
70 References 1. Krammes, R. A. and C. Hayden. Making Two-Lane Roads Safer. Safety Effectiveness of Intersection Left- and Right-Turn Lanes. Pub- Public Roads Magazine, Vol. 66, No. 4, January/February 2003, lication FHWA-RD-02-089, FHWA, U.S. DOT, July 2002. pp. 3840. 13. Khattak, A. J., B. Naik, and V. Kannan. Safety Evaluation of Left- 2. SafetyAnalyst Homepage. Federal Highway Administration. Turn Lane Line Width at Intersections with Opposing Left-Turn www.safetyanalyst.org. Accessed August 10, 2007. Lanes. Final Report, Nebraska Department of Roads, Lincoln, NE, 3. Highway Safety Manual Home Page. Transportation Research December 2004. Board. Hosted by Washington State DOT. www.highwaysafety- 14. Evaluation of Low-Cost Safety Improvements, Phase II/Phase III. manual.org. Accessed August 10, 2007. FHWA, U.S. DOT. Expected completion date unknown. 4. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Offi- 15. Hughes R. (Principal Investigator). NCHRP Project 3-78, "Cross- cials. AASHTO Strategic Highway Safety Plan--A Comprehensive ing Solutions at Roundabouts and Channelized Turn Lanes for Plan to Substantially Reduce Vehicle-Related Fatalities and Injuries Pedestrians with Vision Disabilities." Transportation Research on the Nation's Highways. American Association of State Highway Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., Expected and Transportation Officials, Washington, D.C., 2005. completion--November 2008. 5. Harkey, D. L., R. Srinivasan, C. Zegeer, B. Persaud, C. Lyon, K. Eccles, 16. NCHRP Project 3-89, "Design Guidance for Channelized Right- F. Council, and H. McGee. NCHRP Research Results Digest 299: Crash Turn Lanes." Transportation Research Board of the National Acad- Reduction Factors for Traffic Engineering and Intelligent Transportation emies, Washington, D.C., Expected completion date unknown. System (IFS) Improvements: State-Of-Knowledge Report. Transporta- 17. Bowman, B. L. and R. L. Vecellio. Effects of Urban and Suburban tion Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., Median Types on Both Vehicular and Pedestrian Safety. In Trans- November 2005. portation Research Record 1445, Transportation Research Board, 6. Various authors. NCHRP Report 500: Guidance for Implementation National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1994, pp. 169179. of the AASHTO Strategic Highway Safety Plan, Volumes 117 and 18. McGee, H., S. Taori, and B. Persaud. NCHRP Report 491: Crash 19. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Experience Warrant for Traffic Signals. Transportation Research 20032007. Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2003. 7. Hauer, E. Observational Before--After Studies in Road Safety: Esti- 19. Persaud, B., E. Hauer, R. A. Retting, R. Vallurupalli, and K. Mucsi. mating the Effect of Highway and Traffic Engineering Measures on Crash Reductions Related to Traffic Signal Removal in Philadel- Road Safety. Pergamon Press, Elsevier Science, Ltd., Oxford, UK, phia. In Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 29, No. 6, Pergamon 1997. Press, Oxford, NY, 1997, pp. 803810. 8. Rodegerdts, L., M. Blogg, E. Wemple, E. Myers, M. Kyte, M. Dixon, 20. Hauer, E. Left-Turn Protection, Safety, Delay and Guidelines: A G. List, A. Flannery, R. Troutbeck, W. Brilon, N. Wu, B. Persaud, Literature Review. Prepared for FHWA, U.S. DOT, October 2004. C. Lyon, D. Harkey, and D. Carter. NCHRP Report 572: Round- www.roadsafetyresearch.com. Accessed August 11, 2005. abouts in the United States. Transportation Research Board of the 21. Lyon, C., A. Haq, B. Persaud, and S. Kodama. Safety Performance National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2007. Functions for Signalized Intersections in Large Urban Areas: 9. Harwood, D. W., F. M. Council, E. Hauer, W. E. Hughes, and Development and Application to Evaluation of Left-Turn Priority A. Vogt. Prediction of the Expected Safety Performance of Rural Two- Treatment. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Trans- Lane Highways. Publication FHWA-RD-99-207. FHWA, U.S. portation Research Board, No. 1908, Transportation Research Board, DOT, December 2000. National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2005, pp. 165171. 