National Academy of Sciences | 150 Year Anniversary

Questions? Call 800-624-6242

| Items in cart [0]

The National Academies Press

Rights & Permissions

topleft topright

NCHRP Synthesis 361: Visualization for Project Development (2006)
National Cooperative Highway Research Program Synthesis Program (NCHRPSYN)

Citation Manager

Hixson, Charles L, Transportation Research Board. "Case Study 1: Utah Department of Transportation." NCHRP Synthesis 361: Visualization for Project Development. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2006.

Please select a format:

BibTeX EndNote RefMan


Page
16
bottomleft bottomright
Page
16
Front Matter (R1-R9)
Summary (1-2)
Scope of Work (3-3)
Organization of Synthesis (4-4)
History of Visualization Within Transportation Design Community (5-6)
Why the Need for Visualization? (7-7)
Uses of Visualization Within Transportation Design Community (8-8)
Visualization Tools (9-15)
Case Study 1: Utah Department of Transportation (16-16)
Case Study 2: California Department of Transportation (17-19)
Case Study 3: Minnesota Department of Transportation (20-23)
Case Study 4: New York State Department of Transportation (24-24)
Case Study 5: Federal Highway Administration (25-26)
Case Study 6: Florida Department of Transportation (27-27)
Case Study 7: Visualization for Machine Control (28-30)
Understanding Visualization Technology (31-31)
Training (32-32)
Standardization (33-33)
Awareness of and Access to Informational Resources (34-34)
What Has Been Learned Since 1996 (35-35)
Findings in Common with NCHRP Synthesis 229 (36-36)
Additional Findings (37-37)
Concluding Remarks (38-38)
References (39-39)
Bibliography (40-40)
Glossary (41-43)
Appendix A - Working Research Agenda of the TRB Task Force on Visualization in Transportation (ABJ95T) (44-49)
Appendix B - Utah Department of Transportation Request for Qualifications (50-61)
Appendix C - New York State Department of Transportation Visualization Project Workflow Fact Sheet (62-66)
Appendix D - New York State Department of Transportation - Visualization Request Form (67-68)
Appendix E - New York State Department of Transportation - Visualization Assessment Form (69-70)
Appendix F - Utah Department of Transportation - Virgin River Arch Bridge Case Study (71-73)
Appendix G - Report Questionnaire (74-82)
Abbreviations used without definitions in TRB publications (83-83)

Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 16
16 CHAPTER THREE CASE STUDIES This chapter details case studies from several transportation Implementation Plan and governmental agencies, consultants, manufacturers, and other agencies. These case studies focus on why visualiza- Research and Development tion has been used, how it has been applied, and what the lessons learned from its use are. The UDOT visual team, recognizing the value of visualiza- tion technologies, has for the past 10 years researched and implemented its use within design projects (see Figure 21). A requirement for all research is the compatibility of visual CASE STUDY 1: UTAH DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION tools with UDOT's primary CADD application, Micro- Station. Currently, there are no formal research and develop- Contact: ment directives at UDOT for visualization. To facilitate the Engineering Technology Support Manager for IT research and development effort, the group's engineering Utah Department of Transportation technology support manager for IT participates on the TRB 4501 So. 2700 West Task Force on Visualization in Transportation (ABJ95T) (9). Salt Lake City, UT 84119-0100 This task force has helped to formulate alternatives and keep the group current on visualization technologies. The support manager also relies on hardware and software vendors to Organization keep informed on current and future technologies. UDOT also relies on consultants for visualization support services. The use of visualization technologies is overseen by a group To organize a pool of qualified consultants, UDOT submit- of engineering technology support (ETS) personnel, includ- ted a request for qualifications, "Standard Requests for ing four individuals who have visualization experience. The Qualifications--Visualization Pool" (see Appendix B). This visual team is actually part of the overall information tech- request for qualifications was authored by the support man- nology (IT)/CADD group (which has nine people) for ager and others to properly assess the capabilities and quali- UDOT. Although the ETS personnel do not yet have a for- fications of consultants. The ultimate direction of which mal business plan, guidelines, or job titles for visualization, visual technologies to use is determined by the UDOT ETS the group is actively completing a variety of visualization group and the project manager. The group regularly creates projects and conducting research and development on the visuals in the following formats: 2-D and 3-D renderings, technology. photo-simulation, and animation. The past 2 years have seen the UDOT ETS group begin to Why the Need for Visualization at UDOT? use virtual reality-based, real-time simulation technologies for its projects. The group would like to see visual tools used more The ETS group is highly motivated to use visual technolo- during the design process, specifically using 3-D CADD. The gies and is driven by a combination of in-house directives group observes that most visuals are created after important and requests from UDOT's project managers. The primary design decisions are made. For example, visuals are requested purpose of generating visuals has been for public involve- for a public presentation of previously designed projects. ment projects where there are controversial issues and where Although visuals are effective in helping to educate the pub- decisions with significant ramifications need to be made. lic, they are an added expense to a project. If 3-D CADD were Unless the visualization project is completed as an in-house implemented, visuals would be part of the process from the research project, the need for visuals is directly linked to the beginning and would be easier and less costly to produce. project manager. The group has been recognized throughout UDOT for generating visuals. Project managers regularly There is no ongoing base visualization budget at UDOT. A consult with the group on whether or not visuals should be project level budget is created, and specific visualization hard- used on their projects. However, there is no formal procedure ware and software needs are expensed as part of the project. in place for a project manager to use when determining if This process is relatively new at UDOT. No longer are there visuals are needed for their projects. separate budgets for planning, design, construction, and so