Cover Image

Not for Sale



View/Hide Left Panel
Click for next page ( 93


The National Academies | 500 Fifth St. N.W. | Washington, D.C. 20001
Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
Terms of Use and Privacy Statement



Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 92
80 Bibliography 2000 Model Procurement Code for State and Local Governments. Amer- Federal Highway Administration. Life-Cycle Cost Analysis. Summary of ican Bar Association, Section of Contract Law and Section of State Proceedings: FHWA Life-Cycle Cost Symposium. Washington, DC, and Local Government Law, January 2000, pp. 2231. 1993. AASHTO. Guide Specifications for Highway Construction. 8th ed. Federal Highway Administration. Design-Build: FHWA's Role in the AASHTO, Washington, DC, 1998. Design-Build Program Under Special Experimental Projects No. 14, Allen, L.N., D.D. Gransberg, and K.R. Molenaar. Partnering Successful 1996. Design-Build Contracts in the Naval Facilities Engineering Command Feldman, S.W. Government Contract Awards--Negotiation and Sealed Southwest Division, The Military Engineer, SAME, Vol. 94 (616), 2002, Bidding. Clark Boardman Callaghan, Chicago, IL, 1994. pp. 4748. Florida Department of Transportation Executive Committee Agenda American Society of Civil Engineers. Report Card on America's Request. Design Build Procurement and Administration. State of Infrastructure. 2001. http://www.asce.org/reportcard/index.cfm, Florida: Procedure Number 625-020-010-a, Tallahassee, 1996. November 27, 2002. General Services Administration. Construction Excellence at GSA. Pre- Anderson, S.D. and J.S. Russell. NCHRP Report 451: Guidelines for War- sented by Robert Hixon, GSA Construction Excellence Workshop, ranty, Multi-Parameter, and Best Value Contracting, TRB, National Washington, DC, October 15, 2003. Research Council, Washington, DC, 2001, pp.176. Gransberg, D.D. The Cost of Inaction: Does Massachusetts Need Public Army Source Selection Guide. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Office of the Construction Reform? Pioneer Institute for Public Policy Research, Assistant Secretary of the Army,Acquisitions, Logistics and Technology. Center for Restructuring Government, White Paper No. 7, 1999, 2001. http://www.amc.army.mil/amc/rda/rda-ap/ssrc/fr_ssll.htm, Jan- Boston, MA. uary 15, 2003. Gransberg, D.D. and M.A. Ellicott. Best-Value Contracting: Breaking the Ashley, D., R. Bauman, J. Carroll, J. Diekmann, and F. Finlayson. Evalu- Low-Bid Paradigm. AACE Transactions, 1996. ating Viability of Privatized Transportation Projects. ASCE Journal of Gransberg, D.D., W.D. Dillon, H.L. Reynolds, and J. Boyd. Quantitative Infrastructure Systems, Vol. 4 (3), 1998, p.106. Analysis of Partnered Project Performance. ASCE Journal of Construc- Bordelon, J. Alternative Contracting Program: Preliminary Evalua- tion Engineering and Management, Vol. 125 (3), 1999, pp. 161166. tion. Florida Department of Transportation, Tallahassee, FL, 1998, Highways Agency. Capability Assessment Toolkit, London, England, pp. 23. 2003 (http://www.highways.gov.uk/roads/705.aspx). Dorsey, R. New Paradigms in Construction. Presented at Associated Konchar, M. and V. Sanvido. Comparison of U.S. Project Delivery Sys- General Contractors of America. Project Delivery Systems for Build- tems. ASCE Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, ing Construction Conference, Detroit, MI, October 2627, 1995. Vol. 124 (6), 1998, pp. 435-444. Ellicott, M.A. Best-Value Contracting. Proc. Area Engineer's Conference, MacCrimmon, K.R. Decisionmaking Among Multiple-Attribute Alter- TransAtlantic Division, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Winchester, natives: A Survey and Consolidated Approach. RAND Corporation, VA, 1994, p. 9. Santa Monica, CA, 1968. Ellis, R.D., Z.J. Herbsman, and A. Kumar. Evaluation of Florida Depart- Minchin, R.E. and G.R. Smith. Quality-Based Performance Rating of ment of Transportation Design/Build Program, Final Report. Uni- Contractors for Prequalification and Bidding Purposes. Presented at versity of Florida Engineering and Industrial Experiment Station, the 80th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Gainesville, 1991. Washington, DC, 2001. Federal Acquisition Regulation. Part 9--Contractor Qualifications. Missouri Highway and Transportation Department, Division of Mate- CCH Incorporated, Chicago, Illinois, 2004, pp. 169200. rials and Research, Final Report, Experimental Feature-Warranty, Federal Acquisition Regulation. Part 15--Contracting by Negotiation. Experimental Project No. MO91-03, Jefferson City, November 28, CCH Incorporated, Chicago, Illinois, 2004, pp. 293-341. 1994. Federal Highway Administration. FHWA Initiatives to Encourage Qual- Molenaar, K.R., A.D. Songer, and M. Barash. Public Sector DesignBuild ity Through Innovative Contracting Practices. Special Experimental Evolution and Performance. ASCE Journal of Engineering Manage- Projects No.14, 1998. ment, Vol. 9 (2), 1999, pp. 5462.

