Best-Value Procurement Methods for Highway Construction Projects (2006)

Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

A-1 2000 Model Procurement Code for State and Local Governments. American Bar Association, Section of Contract Law and Section of State and Local Government Law, January 2000, pp. 22-31. Allen, L.N., D.D. Gransberg, and K.R. Molenaar. Partnering Successful Design-Build Contracts in the Naval Facilities Engineering Com- mand Southwest Division, The Military Engineer, SAME, Vol. 94 (616), 2002, pp.47–48. American Society of Civil Engineers. Report Card on America’s Infra- structure. 2001. http://www.asce.org/reportcard/index.cfm, Novem- ber 27, 2002. Anderson, S.D. and J.S. Russell. NCHRP Report 451: Guidelines for War- ranty, Multi-Parameter, and Best Value Contracting, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, DC, 2001, pp.1–76. Army Source Selection Guide. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Office of the Assistant Secretary of the Army, Acquisitions, Logistics and Technology. 2001. http://www.amc.army.mil/amc/rda/rda-ap/ssrc/ fr_ssll.htm, January 15, 2003. Ashley, D., R. Bauman, J. Carroll, J. Diekmann, and F. Finlayson. Evalu- ating Viability of Privatized Transportation Projects. ASCE Journal of Infrastructure Systems, Vol. 4 (3), 1998, p.106. Beard, J.L., M.C. Loulakis, and E.C. Wundram. Design-Build Planning Through Development, McGraw-Hill, New York, New York, 2001, pp. 444-446. Bordelon, J. Alternative Contracting Program: Preliminary Evalua- tion. Florida Department of Transportation, Tallahassee, FL, 1998, pp. 2–3. Dorsey, R. New Paradigms in Construction. Presented at Associated General Contractors of America. Project Delivery Systems for Build- ing Construction Conference, Detroit, MI, October 26–27, 1995. Ellicott, M.A. Best-Value Contracting. Proc. Area Engineer’s Conference, TransAtlantic Division, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Winchester, VA, 1994, p. 9. Ellis, R.D., Z.J. Herbsman, and A. Kumar. Evaluation of Florida Depart- ment of Transportation Design/Build Program, Final Report. Uni- versity of Florida Engineering and Industrial Experiment Station, Gainesville, 1991. Federal Acquisition Regulation. Part 9—Contractor Qualifications. CCH Incorporated, Chicago, Illinois, 2004, pp. 169–200. Federal Acquisition Regulation. Part 15—Contracting by Negotiation. CCH Incorporated, Chicago, Illinois, 2004, pp. 293–341. Federal Highway Administration. FHWA Initiatives to Encourage Qual- ity Through Innovative Contracting Practices. Special Experimen- tal Projects No.14, 1998. Federal Highway Administration. Life-Cycle Cost Analysis. Summary of Proceedings: FHWA Life-Cycle Cost Symposium. Washington, DC, 1993. Federal Highway Administration. Design-Build: FHWA’s Role in the Design-Build Program Under Special Experimental Projects No. 14, 1996. Feldman, S.W. Government Contract Awards—Negotiation and Sealed Bidding. Clark Boardman Callaghan, Chicago, IL, 1994. Florida Department of Transportation Executive Committee Agenda Request. Design Build Procurement and Administration. State of Florida: Procedure Number 625-020-010-a, Tallahassee, 1996. General Services Administration. Construction Excellence at GSA. Pre- sented by Robert Hixon, GSA Construction Excellence Workshop, Washington, DC, October 15, 2003. Gransberg, D.D. The Cost of Inaction: Does Massachusetts Need Public Construction Reform? Pioneer Institute for Public Policy Research, Center for Restructuring Government, White Paper No. 7, 1999, Boston, MA. Gransberg, D.D. and M.A. Ellicott. Best-Value Contracting: Breaking the Low-Bid Paradigm. AACE Transactions, 1996. Gransberg, D.D. and S.P. Senadheera. Design-Build Contract Award Methods for Transportation Projects. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 1999, pp. 565-567. Gransberg, D.D., W.D. Dillon, H.L. Reynolds, and J. Boyd. Quantitative Analysis of Partnered Project Performance. ASCE Journal of Con- struction Engineering and Management, Vol. 125 (3), 1999, pp. 161–166. Herbsman, Z.J. A+B Bidding Method—Hidden Success Story for High- way Construction. ASCE Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, Vol. 121 (3), 1995, pp. 430–437. Herbsman, Z.J., W.T. Chen, and W.C. Epstein. Time Is Money: Innova- tive Contracting Methods in Highway Construction. ASCE Journal of Construction Engineering and Management,Vol. 121 (3), 1995, pp 273–281. Highways Agency. Capability Assessment Toolkit, London, England, 2003 (http://www.highways.gov.uk/roads/705.aspx). Konchar, M. and V. Sanvido. Comparison of U.S. Project Delivery Sys- tems. ASCE Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, Vol. 124 (6), 1998, pp. 435–444. MacCrimmon, K.R. Decisionmaking Among Multiple-Attribute Alter- natives: A Survey and Consolidated Approach, RAND Corpora- tion, Santa Monica, CA, 1968. A P P E N D I X A Literature Review

