Click for next page ( 54


The National Academies | 500 Fifth St. N.W. | Washington, D.C. 20001
Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
Terms of Use and Privacy Statement



Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 53
53 BIBLIOGRAPHY AND SOURCES 1. Stutts, J. C., et al. The National Bicycling and Walking Study: 24. Florida Department of Transportation Office of Policy Plan- Transportation Choice for a Changing America. U.S. Depart- ning. 2002 Transportation Costs. Florida Department of ment of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Transportation, Office of Policy Planning, Tallahassee, 2003. Washington, D.C., 1994. 25. Hanson, R. "Woolwich Getting $400,000 Tunnel." Wiscasset 2. Federal Highway Administration. Manual of Uniform Traffic Newspaper. Wiscasset, ME, 1999. Control Devices for Streets and Highways. Washington, D.C., 26. New York City Bicycle Coalition. States Costs Estimates for 2003. Bicycling Facilities. [Accessed 2004, http://www.nyphysical 3. Engineering News Record Costs Indexes. New York, NY, activity.org] 2003. 27. San Francisco County Transportation Authority Dept of Park- 4. U.S. Department of Labor Bureau of Statistics. Bureau of ing and Traffic. Market Street Study (spreadsheet). 2002. Labor Statistics Data. Washington, D.C., 2004. 28. San Francisco County Transportation Authority Dept of Park- 5. Iowa Department of Transportation. Iowa Trails 2000, ing and Traffic. Maintain Bicycle Facilities (spreadsheet). 2004. Ames, IA. 29. City and County of Denver City Engineering Project Man- 6. Contra Costa Countywide Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan. agement Office. 1999 Cost Data. Denver, CO, 2002, p. 142. p. 121135. Pleasant Hill, CA, 2003. 30. Fences4Less.com. The Fence-timator: Black Vinyl with Top 7. Advanced Drainage Systems Inc. ADS Case Study--Less is Rail. More. 2002. [Accessed 2004, http://www.adspipe.com] 31. Schimek, P. Former Bicycle Program Manager, City of 8. City of Chino. Engineering cost estimate. Chino, CA, 2004. Boston, MA. [Author communication June 22, 2004] 9. San Francisco County Transportation Authority Department 32. Pedestrian and Bicycle Information Center. Bicycle Parking: of Parking and Traffic. Maintain Bicycle Facilities (spread- Costs, Chapel Hill, NC [Accessed 2004 http://bicycling sheet). San Francisco, CA, 2004. info.org] 10. Wisconsin Department of Transportation. Estimating Guide for 33. Sportworks. Bike Rack for Buses. Woodinville, WA, 2004. Bicycle Trail, Path, or Lane by WisDOT District 1 Unit Costs. 34. ITS Benefits and Costs Database. Evaluation of Georgia's Madison, WI, 2002. Emergency Motorist Aid Call Box Pilot Project. Columbus, 11. South Dakota Department of Transportation. Price Index of OH, 2001. State Highway Construction Costs. Pierre, 2003. 35. ITS Benefits and Costs Database. ITS Cost Elements, Road- 12. Della Penna, C. P. New England Field Representative, Rails- side Detection, CCTV Video Camera. Washington, D.C., 2003. to-Trails Conservancy, Worcester, MA. [Author communica- 36. Burton, J. H. Residential Real Estate Development. Univer- tion April 14, 2004] sity of West Georgia, Carrollton, 1996. 13. Vermont Agency of Transportation. Report on Shared-use 37. C. B. Richard Ellis Company. Boston, MA, 2004. Path and Sidewalk Unit Costs. Bicycle and Pedestrian Pro- 38. Patten, R. Appraiser and Chairman, Board of Assessors, gram, Local Transportation Facilities section of the Program Lynnfield, MA, 2004. Development Division, Montpelier, VT, 2004. 39. Alonso, A. Architect, General Services Administration, Prop- 14. Cardinaux, R. "Curb Cut Cost Corrected." Berkeley Daily erty Development Division, National Capitol Region, Wash- Planet. Berkeley, CA, 2004. ington, D.C., 2004. 15. Dutchess County New York. Hopewell Hamlet Pedestrian 40. Rails to Trails Conservancy. Washington, D.C., 2004. Plan. 2002. 41. Porter, C., J. Suhrbier, and W. Schwartz. Forecasting Bicycle 16. Seiderman, C. Transportation Program Manager, Community and Pedestrian Travel. Presented at the 78th Annual Meeting of Development Department, City of Cambridge, MA. [Author the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 1999. communication Feb. 2, 2004] 42. Landis, B. Using the Latent Demand Score Model to Estimate 17. American Association for State Highway Transportation Offi- Use. Ninth International Conference on Bicycle and Pedes- cials. Guide for the Development of Bicycle Facilities. Wash- trian Programs. Portland, ME, 1999. ington, D.C., 1999. 43. U.S. Department of Transportation. Guidebook on Methods to 18. City of Portland. Portland's Blue Bike Lanes--Improved Estimate Non-Motorized Travel. U.S. Department of Trans- Safety through Visibility. Portland, OR, 1999. portation: McLean, VA, 1999. 