National Academy of Sciences | 150 Year Anniversary

Questions? Call 800-624-6242

| Items in cart [0]

The National Academies Press

Rights & Permissions

topleft topright

NCHRP Report 525 Volume 12: Making Transportation Tunnels Safe and Secure (2007)
National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP)

Citation Manager

Transportation Research Board. "5.5 Conclusion." NCHRP Report 525 Volume 12: Making Transportation Tunnels Safe and Secure. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2007.

Please select a format:

BibTeX EndNote RefMan


Page
149
bottomleft bottomright
Page
149
Front Matter (R1-R15)
Chapter 1 - Introduction (1-1)
1.4 Assumptions (2-3)
2.1 Major Hazards and Threats (4-5)
2.2 Damage Potential (6-6)
2.3.1 Hazard Scenarios in Relation to Assets (7-10)
2.3.2 Threat Scenarios in Relation to Assets (11-14)
2.4 Conclusions (15-15)
3.2.1 Moscow Subway Suicide Bombing (16-17)
3.2.2 Jungangno (Chungang-Ro) Subway Station Arson Fire (18-20)
3.2.3 St. Gotthard Tunnel Fire (21-21)
3.2.4 Howard Street CSX Tunnel Fire (22-25)
3.2.5 Kitzsteinhorn Tunnel Cable Car Fire (26-27)
3.2.6 Mont Blanc Tunnel Fire (28-31)
3.2.7 Channel Tunnel Fire (32-33)
3.2.8 Subway Sarin Gas Attack (34-36)
3.2.9 Chicago Freight Tunnel Flood (37-38)
3.2.10 London Underground (the Tube) King's Cross Station Fire (39-41)
3.2.11 Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART) Transbay Tunnel Fire (42-43)
3.2.12 Port Authority Trans-Hudson (PATH) Evacuation under the World Trade Center (44-45)
3.4.2 Lessons Observed (46-49)
3.4.3 Role of MEC Systems in Case Study Incidents (50-50)
4.2 Types of Transportation Tunnels (51-51)
4.3.1 Immersed Tube Tunnels (52-54)
4.3.3 Bored or Mined Tunnels (55-58)
4.4.2 Modes of Tunnel Failure (59-64)
4.4.3 Effects of Other Extreme Events (65-67)
4.4.4 Critical Factors in Vulnerability Assessment of Transportation Tunnels (68-68)
4.4.5 Damage Potential Rating of Tunnels (69-69)
4.5.1 Key Safety Functions (70-71)
4.5.2 Categorization of Systems (72-78)
4.6 Chapter Summary (79-99)
5.2.2 System Hazard and Threat Directories (100-116)
5.3.2 Information Contained in Countermeasure Guides (117-120)
5.4 Countermeasure Descriptions (121-121)
5.4.1 Recommended Minimum Measures (122-131)
5.4.2 Recommended Measures for an Elevated Threat Level (132-135)
5.4.3 Recommended Permanent Enhancements (136-148)
5.5 Conclusion (149-151)
6.2.1 People (152-152)
6.2.3 Engineering and Technological Systems and Controls (153-153)
6.3 Security System Integration (154-155)
6.5 Conclusions (156-156)
7.2 Report Tables on a CD (157-158)
7.10 Owner Orientation Workshops (159-159)
7.14.1 Tunnel Structural Elements (160-160)
7.17 Interactive Electronic Version of this Report (161-161)
7.24 Structural Blast Damage Potential Analyses (162-162)
7.26 Issues Identified by Case Studies (163-163)
References Cited in the Report (164-165)
Additional Sources (166-166)
List of Abbreviations (167-168)
Abbreviations used without definitions in TRB publications (169-169)

Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 149
149 A. Original tunnel cross section. C. Tunnel plan view with floodgates. B. Tunnel elevation with floodgates. D. Tunnel cross section with floodgates. Figure 32. Floodgates · Contractor staging area outside of tunnel. · Contractor staging area is outside of tunnel. · Underwater construction expertise required. · Underwater construction expertise required. Countermeasure 50: Bollards or Fenders in the Water 5.5 Conclusion Bollards or fenders can be constructed on the water side of When using these guidelines, one must recognize that most a tunnel portal to create a stand-off distance and protect the mitigation countermeasures fall between two extremes. One portal from waterborne hazards and threats, such as off- extreme is to prevent all damage at enormous cost, and the other course ships or ships carrying explosives. See Figure 34. extreme is to spend nothing and risk enormous damage. Tun- Constructability issues include the following: nel owners, operators, and engineers must make balanced deci- sions in selecting countermeasures for their facilities, preferably · Environmental issues require permits and approval from to risk an acceptable level of damage at a reasonable cost. How- responsible agencies. ever, finding this balance becomes more complicated when con- · Coordination with water traffic authorities. sidering possible loss of human life, which is extremely difficult

OCR for page 150
150 Figure 33. Barrier walls. Figure 34. Bollards or fenders in the water.

OCR for page 151
151 if not impossible to assign a value to. Protection of human life subjective. They depend on a number of variables, including should always receive the highest priority. tunnel length, tunnel construction type, construction materi- While preparing budgets for tunnel-hardening counter- als, surrounding earth geology and groundwater conditions, measures, be careful to include the costs associated with labor, available clearances, and interruption of operations. To fur- material, equipment, protective services (i.e. flagging), outage ther explore the suitability of particular countermeasures to a costs of highways or rail lines, and interruption of traffic and specific facility, in-house or outside experts should be used to operations during construction. Although the relative effec- develop conceptual designs and cost estimates. Once these tiveness and order-of-magnitude cost ratings in the counter- designs and estimates meet approval, final construction doc- measure guides are based on many years of engineering uments--including design drawings, specifications, construc- expertise and past project experience, the rating systems are tion cost estimates, and schedules--should be developed.