Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.
44 A P P E N D I X National and State-by-State Funding Comparisons This appendix displays two types of time-series comparisons: ⢠Transit funding from state and federal sources over time ⢠Transit and highway funding from federal sources over time The appendix first displays these comparisons at the national level. It then displays comparisons of relative funding growth rates on a state-by-state basis. Funding Trends at the National Level This section focuses on funding trends at the national level, first showing the transit funding amounts from state and fed- eral sources over time. It then turns attention to federal fund- ing only, comparing trends in federal highway and transit funding over time. To compare transit funding amounts coming from state and federal sources, two figures have been developed: Fig- ure A1 shows capital expenditures from each source, and Figure A2 shows operating expenditures from each source. In creating these figures, the state funding category was defined to include âcapital assistance,ââoperating assistance,â and âcapital or operating assistanceâ data from the Survey of State Funding for Public Transportation. For the purposes of comparison, the âcapital or operating assistanceâ num- ber was divided in half and added to the âcapital assistanceâ and âoperating assistanceâ numbers, respectively. State funding data were unavailable for 1997, 2001 and 2002, and were therefore omitted. Federal funding data were obtained from FTA. The figures show two trends. First, state capital funding has not kept up with federal capital funding, as the gap between them has grown dramatically in the last 12 years. Second, at the same time, funding for transit operating assistance pro- vided from state sources has increased as federal operating assistance has dropped in recent years. Figure A3 was created to compare funding from federal sources only, showing federal spending on transit and high- way expenditures from 1992 to 2004. Data for this figure were obtained from FHWAâs Highway Statistics and FTA. In pure dollar terms, FHWA spending has seen a greater increase during this time, going from $17.7 billion to $22.1 billion, a $4.4 billion increase, while FTA spending increased from $3.5 billion to $6.2 billion, a $2.7 billion increase. In comparing highway and transit funding amounts over time, growth rates might also be of interest, in addition to overall amounts of funding. To compare trends in fund- ing growth rates, Figure A4 was created, displaying the com- pound annual growth rate (CAGR) for federal highway and transit funding amounts. The sources for these data were FTA and FHWAâs Highway Statistics. To add an additional dimen- sion for comparison, the figure also displays national growth rates for vehicle miles traveled (VMT) and transit ridership over the same time period. Data for these comparisons were taken from the Bureau of Transportation Statisticsâ National Transportation Statistics and from APTA, respectively. The fig- ure shows that while national VMT and transit ridership have grown at relatively similar rates, FTA spending has grown at a higher rate than FHWA spending. Funding Growth Trends by State This section of the appendix shows two comparisons for each state and the District of Columbia: the growth rates of transit and highway funding from federal sources only, and the growth rates of transit funding only from state and fed- eral sources. Figures showing the comparisons are grouped by state and ordered alphabetically. Funding amounts from state sources were obtained from the Survey of State Fund- ing for Public Transportation; funding amounts from federal sourcesâin particular, FHWA and FTA obligationsâwere obtained from FHWAâs Highway Statistics and FTA. In cases
45 $0 $1 $2 $3 $4 $5 $6 $7 $8 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 sr all o D 2991 ni s n oilli M State Funding Federal Funding $0 $1 $2 $3 $4 $5 $6 $7 $8 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 srallo D 2991 ni s noilli M State Funding Federal Funding $0 $5 $10 $15 $20 $25 $30 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 sr all oD 2991 ni s n oilliB FHWA Obligations FTA Obligations Figure A1. Capital funding for transit from state and federal sources (1992â2004). Figure A2. Operating funding for transit from state and federal sources (1992â2004). Figure A3. Highway and transit funding from federal sources (1992â2004).