19. Virginia Department of Transportation. VADOT Cost Infor- 44. Turner, S., A. Hottenstein, and G. Shunk. Bicycle and Pedes- mation. Richmond, VA, 2000. trian Travel Demand Forecasting: Literature Review. Texas 20. Oregon Department of Transportation. Oregon Pedestrian and Transportation Institute, College Station, 1997. Bicycle Plan. Salem, 1995. 45. Bureau of Transportation Statistics. National Transportation 21. Town of Cary. Staff Report: Davis Drive Widening Project. Household Survey. U.S. Department of Transportation, Wash- Cary, NC, 2000. ington, D.C., 2001. 22. City of Asheville. The Asheville Greenways 2003 Master 46. Parkwood Research Associates. Pathways for People, II. Plan. Asheville, NC. Rodale Press, Emmaus, PA, 1995. 23. O'Brien, D. Massachusetts Department of Environmental 47. U.S. Department of Transportation. National Survey of Pedes- Management. 2004. trian and Bicyclist Attitudes and Behaviors. National Highway

OCR for page 53
54 Traffic Safety Administration, Bureau of Transportation Sta- for Regional Development. University of Wisconsin-Extension, tistics, Washington, D.C., 2003. 1997. 48. National Sporting Goods Association. Sports Participation in 66. Sharples, R. A framework for the evaluation of facilities for 2001: Series I. Statistical Abstract of the United States. U.S. cyclists--Part 1. Traffic Engineering and Control, 1995, Census Bureau, Washington, D.C., 2003, p. 778. p. 142149. 49. Minnesota Department of Natural Resources. State Trail Use: 67. Fix, P. and J. Loomis. The economic benefits of mountain bik- Summary of Summer Trail Use and User Surveys Conducted ing at one of its Meccas: an application of the travel cost in 1996, 1997, and 1998. Minnesota Department of Natural method to mountain biking in Moab, Utah. Journal of Leisure Resources, St. Paul, 2000. Research, 29(3), 1997, p. 342352. 50. Davis, G. A. and T. Wicklatz. Sample Based Estimation of 68. Fix, P. and J. Loomis. Comparing the economic value of Bicycle Miles of Travel. University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, mountain biking estimated using revealed and stated prefer- 2001. ence. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 51. Federal Highway Administration. National Bicycling and 41(2), 1998, p. 227236. Walking Study Five Year Status Report by the U.S. Depart- 69. Buis, J. The Economic Significance of Cycling: A study to ment of Transportation. U.S. Department of Transportation, illustrate the costs and benefits of cycling policy. Interface for Washington, D.C., 1999. Cycling Expertise, Den Haag, 2000. 52. Turner, S., G. Shunk, and A. Hottenstein. Development of 70. Argys, L. and N. Mocan. Bicycling and Walking in Colorado: a Methodology to Estimate Bicycle and Pedestrian Travel Economic Impact and Household Survey Results. Colorado Demand. Texas Transportation Institute, College Station, Department of Transportation, 2000. 1998. 71. Litman, T. Economic Value of Walkability. World Transport 53. Barnes, Gary and Kevin J. Krizek. "Estimating Bicycling Policy & Practice, 10(1), 2004, p. 514. Demand." Transportation Research Record, 1939, Trans- 72. Lindsey, G., et al. Amenity and Recreation Values of Urban portation Research Board, National Research Council, Greenways. In The Association of European Schools of Plan- Washington, D.C., 2006, pp. 4551. ning Congress. Leuven, Belgium, 2003. 73. Randall, A. A difficulty with the travel cost method. Land 54. Krizek, Kevin J. (2006) "Estimating the Economic Value of Economics, 70(1), 1994, p. 8896. Bicycle Facilities: Strategies and Results." Journal of the 74. Bradley, M. and P. E. Kroes. Forecasting Issues in Stated Pref- American Planning Association, Summer. erence Survey Research. In 3rd International Conference on 55. Dill, J. and T. Carr. Bicycle Commuting and Facilities in Survey Methods in Transportation, Washington, D.C., 1990. Major U.S. Cities: If You Build Them, Commuters Will Use 75. Wardman, M. A Comparison of Revealed Preference and Them. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Stated Preference Models of Travel Behavior. Journal of Transportation Research Board, No. 1828, TRB, National Transport Economics and Policy, 22, 1988, Washington, Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2003, p. 116123. D.C., p. 7191. 56. U.S. Department of Transportation. Bicycle and Pedestrian 76. Lindsey, G. and G. Knaap. Willingness to pay for urban Data: Sources, Needs, & Gaps. Bureau of Transportation Sta- greenway projects. Journal of the American Planning Associ- tistics, Washington, D.C., 2000. ation, 65(3), 1999, p. 297301. 57. Forester, J. The Bicycle Transportation Controversy. Trans- 77. Fowkes, T. and M. Wardman. The design of stated preference portation Quarterly, 55(2), 2000, p. 717. travel choice experiments. Journal of Transport Economics 58. Pucher, J. Cycling Safety on Bikeways vs. Roads. Trans- and Policy, 22, 1988, p. 2744. portation Quarterly, 55(4), 2001, p. 911. 