National Academy of Sciences | 150 Year Anniversary

Questions? Call 800-624-6242

| Items in cart [0]

The National Academies Press

Rights & Permissions

topleft topright

ACRP Report 4: Ground Access to Major Airports by Public Transportation (2008)
Airport Cooperative Research Program (ACRP)

Citation Manager

Coogan, Matthew A, Transportation Research Board. "The Geography of Public Ground Transportation to Airports." ACRP Report 4: Ground Access to Major Airports by Public Transportation. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2008.

Please select a format:

BibTeX EndNote RefMan


Page
145
bottomleft bottomright
Page
145
Front Matter (R1-R12)
Summary (1-14)
Chapter 1 - Six Steps in a Market-Based Strategy for Improving Airport Ground Access (15-15)
Coordinate with the Regional Planning Process (16-17)
Data Collection for the Airport Ground Access Survey (18-19)
Data Collection to Monitor the Performance of the System (20-20)
Geographic Scale of the Airport Ground Access Markets (21-21)
Density and Market Support Associated with Specific Modes (22-23)
Best Practices in the United States: Examples of Market Types at U.S. Airports (24-24)
Lessons Learned from Successful Systems (25-26)
Summary: Designing to Deal with Revealed Attributes (27-27)
Best Practices in the United States: Service Based on Markets (28-28)
Encouraging the Use of High-Occupancy Service (29-29)
Learning from Recent U.S. Airport Designs (30-30)
Step 6: Present Information about Ground Access Services to the Traveler (31-31)
Conclusion (32-33)
Understanding the Scale of Airport Ground Access (34-34)
The Scale of the Public Mode Volumes at These Airports (35-35)
What Has Happened over the Last Decade? (36-38)
Trip Purpose: Why Do Airline Passengers Travel? (41-43)
National Patterns of Access to Airports and Terminals (44-44)
Daily Public Mode Volumes to Airports (45-45)
Implications for Choice of Ground Access Mode (46-47)
Ground Access Issues and the Regional Planning Process (48-49)
Environmental Approvals in Europe (50-50)
What's Next? (51-51)
Understanding Successful Airport Ground Access Systems (52-52)
Does Airport Size Explain Ridership? (53-53)
Does the Quality of the Airport Connection Explain Ridership? (54-54)
Does Line-Haul Speed Explain High Ridership? (55-57)
Is Higher Speed or Directness of Service More Important? (58-60)
The Implications of Dedicated Premium Service (61-61)
Berlin Brandenburg Airport (62-62)
Chicago Midway and O'Hare Airports (63-63)
Summing It Up (64-64)
Desired Attributes of Van and Bus Service to U.S. Airports (65-66)
What's Next? (67-67)
Part 1: Best Practices at U.S. Airports (68-68)
Tier 1 (69-69)
San Francisco (23% Market Share) (70-70)
Boston (18% Market Share) (71-72)
Oakland (15% Market Share) (73-73)
New Orleans (15% Market Share) (74-74)
Atlanta (14% Market Share) (75-75)
Denver (14% Market Share) (76-76)
Los Angeles (13% Market Share) (77-77)
Baltimore/Washington (12% Market Share) (78-78)
Chicago O'Hare (12% Market Share) (79-79)
Tier 2 (80-80)
Seattle (11% Market Share) (81-81)
Chicago Midway (9% Market Share) (82-82)
San Diego (9% Market Share) (83-83)
Washington Dulles (8% Market Share) (84-84)
New York LaGuardia (8% Market Share) (85-85)
Philadelphia (7% Market Share) (86-86)
Dallas/Fort Worth (6% Market Share) (87-87)
Cleveland (6% Market Share) (88-88)
Part 2: Best Practices at European and Asian Airports (89-90)
Oslo (64% Market Share) (91-91)
Hong Kong (63% Market Share) (92-92)
Narita (59% Market Share) (93-93)
Zurich (47% Market Share) (94-94)
Vienna (41% Market Share) (95-95)
London Stansted (40% Market Share) (96-96)
Paris Charles de Gaulle (40% Market Share) (97-97)
Amsterdam (37% Market Share) (98-98)
Munich (36% Market Share) (99-99)
London Heathrow (36% Market Share) (100-100)
Stockholm (34% Market Share) (101-101)
Frankfurt (33% Market Share) (102-102)
Geneva (28% Market Share) (103-103)
Brussels (26% Market Share) (104-104)
Dsseldorf (22% Market Share) (105-106)
Part 1: Baggage Strategies for Local Originating Passengers (107-107)
The Importance of Baggage-Handling Strategies (108-108)
A Case Study in Baggage Check-in at a Downtown Terminal (109-111)
Status of Other Downtown Check-in Terminals (112-116)
Near-Airport Check-in Locations (117-118)
Part 2: Integration of Ticketing and Baggage with Longer Distance Systems (119-119)
Integration with National Systems: The GAO Study (120-121)
Why Integrate an Airport with Longer Distance Ground Services? (122-124)
Part 3: Evolving Strategies for Integrated Ticketing and Baggage (125-125)
Las Vegas Strategies for Integration of Modal Services (126-126)
Los Angeles International Airport to Union Station (127-127)
Newark Liberty International Airport Rail Station: A Case Study (128-130)
Lessons Learned: Integration with National Systems (131-131)
Documentation of Examples of Integrated Services (132-134)
Characteristics of the Airport Ground Access Market (135-135)
Demographic Characteristics of Air Travelers (136-137)
Step 1: Decide What Information to Collect (138-138)
Step 2: Select a Data Collection Method (139-140)
Step 3: Determine the Sampling Frame and Sampling Method (141-141)
Step 5: Summarize and Analyze the Results (142-142)
Air Traveler Trip-End Densities Associated with Ground Transportation Markets (143-144)
The Geography of Public Ground Transportation to Airports (145-146)
A Hierarchy of Markets for Public Ground Transportation Services (147-147)
Variation by Demographic Segment: Total Airport Market (148-148)
Variation by Demographic Segment: Washington, D.C. (149-150)
Applying the Four Market Segments: Looking for the Factor of Familiarity (151-151)
Conclusion (152-152)
The Need to Manage Services (153-153)
Measures to Encourage Use of Public Transportation (154-155)
Automated Traffic Monitoring and Management Programs (156-156)
Open Access (157-157)
Balancing Supply and Demand (158-158)
Challenges of Introducing New Services (159-159)
Competition and Enforcement (160-160)
Bond Indenture (161-161)
Airline Agreement (162-162)
Sources of Funding (163-163)
Federal Funding and Financial Oversight of Airports and Airport Access Projects (164-166)
Environmental Implications of Federal Funding for Airport Access Projects (167-167)
Factors That Influence Employee Use of Public Transportation (168-168)
Transit Service Characteristics (169-170)
Employee Characteristics (171-172)
Comparative Comfort of Transit and Automobile (173-173)
Availability, Cost, and Convenience of Parking at the Work Site (174-174)
Extent and Adequacy of Transit Service Hours (175-175)
Non-Flight Crew (176-176)
Getting Information about Ground Access (177-177)
Ground Access Information on the San Francisco Airport Website (178-180)
Ground Access Information on the Portland (Oregon) Airport Website (181-181)
Ground Access Information on the Boston Airport Website (182-182)
Ground Access Information on the New York JFK Airport Website (183-184)
Ground Access Information on the Atlanta Airport Website (185-185)
Ground Access Information on the Amsterdam Airport Website (186-187)
Ground Access Planning on the Narita Airport Website (188-189)
Ground Access Information on the London Heathrow Airport Website (190-190)
Ground Access Information on the Zurich Airport Website (191-191)
The Baltimore/Washington International Airport Prototype Ground Access Module (192-192)
Passenger Information Provided by Other Agencies (193-194)
Conclusions (195-195)
Step 2: Undertake the Program for Data Gathering and System Monitoring (196-196)
Step 5: Manage the Airport to Encourage Higher Occupancy (197-197)
Step 6: Present the Ground Access Services to the Traveler (198-198)
References (199-200)
Appendix - Abbreviations and Acronyms (201-202)
Abbreviations used without definitions in TRB publications (203-203)

Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 145
Applying Market Research to Airport Ground Access 145 100% Percent of Land Area 80% 60% 40% 20% 0% SFO DCA LGA JFK BOS LAX IAD SEA DIA TPA EWR BWI PDX < 5 trip ends/sq. mi. 5 or more trip ends/sq. mi. SOURCE: TCRP Report 83, MarketSense. NOTE: SFO = San Francisco; DCA = Reagan National, Washington D.C.; LGA = LaGuardia, NY; JFK = John F. Kennedy, NY; BOS = Boston; LAX = Los Angeles; IAD = Dulles, Washington D.C.; SEA = Seattle-Tacoma; DIA = Denver; TPA = Tampa; EWR = Newark; BWI = Baltimore/ Washington; and PDX = Portland, Oregon. Figure 6-3. Land area of ground access market areas for 13 large U.S. airports. The Importance of Primary Ground Transportation Markets The previous section highlighted the significance of geographic areas where trip-end densities equal or exceed five trip ends per square mile. This area can be described as the primary market. Borrowed from the field of marketing geography, a primary market is defined as the area asso- ciated with at least 60% of all customers, in this case, air travelers using ground transportation. It is important to the success of any ground access service to understand where the majority of potential customers are located, that is, the area that contains the highest concentration of travelers. The share of air travelers using a particular access mode from a given area will vary depending upon a number of factors, one of which is the origin location of their access trip to the airport. Identifying the primary market for an entire airport is the first step in defining the markets for various public transportation modes. Applying the definition of primary market to trip-end densities, analysis shows that the pri- mary markets for the airports studied have average densities of five trip ends per square mile or higher. As shown in Table 6-5, primary markets account for 59% to 87% of all trip ends and 2% to 17% of the land area associated with the ground transportation service area of an airport. For the majority of airports, the land area in their primary market is between 500 and 950 square miles, the exceptions being Newark (1,429 square miles) and Los Angeles (1,551 square miles). Table 6-5 summarizes the characteristics of the primary ground transportation markets for 13 airports. The concept of a primary market area is important for understanding the service and operat- ing environment of an airport's ground transportation network. It is also an important concept to keep in mind when evaluating the role of an individual ground transportation service. The primary market provides a framework for assessing operations and the potential demand for a new service and comparing market characteristics of a new service to those characteristics that support existing services. The following analysis looks at the use of shared-ride transportation at several major airports. A similar analysis can be conducted with other access modes. The Geography of Public Ground Transportation to Airports Multiple forms of ground transportation are required to meet the needs of the many travel- ers using today's airports. Planning new or improved public transportation services requires an