10. Preston, H. and T. Schoenecker. Bypass Lane Safety, Operations, 22. Retting, R. A., J. F. Chapline, and A. F. Williams. Changes in Crash and Study Design. Publication MN/RC-2000-22, Minnesota DOT, Risk Following Re-timing of Traffic Signal Change Intervals. In July 1999. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 34, No. 2, Pergamon Press, 11. Sebastian, O. L. and R. S. Pusey. Paved-Shoulder Left-Turn Bypass Oxford, NY, 2002, pp. 215220. Lanes: A Report on the Delaware Experience. Delaware DOT, Octo- 23. Hamilton Associates. The Safety Benefits of Additional Primary ber 1982. Signal Heads. Insurance Corporation of British Columbia, 1998. 12. Harwood, D. W., K. M. Bauer, I. B. Potts, D. J. Torbic, K. R. 24. Sayed, T., W. Abdelwahab, and J. Nepomuceno. Safety Evaluation Richard, E. R. Kohlman Rabbani, E. Hauer, and L. Elefteriadou. of Alternative Signal Head Design. In Transportation Research

OCR for page 70
71 Record 1635, Transportation Research Board, National Research the Transportation Research Board, No.1773, Transportation Council, Washington, D.C., 1998, pp. 140146. Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 25. Persaud, B., F. Council, C. Lyon, K. Eccles, and M. Griffith. A 2001, pp. 5668. Multi-Jurisdictional Safety Evaluation of Red Light Cameras. In 39. Zaidel, D. M. and I. Hocherman. Safety of Pedestrian Crossings at Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Signalized Intersections. In Transportation Research Record 1141, Research Board, No. 1922, Transportation Research Board of the Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2005, pp. 2937. Washington, D.C., 1987, pp. 16. 26. Council, F. M., B. Persaud, C. Lyon, K. Eccles, M. Griffith, 40. Zegeer, C. V., K. S. Opiela, and M. J. Cynecki. Effect of Pedestrian E. Zaloshnja, and T. Miller. Implementing Red Light Camera Pro- Signals and Signal Timing on Pedestrian Accidents. In Transporta- grams: Guidance for Economic Analysis of Safety Benefits. In tion Research Record 847, Transportation Research Board, National Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1982, pp. 6272. Research Board, No. 1922, Transportation Research Board of the 41. Andreassen, D. The Treatment/Crash Reduction Matrix. www. National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2005, pp. 3843. dotars.gov.au/transprog/downloads/road_bs_matrix.pdf. Accessed 27. Evaluation of Yellow-Light Hold System to Reduce Rear-End August 11, 2005. Collisions. Insurance Institute for Highway Safety, Arlington, VA. 42. Council, F. M. and J. R. Stewart. Safety Effects of the Conversion of Expected completion is unknown. Rural Two-Lane to Four-Lane Roadways Based on Cross-Sectional 28. Sayed, T., H. Vahidi, and F. Rodriguez. Advance Warning Flashers: Models. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Trans- Do They Improve Safety. In Transportation Research Record: Jour- portation Research Board, No. 1665, Transportation Research Board, nal of the Transportation Research Board, No.1692, Transportation National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1999, pp. 3543. Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 43. Huang, H. F., J. R. Stewart, and C. V. Zegeer. Evaluation of Lane 1999, pp. 3038. Reduction "Road Diet" Measures on Crashes and Injuries. In 29. Srinivasan, R., D. Carter, B. Persaud, K. Eccles, N. Lefler, C. Lyon, Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation and R. Amjadi. Safety Evaluation of Flashing Beacons at Stop- Research Board, No.1784, Transportation Research Board of the Controlled Intersections. Publication FHWA-HRT-08-048. FHWA, National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2002, pp. 8090. U.S. DOT, August 2007. 