Click for next page ( 63


The National Academies | 500 Fifth St. N.W. | Washington, D.C. 20001
Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
Terms of Use and Privacy Statement



Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 62
62 References 1. Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices for Streets and Highways. 16. Rouphail, N., J. Hummer, J. Milazzo II, and D.P. Allen. Literature U.S. DOT, FHWA, Washington, DC, 2003. Available online at Review for Chapter 13, Pedestrians, of the Highway Capacity Man- http://mutcd.fhwa.dot.gov/, accessed June 2, 2005. ual. FHWA, Washington, DC, February 1998. 2. Guide for the Planning, Design, and Operation of Pedestrian Facili- 17. Fruin, John J. Pedestrian Planning and Design. Metropolitan Asso- ties. Draft Report, AASHTO, Washington, DC, August 2001. ciation of Urban Designers and Environmental Planners, New 3. 1995 Nationwide Personal Transportation Survey. U.S. DOT, Bureau York, NY, 1971. of Transportation Statistics, Washington, DC, 1995. Available 18. Pushkarev, B., and J. Zupan. Urban Space for Pedestrians. The MIT online at http://npts.ornl.gov/npts/1995/doc/NPTS_Booklet.pdf Press, Cambridge, MA, 1975. 4. Pedestrian Facilities Guidebook: Incorporating Pedestrians into Wash- 19. Chu, X., M. Guttenplan, and M. Baltes. "Why People Cross Where ington's Transportation System. Prepared by Otak for Washington They Do." TRB Paper No. 03-3078, TRB, Washington, DC, State DOT, Olympia, WA, September 1997. September 2002. 5. Florida Pedestrian Safety Plan. Florida DOT, Tallahassee, FL, 20. McGregor, C., A. Smiley, and W. Dunk. "Identifying Gaps in Child February 1992. Pedestrian Safety: Comparing What Children Do with What Par- 6. Florida Pedestrian Planning and Design Handbook. Florida DOT, ents Teach." Transportation Research Record 1674, TRB, Washing- Tallahassee, FL, April 1999. Available online at http://www11. ton, DC, 1999, pp. 32-40. myflorida.com/safety/ped_bike/ped_bike_standards.htm#Florida 21. Dixon, L. "Bicycle and Pedestrian Level-of-Service Performance %20Ped%20Handbook, accessed April 14, 2003. Measures and Standards for Congestion Management Systems." 7. Zegeer, C. Design and Safety of Pedestrian Facilities. Institute of Transportation Research Record 1538, TRB, Washington, DC, 1996, Transportation Engineers, Washington, DC, March 1998. pp. 1-9. 8. Dewar, R. Human Factors in Traffic Safety, "Chapter 18: Pedestrians 22. Hunt, J., and J. Griffiths. "Vehicle Capacity at Pedestrian Crossings and Bicyclists." Lawyers and Judges Publishing Company, Tucson, in the United Kingdom." Highway Capacity and Level of Service, U. AZ, 2002. Brannolte and A. A. Balkema, eds., Rotterdam, 1991, pp. 181-191. 9. Bennett, S., A. Felton, and R. Akelik."Pedestrian Movement Char- 23. Highway Capacity Manual 2000. TRB, Washington, DC, 2000. acteristics at Signalized Intersections." 23rd Conference of Australian 24. Rouphail, N., J. Hummer, J. Milazzo II, and P. Allen. Capacity Institutes of Transportation Research, Monash University, Mel- Analysis of Pedestrian and Bicycle Facilities: Recommended Proce- bourne, Australia, December 10-12, 2001. dures for the "Pedestrians" Chapter of the Highway Capacity Man- 10. Staplin, L., K. Lococo, S. Byington, and D. Harkey. Guidelines and ual. Report No. FHWA-RD-98-107, FHWA, Washington, DC, Recommendations to Accommodate Older Drivers and Pedestrians. 1998. Report No. FHWA-RD-01-051, FHWA, McLean, VA, October 2001. 25. Griffiths, J., J. Hunt, and M. Marlow. "Delays at Pedestrian Cross- 11. Dahlstedt, S. Walking Speeds and Walking Habits of Elderly People. ings: 1. Site Observations and the Interpretation of Data." Traffic National Swedish Road and Traffic Research Institute, Stockholm, Engineering and Control, 25, 7/8, Printerhall Limited, London, Sweden, undated. July/August 1984, pp. 365-371. 12. Coffin, A., and J. Morrall."Walking Speeds of Elderly Pedestrians at 26. Lalani, N. Alternative Treatments for At-Grade Pedestrian Crossings. Crosswalks." Transportation Research Record 1487, TRB, Washing- Informational Report, Pedestrian and Bicycle Council Task Force ton, DC, 1995, pp. 63-67. Committee, ITE, Washington, DC, August 2001. 13. "Safety of Vulnerable Road Users." Scientific Expert Group on 27. Zegeer, C., C. Seiderman, P. Lagerwey, M. Cynecki, M. Ronkin, and the Safety of Vulnerable Road Users, DTSI/DOT/RTR(98)1/ R. Schneider. Pedestrian Facilities User Guide Providing Safety and FINALMOECD, OECD, Paris, France, 1998. Mobility. Report No. FHWA-RD-00-103, FHWA, Washington, DC, 14. Knoblauch, R. L., M. T. Pietrucha, and M. Nitzburg. "Field Studies 2002. Available online at http://www.dot.state.ut.us/progdev/bike/ of Pedestrian Walking Speed and Start-Up Time." Transportation peduserguide.pdf. Research Record 1538, TRB, Washington, DC, 1996, pp. 27-38. 28. Making Crosswalks Safer for Pedestrians: Application of a Multidis- 15. An Investigation of Pedestrian Movement Characteristics at Mid- ciplinary Approach to Improve Pedestrian Safety at Crosswalks in St. Block Signalized Crossings. Technical Report, Akelik & Associates Petersburg, Florida. Center for Urban Transportation Research Pty. Ltd., Melbourne, Australia, December 2001. (CUTR), University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, July 2000.

