National Academy of Sciences | 150 Year Anniversary

Questions? Call 800-624-6242

| Items in cart [0]

The National Academies Press

Rights & Permissions

topleft topright

NCHRP Report 525 Volume 9: Guidelines for Transportation Emergency Training Exercises (2006)
National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP)

Citation Manager

Transportation Research Board. "Exercise Planning Team." NCHRP Report 525 Volume 9: Guidelines for Transportation Emergency Training Exercises. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2006.

Please select a format:

BibTeX EndNote RefMan


Page
33
bottomleft bottomright
Page
33
Front Matter (R1-R10)
Executive Summary (1-1)
Guidelines Organization (2-2)
Why Conduct Exercises? (3-4)
Federal Exercise Requirements for Transportation Agencies (5-6)
FEMA and G&T Programs (7-9)
Discussion-Based and Operations-Based Exercise Categories (10-10)
Brief Overview of Exercise Types (11-15)
Compliance with the National Response Plan (NRP) and the National Incident Management System (NIMS) (16-17)
DHS Mission Outcomes (18-19)
3.0 Establishing a Progressive Exercise Program in the Transportation Environment (20-20)
Steps in the Process (21-32)
Exercise Planning Team (33-33)
Planning Conference Materials (34-34)
Design and Development (35-35)
Documentation (36-36)
Logistics (37-37)
Media Policy (38-38)
Evaluation (39-39)
Call-Off Procedures (40-40)
Exercise Planning Team (41-42)
Exercise Participants (43-44)
Exercise Planning Conferences (45-46)
Design and Development (47-60)
Transportation Incident Response Typology (61-61)
Appendices (62-62)
Appendix A - Abbreviations (63-64)
Appendix B - Glossary of Terms (65-74)
Appendix C - Categorized Resource Bibliography (75-82)
Appendix D - Training and Exercise Resources (83-89)
Attachment 1 NRP and NIMS Reference Materials (90-104)
Attachment 2 Transportation Exercise Evaluation Guide (105-134)
Attachment 3 Needs Assessment Template (135-140)
Attachment 4 Exercise Design Objectives (141-145)
Attachment 5 Sample Exercise Package (146-157)
Attachment 6 Transportation Incident Response Typology (158-168)
Abbreviations used without definitions in TRB publications (169-169)

Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 33
Guidelines for Transportation Emergency Training Exercises 4.0 DISCUSSION-BASED EXERCISES This section describes the process that can be used by transportation agencies to develop the discussion-based exercises specified in the progressive exercise program, concentrating on the table- top exercise. Section 5 presents this process for operations-based exercises. Whether conducted for discussion-based or operations-based exercises, the exercise planning process involves considerable coordination within the transportation agency and among potential par- ticipating agencies and officials. The planning process includes convening a planning team, setting program management timelines, conducting planning conferences, identifying exercise design objec- tives, developing the scenario and documentation, assigning logistical tasks, managing the exercise, and identifying the evaluation methodology. OVERVIEW Although seminars, workshops, and games are types of discussion-based exercises, the most com- monly used discussion-based exercise in transportation is the tabletop. In the transportation envi- ronment, a tabletop exercise is typically a 4- to 8-hour facilitated discussion centered on an incident scenario. The scenario unfolds in discrete time periods (e.g., over 24 hours from incident detection Tabletops require and verification through notification, initial response, dispatch and mobilization of resources, evacu- a set of ation and treatment of the injured, damage assessment and repair, stabilization of the scene, and coordinated gradual restoration of service). planning activities to be The basic outline of events and response under way during each time period is portrayed in short brief- successfully ings (using PowerPoint presentations, photographs, video clips, or other means of communication). At conducted and the end of each briefing, a caucus period provides participants with the opportunity to discuss the issues evaluated. associated with responding to the scenario presented. In addition to the briefings, a situation manual (sometimes called a player's handbook) is provided that corresponds with the briefings and provides additional details about the incident and response. To facilitate discussion, participants are divided into small groups by functional area. Participants are encouraged to periodically migrate between groups to foster communication. At the conclusion of each caucus session, a spokesperson from each group will report back to all attendees about what was discussed. After the tabletop is complete, a series of evaluation activities will be performed to assess perfor- mance and identify areas of improvement. First, a debrief is performed among participants to gather their assessments regarding the tabletop. Then, an AAR will be developed to document the tabletop, and an improvement plan will be prepared to integrate recommendations into the transportation agency emergency planning, training, and exercise programs. EXERCISE PLANNING TEAM The exercise planning team is responsible for designing, developing, conducting, and evaluating all aspects of transportation emergency exercises. The planning team determines exercise design objec- tives; tailors the scenario to transportation and jurisdictional needs; and develops documents used in simulation, control, and exercise evaluation. The exercise planning team for discussion-based exercises is typically smaller than the team needed for operations-based exercises. As explained in Section 3 of this report, in the transportation environ- ment, one to three persons can typically organize a tabletop exercise or game when supported by con- sultants and members of an ad hoc team, committee, or task force assembled with local responders. The exercise planning team is often managed by a lead exercise planner (also referred to as the exer- cise director, exercise planning team leader, or point of contact). The team should be a manageable 33