OCR for page 92
81 Naval Facilities Engineering Command, Southern Division. Instructions Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century. Pub. L. No. 105, as for Developing Request for Proposals for Source Selection Design/Build amended, Section 1307, 1998. Projects. Specification Instruction 00011, Report Code 076 (RAM/SHP), U.S. Air Force. IDIQ Family Housing DB Plus Services, Luke AFB Seed Pensacola, FL, 1996. Project. RFP F41622-01-R-0011 J, Brooks Air Force Base, San Antonio, Ontario Ministry of Transport. Consultant Performance and Selection TX, 2001. System. Report of the Ontario Ministry of Transportation, Toronto, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Design-build Instructions (DBI) for Mil- Canada, 2003. itary Construction. Engineer Regulation 1180-1-173, Washington, Ontario Ministry of Transport (2004). Registry, Appraisal and Qualifi- DC, 1994. cation System (RAQS), Report of the Ontario Ministry of Transporta- U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, New York District. Request for Proposals: tion, Toronto, Canada. Multi-Modal Transportation Terminal Development Design-Build Parvin, C. Design-build: Evaluation and Award. Roads and Bridges, Vol. Project, New York, NY, 2002. 38 (12), 2000, p. 12. U.S. Postal Service Handbook. Design and Construction Purchasing Riggs, J.L. and T.M. West. Engineering Economics, Third Edition, New Practices: U.S. Department of Justice Federal Bureau of Prisons, Pro- York: McGraw-Hill, Inc., 1996, pp. 781789. gram Statement: Design & Construction Procedures, February 15, Scott, S. and W.G. Geisen. Best-Value Contracting: Will Your Dance Bring 2000. the Best-Value? Presented at American Bar Association Forum on the Utah Technology Transfer Center. Best Practices Guide for Innovative Construction Industry, San Francisco, California, April 1819, 2002. Contracting Procedures. Logan, UT, 2001, p. 38. Smith, N.C. and C.D. Ryan. Design-Build Stipends and Payment for Work Product. Nossaman Guthner Knox Elliott LLP, 2004, Vacura, R.J. and M.J. Bante. Value Based Contracting--It's Not Just pp. 12. http://www.nossaman.com/information/articles/articles.asp Price Anymore: Effective Use of Past Performance--Not a New (accessed May 8, 2006). Challenge. Presented at American Bar Association Forum on the Stamper, G.G. Changes in the Law Applicable to the Use of Design-Build Construction Industry, Washington, DC, October 23, 2003. and Construction Management on Public Construction in Okla- Walls, J. and M.R. Smith. Life-Cycle Cost Analysis in Pavement Design-- homa. Design-Build and Construction Management Contracting, Interim Technical Bulletin. FHWA-SA-98-079, Federal Highway 2001 Construction Law Seminar Workbook, University of Oklahoma, Administration, 1998. Norman, Oklahoma, 2001, pp. 48. Washington State Department of Transportation. Design/Build Task Texas Turnpike Authority. Request for Proposals to Construct, Main- Force Report, Olympia, WA, 1997. tain, and Repair the SH 130 Turnpike Through an Exclusive Devel- Wright, J. Texas Department of Transportation Design/Build Contracting. opment Agreement, Texas Department of Transportation, Austin, Legal Brief, Texas Department of Transportation, Office of General TX, 2001. Counsel, Austin, TX, 1997.