Guidelines for Analysis of Investments in Bicycle Facilities (2006)

Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

53 BIBLIOGRAPHY AND SOURCES 1. Stutts, J. C., et al. The National Bicycling and Walking Study: Transportation Choice for a Changing America. U.S. Depart- ment of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C., 1994. 2. Federal Highway Administration. Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices for Streets and Highways. Washington, D.C., 2003. 3. Engineering News Record Costs Indexes. New York, NY, 2003. 4. U.S. Department of Labor Bureau of Statistics. Bureau of Labor Statistics Data. Washington, D.C., 2004. 5. Iowa Department of Transportation. Iowa Trails 2000, Ames, IA. 6. Contra Costa Countywide Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan. p. 121–135. Pleasant Hill, CA, 2003. 7. Advanced Drainage Systems Inc. ADS Case Study—Less is More. 2002. [Accessed 2004, http://www.adspipe.com] 8. City of Chino. Engineering cost estimate. Chino, CA, 2004. 9. San Francisco County Transportation Authority Department of Parking and Traffic. Maintain Bicycle Facilities (spread- sheet). San Francisco, CA, 2004. 10. Wisconsin Department of Transportation. Estimating Guide for Bicycle Trail, Path, or Lane by WisDOT District 1 Unit Costs. Madison, WI, 2002. 11. South Dakota Department of Transportation. Price Index of State Highway Construction Costs. Pierre, 2003. 12. Della Penna, C. P. New England Field Representative, Rails- to-Trails Conservancy, Worcester, MA. [Author communica- tion April 14, 2004] 13. Vermont Agency of Transportation. Report on Shared-use Path and Sidewalk Unit Costs. Bicycle and Pedestrian Pro- gram, Local Transportation Facilities section of the Program Development Division, Montpelier, VT, 2004. 14. Cardinaux, R. “Curb Cut Cost Corrected.” Berkeley Daily Planet. Berkeley, CA, 2004. 15. Dutchess County New York. Hopewell Hamlet Pedestrian Plan. 2002. 16. Seiderman, C. Transportation Program Manager, Community Development Department, City of Cambridge, MA. [Author communication Feb. 2, 2004] 17. American Association for State Highway Transportation Offi- cials. Guide for the Development of Bicycle Facilities. Wash- ington, D.C., 1999. 18. City of Portland. Portland’s Blue Bike Lanes—Improved Safety through Visibility. Portland, OR, 1999. 19. Virginia Department of Transportation. VADOT Cost Infor- mation. Richmond, VA, 2000. 20. Oregon Department of Transportation. Oregon Pedestrian and Bicycle Plan. Salem, 1995. 21. Town of Cary. Staff Report: Davis Drive Widening Project. Cary, NC, 2000. 22. City of Asheville. The Asheville Greenways 2003 Master Plan. Asheville, NC. 23. O’Brien, D. Massachusetts Department of Environmental Management. 2004. 24. Florida Department of Transportation Office of Policy Plan- ning. 2002 Transportation Costs. Florida Department of Transportation, Office of Policy Planning, Tallahassee, 2003. 25. Hanson, R. “Woolwich Getting $400,000 Tunnel.” Wiscasset Newspaper. Wiscasset, ME, 1999. 26. New York City Bicycle Coalition. States Costs Estimates for Bicycling Facilities. [Accessed 2004, http://www.nyphysical activity.org] 27. San Francisco County Transportation Authority Dept of Park- ing and Traffic. Market Street Study (spreadsheet). 2002. 28. San Francisco County Transportation Authority Dept of Park- ing and Traffic. Maintain Bicycle Facilities (spreadsheet). 2004. 29. City and County of Denver City Engineering Project Man- agement Office. 1999 Cost Data. Denver, CO, 2002, p. 1–42. 30. Fences4Less.com. The Fence-timator: Black Vinyl with Top Rail. 31. Schimek, P. Former Bicycle Program Manager, City of Boston, MA. [Author communication June 22, 2004] 32. Pedestrian and Bicycle Information Center. Bicycle Parking: Costs, Chapel Hill, NC [Accessed 2004 http://bicycling info.org] 33. Sportworks. Bike Rack for Buses. Woodinville, WA, 2004. 34. ITS Benefits and Costs Database. Evaluation of Georgia’s Emergency Motorist Aid Call Box Pilot Project. Columbus, OH, 2001. 35. ITS Benefits and Costs Database. ITS Cost Elements, Road- side Detection, CCTV Video Camera. Washington, D.C., 2003. 36. Burton, J. H. Residential Real Estate Development. Univer- sity of West Georgia, Carrollton, 1996. 37. C. B. Richard Ellis Company. Boston, MA, 2004. 38. Patten, R. Appraiser and Chairman, Board of Assessors, Lynnfield, MA, 2004. 39. Alonso, A. Architect, General Services Administration, Prop- erty Development Division, National Capitol Region, Wash- ington, D.C., 2004. 40. Rails to Trails Conservancy. Washington, D.C., 2004. 41. Porter, C., J. Suhrbier, and W. Schwartz. Forecasting Bicycle and Pedestrian Travel. Presented at the 78th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 1999. 42. Landis, B. Using the Latent Demand Score Model to Estimate Use. Ninth International Conference on Bicycle and Pedes- trian Programs. Portland, ME, 1999. 