44. Pawlovich, M., L. Wen, A. Carriquiry, and T. Welch. Iowa's Expe- rience with Road Diet Measures: Use of Bayesian Approach to 30. Lovell, J. and E. Hauer. The Safety Effect of Conversion to All-Way Assess Impacts on Crash Frequencies and Crash Rates. In Trans- Stop Control. In Transportation Research Record 1068, Transporta- portation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research tion Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, Board, No. 1953, Transportation Research Board of the National D.C., 1986, pp. 103107. Academies, Washington, D.C., 2006, pp. 163171. 31. McGee, H. W. and M. R. Blankenship. NCHRP Report 320: Guide- 45. Bauer, K. M., D. W. Harwood, W. E. Hughes, and K. R. Richard. lines for Converting Stop to Yield Control at Intersections. Trans- Safety Effects of Using Narrow Lanes and Shoulder-Use Lanes to portation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, Increase the Capacity of Urban Freeways. In Transportation D.C., 1989. Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 32. Ray, B. (Principal Investigator, Kittelson & Associates). NCHRP 1897, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Project 3-74, "Guidelines for Selection of Speed Reduction Treat- Washington, D.C., 2004, pp. 7180. ments at High-Speed Intersections." Transportation Research 46. Persaud, B., C. Lyon, K. Eccles, N. Lefler, D. Carter, and R. Amjadi. Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C. Expected Safety Evaluation of Installing Center Two-Way Left-Turn Lanes on publication of final report--June 2008. Two-Lane Roads. Publication FHWA-HRT-08-042. FHWA, U.S. 33. Transverse Rumble Strips at Stop-Controlled Intersections in Iowa. DOT, March 2008. Highway Safety Information System, FHWA, U.S. Department of 47. Harwood, D. W., D. K. Gilmore, K. R. Richard, and J. M. Dunn. Transportation. Expected completion date--2008. NCHRP Report 605: Passing Sight Distance Criteria. Transportation 34. Walker, F. W. and S. E. Roberts. Influence of Lighting on Accident Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2008. Frequency at Highway Intersections. In Transportation Research 48. Hadi, M. A., J. Aruldhas, L. Chow, and J. Wattleworth. Estimating Record 562, Transportation Research Board, National Research Safety Effects of Cross-Section Design for Various Highway Types Council, Washington, D.C., 1976, pp. 7378. Using Negative Binomial Regression. In Transportation Research 35. Lipinski, M. E., and R. H. Wortman. Effect of Illumination on Record 1500, Transportation Research Board, National Research Rural At-Grade Intersection Accidents. In Transportation Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1995, pp. 169177. Record 611, Transportation Research Board, National Research 49. Knuiman, M. W., F. M. Council, and D.W. Reinfurt. Association Council, Washington, D.C., 1976, pp. 2527. of Median Width and Highway Accident Rates. In Transportation 36. Preston, H. and T. Schoenecker. Safety Impacts of Street Lighting Research Record 1401, Transportation Research Board, National at Isolated Rural Intersections. Publication MN/RC-1999-17. Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1993, pp. 7082. Minnesota DOT, April 1999. 50. Maze, T. (Principal Investigator at Iowa State University). NCHRP 37. Rea, M. S. (Principal Investigator at Rensselaer Polytechnic Insti- Project 15-30, "Median Intersection Design for Rural High-Speed tute). NCHRP Project 5-19, "Guidelines for Roadway Lighting Divided Highways." Based on Safety Benefits and Costs." Transportation Research 51. Harwood, D. W., E. R. K. Rabbani, K. R. Richard, H. W. McGee, and Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C. Expected G. L. Gittings. NCHRP Report 486: Systemwide Impact of Safety and completion--July 2008. Traffic Operations Design Decisions for 3R Projects. Transportation 38. Zegeer, C. V., J. R. Stewart, H. Huang, and P. Lagerway. Safety Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2003. Effects of Marked Versus Unmarked Crosswalks at Uncontrolled 52. Hauer E. Safety of Horizontal Curves: Review of Literature for the Locations: Analysis of Pedestrian Crashes in 30 Cities (with Dis- Interactive Highway Safety Design Model. March 2000. www. cussion and Closure). In Transportation Research Record: Journal of roadsafetyresearch.com. Accessed August 11, 2005.

