Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.
69 PARTICIPATING TRANSIT AGENCIES The following transit agencies participated in this study: ⢠AlamedaâContra Costa Transit District ⢠Anoka County Transit ⢠Antelope Valley Transit Authority ⢠BC Transit (Victoria) ⢠ChampaignâUrbana Mass Transit District ⢠Chicago Transit Authority ⢠City of Everett Transportation Services/Everett Transit ⢠City of Phoenix Public Transportation District ⢠Coast Mountain Bus Company ⢠Connecticut Transit ⢠Edmonton Transit System ⢠Fairfield/Suisun Transit ⢠Golden Gate Bridge, Highway & Transportation District ⢠GO Transit ⢠King County Department of Transportation/Metro Transit ⢠Lane Transit District ⢠MiamiâDade Transit ⢠Mississauga Transit ⢠Nashville Metropolitan Transit Authority ⢠New Jersey Transit Corporation ⢠OC Transpo, City of Ottawa ⢠Potomac & Rappahannock Transportation Commission/ OmniRide ⢠Regional Transportation Commission of Southern Nevada ⢠Regional Transportation DistrictâDenver ⢠San Mateo County Transit District ⢠San Diego Metropolitan Transit System ⢠Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority ⢠Snohomish County Public Transportation Benefit Area Corporation ⢠Southwest Metro Transit ⢠Utah Transit Authority ⢠Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority ⢠York Region Transit BUS MANUFACTURERS AND OTHER ORGANIZATIONS The following organizations participated in this study: ⢠ABC Companies ⢠Alexander Dennis Inc. ⢠Altoona Bus Testing Center ⢠American Public Transportation Association ⢠Canadian Urban Transit Association ⢠DaimlerChrysler Commercial Buses, NA ⢠Motor Coach Industries ⢠New Flyer ⢠North American Bus Industries, Inc. ⢠Nova Bus, A Division of Prevost Cara APPENDIX B Study Participants