43. U.S. Department of Transportation. Guidebook on Methods to Estimate Non-Motorized Travel. U.S. Department of Trans- portation: McLean, VA, 1999. 44. Turner, S., A. Hottenstein, and G. Shunk. Bicycle and Pedes- trian Travel Demand Forecasting: Literature Review. Texas Transportation Institute, College Station, 1997. 45. Bureau of Transportation Statistics. National Transportation Household Survey. U.S. Department of Transportation, Wash- ington, D.C., 2001. 46. Parkwood Research Associates. Pathways for People, II. Rodale Press, Emmaus, PA, 1995. 47. U.S. Department of Transportation. National Survey of Pedes- trian and Bicyclist Attitudes and Behaviors. National Highway

Traffic Safety Administration, Bureau of Transportation Sta- tistics, Washington, D.C., 2003. 48. National Sporting Goods Association. Sports Participation in 2001: Series I. Statistical Abstract of the United States. U.S. Census Bureau, Washington, D.C., 2003, p. 778. 49. Minnesota Department of Natural Resources. State Trail Use: Summary of Summer Trail Use and User Surveys Conducted in 1996, 1997, and 1998. Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, St. Paul, 2000. 50. Davis, G. A. and T. Wicklatz. Sample Based Estimation of Bicycle Miles of Travel. University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, 2001. 51. Federal Highway Administration. National Bicycling and Walking Study Five Year Status Report by the U.S. Depart- ment of Transportation. U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C., 1999. 52. Turner, S., G. Shunk, and A. Hottenstein. Development of a Methodology to Estimate Bicycle and Pedestrian Travel Demand. Texas Transportation Institute, College Station, 1998. 53. Barnes, Gary and Kevin J. Krizek. “Estimating Bicycling Demand.” Transportation Research Record, 1939, Trans- portation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2006, pp. 45–51. 54. Krizek, Kevin J. (2006) “Estimating the Economic Value of Bicycle Facilities: Strategies and Results.” Journal of the American Planning Association, Summer. 55. Dill, J. and T. Carr. Bicycle Commuting and Facilities in Major U.S. Cities: If You Build Them, Commuters Will Use Them. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1828, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2003, p. 116–123. 56. U.S. Department of Transportation. Bicycle and Pedestrian Data: Sources, Needs, & Gaps. Bureau of Transportation Sta- tistics, Washington, D.C., 2000. 57. Forester, J. The Bicycle Transportation Controversy. Trans- portation Quarterly, 55(2), 2000, p. 7–17. 58. Pucher, J. Cycling Safety on Bikeways vs. Roads. Trans- portation Quarterly, 55(4), 2001, p. 9–11. 59. Przybylski, M. and G. Lindsey. Economic Evaluation of Major Urban Greenway Projects. Center for Urban Policy and the Environment, Indianapolis, IN, 1998. 60. PKF Consulting. Analysis of Economic Impacts of the North- ern Central Rail Trail. Maryland Greenways Commission, Maryland Department of Natural Resources, Annapolis, 1994, p. 47. 61. Moore, R. L., A. R. Graefe, and R. J. Gitelson. The economic impact of rail-trails. Journal of Park and Recreation Admin- istration, 12(2), 1994, p. 63–72. 62. Betz, C., J. Bergstrom, and J. M. Bowker. A Contingent Trip Model for Estimating Rail-trail Demand. Journal of Environ- mental Planning and Management, 46(1), 2003, p. 79–96. 63. Schutt, A. M. Trails for Economic Development: A Case Study. Journal of Applied Recreation Research, 23(2), 1998, p. 127–145. 64. Siderlis, C. and R. L. Moore. Outdoor recreation net benefits of rail-trails. Journal of Leisure Research, 27(4), 1995, p. 344–359. 65. Sumathi, N. R. and D. A. Berard. Mountain Biking in the Chequamegon Area of Northern Wisconsin and Implications 54 for Regional Development. University of Wisconsin-Extension, 1997. 66. Sharples, R. A framework for the evaluation of facilities for cyclists—Part 1. Traffic Engineering and Control, 1995, p. 142–149. 67. Fix, P. and J. Loomis. The economic benefits of mountain bik- ing at one of its Meccas: an application of the travel cost method to mountain biking in Moab, Utah. Journal of Leisure Research, 29(3), 1997, p. 342–352. 68. Fix, P. and J. Loomis. Comparing the economic value of mountain biking estimated using revealed and stated prefer- ence. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 41(2), 1998, p. 227–236. 69. Buis, J. The Economic Significance of Cycling: A study to illustrate the costs and benefits of cycling policy. Interface for Cycling Expertise, Den Haag, 2000. 70. Argys, L. and N. Mocan. Bicycling and Walking in Colorado: Economic Impact and Household Survey Results. Colorado Department of Transportation, 2000. 71. Litman, T. Economic Value of Walkability. World Transport Policy & Practice, 10(1), 2004, p. 5–14. 