Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter.
Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.
Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.
OCR for page 57
57
Table 28. Pedestrian visual search by treatment.
Visual Search
Treatment B N O X Count
Flag 83% 1% 1% 15% 350
Half 79% 1% 2% 17% 342
Hawk 85% 0% 1% 13% 224
HiVi 34% 0% 1% 65% 606
InSt 71% 3% 3% 22% 310
Msig 21% 10% 4% 66% 393
OfPa 47% 2% 2% 49% 164
OfPb 89% 1% 1% 9% 254
Refu 74% 0% 1% 25% 512
Grand Total 62% 2% 2% 35% 3155
Total after removing
unknowns 94% 3% 3% NA 2082
Table 29. Pedestrian crosswalk use by treatment.
Crosswalk Compliance
Treatment 0 1 2 X Count
Flag 88% 5% 7% 0% 350
Half 80% 7% 13% 0% 342
Hawk 90% 5% 5% 0% 224
HiVi 89% 4% 6% 0% 606
InSt 93% 5% 2% 0% 310
Msig 95% 3% 2% 0% 393
OfPa 87% 3% 10% 0% 164
OfPb 82% 2% 16% 0% 254
Refu 82% 13% 5% 0% 512
Grand Total 87% 6% 7% 0% 3155
All other treatments had rates of 80 to 89 percent. If the dis- acceptable gap was present when the pedestrian arrived at
tance is extended to 50 ft (15 m), all treatments had rates of the curb;
84 to 98 percent. · 3--the crossing treatment was activated by the pedestrian,
who waited until the proper time to cross (i.e., Walk signal
or flashing light activation);
Pedestrian Activation
· 4--the crossing treatment was activated by the pedestrian,
If the crossing treatment could be activated, each crossing who did not wait until the proper time to cross (i.e., Walk
pedestrian was coded into one of the following categories: signal or flashing light activation); or
· X--data could not be determined from the video.
· 1--the pedestrian did not attempt to activate the system
but had to wait for an acceptable gap; The distribution of pedestrian activation in Table 30
· 2--the pedestrian did not attempt or was not properly shows that red devices were activated about two-thirds of
positioned to activate the pedestrian crossing, or an the time. Passive yellow devices (OfPa) were activated for
Table 30. Pedestrian activation by treatment.
Activate
Treatment 1 2 3 4 X Count
Flag 35% 46% 8% 9% 2% 350
Half 8% 25% 63% 4% 0% 342
Hawk 13% 15% 69% 1% 2% 224
HiVi 12% 88% 0% 0% 0% 606
InSt 15% 85% 0% 0% 0% 310
Msig 11% 20% 64% 3% 1% 393
OfPa 20% 21% 33% 25% 1% 164
OfPb 27% 43% 22% 6% 1% 254
Refu 44% 53% 0% 0% 3% 512
Grand Total 21% 50% 24% 4% 1% 3155
