National Academy of Sciences | 150 Year Anniversary

Questions? Call 800-624-6242

| Items in cart [0]

The National Academies Press

Rights & Permissions

topleft topright

ACRP Report 4: Ground Access to Major Airports by Public Transportation (2008)
Airport Cooperative Research Program (ACRP)

Citation Manager

Coogan, Matthew A, Transportation Research Board. "Demographic Characteristics of Air Travelers." ACRP Report 4: Ground Access to Major Airports by Public Transportation. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2008.

Please select a format:

BibTeX EndNote RefMan


Page
136
bottomleft bottomright
Page
136
Front Matter (R1-R12)
Summary (1-14)
Chapter 1 - Six Steps in a Market-Based Strategy for Improving Airport Ground Access (15-15)
Coordinate with the Regional Planning Process (16-17)
Data Collection for the Airport Ground Access Survey (18-19)
Data Collection to Monitor the Performance of the System (20-20)
Geographic Scale of the Airport Ground Access Markets (21-21)
Density and Market Support Associated with Specific Modes (22-23)
Best Practices in the United States: Examples of Market Types at U.S. Airports (24-24)
Lessons Learned from Successful Systems (25-26)
Summary: Designing to Deal with Revealed Attributes (27-27)
Best Practices in the United States: Service Based on Markets (28-28)
Encouraging the Use of High-Occupancy Service (29-29)
Learning from Recent U.S. Airport Designs (30-30)
Step 6: Present Information about Ground Access Services to the Traveler (31-31)
Conclusion (32-33)
Understanding the Scale of Airport Ground Access (34-34)
The Scale of the Public Mode Volumes at These Airports (35-35)
What Has Happened over the Last Decade? (36-38)
Trip Purpose: Why Do Airline Passengers Travel? (41-43)
National Patterns of Access to Airports and Terminals (44-44)
Daily Public Mode Volumes to Airports (45-45)
Implications for Choice of Ground Access Mode (46-47)
Ground Access Issues and the Regional Planning Process (48-49)
Environmental Approvals in Europe (50-50)
What's Next? (51-51)
Understanding Successful Airport Ground Access Systems (52-52)
Does Airport Size Explain Ridership? (53-53)
Does the Quality of the Airport Connection Explain Ridership? (54-54)
Does Line-Haul Speed Explain High Ridership? (55-57)
Is Higher Speed or Directness of Service More Important? (58-60)
The Implications of Dedicated Premium Service (61-61)
Berlin Brandenburg Airport (62-62)
Chicago Midway and O'Hare Airports (63-63)
Summing It Up (64-64)
Desired Attributes of Van and Bus Service to U.S. Airports (65-66)
What's Next? (67-67)
Part 1: Best Practices at U.S. Airports (68-68)
Tier 1 (69-69)
San Francisco (23% Market Share) (70-70)
Boston (18% Market Share) (71-72)
Oakland (15% Market Share) (73-73)
New Orleans (15% Market Share) (74-74)
Atlanta (14% Market Share) (75-75)
Denver (14% Market Share) (76-76)
Los Angeles (13% Market Share) (77-77)
Baltimore/Washington (12% Market Share) (78-78)
Chicago O'Hare (12% Market Share) (79-79)
Tier 2 (80-80)
Seattle (11% Market Share) (81-81)
Chicago Midway (9% Market Share) (82-82)
San Diego (9% Market Share) (83-83)
Washington Dulles (8% Market Share) (84-84)
New York LaGuardia (8% Market Share) (85-85)
Philadelphia (7% Market Share) (86-86)
Dallas/Fort Worth (6% Market Share) (87-87)
Cleveland (6% Market Share) (88-88)
Part 2: Best Practices at European and Asian Airports (89-90)
Oslo (64% Market Share) (91-91)
Hong Kong (63% Market Share) (92-92)
Narita (59% Market Share) (93-93)
Zurich (47% Market Share) (94-94)
Vienna (41% Market Share) (95-95)
London Stansted (40% Market Share) (96-96)
Paris Charles de Gaulle (40% Market Share) (97-97)
Amsterdam (37% Market Share) (98-98)
Munich (36% Market Share) (99-99)
London Heathrow (36% Market Share) (100-100)
Stockholm (34% Market Share) (101-101)
Frankfurt (33% Market Share) (102-102)
Geneva (28% Market Share) (103-103)
Brussels (26% Market Share) (104-104)
Dsseldorf (22% Market Share) (105-106)
Part 1: Baggage Strategies for Local Originating Passengers (107-107)
The Importance of Baggage-Handling Strategies (108-108)
A Case Study in Baggage Check-in at a Downtown Terminal (109-111)
Status of Other Downtown Check-in Terminals (112-116)
Near-Airport Check-in Locations (117-118)
Part 2: Integration of Ticketing and Baggage with Longer Distance Systems (119-119)
Integration with National Systems: The GAO Study (120-121)
Why Integrate an Airport with Longer Distance Ground Services? (122-124)
Part 3: Evolving Strategies for Integrated Ticketing and Baggage (125-125)
Las Vegas Strategies for Integration of Modal Services (126-126)
Los Angeles International Airport to Union Station (127-127)
Newark Liberty International Airport Rail Station: A Case Study (128-130)
Lessons Learned: Integration with National Systems (131-131)
Documentation of Examples of Integrated Services (132-134)
Characteristics of the Airport Ground Access Market (135-135)
Demographic Characteristics of Air Travelers (136-137)
Step 1: Decide What Information to Collect (138-138)
Step 2: Select a Data Collection Method (139-140)
Step 3: Determine the Sampling Frame and Sampling Method (141-141)
Step 5: Summarize and Analyze the Results (142-142)
Air Traveler Trip-End Densities Associated with Ground Transportation Markets (143-144)
The Geography of Public Ground Transportation to Airports (145-146)
A Hierarchy of Markets for Public Ground Transportation Services (147-147)
Variation by Demographic Segment: Total Airport Market (148-148)
Variation by Demographic Segment: Washington, D.C. (149-150)
Applying the Four Market Segments: Looking for the Factor of Familiarity (151-151)
Conclusion (152-152)
The Need to Manage Services (153-153)
Measures to Encourage Use of Public Transportation (154-155)
Automated Traffic Monitoring and Management Programs (156-156)
Open Access (157-157)
Balancing Supply and Demand (158-158)
Challenges of Introducing New Services (159-159)
Competition and Enforcement (160-160)
Bond Indenture (161-161)
Airline Agreement (162-162)
Sources of Funding (163-163)
Federal Funding and Financial Oversight of Airports and Airport Access Projects (164-166)
Environmental Implications of Federal Funding for Airport Access Projects (167-167)
Factors That Influence Employee Use of Public Transportation (168-168)
Transit Service Characteristics (169-170)
Employee Characteristics (171-172)
Comparative Comfort of Transit and Automobile (173-173)
Availability, Cost, and Convenience of Parking at the Work Site (174-174)
Extent and Adequacy of Transit Service Hours (175-175)
Non-Flight Crew (176-176)
Getting Information about Ground Access (177-177)
Ground Access Information on the San Francisco Airport Website (178-180)
Ground Access Information on the Portland (Oregon) Airport Website (181-181)
Ground Access Information on the Boston Airport Website (182-182)
Ground Access Information on the New York JFK Airport Website (183-184)
Ground Access Information on the Atlanta Airport Website (185-185)
Ground Access Information on the Amsterdam Airport Website (186-187)
Ground Access Planning on the Narita Airport Website (188-189)
Ground Access Information on the London Heathrow Airport Website (190-190)
Ground Access Information on the Zurich Airport Website (191-191)
The Baltimore/Washington International Airport Prototype Ground Access Module (192-192)
Passenger Information Provided by Other Agencies (193-194)
Conclusions (195-195)
Step 2: Undertake the Program for Data Gathering and System Monitoring (196-196)
Step 5: Manage the Airport to Encourage Higher Occupancy (197-197)
Step 6: Present the Ground Access Services to the Traveler (198-198)
References (199-200)
Appendix - Abbreviations and Acronyms (201-202)
Abbreviations used without definitions in TRB publications (203-203)

Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 136
136 Ground Access to Major Airports by Public Transportation Geographic Distribution of Ground Access Trips The first step in planning any successful public transportation service is determining the geographic distribution of the potential customers: air travelers and employees. Originating air travelers and airport employees account for the majority of person trips to and from an airport. While these are the most important groups to consider, they have very different ground access needs. Nevertheless, significant markets for ground access services can be found in the elements common to their trips. The term ground access traveler will be used to describe any air traveler or airport employee who travels to or from an airport by a mode other than air. Not all air travelers are ground access travelers; air travelers transferring between two flights (and who do not leave the airport) are not candidates for ground access services at the transfer airport. Although patterns will vary with the airport, mapping the ground access trip origins of large U.S. airports would show that the supporting market area for each airport is spread over a wide region. Several factors influence the distribution of ground access markets: · The physical size of the market. The geographic size of an airport's ground access market is influenced by factors such as proximity to competing airports, the relative price of airfares at competing airports, the regional transportation networks, and the physical geography of the area. · The number of ground access trips originating from different locations. The distribution of ground access trips within an airport's market area is based on development patterns of the region, population density, and demographic characteristics of the population. · The proportion of air traveler origins from defined market segments. As described in the next section, these market segments usually categorize air travelers into four market segments on the basis of residency and trip purpose. Two concepts are important for understanding the geographic distribution of air travelers. A ground transportation trip can be more precisely defined using the measure of trip ends. The definition of a trip end is the origin or destination point of an air traveler's ground access trip; one trip end is at the airport and the second trip end is located somewhere within the airport's market or service area. Therefore, each ground transportation trip made to or from an airport by an air traveler involves two trip ends. An additional measure, which combines the geographic and quantitative components of the airport ground transportation market, is trip-end density. For this report, trip-end density is defined as the number of air traveler trip ends per square mile of land area. These measures and their applications to ground transportation planning are dis- cussed in more detail later in this chapter. Demographic Characteristics of Air Travelers Although air travelers can be classified in many ways, two variables--trip purpose and home residence location--are frequently used to classify air travelers for purposes of airport ground access planning. The combination of these two variables results in four market segments: resi- dent business, resident non-business, non-resident business, and non-resident non-business (Figure 6-1). (In the figures, the four segments are sometimes shortened to res biz, res non-biz, non-res biz, and non-res non-biz.) As mentioned earlier, one objective of market research is to identify target groups for a ser- vice or product. For air travelers, the characteristics of residence and trip purpose influence their preferences for ground access services. The different characteristics of these four market segments and the implications for ground access services are discussed in the following sections.

OCR for page 137
Applying Market Research to Airport Ground Access 137 The "Four Cell Matrix" Resident Non-resident Trip Purpose Business Business Resident Non-resident Non-business Non-business Residential Status Figure 6-1. The four market segments. Resident Business Resident business travelers are often the largest group of air travelers. They tend to travel to and from the airport at peak arrival or departure times. Because of their frequent air travel, resident busi- ness travelers are likely to know the most efficient, reliable, and cost-effective means of accessing the airport. Typically, resident business travelers make shorter trips than non-business travelers and have less baggage. Although this characteristic makes their travel profile more suitable for public transportation, their sensitivity to access time reliability makes them cautious about using these ser- vices. Public transportation service characteristics like schedule reliability must be flawless to attract resident business travelers. This observation is especially true for the so-called "just-in-time" trav- elers, who arrive at the airport with barely enough time to make their flight departure and who are particularly sensitive to even minor delays. Resident business travelers tend to be the dominant users of the more convenient (close-by) and more expensive airport parking options. Resident Non-Business Resident non-business air travelers are almost certain to start their airport trip from home and to have a longer length of stay than resident business air travelers. They also tend to travel in larger travel parties and to have more baggage. Accordingly, they are more sensitive to access costs and may need assistance with baggage handling. Although resident non-business travelers travel less frequently than business travelers, they usually have some information available about access to their local airport and may have developed a preferred access method. They have a greater tendency to travel during off-peak times and are subject to day-of-the-week variations because of travel promotions by the airlines. Because of the characteristics of their travel, resident non- business air travelers will likely be dropped off at the airport by friends or family; if they drive, they are likely to park in reduced-rate facilities. They are candidates for public transportation if the ground mode boarding location is situated along their normal route to the airport. Non-Resident Business Non-resident business travelers usually begin their trips to the airport from a place of busi- ness or a hotel. These places tend to be located in city centers, near regional attractions, near the airport, or in proximity to regional highways. Depending on the nature of their trips (e.g., a busi- ness meeting at one location or multiple meetings with a series of clients), non-resident business travelers usually require the flexibility of a rental car or taxi. When their destination is the cen- ter of the city, they will use the most efficient means of reaching their destination without regard to cost. They may use public transportation, when the service is expedient and delivers them near their destination without the need for multiple stops and transfers. Non-Resident Non-Business Non-resident non-business travelers are usually the least informed and most unfamiliar with the access options available at any given airport. Although these travelers may make multiple