Click for next page ( 34

The National Academies | 500 Fifth St. N.W. | Washington, D.C. 20001
Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
Terms of Use and Privacy Statement

Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 33
33 REFERENCES 1. Yuratovac, D.G., "Bus Route-Level Demand Modeling," 13. Fearnley, N. and J.-T. Bekken, "Short- and Long-Run Transportation Research Record 862, Transportation Demand Effects in Transport: A Literature Survey," TOI Research Board, National Research Council, Washing- Report 802/2005, Institute of Transport Economics, ton, D.C., 1982, pp. 1622. Oslo, Norway, 2005, 12 pp. 2. Ulberg, C., "Short-Term Ridership Projection Model," 14. Eash, R., K. Dallmeyer, and R. Cook, "Ridership Fore- Transportation Research Record 854, Transportation casting for Chicago Transit Authority's West Corridor Research Board, National Research Council, Washing- Project," Transportation Research Record 1402, Trans- ton, D.C., 1982, pp. 1216. portation Research Board, National Research Council, 3. Levinson, H.S. and O. Brown-West, "Estimating Bus Washington, D.C., 1993, pp. 4042. Ridership," Transportation Research Record 994, 15. Rice, W.E., "A Model of Selected Ridership Forecasting Transportation Research Board, National Research Techniques with a Limited Database--A Case Study of Council, Washington, D.C., 1984, pp. 812. the Central Coast Diegan," C. Borrego and L. Sucharov 4. Horowitz, A.J., Transit Ridership Forecasting Model: Eds., Proceedings from the Fourth International Confer- Reference Manual, Urban Mass Transportation Adminis- ence on Urban Transport and Environment for the 21st tration, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, Century, WIT Press, Southampton, United Kingdom, D.C., 1985. 1998, pp. 312. 5. Levinson, H.S., "Forecasting Future Transit Route Rid- 16. Saur, G.J., R. Lee, and C. Gray, "New Method for Tran- ership," Transportation Research Record 1036, Trans- sit Ridership Forecasting," Presented at the 2004 Annual portation Research Board, National Research Council, Meeting of the Institute of Transportation Engineers, Washington, D.C., 1985, pp. 1928. Lake Buena Vista, Fla., Aug. 2004, 14 pp. 6. Menhard, H.R. and G.F. Ruprecht, "Review of Route- 17. Stopher, P.S., "Development of a Route-Level Patron- Level Ridership Prediction Techniques," Transporta- age Forecasting Method," Transportation, Vol. 19, No. tion Research Record 936, Transportation Research 3, 1992, pp. 201220. Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 18. Peng, Z.-R., et al., "A Simultaneous Route-Level Tran- 1983, pp. 2224. sit Patronage Model: Demand, Supply, and Inter-Route 7. Mayworm, P.D., A.M. Lago, and J.M. McEnroe, Relationship," Transportation, Vol. 24, No. 2, May Patronage Impacts of Changes in Transit Fares and Ser- 1997, pp. 159181. vices, Urban Mass Transportation Agency, Washington, 19. Hartgen, D.T. and M.W. Horner, "A Route-Level Transit D.C., 1980, 246 pp. Ridership Forecasting Model for Lane Transit District, 8. Pratt, R.H., N.J. Pederson, and J.J. Mather, Traveler Eugene, Oregon," Transportation Publication Number Response to Transportation System Changes: A Hand- book for Transportation Planners, Federal Highway 170, University of North Carolina Charlotte Center for Administration, Washington, D.C., 1977, 283 pp. Interdisciplinary Transportation Studies, Charlotte, 1997. 9. Pratt, R.H. and J.N. Coople, Traveler Response to 20. Boyle, D. and K. Luhrsen, "Ridership Estimation Model Transportation System Changes, 2nd ed., Federal High- for MTDB," Prepared for MTDB by Transportation way Administration, Washington, D.C., 1981, 408 pp. Management & Design, San Diego, Calif., 1998. 10. Pratt, R.H., Research Results Digest 61: Traveler 21. TranSystems Corporation, et al., "NY5 Bus Rapid Tran- Response to Transportation System Changes: An sit Conceptual Design Study Deliverable G--Technical Interim Introduction to the Handbook, Transportation Memorandum: Ridership Forecasting," Prepared for the Research Board, National Research Council, Washing- Capital District Transportation Commission and the ton, D.C., Sep. 2003, 23 pp. Capital District Transportation Authority, Albany, N.Y., 11. Evans, J.E., IV, "Transit Scheduling and Frequency," In Dec. 2004. TCRP Report 95: Traveler Response to Transportation 22. "RTAP Planning Process," In Regional Transit Action System Changes, Transportation Research Board, National Plan, Georgia Regional Transportation Authority, Research Council, Washington, D.C., [Online]. Available: Atlanta, June 30, 2003. 23. "Phoenix Model Development Project, Sketch Plan- [accessed May 2004]. ning Analysis Report (Task 2)," Prepared for the Mari- 12. Pratt, R.H. and J.E. Evans, IV, "Bus Routing and Cover- copa Association of Governments by Parsons, Brinck- age," In Traveler Response to Transportation System erhoff, Quade, and Douglas, Inc., Tempe, Ariz., Nov. Changes, Transportation Research Board, National 1999. Research Council, Washington, D.C. [Online]. Available: 24. Yu, K., DFWRTM Application Users Guide, Version 2.2.6, North Central Texas Council of Governments, [accessed Aug. 2004]. Dallas, Feb. 2006.

OCR for page 33
34 25. Bernardin, Lochmueller & Associates, Inc., Knoxville tion Research Record 1799, Transportation Research Regional TransCAD Travel Demand Model Develop- Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., ment: Model Development and Validation Report, Pre- 2002, pp. 4249. pared for the Knoxville Regional Transportation Planning 29. Lane, C., M. DiCarlantonio, and L. Usvyat, "Sketch Organization, Knoxville, Tenn., Mar. 2004. Models to Forecast Commuter and Light Rail Ridership: 26. T-BEST (Transit Boardings Estimation and Simulation Update to TCRP Report 16," Presented at the 85th Tool), Florida Department of Transportation, Tallahas- Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, see [Online]. Available: [accessed Feb. Washington, D.C., Jan. 2226, 2006. 15, 2006]. 30. Parsons, Brinckerhoff, Quade & Douglas, Inc., et al., 27. Chu, X., et al., "A Framework of Modeling and Fore- "Commuter and Light Rail Transit Corridors: The Land casting Stop-Level Transit Patronage," Presented at the Use Connection," TCRP Report 16: Transit and Urban 52nd Annual North American Meeting of the Regional Form, Vol. I, Part II, Transportation Research Board, Science Association International, Las Vegas, Nev., National Research Council, Washington, D.C., Mar. 1996. Nov. 1012, 2005. 31. Marshall, N. and B. Grady, "Sketch Transit Modeling 28. Pendyala, R.M., I. Ubaka, and N. Sivaneswaran, "Geo- Based on 2000 Census Data," Presented at the 85th graphic Information System-Based Regional Transit Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Feasibility Analysis and Simulation Tool, Transporta- Washington, D.C., Jan. 2226, 2006.