Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.
62 1. Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices for Streets and Highways. U.S. DOT, FHWA, Washington, DC, 2003. Available online at http://mutcd.fhwa.dot.gov/, accessed June 2, 2005. 2. Guide for the Planning, Design, and Operation of Pedestrian Facili- ties. Draft Report, AASHTO, Washington, DC, August 2001. 3. 1995 Nationwide Personal Transportation Survey. U.S. DOT, Bureau of Transportation Statistics, Washington, DC, 1995. Available online at http://npts.ornl.gov/npts/1995/doc/NPTS_Booklet.pdf 4. Pedestrian Facilities Guidebook: Incorporating Pedestrians into Wash- ingtonâs Transportation System. Prepared by Otak for Washington State DOT, Olympia, WA, September 1997. 5. Florida Pedestrian Safety Plan. Florida DOT, Tallahassee, FL, February 1992. 6. Florida Pedestrian Planning and Design Handbook. Florida DOT, Tallahassee, FL, April 1999. Available online at http://www11. myflorida.com/safety/ped_bike/ped_bike_standards.htm#Florida %20Ped%20Handbook, accessed April 14, 2003. 7. Zegeer, C. Design and Safety of Pedestrian Facilities. Institute of Transportation Engineers, Washington, DC, March 1998. 8. Dewar, R. Human Factors in Traffic Safety,âChapter 18: Pedestrians and Bicyclists.â Lawyers and Judges Publishing Company, Tucson, AZ, 2002. 9. Bennett, S., A. Felton, and R. Akçelik.âPedestrian Movement Char- acteristics at Signalized Intersections.â 23rd Conference of Australian Institutes of Transportation Research, Monash University, Mel- bourne, Australia, December 10-12, 2001. 10. Staplin, L., K. Lococo, S. Byington, and D. Harkey. Guidelines and Recommendations to Accommodate Older Drivers and Pedestrians. Report No. FHWA-RD-01-051, FHWA, McLean,VA, October 2001. 11. Dahlstedt, S. Walking Speeds and Walking Habits of Elderly People. National Swedish Road and Traffic Research Institute, Stockholm, Sweden, undated. 12. Coffin, A., and J. Morrall.âWalking Speeds of Elderly Pedestrians at Crosswalks.â Transportation Research Record 1487, TRB, Washing- ton, DC, 1995, pp. 63-67. 13. âSafety of Vulnerable Road Users.â Scientific Expert Group on the Safety of Vulnerable Road Users, DTSI/DOT/RTR(98)1/ FINALMOECD, OECD, Paris, France, 1998. 14. Knoblauch, R. L., M. T. Pietrucha, and M. Nitzburg. âField Studies of Pedestrian Walking Speed and Start-Up Time.â Transportation Research Record 1538, TRB, Washington, DC, 1996, pp. 27-38. 15. An Investigation of Pedestrian Movement Characteristics at Mid- Block Signalized Crossings. Technical Report, Akçelik & Associates Pty. Ltd., Melbourne, Australia, December 2001. 16. Rouphail, N., J. Hummer, J. Milazzo II, and D.P. Allen. Literature Review for Chapter 13, Pedestrians, of the Highway Capacity Man- ual. FHWA, Washington, DC, February 1998. 17. Fruin, John J. Pedestrian Planning and Design. Metropolitan Asso- ciation of Urban Designers and Environmental Planners, New York, NY, 1971. 18. Pushkarev, B., and J. Zupan. Urban Space for Pedestrians. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1975. 19. Chu, X., M. Guttenplan, and M. Baltes. âWhy People Cross Where They Do.â TRB Paper No. 03-3078, TRB, Washington, DC, September 2002. 20. McGregor, C., A. Smiley, and W. Dunk. âIdentifying Gaps in Child Pedestrian Safety: Comparing What Children Do with What Par- ents Teach.â Transportation Research Record 1674, TRB, Washing- ton, DC, 1999, pp. 32-40. 21. Dixon, L. âBicycle and Pedestrian Level-of-Service Performance Measures and Standards for Congestion Management Systems.â Transportation Research Record 1538, TRB, Washington, DC, 1996, pp. 1-9. 22. Hunt, J., and J. Griffiths. âVehicle Capacity at Pedestrian Crossings in the United Kingdom.â Highway Capacity and Level of Service, U. Brannolte and A. A. Balkema, eds., Rotterdam, 1991, pp. 181-191. 23. Highway Capacity Manual 2000. TRB, Washington, DC, 2000. 24. Rouphail, N., J. Hummer, J. Milazzo II, and P. Allen. Capacity Analysis of Pedestrian and Bicycle Facilities: Recommended Proce- dures for the âPedestriansâ Chapter of the Highway Capacity Man- ual. Report No. FHWA-RD-98-107, FHWA, Washington, DC, 1998. 