78. Ben-Akiva, M. and S. Lerman. Discrete Choice Analysis-- 59. Przybylski, M. and G. Lindsey. Economic Evaluation of Major Theory and Application to Travel Demand. Journal of Trans- Urban Greenway Projects. Center for Urban Policy and the port Economics and Policy, 1989. Environment, Indianapolis, IN, 1998. 79. Handy, S. L., et al. How the Built Environment Affects Phys- 60. PKF Consulting. Analysis of Economic Impacts of the North- ical Activity: Views from Urban Planning. American Journal ern Central Rail Trail. Maryland Greenways Commission, of Preventative Medicine, 23, 2002, p. 6473. Maryland Department of Natural Resources, Annapolis, 1994, 80. Sallis, J., et al. Active Transportation and Physical Activity: p. 47. Opportunities for Collaboration on Transportation and Public 61. Moore, R. L., A. R. Graefe, and R. J. Gitelson. The economic Health Research. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and impact of rail-trails. Journal of Park and Recreation Admin- Practice, 38, 2004, p. 249268. istration, 12(2), 1994, p. 6372. 81. Frank, L. D. Land Use and Transportation Interaction: Impli- 62. Betz, C., J. Bergstrom, and J. M. Bowker. A Contingent Trip cations on Public Health and Quality of Life. Journal of Plan- Model for Estimating Rail-trail Demand. Journal of Environ- ning Education and Research, (20), 2000, p. 622. mental Planning and Management, 46(1), 2003, p. 7996. 82. Wilkinson, W. C., et al. Increasing Physical Activity Through 63. Schutt, A. M. Trails for Economic Development: A Case Community Design: A Guide for Public Health Practitioners. Study. Journal of Applied Recreation Research, 23(2), 1998, National Center for Bicycling and Walking: Washington, D.C., p. 127145. 2002. 64. Siderlis, C. and R. L. Moore. Outdoor recreation net benefits of 83. Pucher, J. and L. Dijkstra. Promoting Safe Walking and Cycling rail-trails. Journal of Leisure Research, 27(4), 1995, p. 344359. to Improve Public Health: Lessons from the Netherlands 65. Sumathi, N. R. and D. A. Berard. Mountain Biking in the and Germany. American Journal of Public Health, 93(9), 2003, Chequamegon Area of Northern Wisconsin and Implications p. 15091516.

OCR for page 53
55 84. Krizek, K. J., A. S. Birnbaum, and D. Levinson. A Schematic 100. Bricker, S. K., et al., Physical Activity Report. Georgia Depart- for Focusing on Youth in Investigations of Community Design ment of Human Resources, Division of Public Health and the and Physical Activity. American Journal of Health Promotion, American Heart Association, Southeast Affiliate, 2001. 19(1), 2004, p. 5763. 101. Colditz, G. A. Economic costs of obesity and inactivity. Medi- 85. Crane, R. The Influence of Urban Form on Travel: An Inter- cine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 31(11 (Suppl)), 1999, pretative Review. Journal of Planning Literature, 15(1), 2000, p. S663S667. p. 323. 102. Pratt, M., C. A. Macera, and G. Wang. Higher Direct Medical 86. Ewing, R. and R. Cervero. Travel and the Built Environ- Costs Associated with Physical Inactivity. The Physician and ment: A Synthesis. In Transportation Research Record: Sports Medicine, 28(10), 2000. Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1780, 103. Quantifying the Cost of Physical Inactivity, Active Living TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2001, Leadership, San Diego, CA, 2004. p. 87112. 104. Osberg, J. S., S. C. Stiles, and O. K. Asare. Bicycle safety 87. Goetzel, R. Z., et al. The Relationship Between Modifiable behavior in Paris and Boston. Accident Analysis and Preven- Health Risks and Health Care Expenditures: An Analysis of the tion, 30(5), 1998, p. 679687. Multi-Employer HERO Health Risk and Cost Database. The 105. Hunter, W. W., W. E. Pein, and J. C. Stutts. Bicycle/Motor Journal of Occupational and Environmental Management, Vehicle Crash Types: The Early 1990's. In Transportation 40(10), 1998, p. 843854. Research Record 1502, TRB, National Research Council, 88. Blair, S. N., M. J. LaMonte, and M. Z. Nichaman. The evo- Washington, D.C., 1995, p. 5674. lution of physical activity recommendations: how much is 106. Rasanen, M. and H. Summala. Attention and Expectation enough? American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 79(5), 2004, Problems in Bicycle-Car Collisions: An In-Depth Study. p. 913S920. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 30(5), 1998, p. 657666. 89. Pronk, N. P., et al. Relationship Between Modifiable Health 107. Eilertpetersson, E. and L. Schelp. An epidemiological study Risks and Short-term Health Care Charges. Journal of the of bicycle-related injuries. Accident Analysis and Prevention, American Medical Association, 292(23), 1999, p. 22352239. 29(3), 1997, p. 363372. 90. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, P.H.S. How 108. Stutts, J. C. and W. W. Hunter. Motor Vehicle and Roadway Factor in Pedestrian and Bicyclist Injuries: An Examination active do adults need to be to gain some benefit? Centers for Based on Emergency Department Data. Accident Analysis Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic and Prevention, 31(5), 1999, p. 505514. Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Division of Nutri- 109. Powell, E. C. and R. R. Tanz. Cycling injuries treated in emer- tion and Physical Activity, 2003. gency departments--Need for bicycle helmets among pre- 91. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, P.H.S. Pro- schoolers. Archives of Pediatrics Adolescent Medicine, 154(11), moting physical activity: a guide for community action. Cen- 2000, p. 10961100. ters for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for 110. Noakes, T. D. Fatal Cycling Injuries. Sports Medicine, 20(5), Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Division 1995, p. 348362. of Nutrition and Physical Activity, 1999. 111. Sorton, A. and T. Walsh. Bicycle Stress Level as a Tool to Eval- 92. Pate, R., et al. Physical Activity and Public Health: A Recom- uate Urban and Suburban Bicycle Compatibility. In Trans- mendation from the Centers for Disease Control and Preven- portation Research Record 1438, TRB, National Research tion and the American College of Sports Medicine. Journal of Council, Washington, D.C., 1994, p. 1725. the American Medical Association, 273(5), 1995, p. 402407. 112. Landis, B. W. Bicycle Interaction Hazard Score: A Theoreti- 93. Wang, G. J., et al. Cost effectiveness of a bicycle/pedestrian cal Model. In Transportation Research Record 1438, TRB, trail development in health promotion. Preventive Medicine, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1994, p. 38. 38(2), 2004. p. 237242. 113. Moritz, W. E., Adult Bicyclists in the United States: Char- 94. Rankinen, T. and C. Bouchard. Dose-Response Issues Con- acteristics and Riding Experience in 1996. In Transportation cerning the Relations Between Regular Physical Activity and Research Record 1636, TRB, National Research Council, Health. President's Council on Physical Fitness and Sports, Washington, D.C., 1998, p. 17. Washington, D.C., 2002. 114. Harkey, D. L., D. W. Reinfurt, and M. Mnuiman. Develop- 95. Hansen, C. J., L. C. Stevens, and J. R. Coast. Exercise duration ment of the Bicycle Compatibility Index. In Transportation and mood state: How much is enough to feel better? Health Research Record 1636, TRB, National Research Council, Psychology, 20(4), 2001, p. 267275. Washington, D.C., 1998, p. 1320. 96. Chenoweth, D., G. DeJong, and L. Sheppard. The Economic 115. Epperson, B. Evaluating Suitability of Roadways for Bicycle Cost of Inactivity in Michigan. Michigan Fitness Foundation, Use: Toward a Cycling Level-of-Service Standard. In Trans- Lansing, 2003. portation Research Record 1438, TRB, National Research 97. Garrett, N., et al. The Direct Cost of Physical Inactivity to a Council, Washington, D.C., 1994, p. 916. Health Plan. Minnesota Department of Health, St. Paul, MN, 116. Landis, B. W., V. R. Vattikuti, and M. T. Brannick. Real- 2001. Time Human Perceptions: Toward a Bicycle Level of Service. 98. Claybrooke, C. Physical Activity in Washington State. Wash- In Transportation Research Record 1578, TRB, National Re- ington State Department of Health, 2001. search Council, Washington, D.C., 1997, p. 119126. 99. Powell, K. E., et al. Physical Activity in South Carolina. Uni- 117. Jackson, N. Bike Lane Design Guide. Pedestrian and Bicycle versity of South Carolina School of Public Health, Columbia, Information Center, Chicagoland Bicycle Federation, City of 1999. Chicago Department of Transportation, Chicago, IL, 2002.

OCR for page 53
56 118. Landis, B. W., Vattikuti, V. R., Ottenberg, R. M., and T. A. Residential Property Values. American Journal of Agricul- Petritsch. Intersection Level of Service for the Bicycle Through tural Economics, 83(3), 2001, p. 698704. Movement. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the 135. Luttik, J. The Value of Trees, Water and Open Space as Transportation Research Board, No. 1828, TRB, National Re- Reflected by House Prices in the Netherlands. Landscape and search Council, Washington, D.C., 2003, p. 101106. Urban Planning, 48, 2000, p. 161167. 119. Krizek, K. J. and R. Roland. What is at the End of the Road? 136. Quang Do, A. and G. Grudnitski. Golf Courses and Residen- Factors Affecting Discontinuities of On-Street Bicycle Lanes in tial House Prices: An Empirical Examination. Journal of Real Urban Settings. Active Communities Transportation Research Estate Finance and Economics, 10, 1995, p. 261270. Group, University of Minnesota, 2004. 137. Dye Management Group. Assessment of Techniques of Corri- 120. Aultman-Hall, L. and M. G. Kaltenecker. Toronto bicycle dor Preservation in South Dakota. South Dakota Department commuter safety rates. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 31, of Transportation, Pierre, 2002. 1999, p. 675686. 