72. Lindsey, G., et al. Amenity and Recreation Values of Urban Greenways. In The Association of European Schools of Plan- ning Congress. Leuven, Belgium, 2003. 73. Randall, A. A difficulty with the travel cost method. Land Economics, 70(1), 1994, p. 88–96. 74. Bradley, M. and P. E. Kroes. Forecasting Issues in Stated Pref- erence Survey Research. In 3rd International Conference on Survey Methods in Transportation, Washington, D.C., 1990. 75. Wardman, M. A Comparison of Revealed Preference and Stated Preference Models of Travel Behavior. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, 22, 1988, Washington, D.C., p. 71–91. 76. Lindsey, G. and G. Knaap. Willingness to pay for urban greenway projects. Journal of the American Planning Associ- ation, 65(3), 1999, p. 297–301. 77. Fowkes, T. and M. Wardman. The design of stated preference travel choice experiments. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, 22, 1988, p. 27–44. 78. Ben-Akiva, M. and S. Lerman. Discrete Choice Analysis— Theory and Application to Travel Demand. Journal of Trans- port Economics and Policy, 1989. 79. Handy, S. L., et al. How the Built Environment Affects Phys- ical Activity: Views from Urban Planning. American Journal of Preventative Medicine, 23, 2002, p. 64–73. 80. Sallis, J., et al. Active Transportation and Physical Activity: Opportunities for Collaboration on Transportation and Public Health Research. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 38, 2004, p. 249–268. 81. Frank, L. D. Land Use and Transportation Interaction: Impli- cations on Public Health and Quality of Life. Journal of Plan- ning Education and Research, (20), 2000, p. 6–22. 82. Wilkinson, W. C., et al. Increasing Physical Activity Through Community Design: A Guide for Public Health Practitioners. National Center for Bicycling and Walking: Washington, D.C., 2002. 83. Pucher, J. and L. Dijkstra. Promoting Safe Walking and Cycling to Improve Public Health: Lessons from the Netherlands and Germany. American Journal of Public Health, 93(9), 2003, p. 1509–1516.

84. Krizek, K. J., A. S. Birnbaum, and D. Levinson. A Schematic for Focusing on Youth in Investigations of Community Design and Physical Activity. American Journal of Health Promotion, 19(1), 2004, p. 57–63. 85. Crane, R. The Influence of Urban Form on Travel: An Inter- pretative Review. Journal of Planning Literature, 15(1), 2000, p. 3–23. 86. Ewing, R. and R. Cervero. Travel and the Built Environ- ment: A Synthesis. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1780, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2001, p. 87–112. 87. Goetzel, R. Z., et al. The Relationship Between Modifiable Health Risks and Health Care Expenditures: An Analysis of the Multi-Employer HERO Health Risk and Cost Database. The Journal of Occupational and Environmental Management, 40(10), 1998, p. 843–854. 88. Blair, S. N., M. J. LaMonte, and M. Z. Nichaman. The evo- lution of physical activity recommendations: how much is enough? American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 79(5), 2004, p. 913S–920. 89. Pronk, N. P., et al. Relationship Between Modifiable Health Risks and Short-term Health Care Charges. Journal of the American Medical Association, 292(23), 1999, p. 2235–2239. 90. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, P.H.S. How active do adults need to be to gain some benefit? Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Division of Nutri- tion and Physical Activity, 2003. 91. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, P.H.S. Pro- moting physical activity: a guide for community action. Cen- ters for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Division of Nutrition and Physical Activity, 1999. 92. Pate, R., et al. Physical Activity and Public Health: A Recom- mendation from the Centers for Disease Control and Preven- tion and the American College of Sports Medicine. Journal of the American Medical Association, 273(5), 1995, p. 402–407. 93. Wang, G. J., et al. Cost effectiveness of a bicycle/pedestrian trail development in health promotion. Preventive Medicine, 38(2), 2004. p. 237–242. 94. Rankinen, T. and C. Bouchard. Dose-Response Issues Con- cerning the Relations Between Regular Physical Activity and Health. President’s Council on Physical Fitness and Sports, Washington, D.C., 2002. 95. Hansen, C. J., L. C. Stevens, and J. R. Coast. Exercise duration and mood state: How much is enough to feel better? Health Psychology, 20(4), 2001, p. 267–275. 96. Chenoweth, D., G. DeJong, and L. Sheppard. The Economic Cost of Inactivity in Michigan. Michigan Fitness Foundation, Lansing, 2003. 97. Garrett, N., et al. The Direct Cost of Physical Inactivity to a Health Plan. Minnesota Department of Health, St. Paul, MN, 2001. 98. Claybrooke, C. Physical Activity in Washington State. Wash- ington State Department of Health, 2001. 