OCR for page 62
63 29. Glock, J. W., R. B. Nassi, R. E. Hunt, and B.W. Fairfax. Implementa- 47. Van Houten, R., J. E. L. Malenfant, and D. McCusker."Advance Yield tion of a Program to Reduce Pedestrian Related Accidents and Facilitate Markings: Reducing Motor Vehicle-Pedestrian Conflicts at Multi- Pedestrian Crossings. City of Tucson Transportation Department, lane Crosswalks with Uncontrolled Approach." Transportation Tucson, AZ, 2000. Research Record 1773, TRB, Washington, DC, 2001, pp. 69-74. 30. Nassi, R.B. "Pedestrians." Chapter 13 in Traffic Control Devices 48. Van Houten, R., D. McCusker, S. Huybers, J. E. L. Malenfant, and D. Handbook, Pub. No. IR-112, ITE, Washington, DC, 2001. Rice-Smith. "Advance Yield Markings and Fluorescent Yellow-Green 31. Fairfax, B. W. School-Pedestrian Crosswalk Signals at Intersections: A RA 4 Signs at Crosswalks with Uncontrolled Approaches." Transporta- Quantified Evaluation of Performance. Seattle Engineering Depart- tion Research Record 1818, TRB, Washington, DC, 2002, pp. 119-124. ment, Seattle, WA, 1974. 49. Herms, B. F."Pedestrian Crosswalk Study: Accidents in Painted and 32. Petzold, R. G., and R. Nawrocki. "Urban Intersection Improve- Unpainted Crosswalks." Highway Research Record 406, Highway ments for Pedestrian Safety: Volume V." Evaluation of Alternatives Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, DC, to Full Signalization at Pedestrian Crossings, FHWA-RD-77-146, 1972, pp. 1-14. FHWA, Washington, DC, December 1977. 50. Zegeer, C. V., J. R. Stewart, and H. Huang. Safety Effects of Marked 33. Hendrickson, J. Half Signal Report. Seattle Engineering Depart- vs. Unmarked Crosswalks at Uncontrolled Locations: Executive Sum- ment, Seattle, WA, 1988. mary and Recommended Guidelines. FHWA-RD-01-075, FHWA, 34. Fairfax, B.W. Pedestrian Crossing Traffic Control Devices: An Assess- Washington, DC, March 2002. ment of Innovative Methods for Enhancing Pedestrian Safety at Cross- 51. Gibby, A. R., J. Stites, G. S. Thurgood, and T. C. Ferrara. Evaluation ings of Arterial Streets. Prepared for the City of Tucson Department of Marked and Unmarked Crosswalks at Intersections in California: of Transportation, Tucson, Arizona, December 14, 1999. Final Report. FHWA/CA/TO-94/1, California Department of 35. Voss, J. O., and L. Parks. Operational and Safety Issues of British Colum- Transportation, Sacramento, CA, June 1994. bia's Unique Pedestrian Signals. Vancouver, BC, Canada, July 17, 2001. 52. Jones, T. L., and P. Tomcheck."Pedestrian Accidents in Marked and 36. Van Winkle, J. W., and D.A. Neal. "Pedestrian-Actuated Crosswalk Unmarked Crosswalks: A Quantitative Study." ITE Journal, Sep- Flashers." Paper presented at the ITE 2000Annual Meeting, ITE, tember 2000. August 2000. 53. Knoblauch, R. L., and P. D. Raymond. The Effect of Crosswalk Mark- 37. Fisher, J. E. The Smart and Smarter Pedestrian Warning. City of ings on Vehicle Speeds in Maryland, Virginia, and Arizona. FHWA- Los Angeles Department of Transportation, Los Angeles, CA, no RD-00-101, FHWA, Washington, DC, August 2000. date. 54. Knoblauch, R. L., M. Nitzburg, and R. F. Seifert. Pedestrian Cross- 38. Huang, H. An Evaluation of Flashing Crosswalks in Gainesville and walk Case Studies: Sacramento, California; Richmond, Virginia; Buf- Lakeland. Highway Safety Research Center, University of North falo, New York; Stillwater, Minnesota. FHWA-RD-00-103, FHWA, Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, for Florida Department of Transporta- Washington, DC, August 2001. tion, November 2000. 