25. Griffiths, J., J. Hunt, and M. Marlow. âDelays at Pedestrian Cross- ings: 1. Site Observations and the Interpretation of Data.â Traffic Engineering and Control, 25, 7/8, Printerhall Limited, London, July/August 1984, pp. 365-371. 26. Lalani, N. Alternative Treatments for At-Grade Pedestrian Crossings. Informational Report, Pedestrian and Bicycle Council Task Force Committee, ITE, Washington, DC, August 2001. 27. Zegeer, C., C. Seiderman, P. Lagerwey, M. Cynecki, M. Ronkin, and R. Schneider. Pedestrian Facilities User Guide â Providing Safety and Mobility. Report No. FHWA-RD-00-103, FHWA, Washington, DC, 2002. Available online at http://www.dot.state.ut.us/progdev/bike/ peduserguide.pdf. 28. Making Crosswalks Safer for Pedestrians: Application of a Multidis- ciplinary Approach to Improve Pedestrian Safety at Crosswalks in St. Petersburg, Florida. Center for Urban Transportation Research (CUTR), University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, July 2000. References
63 29. Glock, J. W., R. B. Nassi, R. E. Hunt, and B.W. Fairfax. Implementa- tion of a Program to Reduce Pedestrian Related Accidents and Facilitate Pedestrian Crossings. City of Tucson Transportation Department, Tucson, AZ, 2000. 30. Nassi, R.B. âPedestrians.â Chapter 13 in Traffic Control Devices Handbook, Pub. No. IR-112, ITE, Washington, DC, 2001. 31. Fairfax, B. W. School-Pedestrian Crosswalk Signals at Intersections: A Quantified Evaluation of Performance. Seattle Engineering Depart- ment, Seattle, WA, 1974. 32. Petzold, R. G., and R. Nawrocki. âUrban Intersection Improve- ments for Pedestrian Safety: Volume V.â Evaluation of Alternatives to Full Signalization at Pedestrian Crossings, FHWA-RD-77-146, FHWA, Washington, DC, December 1977. 33. Hendrickson, J. Half Signal Report. Seattle Engineering Depart- ment, Seattle, WA, 1988. 34. Fairfax, B.W. Pedestrian Crossing Traffic Control Devices: An Assess- ment of Innovative Methods for Enhancing Pedestrian Safety at Cross- ings of Arterial Streets. Prepared for the City of Tucson Department of Transportation, Tucson, Arizona, December 14, 1999. 35. Voss, J.O.,and L.Parks.Operational and Safety Issues of British Colum- biaâs Unique Pedestrian Signals. Vancouver, BC, Canada, July 17, 2001. 36. Van Winkle, J. W., and D.A. Neal. âPedestrian-Actuated Crosswalk Flashers.â Paper presented at the ITE 2000Annual Meeting, ITE, August 2000. 37. Fisher, J. E. The Smart and Smarter Pedestrian Warning. City of Los Angeles Department of Transportation, Los Angeles, CA, no date. 38. Huang, H. An Evaluation of Flashing Crosswalks in Gainesville and Lakeland. Highway Safety Research Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, for Florida Department of Transporta- tion, November 2000. 39. Tobin, J. R. âStandards & Guidelines for Mid-Block Crossings: Las Vegas Study.â Paper presented at the ITE 1999 Annual Meeting, Institute of Transportation Engineers, August 1999. 40. An Evaluation of a Crosswalk Warning System Utilizing In-Pavement Flashing Lights. Whitlock and Weinberger Transportation, Inc., Santa Rosa, CA, April 1998. Available online at http://www. w-trans.com/xwk-report.pdf, accessed March 28, 2003. 41. Evans, D.âThe Light of Your Life: In-Pavement LEDs Stop Cars and Save Lives.â Traffic Technology International, 1999 Annual Review, Volume 5, No. 6, Surrey, United Kingdom, December 1999. 42. Godfrey, D., and T. Mazzella. âKirklandâs Experience with In- Pavement Flashing Lights at Crosswalks.âPresented at the ITE/IMSA Annual Meeting, Lynnwood, WA, February 8, 1999. Available online at http://www.ci.kirkland.wa.us/depart/pw/transportation/ flscrswk.htm, accessed December 22, 2005. 43. City of Fountain Valley Illuminated Crosswalks: An Evaluation Study and Policy Recommendations. Katz, Okitsu & Associates, Tustin, CA, October 2000. Available online at http://www.katzokitsu.com/ peds.htm, accessed May 27, 2002. 44. Prevedouros, P. D. âEvaluation of In-Pavement Flashing Lights on a Six-Lane Arterial Pedestrian Crossing.