99. Powell, K. E., et al. Physical Activity in South Carolina. Uni- versity of South Carolina School of Public Health, Columbia, 1999. 55 100. Bricker, S. K., et al., Physical Activity Report. Georgia Depart- ment of Human Resources, Division of Public Health and the American Heart Association, Southeast Affiliate, 2001. 101. Colditz, G. A. Economic costs of obesity and inactivity. Medi- cine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 31(11 (Suppl)), 1999, p. S663–S667. 102. Pratt, M., C. A. Macera, and G. Wang. Higher Direct Medical Costs Associated with Physical Inactivity. The Physician and Sports Medicine, 28(10), 2000. 103. Quantifying the Cost of Physical Inactivity, Active Living Leadership, San Diego, CA, 2004. 104. Osberg, J. S., S. C. Stiles, and O. K. Asare. Bicycle safety behavior in Paris and Boston. Accident Analysis and Preven- tion, 30(5), 1998, p. 679–687. 105. Hunter, W. W., W. E. Pein, and J. C. Stutts. Bicycle/Motor Vehicle Crash Types: The Early 1990’s. In Transportation Research Record 1502, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1995, p. 56–74. 106. Rasanen, M. and H. Summala. Attention and Expectation Problems in Bicycle-Car Collisions: An In-Depth Study. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 30(5), 1998, p. 657–666. 107. Eilertpetersson, E. and L. Schelp. An epidemiological study of bicycle-related injuries. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 29(3), 1997, p. 363–372. 108. Stutts, J. C. and W. W. Hunter. Motor Vehicle and Roadway Factor in Pedestrian and Bicyclist Injuries: An Examination Based on Emergency Department Data. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 31(5), 1999, p. 505–514. 109. Powell, E. C. and R. R. Tanz. Cycling injuries treated in emer- gency departments—Need for bicycle helmets among pre- schoolers. Archives of Pediatrics Adolescent Medicine, 154(11), 2000, p. 1096–1100. 110. Noakes, T. D. Fatal Cycling Injuries. Sports Medicine, 20(5), 1995, p. 348–362. 111. Sorton, A. and T. Walsh. Bicycle Stress Level as a Tool to Eval- uate Urban and Suburban Bicycle Compatibility. In Trans- portation Research Record 1438, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1994, p. 17–25. 112. Landis, B. W. Bicycle Interaction Hazard Score: A Theoreti- cal Model. In Transportation Research Record 1438, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1994, p. 3–8. 113. Moritz, W. E., Adult Bicyclists in the United States: Char- acteristics and Riding Experience in 1996. In Transportation Research Record 1636, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1998, p. 1–7. 114. Harkey, D. L., D. W. Reinfurt, and M. Mnuiman. Develop- ment of the Bicycle Compatibility Index. In Transportation Research Record 1636, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1998, p. 13–20. 115. Epperson, B. Evaluating Suitability of Roadways for Bicycle Use: Toward a Cycling Level-of-Service Standard. In Trans- portation Research Record 1438, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1994, p. 9–16. 116. Landis, B. W., V. R. Vattikuti, and M. T. Brannick. Real- Time Human Perceptions: Toward a Bicycle Level of Service. In Transportation Research Record 1578, TRB, National Re- search Council, Washington, D.C., 1997, p. 119–126. 117. Jackson, N. Bike Lane Design Guide. Pedestrian and Bicycle Information Center, Chicagoland Bicycle Federation, City of Chicago Department of Transportation, Chicago, IL, 2002.

118. Landis, B. W., Vattikuti, V. R., Ottenberg, R. M., and T. A. Petritsch. Intersection Level of Service for the Bicycle Through Movement. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1828, TRB, National Re- search Council, Washington, D.C., 2003, p. 101–106. 119. Krizek, K. J. and R. Roland. What is at the End of the Road? Factors Affecting Discontinuities of On-Street Bicycle Lanes in Urban Settings. Active Communities Transportation Research Group, University of Minnesota, 2004. 120. Aultman-Hall, L. and M. G. Kaltenecker. Toronto bicycle commuter safety rates. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 31, 1999, p. 675–686. 121. Garder, P., L. Leden, and U. Pulkkinen. Measuring the Safety Effect of Raised Bicycle Crossings Using a New Research Methodology. In Transportation Research Record 1636, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1998, p. 64–70. 122. Hunter, W. W., J. R. Stewart, and J. C. Stutts. Study of Bi- cycle Lanes Versus Wide Curb Lanes. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1674, TRB, National Research Council, Washing- ton, D.C., 1999, p. 70–77. 123. Smith, R. L., Jr., and T. Walsh. Safety Impacts of Bicycle Lanes. In Transportation Research Record 1168, TRB, Na- tional Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1988, p. 49–56. 124. Hunter, W. W. Evaluation of Innovative Bike-Box Applica- tion in Eugene, Oregon. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1705, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2000, p. 101–115. 125. Hunter, W. W., et al. Evaluation of Blue Bike Lane Treatment in Portland, Oregon. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1705, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2000, p. 107–115. 126. Handy, S. L. Regional Versus Local Accessibility: Neotradi- tional Development and Its Implications for Non-work Travel. Built Environment, 18(4), 1992, p. 253–267. 127. Downs, A. Stuck in Traffic: Coping with Peak-Hour Conges- tion. Brookings Institution, Washington, D.C., Lincoln Insti- tute of Land Policy, Cambridge, MA, 1992. 128. Lancaster, K. J. A New Approach to Consumer Theory. The Journal of Political Economy, 74(2), 1966, p. 132–157. 129. Rosen, S. Hedonic Prices and Implicit Markets: Product Dif- ferentiation in Pure Competition. The Journal of Political Economy, 82(1), 1974. 130. Sirmans, G. S. and D. A. Macpherson. The Composition of Hedonic Pricing Models: A Review of the Literature. National Association of Realtors, Chicago, IL, 2003. 131. Anderson, S. T. and S. E. West. The Value of Open Space Proximity and Size: City versus Suburbs. Macalester College, Department of Economics, St. Paul, MN, working paper, 2004. 132. Benson, E. D., et al. Pricing Residential Amenities: The Value of A View. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 16(1), 1998, p. 55–73. 133. Geoghegan, J. The Value of Open Spaces in Residential Land Use. Land Use Policy, 19(1), 2002, p. 91–98. 134. Irwin, E. G. and N. E. Bockstael. The Problem of Identifying Land Use Spillovers: Measuring the Effects of Open Space on 56 Residential Property Values. American Journal of Agricul- tural Economics, 83(3), 2001, p. 698–704. 135. Luttik, J. The Value of Trees, Water and Open Space as Reflected by House Prices in the Netherlands. Landscape and Urban Planning, 48, 2000, p. 161–167. 136. Quang Do, A. and G. Grudnitski. Golf Courses and Residen- tial House Prices: An Empirical Examination. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 10, 1995, p. 261–270. 137. Dye Management Group. Assessment of Techniques of Corri- dor Preservation in South Dakota. South Dakota Department of Transportation, Pierre, 2002. 138. Epperson, B. Demographic and Economic Characteristics of Bicyclists Involved in Bicycle-Motor Vehicle Accidents. In Transportation Research Record 1502, TRB, National Re- search Council, Washington, D.C., 1996, p. 58–64. 139. Goldsmith, S. Estimating the Effect of Bicycle Facilities on VMT and Emissions. n.d., Seattle Engineering Department, Seattle, WA. 140. Metropolitan Council, Travel Behavior Inventory, St. Paul, MN, 2000. 141. MarketLine Research, Inc. Minnesota Department of Trans- portation Mn/DOT Statewide Omnibus Study 2003/2004. 142. U.S. Department of Transportation. Census Transportation Planning Package. U.S. Census Bureau, Washington, D.C., 2000. 143. Killingsworth, R. E. Health Promoting Community Design: A New Paradigm to Promote Health and Active Communities. American Journal of Health Promotion, 17(3), 2003, 169–170. 144. Jackson, R. J. The Impact of the Built Environment on Health: An Emerging Field. American Journal of Public Health, 93(9), 2003, p. 1382–1384. 145. Sallis, J. F., L. D. Frank, B. E. Saelens, and M. K. Kraft. Active transportation and physical activity: opportunities for collaboration on transportation and public health research. Transportation Research Part A, 38, 2003, p. 249–268. 146. Bauman, A. E., J. F. Sallies, D. A. Dzewaltowski, and N. Owen. Toward a Better Understanding of the Influences on Physical Activity: The Role of Determinants, Correlates, Causal Variables, Mediators, Moderators, and Confounders. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 23(2S), 2002, p. 5–14. 147. Special Report 282: Does the Built Environment Influence Physical Activity? Examining the Evidence. Transportation Research Board and the Institute of Medicine of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2005, p. 224. 148. Wendel-Vos, G. S. W., et al. Factors of the Physical Environ- ment Associated with Walking and Bicycling. Official Journal of the American College of Sports Medicine, 2004, p. 725–730. 149. Pikora, T., et al. Developing a framework for assessment of the environmental determinants of walking and cycling. Social Science and Medicine, 56, 2003, p. 1693–1703. 150. Owens, P. M. Neighborhood form and pedestrian life: Tak- ing a closer look. Landscale and Urban Planning, 26, 1993, p. 115–135. 151. White, W. “How to Dullify Downtown.” The City. 1988. p. 310–324. 152. Rapaport, A. Pedestrian Street Use: Culture and Percep- tion, in Public Streets for Public Use, A. V. Moudon, Edi- tor, Columbia University Press: New York, 1987.

153. Krizek, K. J. Operationalizing Neighborhood Accessibility for Land use-Travel Behavior Research and Modeling. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 22(3), 2003, p. 270–287. 154. Talen, E. Neighborhoods as service providers: a methodology for evaluating pedestrian access. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 30, 2003, p. 181–200. 155. Handy, S. L. and D. A. Niemeier. Measuring Accessibility: an exploration of issues and alternatives. Environment and Plan- ning A, 29, 1997, p. 1175–1194. 156. Day, K., et al. Measuring Urban Design Features Related to Walking and Bicycling: The Irvine Minnesota Inventory. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, under review. 157. Forsyth, A., et al. Standards for Environmental Measurement using GIS: Toward a Protocol for Protocols. Journal of Phys- ical Activity and Health, under review. 158. Brownson, R. C., R. A. Housemann, D. R. Brown, J. Jack- son-Thompson, A. C. King, B. R. Malone, and J. F. Sallies, James F. Promoting Physical Activity in Rural Communities Walking Trail Access, Use, and Effects. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 18(3), 2000, p. 235–241. 159. Huston, S. L., K. R. Evenson, P. Bors, and Z. Gizlice. Neigh- borhood Environment, Access to Places for Activity, and Leisure-time Physical Activity in a Diverse North Carolina Population. American Journal of Health Promotion, 18(1), 2003, p. 58–69. 160. Moudon, A. V., et al. Effects of Site Design on Pedestrian Travel in Mixed Use, Medium-Density Environments. In Transportation Research Record 1578, TRB, National Re- search Council, Washington, D.C., 1997, p. 48–55. 161. Handy, S. L. Urban Form and Pedestrian Choices: Study of Austin Neighborhoods. In Transportation Research Record 1552, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1996, p. 135–144. 162. Cervero, R. and M. Duncan. Walking, bicycling, and urban landscapes: Evidence from the San Francisco Bay area. Amer- ican Journal of Public Health, 93(9), 2003, p. 1478–1483. 163. Powell, K. E., L. M. Martin, and P. P. Chowdhury. Places to Walk: Convenience and Regular Physical Activity. American Journal of Public Health, 93(9), 2003, p. 1519–1521. 164. Hess, P. M., et al. Site Design and Pedestrian Travel. In Trans- portation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1674, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1999, p. 9–19. 165. Shriver, K. Influence of Environmental Design On Pedestrian Travel Behavior in Four Austin Neighborhoods. TRB, Jour- nal of the Transportation Research Board, 1918: p. 64–75, Washington, D.C., 1997. 166. Handy, S. L. and K. J. Clifton. Local Shopping as Strategy for Reducing Automobile Use. Transportation Research A, 2001. 167. Krizek, K. J. Patterns of Use in Main Street Activity: A Case Study of Downtown Chapel Hill, NC. Carolina Planning, 20(2), 1995, p. 62–70. 168. Wardman, M., R. Hatfield, and M. Page. The UK national cycling strategy: can improved facilities meet the targets? Transport Policy, 4(2), 1998, p. 123–133. 169. Rietveld, P. and V. Daniel. Determinants of bicycle use: do municipal policies matter? Transportation Research Part A, 38, 2004, p. 531–550. 170. Librett, J. J., M. M. Yore, and T. L. Schmid. Local ordinances that promote physical activity: A survey of municipal policies. American Journal of Public Health, 93(9), 2003, p. 1399–1403. 57 171. Troped, P. J., R. P. Saunders, R. R. Pate, B. Reininger, J. R. Ureda, and S. J. Thompson. Associations between Self- Reported and Objective Physical Environmental Factors and Use of a Community Rail-Trail. Preventive Medicine, 32, 2001, p. 191–200. 172. Merom, D., A. Bauman, P. Vita, and G. Close. An environ- mental intervention to promote walking and cycling—the impact of a newly constructed Rail Trail in Western Sydney. Preventive Medicine, 36, 2003, p. 235–242. 173. Lindsey, G., and N. L. B Doan. Use of Greenway Trails in Indiana. Center for Urban Policy and the Environment, School for Public and Environmental Affairs, Indiana Uni- versity Purdue University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, 2002, p. 1–15. 174. Nelson, A. C. and D. P. Allen. If You Build Them, Com- muters Will Use Them. In Transportation Research Record 1578, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1997, p. 79–83. 175. Dill, J. and T. Carr. Bicycle Commuting and Facilities in Major U.S. Cities: If You Build Them, Commuters Will Use Them—Another Look. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1828, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2003, p. 116–123. 176. Hyodo, T., N. Suzuki, and K. Takahashi. Modeling of bicycle route and destination choice behavior for bicycle road net- work plan. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1705, 2000, p. 70–76. 177. Zahavi, Y. and J. M. Ryan. Stability of Travel Components Over Time. In Transportation Research Record 750, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1980, p. 19–26. 178. Untermann, R. Accommodating the pedestrian: adapting towns and neighborhoods for walking and bicycling. Van Nostrand Reinhold Co., New York, 1984. 179. Barnes, G. and K. J. Krizek. Estimating Bicycling Demand. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Trans- portation Research Board, No. TBD, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2005. 180. Gordon, P. and H. W. Richardson. Bicycling in the United States: A Fringe Mode. Transportation Quarterly, 52(1), 1998, p. 9–11. 181. Librett, J. J., M. M. Yore, and T. L. Schmid. Local Ordi- nances That Promote Physical Activity: A Survey of Munici- pal Policies. American Journal of Public Health, 93(9), 2003, p. 1399–1403. 182. Parks, S. E., R. A. Housemann, and R. C. Brownson. Differ- ential correlates of physical activity in urban and rural adults of various socioeconomic backgrounds in the United States. Journal of Epidemial Community Health, 57, 2003, p. 29–35. 183. Winship, C. and S. L. Morgan. The estimation of causal effects from observational data. Annu Rev Sociol, 25(1), 1999, p. 659–706. 184. Boarnet, M. G. and S. Sarmiento. Can Land-Use Policy Really Affect Travel Behavior? A Study of the Link Between Non- work Travel and Land-Use Characteristics. Urban Studies, 35(7), 1998, p. 1155–1169. 185. Krizek, K. J. Planning, Household Travel, and Household Lifestyles. Transportation Systems Planning: Methods and Applications, K. G. Goulias, Editor, CRC Press, New York, 2003, 6: 1–42.

186. Krizek, K. J. The Complex Role of Urban Design and Theo- retical Models of Physical Activity. Progressive Planning, 157, 2003, p. 28–29. 187. Maine Department of Transportation. Bicycle Tourism in Maine: Economic Impacts and Marketing Recommendations. Maine Department of Transportation, Augusta, 2001. 188. Nelson, C., et al. 2000 Midland County Recreation Needs Assessment: The Pere Marquette Rail–Trail. Department of Park, Recreation and Tourism Resources, East Lansing, MI, 2001. 189. Saelensminde, K. Walking- and cycling-track networks in Nor- wegian cities: Cost-benefit analyses including health effects and external costs of road traffic. Institute of Transport Eco- nomics, Oslo, 2002, p. 50. 190. Everett, M. Measuring the Economic Value of Exercise in Labor Intensive Urban Transportation Systems. In Transportation Research Record 599, TRB, National Research Council, Wash- ington, D.C., 1976. 191. Everett, M. and J. Dorman. New Approach to Economic Eval- uation of Labor-Intensive Transportation Systems. In Trans- portation Research Record 599, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1976. 192. Sharples, R. A framework for the evaluation of facilities for cyclists—Part 2. Traffic Engineering and Control, 1995, p. 221–223. 193. Lindsey, G. and M. Przybylski. Economic Considerations in Planning Urban Greenways: A Brief Review. Center for Urban Policy and the Environment, School of Public and Environ- mental Affairs, University of Indiana, Indianapolis. 1998, p. 20. 194. Bovy, P. and P. Bradley. Route Choice Analyzed with Stated Preference Approaches. In Transportation Research Record 1037, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1985. 195. Hopkinson, P. and M. Wardman. Evaluating the Demand for New Bicycle Facilities. Transport Policy, 3(4), 1996, p. 241–249. 196. Abraham, J., et al. Investigation of Cycling Sensitivities. Pre- sented at 81st Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board. Washington, D.C., 2002. 197. Shafizadeh, K. and D. Niemeier. Bicycle Journey-to-Work: Travel Behavior Characteristics and Spatial Attributes. In Transportation Research Record 1578, TRB, National Re- search Council, Washington, D.C., 1997, p. 84–90. 198. Aultman-Hall, L., F. Hall, and B. Baetz. Analysis of Bicycle Commuter Routes Using Geographic Information Systems: Implications for Bicycle Planning. In Transportation Research Record 1578, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1997. 199. Stinson, A. S. and C. R. Bhat. An Analysis of Commuter Bicy- clist Route Choice Using a Stated Preference Survey. In Trans- portation Research Record 1578, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1997. 200. Taylor, D. and H. Mahmassani. Analysis of Stated Preference for Intermodal Bicycle-Transit Interfaces. In Transportation Research Record 1556, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1996, p. 86–95. 201. Smalkoski, B. R. Value of Time for Commercial Vehicle Oper- ators in Minnesota. Civil Engineering. University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, 2003. 58 202. Bergantino, A. and S. Bolis. An Adaptive Conjoint Analysis of Freight Service Alternatives: Evaluating the Maritime Option. Proc. of the IAME, Panama, 2002. 203. Falzarno, S., R. Hazlett, and T. Adler. Quantifying the Value of Transit Station and Access Improvements for Chicago’s Rapid Transit System. Presented at the 80th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2001. 204. Efron, B. and R. Tibshirani. An Introduction to the Bootstrap. Chapman and Hall, New York, 1993. 205. Boueri, F. M., et al. Quality of life measured with a generic instrument (Short Form-36) improves following pulmonary rehabilitation in patients with COPD. Chest, 119(1), 2001, p. 77–84. 206. Wahrborg, L. and P. Wahrborg. Psychosocial characteristics of a group of males with ischemic heart disease and extended sick leave. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences, 11(4), 1997, p. 217–33. 207. Miche, E., et al. Effects of education, self care instruction and physical exercise on patients with chronic heart failure. Zeitschrift Fur Kardiologie, 92(12), 2003, p. 985–993. 208. Radzewitz, A., et al. Exercise and muscle strength training and their effect on quality of life in patients with chronic heart failure. European Journal of Heart Failure, 4(5), 2002, p. 627–634. 209. Myers, J. N. The physiology behind exercise testing. Primary Care, 28(1), 2001. 210. Moreira, W., et al. The effects of two aerobic training intensi- ties on ambulatory blood pressure in hypertensive patients: results of a randomized trial. Journal of Clinical Epidemiol- ogy, 52(7), 1999, p. 637–42. 211. Colditz, G. A., et al. Weight gain as a risk factor for clinical diabetes in women. Annals of Internal Medicine, 122, 1995, p. 481–486. 212. Chan, J. M., et al. Obesity, fat distribution, and weight gain as risk factors for clinical diabetes in men. Diabetes Care, 17, 1994, p. 961–964. 213. Henderson, N., C. White, and J. Eisman. The role of exercise and fall risk reduction in the prevention of osteoporosis. Endocrinol. Metab. Clin. North Am., 27, 1998, p. 369–87. 214. Huuskonen, J., et al. Determinants of bone mineral density in middle aged men: A population-based study. Osteoporosis International, 11(8) 2000, p. 702–708. 215. Colditz, G. A., C. Cannuscio, and A. Frazier. Physical activ- ity and reduced risk of colon cancer. Cancer Causes Control, 8, 1997, p. 649–667. 216. Huang, Z., G. A. Hankinson, and G. A. Colditz. Dual effects of weight and weight gain on breast cancer risk. Journal of the American Medical Association, 278, 1997, p. 1407–1411. 217. Schulz, K. H., et al. Implementation and evaluation of an exer- cise rehabilitation training for breast cancer patients. Psycho- therapie Psychosomatik Medizinische Psychologie, 48(9–10), 1998, p. 398–407. 218. Salmon, P. Effects of physical exercise on anxiety, depres- sion, and sensitivity to stress: A unifying theory. Clinical Psy- chology Review, 21(1), 2001, p. 33–61. 219. DiLorenzo, T. M., et al. Long-term effects of aerobic exercise on psychological outcomes. Preventive Medicine, 28(1), 1999, p. 75–85. 220. Plante, T. G., L. Coscarelli, and M. Ford. Does exercising with another enhance the stress-reducing benefits of exercise? Inter- national Journal of Stress Management, 8(3), 2001, p. 201–213.