55. Carlson, P. J., and S. M. Turner. Revising the Traffic Signal Warrants 39. Tobin, J. R. "Standards & Guidelines for Mid-Block Crossings: Las to Better Accommodate Pedestrians and Cyclists. FHWA/TX- Vegas Study." Paper presented at the ITE 1999 Annual Meeting, 01/2136-1, FHWA, Washington, DC, May 2001. Institute of Transportation Engineers, August 1999. 56. A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets. AASHTO, 40. An Evaluation of a Crosswalk Warning System Utilizing In-Pavement Washington, DC, 2001. Flashing Lights. Whitlock and Weinberger Transportation, Inc., 57. Draft Guidelines for Accessible Public Rights of Way. U.S. Access Santa Rosa, CA, April 1998. Available online at http://www. Board, June 17, 2002. Available online at http://www.access- w-trans.com/xwk-report.pdf, accessed March 28, 2003. board.gov/Rowdraft.htm, accessed September 2003. 41. Evans, D."The Light of Your Life: In-Pavement LEDs Stop Cars and 58. LaPlante, J. N., and T. P. Kaeser."The Continuing Evolution of Pedes- Save Lives." Traffic Technology International, 1999 Annual Review, trian Walking Speed Assumptions." ITE Journal, September 2004. Volume 5, No. 6, Surrey, United Kingdom, December 1999. 59. Transportation and Traffic Engineering Handbook, 2nd Edition. ITE, 42. Godfrey, D., and T. Mazzella. "Kirkland's Experience with In- Prentice-Hall International, Inc., 1982. Pavement Flashing Lights at Crosswalks."Presented at the ITE/IMSA 60. Guerrier, J. H., and S. C. Jolibois, Jr. "The Safety of Elderly Pedes- Annual Meeting, Lynnwood, WA, February 8, 1999. Available trians at Five Urban Intersections in Miami." Proceedings of the online at http://www.ci.kirkland.wa.us/depart/pw/transportation/ Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 42nd Annual Meeting, flscrswk.htm, accessed December 22, 2005. Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, Santa Monica, CA, 43. City of Fountain Valley Illuminated Crosswalks: An Evaluation Study 1998. and Policy Recommendations. Katz, Okitsu & Associates, Tustin, CA, 61. Milazzo, J. S., N. M. Rouphail, J. E. Hummer, and D. P. Allen."Qual- October 2000. Available online at http://www.katzokitsu.com/ ity of Service for Interrupted-Flow Pedestrian Facilities in Highway peds.htm, accessed May 27, 2002. Capacity Manual 2000." Transportation Research Record 1678, TRB, 44. Prevedouros, P. D. "Evaluation of In-Pavement Flashing Lights on Washington, DC, 1999, pp. 25-31. a Six-Lane Arterial Pedestrian Crossing." Paper presented at the ITE 62. Pline, J. L., ed. Traffic Control Devices Handbook. ITE Publication 2001 Annual Meeting, ITE, August 2001. IR-112, ITE, Washington, DC, 2001. 45. Huang, H., R. Hughes, C. Zegeer, and M. Nitzburg. "An Evaluation 63. Staplin, L., K. Lococo, S. Byington, and D. Harkey. Guidelines and of the LightGuardTM Pedestrian Crosswalk Warning System." High- Recommendations to Accommodate Older Drivers and Pedestrians. way Safety Research Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel FHWA-RD-01-051FHWA, McLean, VA, October 2001. Hill, NC, June 1999. 64. An Investigation of Pedestrian Movement Characteristics at Mid- 46. Van Houten, R., and L. Malenfant. "The Influence of Signs Block Signalized Crossings. Technical Report, Akelik & Associates Prompting Motorists to Yield before Marked Crosswalks on Pty. Ltd., Melbourne, Australia, December 2001. Motor Vehicle-Pedestrian Conflicts at Crosswalks with Flashing 65. Fambro, D. B., K. Fitzpatrick, and R. J. Koppa. NCHRP Report 400: Amber." Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 24, No. 3, 1992, pp. Determination of Stopping Sight Distances, TRB, Washington, DC, 217-225. 1997, 134 p.