Click for next page ( 49


The National Academies | 500 Fifth St. N.W. | Washington, D.C. 20001
Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
Terms of Use and Privacy Statement



Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 48
48 References American Marketing Association, Dictionary of Marketing Terms. Elmore-Yalch, R. TCRP Report 37: A Handbook: Integrating Market Re- http://www.marketingpower.com/mg-dictionary-view1848.php. search into Transit Management. TRB, National Research Council, Accessed November 30, 2007. Washington, D.C., 1998b. Apogee Research, Inc., NCHRP Report 329: Using Market Research to Federal Transit Administration. Best Practices for Using Geographic Data Improve Management of Transportation Systems. TRB, National in Transit: A Location Referencing Guidebook. Report No. FTA-NJ- Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1990. 26-7044-2003.1. U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, Bagchi, M., and White, P. R. The Potential of Public Transport Smart D.C., 2005. Card Data. Transport Policy, Vol. 12, 2005, pp. 464474. Fielding, G.J. Managing Public Transit Strategically: A Comprehensive Barry, J.J., Newhouser, R., Rahbee, A., and Sayeda, S. Origin and Desti- Approach to Strengthening Service and Monitoring Performance. nation Estimation in New York City with Automated Fare System Jossey-Bass Publishers, San Francisco, CA, 1987. Data. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transporta- Furth, P.G., Hemily, B., Muller, T.H.J., and Strathman, G. TCRP Report tion Research Board, No. 1817, Transportation Research Board of the 113: Using Archived AVL-APC Data to Improve Transit Performance National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2002, pp.183187. and Management. Transportation Research Board of the National Bates, J.W. Definition of Practices for Bus Transit On-Time Perfor- Academies, Washington, D.C., 2006. mance: Preliminary Study. In Transportation Research Circular 300, Gehrs, D., Guggisberg, T., and Haynes, M. Public Transit ITS Data Col- TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1986 pp. 15. lection and Analysis: Large and Small Agency Lessons Learned. ITS Boldt, R. TCRP Synthesis of Transit Practice 35: Information Technology Joint Program Office, U.S. Department of Transportation. http:// Update for Transit. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, www.pcb.its.dot.gov/res_t3_archive.asp?Archive=True. Accessed D.C., 2000. November 30, 2007. Cambridge Systematics, Inc. TCRP Report 53: New Paradigms for Local Gross, P., Haynes, M., and Schroeder, J. APC/AVL and GIS Pacific Public Transportation Organizations, Task 1 Report: Forces and Fac- Northwest Knowledge Sharing. Final Report. Peer-to-Peer Devel- tors That Require Consideration of New Paradigms. TRB, National opment Program. ITS Joint Program Office, U.S. Department of Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1999. Transportation, Washington, D.C., 2003. Casey, R. In What Have We Learned About Intelligent Transportation Hatfield, N.J., and Guseman, P.K. Basic Market Research Techniques for Systems? FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, Transit Systems. Texas Transportation Institute, College Station, D.C., 2000, Chapter 5. 1978. Casey, R. Tri-County Metropolitan Transportation District of Oregon ITS Joint Program Office. Building Professional Capacity in ITS: An Assess- Intelligent Transportation Systems. FTA, U.S. Department of Trans- ment of ITS Training and Education Needs: The Transit Perspective. portation, Washington, D.C., 2003. U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C., 1999a. Cronin, J.J., and Hightower, R. An Evaluation of the Role of Marketing ITS Joint Program Office. Building Professional Capacity in ITS: Guidelines in Public Transit Organizations. Journal of Public Transportation, for Staffing, Hiring, and Designing Ideal Project Teams. U.S. Depart- Vol. 7, No. 2, 2004, pp. 1736. ment of Transportation, Washington, D.C., 1999b. Crout, D.T. Accuracy and Precision of TriMet's Transit Tracker System. ITS Joint Program Office. Automatic Vehicle Location: Successful Transit Presented at the 86th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Applications: A Cross-cutting Study. U.S. Department of Transporta- Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2007. tion, Washington DC (2000). Cui, A. Bus Passenger Origin-Destination Matrix Estimation Using ITS Joint Program Office. Ventura County Fare Integration Case Study: Automated Data Collection Systems. M.S. thesis. Massachusetts Promoting Seamless Regional Fare Coordination. U.S. Department Institute of Technology, Cambridge, 2006. of Transportation, Washington DC (2001). ESRI, Inc. Downloads for Data Models. http://support.esri.com/ Kemp, J. Lessons Learned--Things You Didn't Have to Think About index.cfm?fa=downloads.dataModels.gateway. Accessed Novem- When It Was Just AVL. Presented at the 81st Annual Meeting of the ber 30, 2007. Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2002. Elmore-Yalch, R. TCRP Report 36: A Handbook: Using Market Segmenta- Kimpel, T.J., Dueker, K.J., and El-Geneidy, A.M. Using GIS to Measure tion to Increase Transit Ridership. TRB, National Research Council, the Effects of Service Area and Frequency on Passenger Boardings Washington, D.C., 1998a. at Bus Stops. URISA Journal, Vol. 19, 2007, pp. 511.