46 where amounts were missing for particular years, data points for those corresponding years were omitted from the graphs. Sometimes state data were insufficient overall to create a graph, in which case that particular comparison was omit- ted altogether. The figures in this section use CAGR to show trends in transit and highway funding. CAGR is typically used to measure the growth rate of an investment, but it is also useful here because it shows steady growth over time. It describes the rate at which something would have grown over a certain period of time if the growth rate had been steady during that time. For example, if the growth rate in transit funding for a state between 1995 and 1996 was 20%, and the growth rate between 1996 and 1997 was 50%, the CAGR between 1995 and 1997 would be 34%. Had growth been steady between 1995 and 1997, funding would have grown at a rate of 34% annually. In the context of many years of growth, CAGR can smooth out growth rates in a way that clarifies overall trends. In the case of this particular set of funding data, it makes trends much more visible. Regular growth rates in transit funding tend to vary wildly from year to year and thus do not provide a good sense of the general trend, but CAGR smoothes out those variations and provides a better sense of the overall direction of funding trends. 0% 1% 2% 3% 4% 5% 6% 7% 8% VMT FHWA Spending Ridership FTA Spending Figure A4. Compound annual growth rates for high- way and transit indicators (1992â2003). Federal Transit and Highway Funding -15% -10% -5% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 2991 3991 4991 5991 6991 7991 8991 9991 0002 1002 2002 3002 4002 FTA CAGR FHWA CAGR Alabama: Comparison of Compound Annual Growth Rates
47 Alaska: Comparison of Compound Annual Growth Rates Federal Transit and Highway Funding -50% 0% 50% 100% 150% 200% 250% 300% 2991 3991 4991 5991 6991 7991 8991 9991 0002 1002 2002 3002 4002 FTA CAGR FHWA CAGR
48 Federal Transit and Highway Funding -50% 0% 50% 100% 150% 200% 250% 300% 350% 400% 19 92 19 93 19 94 19 95 19 96 19 97 19 98 19 99 20 00 20 01 20 02 20 03 20 04 FTA CAGR FHWA CAGR 19 92 19 93 19 94 19 95 19 96 19 97 19 98 19 99 20 00 20 01 20 02 20 03 20 04 Federal and State Transit Funding -50% 0% 50% 100% 150% 200% 250% 300% 350% 400% FTA CAGR State CAGR Arizona: Comparison of Compound Annual Growth Rates
49 Federal Transit and Highway Funding -30% -20% -10% 0% 10% 20% 30% 2991 3991 4991 5991 6991 7991 8991 9991 0002 1002 2002 3002 4002 FTA CAGR FHWA CAGR Federal and State Transit Funding -30% -20% -10% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 2991 3991 4991 5991 6991 7991 8991 9991 0002 1002 2002 3002 4002 FTA CAGR State CAGR Arkansas: Comparison of Compound Annual Growth Rates
50 Federal Transit and Highway Funding -80% -60% -40% -20% 0% 20% 40% 60% 2991 3991 4991 5991 6991 7991 8991 9991 0002 1002 2002 3002 4002 FTA CAGR FHWA CAGR Federal and State Transit Funding -80% -60% -40% -20% 0% 20% 40% 60% 2991 3991 4991 5991 6991 7991 8991 9991 0002 1002 2002 3002 4002 FTA CAGR State CAGR California: Comparison of Compound Annual Growth Rates
51 Federal Transit and Highway Funding -45.00% -30.00% -15.00% 0.00% 15.00% 30.00% 45.00% 2991 3991 4991 5991 6991 7991 8991 9991 0002 1002 2002 3002 4002 FTA CAGR FHWA CAGR Colorado: Comparison of Compound Annual Growth Rates
