Click for next page ( 11


The National Academies | 500 Fifth St. N.W. | Washington, D.C. 20001
Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
Terms of Use and Privacy Statement



Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 10
10 Laboratory Testing the NCHRP Projects 9-25 and 9-31 mixtures, the concept of resistivity was developed and appeared to relate very As part of NCHRP Projects 9-25 and 9-31, a wide range of well to the results of the RSCH test. To further verify laboratory tests was performed on a variety of HMA. The lab- these results, field data from three sources was compiled oratory tests were designed to provide information concern- and analyzed: ing the rut resistance, fatigue resistance, permeability, and resistance to age hardening of the mixtures studied. The most 1. The MnRoad test track, as discussed in numerous important of the procedures performed as part of this reports by the Minnesota DOT and the University of research included the following tests: Minnesota (5); 2. The NCAT test track, as documented by Brown et al. (6); RSCH testing using the Superpave shear tester, at 58C and and 64C (AASHTO T320-03); 3. The WesTrack project, as documented in FHWA's Perfor- Uniaxial fatigue testing at 10 Hz and 4C and 20C, which mance of Coarse-Graded Mixes at WesTrack--Premature includes an initial measurement of the complex modulus Rutting (2). |E*| (16); and Mixture permeability, using the Florida permeability test The approach in analyzing the uniaxial fatigue results (Florida Test Method FM 5-565). involved a further development and simplification of con- tinuum damage theory. Because of the variability in fatigue The mixtures tested were made using eight different aggre- data, the relatively small amount of testing performed as gates and gradations: part of NCHRP Projects 9-25 and 9-31 and because of the novelty of the approach, further verification of the results A 9.5-mm limestone from Virginia, coarse and fine was desired. This verification was performed by applying gradations; the same analytical approach to fatigue data gathered dur- A 19-mm gravel from Pennsylvania, coarse and dense ing the Strategic Highway Research Program (SHRP), gradations; as summarized in SHRP Report SHRP-A-404: Fatigue A 19-mm limestone from Kentucky, coarse and dense Response of Asphalt-Aggregate Mixes (15). Although these gradations; and data were gathered using flexural fatigue tests, continuum A 12.5-mm granite from California, dense and fine damage theory predicts that the damage in the extreme gradations. fiber at the test conclusion for this procedure should be constant and can thus be related to the results of uniaxial All of these mixtures were combined with a performance tests. grade (PG) 64-22 binder. Some were also combined with a The permeability tests performed during this research were PG 58-28 binder and/or an air blown PG 76-16 binder. In very limited. This occurred for two reasons--(1) the air void most cases, the design gyration level was 100, but for some content of the mixtures was relatively low, resulting in low mixtures, Ndesign was 75. All of the California granite mixtures permeability values and (2) permeability tests performed in were designed using 125 gyrations. Early in the project, an the laboratory will usually show lower values than those attempt was made to design and evaluate some mixtures at determined from field cores. Therefore, most of the speci- 50 gyrations, but these were typically very weak and difficult mens tested during NCHRP Projects 9-25 and 9-31 showed to test; further testing of these mixtures was therefore aban- very low or zero permeability. To better understand the rela- doned. All mixtures were made using three binder contents: tionship between mixture composition and permeability, the optimum binder content, optimum -1%, and optimum data from the Florida permeability study was included in this +1% (by total mix weight). The materials used represented a analysis (3). range of aggregate types, gradations, binder grades, and mix- Because understanding the extent and scope of the data ture compositions. used in developing the performance models developed dur- ing this research is essential to interpreting the findings pre- sented in this chapter, the external data sets summarized Analysis of Other Data Sets above are discussed in more detail in the sections below. As discussed later in this short report, some of the find- This unfortunately increases the length and complexity of ings made during the research appeared very promising, this report, but makes clear the fact that the findings are but somewhat controversial. Therefore, in several cases ver- based on a much more robust set of data than that which ification of the findings was attempted using data sets from was collected during testing performed under NCHRP Proj- other research projects. In evaluating the rut resistance of ects 9-25 and 9-31.