National Academy of Sciences | 150 Year Anniversary

Questions? Call 800-624-6242

| Items in cart [0]

The National Academies Press

Rights & Permissions

topleft topright

TCRP Synthesis 75: Uses of Higher Capacity Buses in Transit Service (2008)
Transit Cooperative Research Program Synthesis Program (TCRPSYNTH)

Citation Manager

Hemily, Brendon, King, Rolland D, Transportation Research Board. "A Look at the Future." TCRP Synthesis 75: Uses of Higher Capacity Buses in Transit Service. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2008.

Please select a format:

BibTeX EndNote RefMan


Page
43
bottomleft bottomright
Page
43
Front Matter (R1-R9)
Summary (1-3)
Historical Perspective (4-5)
Approach (6-6)
Types of Service Using Higher Capacity Buses (7-8)
Reasons for Implementing Higher Capacity Buses (9-10)
Facilities or Infrastructure Modifications (11-11)
Actions Taken to Reduce Dwell Time (12-13)
Experience with Higher Capacity Buses (14-14)
Agency-Reported Customer Acceptance of Higher Capacity Buses (15-15)
Issues or Concerns Raised with Use of Higher Capacity Buses (16-16)
Vehicle Features and Amenities (17-18)
Wheelchair Equipment and Passenger Experience (19-19)
Spare Ratios for Higher Capacity Buses (20-20)
Future Plans for Higher Capacity Buses (21-21)
Regional Transportation District (Denver, Colorado): Higher Capacity Buses as a Component of a Family of Services (22-24)
Victoria Regional Transit System/BC Transit: Search for Higher Capacity in an Older City Context (25-33)
ChampaignUrbana (Illinois) Mass Transit District: Small Systems Can Effectively Use Higher Capacity Buses (34-37)
Operating Performance of Current Higher Capacity Buses (38-42)
A Look at the Future (43-43)
Capital Costs of Higher Capacity Buses (44-45)
Experience with Higher Capacity Buses (46-47)
Safety Issues (48-48)
Infrastructure Issues (49-49)
Other Operational Issues (50-52)
Trade-Offs in Using Higher Capacity Buses (53-53)
Vehicle Design Issues (54-54)
Chapter Six - Conclusions (55-57)
References (58-59)
Appendix A - Surveys of Transit Agencies and Bus Manufacturers (60-67)
Appendix B - Study Participants (68-68)
Appendix C - Regulations on Vehicle Size and Weight (69-71)
Abbreviations used without definitions in TRB publications (72-72)

Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 43
44 horsepower to approximately 100. This is enough power to Internal noise test data for 10 HC buses are given in Ta- operate the bus electrical loads and run in the tunnel using the ble 38. Data for the average of four 40-ft diesel buses are also battery. In the 1.3 miles inside the tunnel, the fuel consumed included for comparison purposes. is about 1.5 cups, and there are essentially no emissions and no odor (J. Boon, King County Metro Transit, personal com- As shown in the table, the passenger compartments of the munication, March 4, 2007). 45-ft intercity and the double-deck buses are considerably quieter than the other bus types. The elevation from the road- Internal Sound Levels for Higher Capacity Buses way and engine would tend to make the upper deck of the double-deck and the 45-ft intercity buses quieter. Internal sound levels are a growing concern for the transit in- dustry in general. Data from the noise tests conducted at A LOOK AT THE FUTURE ABTC were reviewed to obtain data on the performance of HC and 40-ft buses. All tests are conducted with the bus Some hints of changes in HC vehicle technologies are begin- ning to emerge. The change to a hybrid propulsion technology at seated load weight. Two internal sound level tests are appears to be increasingly accepted. The significant improve- conducted. ment in vehicle performance (acceleration and gradability), along with improved fuel economy make hybrid propulsion in- 1. With doors and windows closed and the engine and all creasingly attractive, in spite of the higher initial capital costs. accessories off, the external surface of the left side of Transit agencies in Europe are increasingly using 15-m buses the bus is exposed to a 80 decibel [dB(A)] uniform for their intercity and regional routes because of the higher seat pressure level using a white noise generator. The noise capacities and improved operator productivity. Figure 27 transmitted to the interior is measured at six locations, shows a low-floor 15-m bus operating in Zeven, Germany. five in the center aisle at 48 inches in height (nominal ear height of seated passenger) and one at the driver There are a few transit agencies in Europe and South Amer- seat at ear height. ica that are using double (or bi) articulated buses that provide 2. With all openings closed and all accessories on, the very high capacities. These 24-m vehicles usually operate in bus is accelerated at full throttle from zero to 35 mph. bus lanes or exclusive busways. Recent French INRETS (Insti- The internal sound levels are measured at four loca- tut National de Recherche sur les Transports et leur Sécurité) tions in the center aisle at 48 inches in height. research on super-high capacity buses was presented at a 2006 BRT conference in France (30). Bordeaux, in France, operated The sound levels are measured on a logarithmic scale, and a line with 10 megabuses from 1988 to 2004, when they were some example perceptions of the change of sound levels are replaced by light-rail transit (LRT). There have been high-floor listed here: bi-articulated buses in operation in Curitiba and Sao Paolo since 1992, and there are bi-articulated buses either in opera- · A 1-db(A) change is an imperceptible change, tion, or planned, in Utrecht (The Netherlands), Aachen, · A 3-db(A) change is barely perceptible, and Wuppertal, Goteborg, and Hamburg (Germany). The Wupper- · A 10-db(A) increase is perceived as twice as loud. tal bus is shown in Figure 28. To place a sound level in perspective, a 40 dB(A) sound level A recent U.S. innovation of attempting to produce lighter- would be similar to that of a quiet library or home (29). weight transit buses using composite technology was not a TABLE 38 INTERNAL AND EXTERNAL NOISE TEST DATA FOR HC BUSES Interior Sound Levels in dB(A) APTA Guidelines 80 dB(A) External Noise 80 dB(A) Source 0 to 35 Acceleration Test 0­35 Test Bus Type Average Peak Average Peak Less than Less Than Articulated--Diesela 57.0a 64.6 75.7a 86.6 65 83 Articulated--Hybrid D/E 54.2 58.7 79.2 82.2 65 83 Double-Deck--Diesel Lower Deck 44.6 45.5 76.4 77.5 65 83 Upper Deck 40.4 41.4 64.4 66.6 65 83 45-ft Intercity--Dieselb 39.0b 46.3 69.9b 79.6 65 83 45-ft Compo--CNG 50.8 55.9 76.6 79.9 65 83 40-ft--Dieselc 52.0c 63.2 77.1c 83.2 65 83 D/E = diesel/electric; CNG = compressed natural gas. Source: References 24­27. a The average measurements are for the average of four articulated buses. b The average measurements are for the average of three 45-ft intercity coaches. c The average measurements are for the average of four 40-ft buses.