Minchin, E. and Smith, G. Contractor Performance Rating—Where Are We Now? Presented at the 78th Annual Meeting of the Transporta- tion Research Board, Washington D.C, 1999. Minchin, R. E. and G. R. Smith. Quality-Based Performance Rating of Contractors for Prequalification and Bidding Purposes. Presented at the 80th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 2001. Missouri Highway and Transportation Department, Division of Materials and Research, Final Report, Experimental Feature-Warranty, Experi- mental Project No. MO91-03, Jefferson City, November 28, 1994. Molenaar, K.R., A.D. Songer, and M. Barash. Public Sector Design–Build Evolution and Performance, Journal of Engineering Management, ASCE 9(2), 1999, pp. 54–62. Naval Facilities Engineering Command, Southern Division. Instruc- tions for Developing Request for Proposals for Source Selection Design/Build Projects. Specification Instruction 00011, Report Code 076 (RAM/SHP), Pensacola, FL, 1996. Ontario Ministry of Transport. Consultant Performance and Selection System. Report of the Ontario Ministry of Transportation, Toronto, Canada, 2003. https://www.raqsa.mto.gov.on.ca/ Ontario Ministry of Transport (2004). Registry, Appraisal and Qualifi- cation System (RAQS), Report of the Ontario Ministry of Trans- portation, Toronto, Canada. https://www.raqsa.mto.gov.on.ca/ Parvin, C. Design-build: Evaluation and Award. Roads and Bridges, Vol. 38 (12), 2000, p. 12. Riggs, J.L. and T.M. West. Engineering Economics, Third Edition, New York: McGraw-Hill, Inc., 1996, pp. 781–789. Runde, D.F. and Y. Sunayama. Innovative Contractor Selections Meth- ods: Alternatives to the Traditional Low-Bid in Massachusetts Pub- lic Construction. Policy Analysis Report, John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, Boston, MA, 1999, pp. 46–48. Scott, S. and W.G. Geisen. Best-Value Contracting: Will Your Dance Bring the Best-Value? Presented at American Bar Association Forum on the Construction Industry, San Francisco, California, April 18–19, 2002. Smith, N.C. and C.D. Ryan. Design-Build Stipends and Payment for Work Product. Nossaman Guthner Knox Elliott LLP, 2004, pp. 1–2. http://www.nossaman.com/information/articles/articles.asp (ac- cessed May 8, 2006). Stamper, G.G. Changes in the Law Applicable to the Use of Design-Build and Construction Management on Public Construction in Okla- homa. Design-Build and Construction Management Contracting, 2001 Construction Law Seminar Workbook, University of Okla- homa, Norman, Oklahoma, 2001, pp. 4–8. Texas Turnpike Authority. Request for Proposals to Construct, Main- tain, and Repair the SH 130 Turnpike Through an Exclusive Devel- opment Agreement, Texas Department of Transportation, Austin, TX, 2001. Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century. Pub. L. No. 105, as amended, Section 1307, 1998. U.S. Air Force. IDIQ Family Housing DB Plus Services, Luke AFB Seed Project. RFP F41622-01-R-0011 J, Brooks Air Force Base, San Antonio, TX, 2001. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Design-build Instructions (DBI) for Mil- itary Construction. Engineer Regulation 1180-1-173, Washington, DC, 1994. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, New York District. Request for Proposals: Multi-Modal Transportation Terminal Development Design-Build Project, New York, NY, 2002. U.S. Postal Service Handbook. Design and Construction Purchasing Practices: U.S. Department of Justice Federal Bureau of Prisons, Program Statement: Design & Construction Procedures, February 15, 2000. Utah Technology Transfer Center. Best Practices Guide for Innovative Contracting Procedures. Logan, UT, 2001, p. 3–8. Vacura, R.J. and M.J. Bante. Value Based Contracting—It’s Not Just Price Anymore: Effective Use of Past Performance—Not a New Challenge. Presented at American Bar Association Forum on the Construction Industry, Washington, DC, October 2–3, 2003. Walls, J. and M.R. Smith. Life-Cycle Cost Analysis in Pavement Design— Interim Technical Bulletin. FHWA-SA-98-079, Federal Highway Administration, 1998. Washington State Department of Transportation. Design/Build Task Force Report, Olympia, WA, 1997. Wright, J. Texas Department of Transportation Design/Build Contract- ing. Legal Brief, Texas Department of Transportation, Office of Gen- eral Counsel, Austin, TX, 1997. A-2