âPaper presented at the ITE 2001 Annual Meeting, ITE, August 2001. 45. Huang, H., R. Hughes, C. Zegeer, and M. Nitzburg. âAn Evaluation of the LightGuard⢠Pedestrian Crosswalk Warning System.â High- way Safety Research Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, June 1999. 46. Van Houten, R., and L. Malenfant. âThe Influence of Signs Prompting Motorists to Yield before Marked Crosswalks on Motor Vehicle-Pedestrian Conflicts at Crosswalks with Flashing Amber.â Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 24, No. 3, 1992, pp. 217-225. 47. Van Houten, R., J. E. L. Malenfant, and D. McCusker.âAdvance Yield Markings: Reducing Motor Vehicle-Pedestrian Conflicts at Multi- lane Crosswalks with Uncontrolled Approach.â Transportation Research Record 1773, TRB, Washington, DC, 2001, pp. 69-74. 48. Van Houten, R., D. McCusker, S. Huybers, J. E. L. Malenfant, and D. Rice-Smith. âAdvance Yield Markings and Fluorescent Yellow-Green RA 4 Signs at Crosswalks with Uncontrolled Approaches.âTransporta- tion Research Record 1818, TRB, Washington, DC, 2002, pp. 119-124. 49. Herms, B. F.âPedestrian Crosswalk Study: Accidents in Painted and Unpainted Crosswalks.â Highway Research Record 406, Highway Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, DC, 1972, pp. 1-14. 50. Zegeer, C. V., J. R. Stewart, and H. Huang. Safety Effects of Marked vs. Unmarked Crosswalks at Uncontrolled Locations: Executive Sum- mary and Recommended Guidelines. FHWA-RD-01-075, FHWA, Washington, DC, March 2002. 51. Gibby, A. R., J. Stites, G. S. Thurgood, and T. C. Ferrara. Evaluation of Marked and Unmarked Crosswalks at Intersections in California: Final Report. FHWA/CA/TO-94/1, California Department of Transportation, Sacramento, CA, June 1994. 52. Jones, T. L., and P. Tomcheck.âPedestrian Accidents in Marked and Unmarked Crosswalks: A Quantitative Study.â ITE Journal, Sep- tember 2000. 53. Knoblauch, R. L., and P. D. Raymond. The Effect of Crosswalk Mark- ings on Vehicle Speeds in Maryland, Virginia, and Arizona. FHWA- RD-00-101, FHWA, Washington, DC, August 2000. 54. Knoblauch, R. L., M. Nitzburg, and R. F. Seifert. Pedestrian Cross- walk Case Studies: Sacramento, California; Richmond, Virginia; Buf- falo, New York; Stillwater, Minnesota. FHWA-RD-00-103, FHWA, Washington, DC, August 2001. 55. Carlson, P. J., and S. M. Turner. Revising the Traffic Signal Warrants to Better Accommodate Pedestrians and Cyclists. FHWA/TX- 01/2136-1, FHWA, Washington, DC, May 2001. 56. A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets. AASHTO, Washington, DC, 2001. 57. Draft Guidelines for Accessible Public Rights of Way. U.S. Access Board, June 17, 2002. Available online at http://www.access- board.gov/Rowdraft.htm, accessed September 2003. 58. LaPlante, J. N., and T. P. Kaeser.âThe Continuing Evolution of Pedes- trian Walking Speed Assumptions.â ITE Journal, September 2004. 59. Transportation and Traffic Engineering Handbook, 2nd Edition. ITE, Prentice-Hall International, Inc., 1982. 60. Guerrier, J. H., and S. C. Jolibois, Jr. âThe Safety of Elderly Pedes- trians at Five Urban Intersections in Miami.â Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 42nd Annual Meeting, Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, Santa Monica, CA, 1998. 61. Milazzo, J. S., N. M. Rouphail, J. E. Hummer, and D. P. Allen.âQual- ity of Service for Interrupted-Flow Pedestrian Facilities in Highway Capacity Manual 2000.â Transportation Research Record 1678, TRB, Washington, DC, 1999, pp. 25-31. 62. Pline, J. L., ed. Traffic Control Devices Handbook. ITE Publication IR-112, ITE, Washington, DC, 2001. 63. Staplin, L., K. Lococo, S. Byington, and D. Harkey. Guidelines and Recommendations to Accommodate Older Drivers and Pedestrians. FHWA-RD-01-051FHWA, McLean, VA, October 2001. 64. An Investigation of Pedestrian Movement Characteristics at Mid- Block Signalized Crossings. Technical Report, Akçelik & Associates Pty. Ltd., Melbourne, Australia, December 2001. 65. Fambro, D. B., K. Fitzpatrick, and R. J. Koppa. NCHRP Report 400: Determination of Stopping Sight Distances, TRB, Washington, DC, 1997, 134 p.