• Front Matter R1-R12

• Summary 1-14

• Chapter 1 - Six Steps in a Market-Based Strategy for Improving Airport Ground Access 15-15

• Coordinate with the Regional Planning Process 16-17

• Data Collection for the Airport Ground Access Survey 18-19

• Data Collection to Monitor the Performance of the System 20-20

• Geographic Scale of the Airport Ground Access Markets 21-21

• Density and Market Support Associated with Specific Modes 22-23

• Best Practices in the United States: Examples of Market Types at U.S. Airports 24-24

• Lessons Learned from Successful Systems 25-26

• Summary: Designing to Deal with Revealed Attributes 27-27

• Best Practices in the United States: Service Based on Markets 28-28

• Encouraging the Use of High-Occupancy Service 29-29

• Learning from Recent U.S. Airport Designs 30-30

• Step 6: Present Information about Ground Access Services to the Traveler 31-31

• Conclusion 32-33

• Understanding the Scale of Airport Ground Access 34-34

• The Scale of the Public Mode Volumes at These Airports 35-35

• What Has Happened over the Last Decade? 36-38

• Trip Purpose: Why Do Airline Passengers Travel? 41-43

• National Patterns of Access to Airports and Terminals 44-44

• Daily Public Mode Volumes to Airports 45-45

• Implications for Choice of Ground Access Mode 46-47

• Ground Access Issues and the Regional Planning Process 48-49

• Environmental Approvals in Europe 50-50

• What's Next? 51-51

• Understanding Successful Airport Ground Access Systems 52-52

• Does Airport Size Explain Ridership? 53-53

• Does the Quality of the Airport Connection Explain Ridership? 54-54

• Does Line-Haul Speed Explain High Ridership? 55-57

• Is Higher Speed or Directness of Service More Important? 58-60

• The Implications of Dedicated Premium Service 61-61

• Berlin Brandenburg Airport 62-62

• Chicago Midway and O'Hare Airports 63-63

• Summing It Up 64-64

• Desired Attributes of Van and Bus Service to U.S. Airports 65-66

• What's Next? 67-67

• Part 1: Best Practices at U.S. Airports 68-68

• Tier 1 69-69

• San Francisco (23% Market Share) 70-70

• Boston (18% Market Share) 71-72

• Oakland (15% Market Share) 73-73

• New Orleans (15% Market Share) 74-74

• Atlanta (14% Market Share) 75-75

• Denver (14% Market Share) 76-76

• Los Angeles (13% Market Share) 77-77

• Baltimore/Washington (12% Market Share) 78-78

• Chicago O'Hare (12% Market Share) 79-79

• Tier 2 80-80

• Seattle (11% Market Share) 81-81

• Chicago Midway (9% Market Share) 82-82

• San Diego (9% Market Share) 83-83

• Washington Dulles (8% Market Share) 84-84

• New York LaGuardia (8% Market Share) 85-85

• Philadelphia (7% Market Share) 86-86

• Dallas/Fort Worth (6% Market Share) 87-87

• Cleveland (6% Market Share) 88-88

• Part 2: Best Practices at European and Asian Airports 89-90

• Oslo (64% Market Share) 91-91

• Hong Kong (63% Market Share) 92-92

• Narita (59% Market Share) 93-93

• Zurich (47% Market Share) 94-94

• Vienna (41% Market Share) 95-95

• London Stansted (40% Market Share) 96-96

• Paris Charles de Gaulle (40% Market Share) 97-97

• Amsterdam (37% Market Share) 98-98

• Munich (36% Market Share) 99-99

• London Heathrow (36% Market Share) 100-100

• Stockholm (34% Market Share) 101-101

• Frankfurt (33% Market Share) 102-102

• Geneva (28% Market Share) 103-103

• Brussels (26% Market Share) 104-104

• Dsseldorf (22% Market Share) 105-106

• Part 1: Baggage Strategies for Local Originating Passengers 107-107

• The Importance of Baggage-Handling Strategies 108-108

• A Case Study in Baggage Check-in at a Downtown Terminal 109-111

• Status of Other Downtown Check-in Terminals 112-116

• Near-Airport Check-in Locations 117-118

• Part 2: Integration of Ticketing and Baggage with Longer Distance Systems 119-119

