Cover Image

Not for Sale



View/Hide Left Panel
Click for next page ( 95


The National Academies | 500 Fifth St. N.W. | Washington, D.C. 20001
Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
Terms of Use and Privacy Statement



Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 94
A-1 APPENDIX A Literature Review 2000 Model Procurement Code for State and Local Governments. Federal Highway Administration. Life-Cycle Cost Analysis. Summary of American Bar Association, Section of Contract Law and Section of Proceedings: FHWA Life-Cycle Cost Symposium. Washington, DC, State and Local Government Law, January 2000, pp. 22-31. 1993. Allen, L.N., D.D. Gransberg, and K.R. Molenaar. Partnering Successful Federal Highway Administration. Design-Build: FHWA's Role in the Design-Build Contracts in the Naval Facilities Engineering Com- Design-Build Program Under Special Experimental Projects No. mand Southwest Division, The Military Engineer, SAME, Vol. 94 14, 1996. (616), 2002, pp.4748. Feldman, S.W. Government Contract Awards--Negotiation and Sealed American Society of Civil Engineers. Report Card on America's Infra- Bidding. Clark Boardman Callaghan, Chicago, IL, 1994. structure. 2001. http://www.asce.org/reportcard/index.cfm, Novem- Florida Department of Transportation Executive Committee Agenda ber 27, 2002. Request. Design Build Procurement and Administration. State of Anderson, S.D. and J.S. Russell. NCHRP Report 451: Guidelines for War- Florida: Procedure Number 625-020-010-a, Tallahassee, 1996. ranty, Multi-Parameter, and Best Value Contracting, TRB, National General Services Administration. Construction Excellence at GSA. Pre- Research Council, Washington, DC, 2001, pp.176. sented by Robert Hixon, GSA Construction Excellence Workshop, Army Source Selection Guide. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Office of Washington, DC, October 15, 2003. the Assistant Secretary of the Army, Acquisitions, Logistics and Gransberg, D.D. The Cost of Inaction: Does Massachusetts Need Public Technology. 2001. http://www.amc.army.mil/amc/rda/rda-ap/ssrc/ Construction Reform? Pioneer Institute for Public Policy Research, fr_ssll.htm, January 15, 2003. Center for Restructuring Government, White Paper No. 7, 1999, Ashley, D., R. Bauman, J. Carroll, J. Diekmann, and F. Finlayson. Evalu- Boston, MA. ating Viability of Privatized Transportation Projects. ASCE Journal Gransberg, D.D. and M.A. Ellicott. Best-Value Contracting: Breaking the of Infrastructure Systems, Vol. 4 (3), 1998, p.106. Low-Bid Paradigm. AACE Transactions, 1996. Beard, J.L., M.C. Loulakis, and E.C. Wundram. Design-Build Planning Gransberg, D.D. and S.P. Senadheera. Design-Build Contract Award Through Development, McGraw-Hill, New York, New York, 2001, Methods for Transportation Projects. Journal of Transportation pp. 444-446. Engineering, 1999, pp. 565-567. Bordelon, J. Alternative Contracting Program: Preliminary Evalua- Gransberg, D.D., W.D. Dillon, H.L. Reynolds, and J. Boyd. Quantitative tion. Florida Department of Transportation, Tallahassee, FL, Analysis of Partnered Project Performance. ASCE Journal of Con- 1998, pp. 23. Dorsey, R. New Paradigms in Construction. Presented at Associated struction Engineering and Management, Vol. 125 (3), 1999, pp. General Contractors of America. Project Delivery Systems for Build- 161166. ing Construction Conference, Detroit, MI, October 2627, 1995. Herbsman, Z.J. A+B Bidding Method--Hidden Success Story for High- Ellicott, M.A. Best-Value Contracting. Proc. Area Engineer's Conference, way Construction. ASCE Journal of Construction Engineering and TransAtlantic Division, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Winchester, Management, Vol. 121 (3), 1995, pp. 430437. VA, 1994, p. 9. Herbsman, Z.J., W.T. Chen, and W.C. Epstein. Time Is Money: Innova- Ellis, R.D., Z.J. Herbsman, and A. Kumar. Evaluation of Florida Depart- tive Contracting Methods in Highway Construction. ASCE Journal ment of Transportation Design/Build Program, Final Report. Uni- of Construction Engineering and Management, Vol. 121 (3), 1995, pp versity of Florida Engineering and Industrial Experiment Station, 273281. Gainesville, 1991. Highways Agency. Capability Assessment Toolkit, London, England, Federal Acquisition Regulation. Part 9--Contractor Qualifications. 2003 (http://www.highways.gov.uk/roads/705.aspx). CCH Incorporated, Chicago, Illinois, 2004, pp. 169200. Konchar, M. and V. Sanvido. Comparison of U.S. Project Delivery Sys- Federal Acquisition Regulation. Part 15--Contracting by Negotiation. tems. ASCE Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, CCH Incorporated, Chicago, Illinois, 2004, pp. 293341. Vol. 124 (6), 1998, pp. 435444. Federal Highway Administration. FHWA Initiatives to Encourage Qual- MacCrimmon, K.R. Decisionmaking Among Multiple-Attribute Alter- ity Through Innovative Contracting Practices. Special Experimen- natives: A Survey and Consolidated Approach, RAND Corpora- tal Projects No.14, 1998. tion, Santa Monica, CA, 1968.