OCR for page 146
146 Ground Access to Major Airports by Public Transportation Table 6-5. Primary ground transportation markets. Land Percentage of Percentage area total ground Number of air of total air (square transportation traveler traveler 1999 population Airport miles) market area trip ends trip ends estimate (000's) New York LaGuardia 744 10% 19,850 84% 9,200 New York JFK 622 6% 18,200 76% 9,500 San Francisco 760 7% 26,200 83% 3,900 Boston 944 11% 20,400 78% 2,950 Newark 1,429 13% 21,500 75% 8,300 Seattle 637 3% 12,100 72% 2,500 Denver 886 7% 20,500 69% 1,750 Los Angeles 1,551 17% 34,000 87% 10,100 Tampa 484 9% 9,325 77% 1,300 Portland (Oregon) 425 2% 5,765 60% 1,300 Reagan National 484 7% 15,500 82% NA Washington Dulles 515 7% 11,010 77% NA Baltimore/Washington 599 8% 8,490 59% NA SOURCE: TCRP Report 63, MarketSense. understanding of the geographic markets supportive of the particular modes under considera- tion. Summarizing the geographic patterns of public transportation use at large airports is a way of identifying these characteristics. Most discussions of airport ground transportation focus on the mode share for general cate- gories of ground transportation available at an airport. While general mode share is a valid meas- ure of how well ground transportation is serving an airport's entire ground access market, it is not a good measure of the market potential for an individual service. The assessment of mode share must be linked to a realistic description of a service's market area in order to develop mar- ket profiles that are comparable between airports. Focusing instead on the primary market--the area where at least 60% of all ground transportation trips to an airport are generated--indicates that primary ground transportation markets for large airports circumscribe a geographic area where trip activity is five or more air traveler trip ends per square mile. Research conducted about market conditions supportive of three basic categories of public ground transportation (traditional fixed-route services, shared door-to-door services, and express bus service from a regional collection point) provides empirical observations about air- port ground transportation markets and how air traveler trip ends are distributed within those markets. Traditional Fixed-Route Services Existing traditional rail services that can be considered successful (mode shares of 15% or greater in their primary market) are located in urban areas with high trip-end densities. Primary markets for the two successful services presented in this research--Washington, D.C.'s Metro- Rail and Boston's MBTA subway services--average 125 to 150 trip ends per square mile in an area encompassing 60 to 100 square miles.