OCR for page 48
49 Kimpel, T.J., Strathman, J.G., Callas, S., Griffin, D., and Gerhart, R. L. Stanley, R.G., Coogan, M.A., Bolton, M.P., Campbell, S., and Sparrow, Automatic Passenger Counter Evaluation: Implications for National R. TCRP Report 97: Emerging New Paradigms: A Guide to Funda- Transit Database Reporting. In Transportation Research Record: mental Change in Local Public Transportation Organizations. Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1835, Transporta- Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, tion Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., Washington, D.C., 2003. 2003, pp. 93100. Strathman, J.G., and Hopper, J.L. An Evaluation of Automatic Passen- Kittelson & Associates, Inc. TCRP Report 100: Transit Capacity and ger Counters: Validation, Sampling, and Statistical Inference. In Quality of Service Manual, 2nd ed. Transportation Research Board Transportation Research Record 1308, TRB, National Research of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2003. Council, 1991, pp. 6977. Lehtonen, M., Rosenberg, M., Rsnen, J., and Sirki, A. Utilization of Strathman, J.G., Kimpel, T.J., Dueker, K.J, Gerhart, R., and Callas, S. the Smart Card Payment Systems (SCPS) Data in Public Transport Evaluation of Transit Operations: Data Applications of TriMet's Planning and Statistics. Presented at the 9th World Congress of Automated Bus Dispatching System. Transportation, Vol. 29, 2002, Intelligent Transport Systems, Chicago, IL, 2002. pp. 321345. Levinson, H.S. Synthesis of Transit Practice 15: Supervision Strategies for Strathman, J.G., Kimpel, T.J., and Callas, S. Rail APC Validation and Improved Reliability of Bus Routes. TRB, National Research Coun- Sampling for NTD and Internal Reporting at TriMet. In Trans- cil, Washington, D.C., 1991. portation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Board, No. McGlothin Davis, Inc., and Corporate Strategies, Inc. TCRP Report 77: 1927, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Managing Transit's Workforce in the New Millennium. Transportation Washington, D.C., 2005, pp. 217222. Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2002. Strathman, J.G., Kimpel, T.J., and Callas, S. Headway Deviation Effects Miller, H.J., and Shaw, S. Geographic Information Systems for Trans- on Bus Passenger Loads: Analysis of TriMet's Archived AVL-APC portation: Principles and Applications. Oxford University Press, Data. Center for Urban Studies, Portland State University, Port- New York, 2001. land, OR, 2003. Morpace International and Cambridge Systematics, TCRP Report 47: A Sutton, J. TCRP Synthesis 55: Geographic Information Systems Applications Handbook for Measuring Customer Satisfaction and Service Quality. in Transit. Transportation Research Board of the National Acade- TRB, National Research Council, Washington D.C., 1999. mies, Washington, D.C., 2004. Navick, D. S., and Furth, P.G. Using Location-Stamped Farebox Data Thill, J-C. Geographic Information Systems for Transportation in Per- to Estimate Passenger-Miles, O-D Patterns, and Loads. In Trans- spective. Transportation Research, Part C, Vol. 8, 2000, pp. 312. portation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Transit Cooperative Research Program. Research Results Digest 24: Cre- Board, No. 1799, Transportation Research Board of the National ating a New Future for Public Transportation: TCRP's Strategic Road Academies, Washington, D.C., 2002, pp. 107113. Map. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1998. Potts, J. TCRP Synthesis 45: Customer-Focused Transit. Transportation Transit Cooperative Research Program. Research Results Digest 45: Iden- Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2002. tification of the Critical Workforce Development Issues in the Transit Rahbee, A., and Czerwinski, D. Using Entry-Only Automatic Fare Industry. Transportation Research Board of the National Acade- Collection Data to Estimate Rail Transit Passenger Flows at CTA. mies, Washington, D.C., 2001. Proc., 2002 Transit Chicago Conference, Chicago, IL, 2002. TranSystems, Planners Collaborative, Inc., and Tom Crikelair Associates. Retzlaff, J., Soucie, K., and Biemborn, E. Use of Market Research in TCRP Report 111: Elements Needed to Create High-Ridership Transit Public Transit. Report No. DOT-I-85-45. University Research and Systems. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Training Program, Urban Mass Transportation Administration, Washington, D.C., 2007. U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C., 1985. Trepanier, M., Chapleau, R., and Allard, B. Can Trip Planner Log Files Richardson, A.J. Estimating Average Distance Traveled from Bus Analysis Help in Transit Service Planning? Journal of Public Trans- Boarding Counts. TTIU Report 2-2000. The Urban Transport portation, Vol. 8, 2005, pp. 79101. Institute, Melbourne, Australia, 2000. Utsunomiya, U., Attanucci, J., and Wilson, N. Potential Uses of Tran- Schneider, R. TCRP Synthesis 62: Integration of Bicycles and Transit. sit Smart Card Registration and Transaction Data to Improve Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Transit Planning. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Washington, D.C., 2005. Transportation Board, No. 1971, Transportation Research Board of Schweiger, C.L. TCRP Synthesis of Transit Practice 48: Real-Time Bus Ar- the National Academies, 2006, pp. 119126. rival Information Systems. Transportation Research Board of the Volpe National Transportation Systems Center. Advanced Public Trans- National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2003. portation Systems Deployment in the United States: Year 2004 Society of Automotive Engineers. Surface Vehicle Recommended Practice Update. FTA, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, for Serial Data Communications between Microcomputer Systems in D.C., 2005. Heavy-Duty Applications. Standard SAE 1708 (1993). Zhao, J. The Planning and Analysis Implications of Automated Data Society of Automotive Engineers. Surface Vehicle Recommended Prac- Collection Systems: Rail Transit OD Matrix Inference and Path tice for Electronic Data Interchange between Microcomputer Systems Choice Modeling Examples. M.S. thesis. Massachusetts Institute of in Heavy-Duty Applications. Standard SAE 1587 (1996). Technology, Cambridge, 2004.