OCR for page 94
A-2 Minchin, E. and Smith, G. Contractor Performance Rating--Where Are Stamper, G.G. Changes in the Law Applicable to the Use of Design-Build We Now? Presented at the 78th Annual Meeting of the Transporta- and Construction Management on Public Construction in Okla- tion Research Board, Washington D.C, 1999. homa. Design-Build and Construction Management Contracting, Minchin, R. E. and G. R. Smith. Quality-Based Performance Rating of 2001 Construction Law Seminar Workbook, University of Okla- Contractors for Prequalification and Bidding Purposes. Presented at homa, Norman, Oklahoma, 2001, pp. 48. the 80th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Texas Turnpike Authority. Request for Proposals to Construct, Main- Washington, DC, 2001. tain, and Repair the SH 130 Turnpike Through an Exclusive Devel- Missouri Highway and Transportation Department, Division of Materials opment Agreement, Texas Department of Transportation, Austin, and Research, Final Report, Experimental Feature-Warranty, Experi- TX, 2001. mental Project No. MO91-03, Jefferson City, November 28, 1994. Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century. Pub. L. No. 105, as Molenaar, K.R., A.D. Songer, and M. Barash. Public Sector DesignBuild amended, Section 1307, 1998. Evolution and Performance, Journal of Engineering Management, U.S. Air Force. IDIQ Family Housing DB Plus Services, Luke AFB Seed ASCE 9(2), 1999, pp. 5462. Project. RFP F41622-01-R-0011 J, Brooks Air Force Base, San Antonio, Naval Facilities Engineering Command, Southern Division. Instruc- TX, 2001. tions for Developing Request for Proposals for Source Selection U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Design-build Instructions (DBI) for Mil- Design/Build Projects. Specification Instruction 00011, Report itary Construction. Engineer Regulation 1180-1-173, Washington, Code 076 (RAM/SHP), Pensacola, FL, 1996. DC, 1994. Ontario Ministry of Transport. Consultant Performance and Selection U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, New York District. Request for Proposals: System. Report of the Ontario Ministry of Transportation, Toronto, Multi-Modal Transportation Terminal Development Design-Build Canada, 2003. https://www.raqsa.mto.gov.on.ca/ Project, New York, NY, 2002. Ontario Ministry of Transport (2004). Registry, Appraisal and Qualifi- U.S. Postal Service Handbook. Design and Construction Purchasing cation System (RAQS), Report of the Ontario Ministry of Trans- Practices: U.S. Department of Justice Federal Bureau of Prisons, portation, Toronto, Canada. https://www.raqsa.mto.gov.on.ca/ Program Statement: Design & Construction Procedures, February Parvin, C. Design-build: Evaluation and Award. Roads and Bridges, Vol. 15, 2000. 38 (12), 2000, p. 12. Utah Technology Transfer Center. Best Practices Guide for Innovative Riggs, J.L. and T.M. West. Engineering Economics, Third Edition, New Contracting Procedures. Logan, UT, 2001, p. 38. York: McGraw-Hill, Inc., 1996, pp. 781789. Vacura, R.J. and M.J. Bante. Value Based Contracting--It's Not Just Price Runde, D.F. and Y. Sunayama. Innovative Contractor Selections Meth- Anymore: Effective Use of Past Performance--Not a New Challenge. ods: Alternatives to the Traditional Low-Bid in Massachusetts Pub- Presented at American Bar Association Forum on the Construction lic Construction. Policy Analysis Report, John F. Kennedy School of Industry, Washington, DC, October 23, 2003. Government, Harvard University, Boston, MA, 1999, pp. 4648. Walls, J. and M.R. Smith. Life-Cycle Cost Analysis in Pavement Design-- Scott, S. and W.G. Geisen. Best-Value Contracting: Will Your Dance Bring Interim Technical Bulletin. FHWA-SA-98-079, Federal Highway the Best-Value? Presented at American Bar Association Forum on the Administration, 1998. Construction Industry, San Francisco, California, April 1819, 2002. Washington State Department of Transportation. Design/Build Task Smith, N.C. and C.D. Ryan. Design-Build Stipends and Payment for Force Report, Olympia, WA, 1997. Work Product. Nossaman Guthner Knox Elliott LLP, 2004, pp. 12. Wright, J. Texas Department of Transportation Design/Build Contract- http://www.nossaman.com/information/articles/articles.asp (ac- ing. Legal Brief, Texas Department of Transportation, Office of Gen- cessed May 8, 2006). eral Counsel, Austin, TX, 1997.