138. Epperson, B. Demographic and Economic Characteristics of 121. Garder, P., L. Leden, and U. Pulkkinen. Measuring the Safety Bicyclists Involved in Bicycle-Motor Vehicle Accidents. In Effect of Raised Bicycle Crossings Using a New Research Transportation Research Record 1502, TRB, National Re- Methodology. In Transportation Research Record 1636, TRB, search Council, Washington, D.C., 1996, p. 5864. National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1998, p. 6470. 139. Goldsmith, S. Estimating the Effect of Bicycle Facilities on 122. Hunter, W. W., J. R. Stewart, and J. C. Stutts. Study of Bi- VMT and Emissions. n.d., Seattle Engineering Department, cycle Lanes Versus Wide Curb Lanes. In Transportation Seattle, WA. Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research 140. Metropolitan Council, Travel Behavior Inventory, St. Paul, Board, No. 1674, TRB, National Research Council, Washing- MN, 2000. ton, D.C., 1999, p. 7077. 141. MarketLine Research, Inc. Minnesota Department of Trans- 123. Smith, R. L., Jr., and T. Walsh. Safety Impacts of Bicycle portation Mn/DOT Statewide Omnibus Study 2003/2004. Lanes. In Transportation Research Record 1168, TRB, Na- 142. U.S. Department of Transportation. Census Transportation tional Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1988, p. 4956. Planning Package. U.S. Census Bureau, Washington, D.C., 124. Hunter, W. W. Evaluation of Innovative Bike-Box Applica- 2000. tion in Eugene, Oregon. In Transportation Research Record: 143. Killingsworth, R. E. Health Promoting Community Design: A Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1705, New Paradigm to Promote Health and Active Communities. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2000, American Journal of Health Promotion, 17(3), 2003, 169170. p. 101115. 144. Jackson, R. J. The Impact of the Built Environment on Health: 125. Hunter, W. W., et al. Evaluation of Blue Bike Lane Treatment An Emerging Field. American Journal of Public Health, 93(9), in Portland, Oregon. In Transportation Research Record: 2003, p. 13821384. Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1705, 145. Sallis, J. F., L. D. Frank, B. E. Saelens, and M. K. Kraft. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2000, Active transportation and physical activity: opportunities for p. 107115. collaboration on transportation and public health research. 126. Handy, S. L. Regional Versus Local Accessibility: Neotradi- Transportation Research Part A, 38, 2003, p. 249268. tional Development and Its Implications for Non-work Travel. 146. Bauman, A. E., J. F. Sallies, D. A. Dzewaltowski, and Built Environment, 18(4), 1992, p. 253267. N. Owen. Toward a Better Understanding of the Influences 127. Downs, A. Stuck in Traffic: Coping with Peak-Hour Conges- on Physical Activity: The Role of Determinants, Correlates, tion. Brookings Institution, Washington, D.C., Lincoln Insti- Causal Variables, Mediators, Moderators, and Confounders. tute of Land Policy, Cambridge, MA, 1992. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 23(2S), 2002, 128. Lancaster, K. J. A New Approach to Consumer Theory. The p. 514. Journal of Political Economy, 74(2), 1966, p. 132157. 147. Special Report 282: Does the Built Environment Influence 129. Rosen, S. Hedonic Prices and Implicit Markets: Product Dif- Physical Activity? Examining the Evidence. Transportation ferentiation in Pure Competition. The Journal of Political Research Board and the Institute of Medicine of the National Economy, 82(1), 1974. Academies, Washington, D.C., 2005, p. 224. 130. Sirmans, G. S. and D. A. Macpherson. The Composition of 148. Wendel-Vos, G. S. W., et al. Factors of the Physical Environ- Hedonic Pricing Models: A Review of the Literature. National ment Associated with Walking and Bicycling. Official Journal Association of Realtors, Chicago, IL, 2003. of the American College of Sports Medicine, 2004, p. 725730. 131. Anderson, S. T. and S. E. West. The Value of Open Space 149. Pikora, T., et al. Developing a framework for assessment of Proximity and Size: City versus Suburbs. Macalester College, the environmental determinants of walking and cycling. Department of Economics, St. Paul, MN, working paper, Social Science and Medicine, 56, 2003, p. 16931703. 2004. 150. Owens, P. M. Neighborhood form and pedestrian life: Tak- 132. Benson, E. D., et al. Pricing Residential Amenities: The Value ing a closer look. Landscale and Urban Planning, 26, 1993, of A View. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, p. 115135. 16(1), 1998, p. 5573. 151. White, W. "How to Dullify Downtown." The City. 1988. 133. Geoghegan, J. The Value of Open Spaces in Residential Land p. 310324. Use. Land Use Policy, 19(1), 2002, p. 9198. 152. Rapaport, A. Pedestrian Street Use: Culture and Percep- 134. Irwin, E. G. and N. E. Bockstael. The Problem of Identifying tion, in Public Streets for Public Use, A. V. Moudon, Edi- Land Use Spillovers: Measuring the Effects of Open Space on tor, Columbia University Press: New York, 1987.

OCR for page 53
57 153. Krizek, K. J. Operationalizing Neighborhood Accessibility for 171. Troped, P. J., R. P. Saunders, R. R. Pate, B. Reininger, J. R. Land use-Travel Behavior Research and Modeling. Journal of Ureda, and S. J. Thompson. Associations between Self- Planning Education and Research, 22(3), 2003, p. 270287. Reported and Objective Physical Environmental Factors and 154. Talen, E. Neighborhoods as service providers: a methodology Use of a Community Rail-Trail. Preventive Medicine, 32, 2001, for evaluating pedestrian access. Environment and Planning p. 191200. B: Planning and Design, 30, 2003, p. 181200. 172. Merom, D., A. Bauman, P. Vita, and G. Close. An environ- 155. Handy, S. L. and D. A. Niemeier. Measuring Accessibility: an mental intervention to promote walking and cycling--the exploration of issues and alternatives. Environment and Plan- impact of a newly constructed Rail Trail in Western Sydney. ning A, 29, 1997, p. 11751194. Preventive Medicine, 36, 2003, p. 235242. 156. Day, K., et al. Measuring Urban Design Features Related to 173. Lindsey, G., and N. L. B Doan. Use of Greenway Trails in Walking and Bicycling: The Irvine Minnesota Inventory. Indiana. Center for Urban Policy and the Environment, American Journal of Preventive Medicine, under review. School for Public and Environmental Affairs, Indiana Uni- 157. Forsyth, A., et al. Standards for Environmental Measurement versity Purdue University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, 2002, using GIS: Toward a Protocol for Protocols. Journal of Phys- p. 115. ical Activity and Health, under review. 174. Nelson, A. C. and D. P. Allen. If You Build Them, Com- 158. Brownson, R. C., R. A. Housemann, D. R. Brown, J. Jack- muters Will Use Them. In Transportation Research Record son-Thompson, A. C. King, B. R. Malone, and J. F. Sallies, 1578, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., James F. Promoting Physical Activity in Rural Communities 1997, p. 7983. Walking Trail Access, Use, and Effects. American Journal of 175. Dill, J. and T. Carr. Bicycle Commuting and Facilities in Preventive Medicine, 18(3), 2000, p. 235241. Major U.S. Cities: If You Build Them, Commuters Will Use 159. Huston, S. L., K. R. Evenson, P. Bors, and Z. Gizlice. Neigh- Them--Another Look. In Transportation Research Record: borhood Environment, Access to Places for Activity, and Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1828, Leisure-time Physical Activity in a Diverse North Carolina TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2003, Population. American Journal of Health Promotion, 18(1), p. 116123. 2003, p. 5869. 176. Hyodo, T., N. Suzuki, and K. Takahashi. Modeling of bicycle 160. Moudon, A. V., et al. Effects of Site Design on Pedestrian route and destination choice behavior for bicycle road net- Travel in Mixed Use, Medium-Density Environments. In work plan. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Record 1578, TRB, National Re- Transportation Research Board, No. 1705, 2000, p. 7076. search Council, Washington, D.C., 1997, p. 4855. 177. Zahavi, Y. and J. M. Ryan. Stability of Travel Components 161. Handy, S. L. Urban Form and Pedestrian Choices: Study of Over Time. In Transportation Research Record 750, TRB, Austin Neighborhoods. In Transportation Research Record National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1980, p. 1926. 1552, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 178. Untermann, R. Accommodating the pedestrian: adapting towns 1996, p. 135144. 162. Cervero, R. and M. Duncan. Walking, bicycling, and urban and neighborhoods for walking and bicycling. Van Nostrand landscapes: Evidence from the San Francisco Bay area. Amer- Reinhold Co., New York, 1984. ican Journal of Public Health, 93(9), 2003, p. 14781483. 179. Barnes, G. and K. J. Krizek. Estimating Bicycling Demand. 163. Powell, K. E., L. M. Martin, and P. P. Chowdhury. Places to In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Trans- Walk: Convenience and Regular Physical Activity. American portation Research Board, No. TBD, TRB, National Research Journal of Public Health, 93(9), 2003, p. 15191521. Council, Washington, D.C., 2005. 164. Hess, P. M., et al. Site Design and Pedestrian Travel. In Trans- 180. Gordon, P. and H. W. Richardson. Bicycling in the United portation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation States: A Fringe Mode. Transportation Quarterly, 52(1), 1998, Research Board, No. 1674, TRB, National Research Council, p. 911. Washington, D.C., 1999, p. 919. 181. Librett, J. J., M. M. Yore, and T. L. Schmid. Local Ordi- 165. Shriver, K. Influence of Environmental Design On Pedestrian nances That Promote Physical Activity: A Survey of Munici- Travel Behavior in Four Austin Neighborhoods. TRB, Jour- pal Policies. American Journal of Public Health, 93(9), 2003, nal of the Transportation Research Board, 1918: p. 6475, p. 13991403. Washington, D.C., 1997. 182. Parks, S. E., R. A. Housemann, and R. C. Brownson. Differ- 166. Handy, S. L. and K. J. Clifton. Local Shopping as Strategy for ential correlates of physical activity in urban and rural adults Reducing Automobile Use. Transportation Research A, 2001. of various socioeconomic backgrounds in the United States. 167. Krizek, K. J. Patterns of Use in Main Street Activity: A Case Journal of Epidemial Community Health, 57, 2003, p. 2935. Study of Downtown Chapel Hill, NC. Carolina Planning, 183. Winship, C. and S. L. Morgan. The estimation of causal 20(2), 1995, p. 6270. effects from observational data. Annu Rev Sociol, 25(1), 1999, 168. Wardman, M., R. Hatfield, and M. Page. The UK national p. 659706. cycling strategy: can improved facilities meet the targets? 184. Boarnet, M. G. and S. Sarmiento. Can Land-Use Policy Really Transport Policy, 4(2), 1998, p. 123133. Affect Travel Behavior? A Study of the Link Between Non- 169. Rietveld, P. and V. Daniel. Determinants of bicycle use: do work Travel and Land-Use Characteristics. Urban Studies, municipal policies matter? Transportation Research Part A, 35(7), 1998, p. 11551169. 38, 2004, p. 531550. 185. Krizek, K. J. Planning, Household Travel, and Household 170. Librett, J. J., M. M. Yore, and T. L. Schmid. Local ordinances Lifestyles. Transportation Systems Planning: Methods and that promote physical activity: A survey of municipal policies. Applications, K. G. Goulias, Editor, CRC Press, New York, American Journal of Public Health, 93(9), 2003, p. 13991403. 2003, 6: 142.