221. Blair, S. N., et al. Physical fitness and all-cause mortality: a prospective study of healthy men and women. Journal of the American Medical Association, 262, 1989, p. 2395–2401. 222. Blair, S. N., et al. Changes in physical fitness and all cause mor- tality: a prospective study of healthy and unhealthy men. Jour- nal of the American Medical Association, 273, 1995, p. 1093–8. 223. Erikssen, G., et al. Changes in physical fitness and changes in mortality. Lancet, 352(9130), 1998, p. 759–762. 224. Barnes, G. Benefits of Bicycling in Minnesota. Minnesota Department of Transportation, St. Paul, 2004. 225. Litman, T. Quantifying the Benefits of Non-Motorized Trans- port for Achieving TDM Objectives. Victoria Transport Pol- icy Institute, Victoria, BC, Canada, 1999. 226. Barnes, G. and P. Langworthy. Vehicle Operating Costs for Benefit-Cost Analysis. Minnesota Department of Transporta- tion, St. Paul, 2003. 227. Stinson, B. R. T. Road finance alternatives: an analysis of metro-area road taxes. Center for Transportation Studies, Uni- versity of Minnesota, 2002. 228. Anderson, D. and H. Mohring. Congestion costs and conges- tion pricing for the Twin Cities. Minnesota Department of Transportation, St. Paul, 1996. 229. Taylor, F. Relation between Primary Market Prices and Qual- ities of Cotton. U.S. Department of Agriculture, 1916. 230. Franklin, J. P. and P. Waddell. A Hedonic Regression of Home Prices in King County, Washington, using Activity-Specific Accessibility Measures. Presented at the 82nd Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board. Washington, D.C., 2003. 231. Brasington, D. M. Which Measures of School Quality Does the Housing Market Value? Journal of Real Estate Research, 18(3), 1999, p. 395–413. 232. Earnhart, D. Combining Revealed and Stated Preference Methods to Value Environmental Amenities at Residential Locations. Land Economics, 77(1), 2001, p. 12–29. 233. Lutzenhiser, M. and N. R. Netusil. The Effect of Open Spaces on a Home’s Sale Price. Contemporary Economic Policy, 19(3), 2001, p. 291–298. 59 234. Mahan, B. L., S. Polasky, and R. M. Adams. Valuing Urban Wetlands: A Property Price Approach. Land Economics, 76(1), 2000, p. 100–113. 235. Smith, V. K., C. Paulos, and H. Kim. Treating Open Space as an Urban Amenity. Resource and Energy Economics, 24, 2002, p. 107–129. 236. Irwin, E. G. The Effects of Open Space on Residential Prop- erty Values. Land Economics, 78(4), 2002, p. 465–480. 237. City of Vancouver. Bicycle Plan 1999: Reviewing the Past, Planning the Future. Vancouver, B.C., Canada, 1999. 238. McLaughlin, P. Hennepin County Commissioner. Minneapolis, MN, 2003. 239. Krizek, K. J. and P. J. Johnson. The Effect of Facility Access on Bicycling Behavior. Active Communities Transportation Research Group, University of Minnesota, 2004. 240. Jackson, M. E. and P. Newsome. A Guide to Bicycle Trans- portation in the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area: The Processes, The Players, The Potential. Minnesota Department of Trans- portation: St. Paul, 2000, p. 82. 241. Michaels, R. G. and V. K. Smith. Market Segmentation and Valuing Amenities with Hedonic Models: The Case of Haz- ardous Waste Sites. Journal of Urban Economics, 28, 1990, p. 223–242. 242. Smith, V. K. and Y. Kaoru. The Hedonic Travel Cost Model: A View from the Trenches. Land Economics, 63(2), 1987, p. 179–192. 243. Riddel, M. A Dynamic Approach to Estimating Hedonic Prices for Environmental Goods: An Application to Open Space Pur- chase. Land Economics, 77(4), 2001, p. 494–512. 244. Shonkweiler, J. S. and J. E. Reynolds. A Note on the Use of Hedonic Price Models in the Analysis of Land Prices at the Urban Fringe. Land Economics, 62(1), 1986, p. 58–63. 245. Przybylski, M. and G. Lindsey, Economic Evaluation of Major Urban Greenway Projects, 98-C13. Center for Urban Policy and the Environment, Indianapolis, IN, 1998. 246. Walsh, R. Recreation Economic Decisions. Venture Publish- ing, State College, PA, 1986.