OCR for page 70
72 53. Griffith, M. S. Safety Evaluation of Rolled-in Continuous Shoulder Research Board, No. 1727, Transportation Research Board, National Rumble Strips Installed on Freeways. In Transportation Research Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2000. Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1665, 68. Bray, J. S. Skid Accident Reduction Program (SKARP): Targeted Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Crash Reductions. In 2003 ITE Technical Conference and Exhibit. Washington, D.C., 1999, pp. 2834. CD-ROM. Institute of Transportation Engineers, Washington, 54. Torbic, D.J. (Principal Investigator, Midwest Research Institute). D.C., March 2003. NCHRP Project 17-32, "Guidance for the Design and Application 69. Bowman, B. L., and R. L. Vecellio. Effects of Urban and Suburban of Shoulder and Centerline Rumble Strips." Transportation Median Types on Both Vehicular and Pedestrian Safety. In Trans- Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C. portation Research Record 1445, Transportation Research Board, Expected completion--August 2008. National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1994, pp. 169179. 55. Patel, R. B., F. M. Council, and M. S. Griffith. Estimating Safety 70. Grder, P. Pedestrian Safety at Traffic Signals. In Accident Analysis Benefits of Shoulder Rumble Strips on Two-Lane Rural Highways and Prevention, Vol. 21, No.5, 1989, pp. 435444. in Minnesota: Empirical Bayes Observational Before-and-After 71. Miller, T., T. Schlax, D. Lestina, M. Galbraith, P. Mabery, R. Deering, Study. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Trans- K. L. Campbell, and D. L. Massie. Understanding the Harm from U.S. portation Research Board, No. 2019, Transportation Research Board Motor Vehicle Crashes. In Proceedings of the 39th Annual Meeting of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2007, pp. 205211. of the Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine. Asso- 56. Lindly, J. K. and R. K. Wijesundera. Evaluation of Profiled Pavement ciation for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine, Barrington, Markings. Publication UTCA 01465. University Transportation IL, 1995, pp. 327342. Center for Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL, November 2003. 72. Council, F., E. Zaloshnja, T. Miller, and B. Persaud. Crash Cost 57. Persaud, B. N., R. A. Retting, and C. Lyon. Crash Reduction Estimates by Maximum Police-Reported Injury Severity within Following Installation of Centerline Rumble Strips on Rural Two- Selected Crash Geometries. Publication FHWA-HRT-05-051, Lane Roads. Insurance Institute for Highway Safety, Arlington, VA, FHWA, U.S. DOT, October 2005. September 2003. 73. Nilsson, G. Traffic Safety Dimensions and the Power Model to 58. Dixon, K. (Principal Investigator, Georgia Tech Research Corpo- Describe the Effect of Speed on Safety. Lund Institute of Technology, ration). NCHRP Project 16-04, "Design Guidelines for Safe and Department of Technology and Society, Traffic Engineering, Lund, Aesthetic Roadside Treatments in Urban Areas." Transportation Sweden, 2004. www.lub.lu.se/luft/diss/tec_733/tec_733.pdf. Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 74. Elvik, R., P. Christensen, and A. Amundsen. Speed and Road Acci- 20032007. dents: An Evaluation of the Power Model. TOI Report 740, Institute 59. Zegeer, C. V., J. Hummer, D. Reinfurt, L. Herf, and W. Hunter. of Transport Economics (TOI), Oslo, Norway, 2004. Safety Effects of Cross-Section Design for Two-Lane Roads--Volumes 75. Lee, J. and F. Mannering. Analysis of Roadside Accident Frequency and I and II. Publication FHWA-RD-87-008, FHWA, U.S. DOT, 1987. Severity and Roadside Safety Management, Final Research Report. 60. Elvik, R. and T. Vaa. The Handbook of Road Safety Measures, Elsevier Publication No. WA-RD 475.1, Washington State DOT, 1999. Science, Oxford, UK, 2004. 76. Donnell, E. T., D. W. Harwood, K. M. Bauer, J. M. Mason, and 61. Miaou, S., R. P. Bligh and D. Lord. Developing Guidelines for M. T. Pietrucha. Cross-Median Collisions on Pennsylvania Inter- Median Barrier Installation: Benefit-Cost Analysis with Texas Data. states and Expressways. In Transportation Research Record: Journal In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1784, Transportation Research Board, No. 1904, Transportation Research Board of the Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., National Academies, D.C., 2005, pp. 319. 2002, pp. 9199. 62. Zegeer, C. V. and M. J. Cynecki. Determination of Cost-Effective 77. Bligh, R., S. Miaou, D. Lord, and S. Cooner. Median Barrier Guide- Roadway Treatments for Utility Pole Accidents. In Transportation lines for Texas. Publication No. FHWA/TX-06/0-4254-1. Texas Research Record 970, Transportation Research Board, National Department of Transportation, August 2006. Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1984, pp. 5264. 78. Ulf, B. and L. Jrgen. Traffic Safety of Roundabouts for Cyclists and 63. Elvik, R. Meta-Analysis of Evaluations of Public Lighting as Acci- Pedestrians. Swedish National Road and Transport Research Insti- dent Countermeasure. In Transportation Research Record 1485, tute (VTI), Linkping, Sweden, 1999. Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, 79. Clark, J. E., S. Maghsoodloo, and D. Brown. Public Good Relative Washington, D.C., 1995, pp. 112123. to Right-Turn-On-Red in South Carolina and Alabama. In Trans- 64. Weiss, A. (Principal Investigator, Northwestern University). portation Research Record 926, Transportation Research Board, NCHRP Project 3-59, "Assessment of Variable Speed Limit Imple- National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1983, pp. 2431. mentation Issues." Transportation Research Board of the National 80. Bray, J. S. Memo on Skid Accident Reduction Program (SKARP). Academies, Washington, D.C., 20002005. 2001 65. Results of Field Tests on Impacts of Setting and Enforcing Rational 81. Harwood, D. W. and A. D. St. John. Passing Lanes and Other Speed Limits. Cooperative Agreement Projects. FHWA, U.S. DOT. Operational Improvements on Two-Lane Highways. Publication Expected completion date is unknown. FHWA/RD-85/028. FHWA, U.S. DOT, July 1984. 66. Kockelman, K. NCHRP Research Results Digest 303: Safety Impacts 82. Nettelbad, P. Traffic Safety Effects of Passing (Climbing) Lanes: An and Other Implications of Raised Speed Limits on High-Speed Accident Analysis Based on Data for 19721977. Meddelande TU Roads. Transportation Research Board of the National Acade- 1979-5. Swedish National Road Administration, 1979. mies, Washington, D.C., April 2006. 83. Hauer E. The Median and Safety: Review of Literature for the Interactive 67. Rakha, H., A. Medina, F. Sin, M. Dion, M. Van Aerde, and J Jenq. Highway Safety Design Model. March 2000. www.roadsafetyresearch. Traffic Signal Coordination Across Jurisdictional Boundaries: Field com. Accessed August 11, 2005. Evaluation of Efficiency, Energy, Environmental, and Safety Impacts. 84. Zegeer, C. V., D. W. Reinfurt, J. Hummer, L. Herf, and W. Hunter. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Safety Effects of Cross-Section Design for Two-Lane Roads. In

OCR for page 70
73 Transportation Research Record 1195, Transportation Research zontal Curves. In Transportation Research Record 1356, Transporta- Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1988, pp. tion Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, 2032. D.C., 1992, pp. 1119. 85. Griffin, L. I. and K. K. Mak. The Benefits to Be Achieved from Widen- 91. Bonneson, J. A., K. Zimmerman, and K. Fitzpatrick. Roadway ing Rural, Two-Lane Farm-to-Market Roads in Texas. Publication Safety Design Synthesis. Publication No. FHWA/TX-05/0-4703-P1. IAC (86-87)-1039. Texas Transportation Institute, College Station, Texas DOT, November 2005. TX, April 1987. 92. Bonneson, J. A. and P. T. McCoy. NCHRP Report 395: Capacity and 86. Hauer E. Lane Width and Safety: Review of Literature for the Interactive Operational Effects of Midblock Left-Turn Lanes. Transportation Highway Safety Design Model. March 2000. www.roadsafetyresearch. Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., com. Accessed August 11, 2005. 1997. 87. Zegeer, C. V., R. C. Dean and J. G. Mayes. Effect of Lane and Shoul- 93. McCoy, P. T., M. Ramanujam, M. Moussavi, and J. L. Ballard. der Widths on Accident Reduction on Rural, Two-Lane Roads. In Safety Comparison of Types of Parking on Urban Streets in Transportation Research Record 806, Transportation Research Board, Nebraska. In Transportation Research Record 1270, Transportation National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1981, pp. 3343. Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 88. Miaou, S. Measuring the Goodness-of-Fit of Accident Prediction 1990, pp. 2841. Models. Publication FHWA-RD-96-040. FHWA, U.S. DOT, 94. Box, P. C. Angle Parking Issues Revisited. ITE Journal, Institute of December 1996. Transportation Engineers, Washington, D.C., March 2002, pp. 89. Hauer E. Shoulder Width, Shoulder Paving and Safety: Review of 3647. Literature for the Interactive Highway Safety Design Model. March 95. Institute for Transportation Engineers. Determining Vehicle 2000. www.roadsafetyresearch.com. Accessed August 11, 2005. Change Intervals: A Proposed Recommended Practice. ITE Journal, 90. Zegeer, C. V., J. R. Stewart, F. M. Council, D. W. Reinfurt, and Vol. 59, No. 7, Institute of Transportation Engineers, Washington, E. Hamilton. Safety Effects of Geometric Improvements on Hori- D.C., 1989, pp. 2732.