OCR for page 53
58 186. Krizek, K. J. The Complex Role of Urban Design and Theo- 202. Bergantino, A. and S. Bolis. An Adaptive Conjoint Analysis of retical Models of Physical Activity. Progressive Planning, Freight Service Alternatives: Evaluating the Maritime Option. 157, 2003, p. 2829. Proc. of the IAME, Panama, 2002. 187. Maine Department of Transportation. Bicycle Tourism in 203. Falzarno, S., R. Hazlett, and T. Adler. Quantifying the Value Maine: Economic Impacts and Marketing Recommendations. of Transit Station and Access Improvements for Chicago's Maine Department of Transportation, Augusta, 2001. Rapid Transit System. Presented at the 80th Annual Meeting of 188. Nelson, C., et al. 2000 Midland County Recreation Needs the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2001. Assessment: The Pere Marquette RailTrail. Department of 204. Efron, B. and R. Tibshirani. An Introduction to the Bootstrap. Park, Recreation and Tourism Resources, East Lansing, MI, Chapman and Hall, New York, 1993. 2001. 205. Boueri, F. M., et al. Quality of life measured with a generic 189. Saelensminde, K. Walking- and cycling-track networks in Nor- instrument (Short Form-36) improves following pulmonary wegian cities: Cost-benefit analyses including health effects rehabilitation in patients with COPD. Chest, 119(1), 2001, p. 7784. and external costs of road traffic. Institute of Transport Eco- 206. Wahrborg, L. and P. Wahrborg. Psychosocial characteristics nomics, Oslo, 2002, p. 50. of a group of males with ischemic heart disease and extended 190. Everett, M. Measuring the Economic Value of Exercise in Labor sick leave. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences, 11(4), Intensive Urban Transportation Systems. In Transportation 1997, p. 21733. Research Record 599, TRB, National Research Council, Wash- 207. Miche, E., et al. Effects of education, self care instruction ington, D.C., 1976. and physical exercise on patients with chronic heart failure. 191. Everett, M. and J. Dorman. New Approach to Economic Eval- Zeitschrift Fur Kardiologie, 92(12), 2003, p. 985993. uation of Labor-Intensive Transportation Systems. In Trans- 208. Radzewitz, A., et al. Exercise and muscle strength training portation Research Record 599, TRB, National Research and their effect on quality of life in patients with chronic Council, Washington, D.C., 1976. heart failure. European Journal of Heart Failure, 4(5), 2002, 192. Sharples, R. A framework for the evaluation of facilities for p. 627634. cyclists--Part 2. Traffic Engineering and Control, 1995, 209. Myers, J. N. The physiology behind exercise testing. Primary p. 221223. Care, 28(1), 2001. 193. Lindsey, G. and M. Przybylski. Economic Considerations in 210. Moreira, W., et al. The effects of two aerobic training intensi- Planning Urban Greenways: A Brief Review. Center for Urban ties on ambulatory blood pressure in hypertensive patients: Policy and the Environment, School of Public and Environ- results of a randomized trial. Journal of Clinical Epidemiol- mental Affairs, University of Indiana, Indianapolis. 1998, p. 20. ogy, 52(7), 1999, p. 63742. 194. Bovy, P. and P. Bradley. Route Choice Analyzed with Stated 211. Colditz, G. A., et al. Weight gain as a risk factor for clinical Preference Approaches. In Transportation Research Record diabetes in women. Annals of Internal Medicine, 122, 1995, 1037, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., p. 481486. 1985. 212. Chan, J. M., et al. Obesity, fat distribution, and weight gain as 195. Hopkinson, P. and M. Wardman. Evaluating the Demand risk factors for clinical diabetes in men. Diabetes Care, 17, for New Bicycle Facilities. Transport Policy, 3(4), 1996, 1994, p. 961964. p. 241249. 213. Henderson, N., C. White, and J. Eisman. The role of exercise 196. Abraham, J., et al. Investigation of Cycling Sensitivities. Pre- and fall risk reduction in the prevention of osteoporosis. sented at 81st Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Endocrinol. Metab. Clin. North Am., 27, 1998, p. 36987. Board. Washington, D.C., 2002. 214. Huuskonen, J., et al. Determinants of bone mineral density in 197. Shafizadeh, K. and D. Niemeier. Bicycle Journey-to-Work: middle aged men: A population-based study. Osteoporosis Travel Behavior Characteristics and Spatial Attributes. In International, 11(8) 2000, p. 702708. 215. Colditz, G. A., C. Cannuscio, and A. Frazier. Physical activ- Transportation Research Record 1578, TRB, National Re- ity and reduced risk of colon cancer. Cancer Causes Control, search Council, Washington, D.C., 1997, p. 8490. 8, 1997, p. 649667. 198. Aultman-Hall, L., F. Hall, and B. Baetz. Analysis of Bicycle 216. Huang, Z., G. A. Hankinson, and G. A. Colditz. Dual effects Commuter Routes Using Geographic Information Systems: of weight and weight gain on breast cancer risk. Journal of the Implications for Bicycle Planning. In Transportation Research American Medical Association, 278, 1997, p. 14071411. Record 1578, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, 217. Schulz, K. H., et al. Implementation and evaluation of an exer- D.C., 1997. cise rehabilitation training for breast cancer patients. Psycho- 199. Stinson, A. S. and C. R. Bhat. An Analysis of Commuter Bicy- therapie Psychosomatik Medizinische Psychologie, 48(910), clist Route Choice Using a Stated Preference Survey. In Trans- 1998, p. 398407. portation Research Record 1578, TRB, National Research 218. Salmon, P. Effects of physical exercise on anxiety, depres- Council, Washington, D.C., 1997. sion, and sensitivity to stress: A unifying theory. Clinical Psy- 200. Taylor, D. and H. Mahmassani. Analysis of Stated Preference chology Review, 21(1), 2001, p. 3361. for Intermodal Bicycle-Transit Interfaces. In Transportation 219. DiLorenzo, T. M., et al. Long-term effects of aerobic exercise Research Record 1556, TRB, National Research Council, on psychological outcomes. Preventive Medicine, 28(1), 1999, Washington, D.C., 1996, p. 8695. p. 7585. 201. Smalkoski, B. R. Value of Time for Commercial Vehicle Oper- 220. Plante, T. G., L. Coscarelli, and M. Ford. Does exercising with ators in Minnesota. Civil Engineering. University of Minnesota, another enhance the stress-reducing benefits of exercise? Inter- Minneapolis, 2003. national Journal of Stress Management, 8(3), 2001, p. 201213.