• Integration with National Systems: The GAO Study 120-121

• Why Integrate an Airport with Longer Distance Ground Services? 122-124

• Part 3: Evolving Strategies for Integrated Ticketing and Baggage 125-125

• Las Vegas Strategies for Integration of Modal Services 126-126

• Los Angeles International Airport to Union Station 127-127

• Newark Liberty International Airport Rail Station: A Case Study 128-130

• Lessons Learned: Integration with National Systems 131-131

• Documentation of Examples of Integrated Services 132-134

• Characteristics of the Airport Ground Access Market 135-135

• Demographic Characteristics of Air Travelers 136-137

• Step 1: Decide What Information to Collect 138-138

• Step 2: Select a Data Collection Method 139-140

• Step 3: Determine the Sampling Frame and Sampling Method 141-141

• Step 5: Summarize and Analyze the Results 142-142

• Air Traveler Trip-End Densities Associated with Ground Transportation Markets 143-144

• The Geography of Public Ground Transportation to Airports 145-146

• A Hierarchy of Markets for Public Ground Transportation Services 147-147

• Variation by Demographic Segment: Total Airport Market 148-148

• Variation by Demographic Segment: Washington, D.C. 149-150

• Applying the Four Market Segments: Looking for the Factor of Familiarity 151-151

• Conclusion 152-152

• The Need to Manage Services 153-153

• Measures to Encourage Use of Public Transportation 154-155

• Automated Traffic Monitoring and Management Programs 156-156

• Open Access 157-157

• Balancing Supply and Demand 158-158

• Challenges of Introducing New Services 159-159

• Competition and Enforcement 160-160

• Bond Indenture 161-161

• Airline Agreement 162-162

• Sources of Funding 163-163

• Federal Funding and Financial Oversight of Airports and Airport Access Projects 164-166

• Environmental Implications of Federal Funding for Airport Access Projects 167-167

• Factors That Influence Employee Use of Public Transportation 168-168

• Transit Service Characteristics 169-170

• Employee Characteristics 171-172

• Comparative Comfort of Transit and Automobile 173-173

• Availability, Cost, and Convenience of Parking at the Work Site 174-174

• Extent and Adequacy of Transit Service Hours 175-175

• Non-Flight Crew 176-176

• Getting Information about Ground Access 177-177

• Ground Access Information on the San Francisco Airport Website 178-180

• Ground Access Information on the Portland (Oregon) Airport Website 181-181

• Ground Access Information on the Boston Airport Website 182-182

• Ground Access Information on the New York JFK Airport Website 183-184

• Ground Access Information on the Atlanta Airport Website 185-185

• Ground Access Information on the Amsterdam Airport Website 186-187

• Ground Access Planning on the Narita Airport Website 188-189

• Ground Access Information on the London Heathrow Airport Website 190-190

• Ground Access Information on the Zurich Airport Website 191-191

• The Baltimore/Washington International Airport Prototype Ground Access Module 192-192

• Passenger Information Provided by Other Agencies 193-194

• Conclusions 195-195

• Step 2: Undertake the Program for Data Gathering and System Monitoring 196-196

• Step 5: Manage the Airport to Encourage Higher Occupancy 197-197

• Step 6: Present the Ground Access Services to the Traveler 198-198

• References 199-200

• Appendix - Abbreviations and Acronyms 201-202

• Abbreviations used without definitions in TRB publications 203-203

Coogan, Matthew A, Transportation Research Board " References ." ACRP Report 4: Ground Access to Major Airports by Public Transportation . Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2008 .

Please select a format: