Click for next page ( 58


The National Academies | 500 Fifth St. N.W. | Washington, D.C. 20001
Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
Terms of Use and Privacy Statement



Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 57
57 Table 28. Pedestrian visual search by treatment. Visual Search Treatment B N O X Count Flag 83% 1% 1% 15% 350 Half 79% 1% 2% 17% 342 Hawk 85% 0% 1% 13% 224 HiVi 34% 0% 1% 65% 606 InSt 71% 3% 3% 22% 310 Msig 21% 10% 4% 66% 393 OfPa 47% 2% 2% 49% 164 OfPb 89% 1% 1% 9% 254 Refu 74% 0% 1% 25% 512 Grand Total 62% 2% 2% 35% 3155 Total after removing unknowns 94% 3% 3% NA 2082 Table 29. Pedestrian crosswalk use by treatment. Crosswalk Compliance Treatment 0 1 2 X Count Flag 88% 5% 7% 0% 350 Half 80% 7% 13% 0% 342 Hawk 90% 5% 5% 0% 224 HiVi 89% 4% 6% 0% 606 InSt 93% 5% 2% 0% 310 Msig 95% 3% 2% 0% 393 OfPa 87% 3% 10% 0% 164 OfPb 82% 2% 16% 0% 254 Refu 82% 13% 5% 0% 512 Grand Total 87% 6% 7% 0% 3155 All other treatments had rates of 80 to 89 percent. If the dis- acceptable gap was present when the pedestrian arrived at tance is extended to 50 ft (15 m), all treatments had rates of the curb; 84 to 98 percent. 3--the crossing treatment was activated by the pedestrian, who waited until the proper time to cross (i.e., Walk signal or flashing light activation); Pedestrian Activation 4--the crossing treatment was activated by the pedestrian, If the crossing treatment could be activated, each crossing who did not wait until the proper time to cross (i.e., Walk pedestrian was coded into one of the following categories: signal or flashing light activation); or X--data could not be determined from the video. 1--the pedestrian did not attempt to activate the system but had to wait for an acceptable gap; The distribution of pedestrian activation in Table 30 2--the pedestrian did not attempt or was not properly shows that red devices were activated about two-thirds of positioned to activate the pedestrian crossing, or an the time. Passive yellow devices (OfPa) were activated for Table 30. Pedestrian activation by treatment. Activate Treatment 1 2 3 4 X Count Flag 35% 46% 8% 9% 2% 350 Half 8% 25% 63% 4% 0% 342 Hawk 13% 15% 69% 1% 2% 224 HiVi 12% 88% 0% 0% 0% 606 InSt 15% 85% 0% 0% 0% 310 Msig 11% 20% 64% 3% 1% 393 OfPa 20% 21% 33% 25% 1% 164 OfPb 27% 43% 22% 6% 1% 254 Refu 44% 53% 0% 0% 3% 512 Grand Total 21% 50% 24% 4% 1% 3155