OCR for page 53
59 221. Blair, S. N., et al. Physical fitness and all-cause mortality: a 234. Mahan, B. L., S. Polasky, and R. M. Adams. Valuing Urban prospective study of healthy men and women. Journal of the Wetlands: A Property Price Approach. Land Economics, 76(1), American Medical Association, 262, 1989, p. 23952401. 2000, p. 100113. 222. Blair, S. N., et al. Changes in physical fitness and all cause mor- 235. Smith, V. K., C. Paulos, and H. Kim. Treating Open Space as tality: a prospective study of healthy and unhealthy men. Jour- an Urban Amenity. Resource and Energy Economics, 24, 2002, nal of the American Medical Association, 273, 1995, p. 10938. p. 107129. 223. Erikssen, G., et al. Changes in physical fitness and changes in 236. Irwin, E. G. The Effects of Open Space on Residential Prop- mortality. Lancet, 352(9130), 1998, p. 759762. erty Values. Land Economics, 78(4), 2002, p. 465480. 224. Barnes, G. Benefits of Bicycling in Minnesota. Minnesota 237. City of Vancouver. Bicycle Plan 1999: Reviewing the Past, Department of Transportation, St. Paul, 2004. Planning the Future. Vancouver, B.C., Canada, 1999. 225. Litman, T. Quantifying the Benefits of Non-Motorized Trans- 238. McLaughlin, P. Hennepin County Commissioner. Minneapolis, port for Achieving TDM Objectives. Victoria Transport Pol- MN, 2003. icy Institute, Victoria, BC, Canada, 1999. 239. Krizek, K. J. and P. J. Johnson. The Effect of Facility Access 226. Barnes, G. and P. Langworthy. Vehicle Operating Costs for on Bicycling Behavior. Active Communities Transportation Benefit-Cost Analysis. Minnesota Department of Transporta- Research Group, University of Minnesota, 2004. tion, St. Paul, 2003. 240. Jackson, M. E. and P. Newsome. A Guide to Bicycle Trans- 227. Stinson, B. R. T. Road finance alternatives: an analysis of portation in the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area: The Processes, metro-area road taxes. Center for Transportation Studies, Uni- The Players, The Potential. Minnesota Department of Trans- versity of Minnesota, 2002. portation: St. Paul, 2000, p. 82. 228. Anderson, D. and H. Mohring. Congestion costs and conges- 241. Michaels, R. G. and V. K. Smith. Market Segmentation and tion pricing for the Twin Cities. Minnesota Department of Valuing Amenities with Hedonic Models: The Case of Haz- Transportation, St. Paul, 1996. ardous Waste Sites. Journal of Urban Economics, 28, 1990, 229. Taylor, F. Relation between Primary Market Prices and Qual- p. 223242. ities of Cotton. U.S. Department of Agriculture, 1916. 242. Smith, V. K. and Y. Kaoru. The Hedonic Travel Cost Model: 230. Franklin, J. P. and P. Waddell. A Hedonic Regression of Home A View from the Trenches. Land Economics, 63(2), 1987, Prices in King County, Washington, using Activity-Specific p. 179192. Accessibility Measures. Presented at the 82nd Annual Meeting 243. Riddel, M. A Dynamic Approach to Estimating Hedonic Prices of the Transportation Research Board. Washington, D.C., 2003. for Environmental Goods: An Application to Open Space Pur- 231. Brasington, D. M. Which Measures of School Quality Does chase. Land Economics, 77(4), 2001, p. 494512. the Housing Market Value? Journal of Real Estate Research, 244. Shonkweiler, J. S. and J. E. Reynolds. A Note on the Use of 18(3), 1999, p. 395413. Hedonic Price Models in the Analysis of Land Prices at the 232. Earnhart, D. Combining Revealed and Stated Preference Urban Fringe. Land Economics, 62(1), 1986, p. 5863. Methods to Value Environmental Amenities at Residential 245. Przybylski, M. and G. Lindsey, Economic Evaluation of Major Locations. Land Economics, 77(1), 2001, p. 1229. Urban Greenway Projects, 98-C13. Center for Urban Policy 233. Lutzenhiser, M. and N. R. Netusil. The Effect of Open Spaces and the Environment, Indianapolis, IN, 1998. on a Home's Sale Price. Contemporary Economic Policy, 19(3), 246. Walsh, R. Recreation Economic Decisions. Venture Publish- 2001, p. 291298. ing, State College, PA, 1986.