Statewide Travel Forecasting Models (2006)

Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

55 Barton–Aschman Associates, Inc., and Cambridge System- atics, Inc., Model Validation and Reasonableness Check- ing Manual, Travel Model Improvement Program, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C., Feb. 1997, 113 pp. Bernardin, Lochmueller & Associates, Inc., and Cambridge Systematics, Inc., “Indiana Statewide Travel Demand Model Upgrade Technical Memorandum: Model Update and Validation,” Sep. 2004. Cambridge Systematics, Inc.; Economic Development Research Group; ICF Consulting; and Short Elliott Hen- drickson, Inc., “Montana Highway Reconfiguration Study,” Montana Department of Transportation, Helena, Dec. 2004. Cambridge Systematics, Inc., COMSIS Corporation, and University of Wisconsin—Milwaukee, Quick Response Freight Manual, DOT-T-97-10, Travel Model Improve- ment Program, U.S. Department of Transportation and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C., Sep. 1996. Cambridge Systematics, Inc., et al., Methods for Forecasting Statewide Freight Movements and Related Performance Measures, draft final report, NCHRP Project 8-43 Report, Transportation Research Board, National Research Coun- cil, Washington, D.C., 2005. Coldren, G.M. and F.S. Koppelman, “Modeling the Com- petition Among Air Travel Itinerary Shares: GEV Model Development,” Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Vol. 39, Issue 4, May 2005, pp. 345–365. HBA Specto Inc., and Parsons Brinckerhoff Ohio, “Ohio Statewide Travel Demand Model—Model Specification Report: Chapter 1 Outline of Modeling Framework,” un- dated draft report, obtained in 2005. Highway Capacity Manual 2000, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., Dec. 2000. Horowitz, A.J. and D.D. Farmer, “Critical Review of Statewide Travel Forecasting Practice,” Transportation Research Record 1685, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1999, pp. 13–20. Horowitz, A.J., Guidebook on Statewide Travel Forecasting, Report FHWA-HEP-99-007, Federal Highway Adminis- tration, Washington, D.C., July 1999. Hunt, J.D. and J.E. Abraham, “Design and Application of the PECAS Land Use Modeling System,” Proceedings, 8th Computers in Urban Planning and Urban Manage- ment Conference, Sendai, Japan, 2003 [Online]. Avail- able: http://www.ucalgary.ca/~jabraham/Papers/pecas/ 8094.pdf. Hunt, J.D., J.E. Abraham, and T. Weidner, “The Land Development Module of the Oregon2 Modeling Frame- work,” Transportation Research Board 83rd Annual Meeting, CD-ROM, 2004a. Hunt, J.D., K.J. Stefan, A.T. Brownlee, J.D.P. McMillan, A. Farhan, K. Tsang, D.M. Atkins, and M. Ishani, “A Com- mercial Movement Modelling Strategy for Alberta’s Major Cities,” Proceedings of the 2004 Annual Confer- ence of the Transportation Association of Canada, Québec City, QC, Canada, Sep. 2004b. Johnson, D.L., “20-Year Traffic Forecasting Factors Study,” SD1999-04, Final Report, South Dakota Department of Transportation, Pierre, Oct. 2000. Mallett, W.J. and N. McGuckin, “Driving to Distractions, Recreational Trips in Private Vehicles,” Paper 04- 003230, Transportation Research Board 83th Annual Meeting, CD-ROM, 2004. Martin, W.A. and N.A. McGuckin, NCHRP Report 365: Travel Estimation Techniques for Urban Planning, Transportation Research Board, National Research Coun- cil, Washington, D.C., 1998, 178 pp. Memmott, F.W., NCHRP Report 260: Application of Statewide Freight Demand Forecasting, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washing- ton, D.C., 1983, 210 pp. Meyburg, A.H., Letter for Bruce Lambert, findings from TRB’s Committee on the Future of the Federal Highway Administration’s Freight Analysis Framework, Feb. 9, 2004 [Online]. Available: http://trb.org/publications/ reports/fafltrfeb2004.pdf. Miller, E.J., “The Trouble with Intercity Travel Demand Models,” Transportation Research Record 1895, Trans- portation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2004, pp. 94–101. O’Neill, W.A., P.N. Fulton, and E. Brown, “Evaluating Role of Distance and Location in Statewide Travel Demand Forecasting by Using American Travel Survey,” Trans- portation Research Record 1660, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washing- ton, D.C., 1999, pp. 41–47. Sosslau, A.B., A.B. Hassam, M.M. Carter, and G.V. Wick- strom, NCHRP Report 187: Quick-Response Urban Travel Estimation Techniques and Transferable Parameters: User’s Guide, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1978, 229 pp. Transportation Research Circular E-C011: Statewide Travel Demand Forecasting, Conference Proceedings, Irvine, Transportation Research Board, National Research Coun- cil, Washington, D.C., 1999. Transportation Research Circular E-C075: Statewide Travel Demand Modeling: A Peer Exchange, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., Aug. 2005. Trip Generation, 6th ed., Institute of Transportation Engi- neers, Washington, D.C., 1997. REFERENCES

56 Wilbur Smith Associates, “Virginia Statewide Transporta- tion Demand Model, Macro Model Development, Tech- nical Memo,” Richmond, Mar. 31, 2003. Wilbur Smith Associates, “Louisiana Statewide Traffic Model, Methodology Report,” Prepared for the Louisiana Depart- ment of Transportation and Development, Baton Rouge, Sep. 2004. Wilbur Smith Associates, “Kentucky Statewide Traffic Model Methodology Report,” Draft Report, Frankfurt, May 2005a. Wilbur Smith Associates, “Virginia Statewide Multi-Modal Transportation Demand Model Development, Summary and Forecast of Goods Movement Data,” Richmond, 2005b.