52 Federal Transit and Highway Funding -60% -50% -40% -30% -20% -10% 0% 10% 2991 3991 4991 5991 6991 7991 8991 9991 0002 1002 2002 3002 4002 FTA CAGR FHWA CAGR Federal and State Transit Funding -60% -50% -40% -30% -20% -10% 0% 10% 20% 2991 3991 4991 5991 6991 7991 8991 9991 0002 1002 2002 3002 4002 FTA CAGR State CAGR Connecticut: Comparison of Compound Annual Growth Rates
53 Federal Transit and Highway Funding -40% -20% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2991 3991 4991 5991 6991 7991 8991 9991 0002 1002 2002 3002 4002 FTA CAGR FHWA CAGR Federal and State Transit Funding -40% -20% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2991 3991 4991 5991 6991 7991 8991 9991 0002 1002 2002 3002 4002 FTA CAGR State CAGR Delaware: Comparison of Compound Annual Growth Rates
54 Federal Transit and Highway Funding -75% -60% -45% -30% -15% 0% 15% 30% 2991 3991 4991 5991 6991 7991 8991 9991 0002 1002 2002 3002 4002 FTA CAGR FHWA CAGR Federal and State Transit Funding -75% -60% -45% -30% -15% 0% 15% 30% 2991 3991 4991 5991 6991 7991 8991 9991 0002 1002 2002 3002 4002 FTA CAGR State CAGR District of Columbia: Comparison of Compound Annual Growth Rates
55 Federal Transit and Highway Funding -60% -45% -30% -15% 0% 15% 30% 45% 60% Federal and State Transit Funding -60% -45% -30% -15% 0% 15% 30% 45% 60% 2991 3991 4991 5991 6991 7991 8991 9991 0002 1002 2002 3002 4002 FTA CAGR FHWA CAGR 2991 3991 4991 5991 6991 7991 8991 9991 0002 1002 2002 3002 4002 FTA CAGR State CAGR Florida: Comparison of Compound Annual Growth Rates
56 Federal Transit and Highway Funding -60% -50% -40% -30% -20% -10% 0% 10% 20% 2991 3991 4991 5991 6991 7991 8991 9991 0002 1002 2002 3002 4002 FTA CAGR FHWA CAGR Federal and State Transit Funding -60% -50% -40% -30% -20% -10% 0% 10% 20% 2991 3991 4991 5991 6991 7991 8991 9991 0002 1002 2002 3002 4002 FTA CAGR State CAGR Georgia: Comparison of Compound Annual Growth Rates
57 Federal Transit and Highway Funding -50% -40% -30% -20% -10% 0% 10% 2991 3991 4991 5991 6991 7991 8991 9991 0002 1002 2002 3002 4002 FTA CAGR FHWA CAGR Hawaii: Comparison of Compound Annual Growth Rates Federal Transit and Highway Funding -25% 0% 25% 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 2991 3991 4991 5991 6991 7991 8991 9991 0002 1002 2002 3002 4002 FTA CAGR FHWA CAGR Idaho: Comparison of Compound Annual Growth Rates
58 Federal Transit and Highway Funding -75% -60% -45% -30% -15% 0% 15% 2991 3991 4991 5991 6991 7991 8991 9991 0002 1002 2002 3002 4002 FHWA CAGR FTA CAGR Federal and State Transit Funding -75% -60% -45% -30% -15% 0% 15% 2991 3991 4991 5991 6991 7991 8991 9991 0002 1002 2002 3002 4002 State CAGR FTA CAGR Illinois: Comparison of Compound Annual Growth Rates
59 Federal Transit and Highway Funding -45% -30% -15% 0% 15% 30% 45% 2991 3991 4991 5991 6991 7991 8991 9991 0002 1002 2002 3002 4002 FTA CAGR FHWA CAGR Federal and State Transit Funding -45% -30% -15% 0% 15% 30% 45% 2991 3991 4991 5991 6991 7991 8991 9991 0002 1002 2002 3002 4002 FTA CAGR State CAGR Indiana: Comparison of Compound Annual Growth Rates
60 Federal Transit and Highway Funding -50% -40% -30% -20% -10% 0% 10% 20% 2991 3991 4991 5991 6991 7991 8991 9991 0002 1002 2002 3002 4002 FTA CAGR FHWA CAGR Federal and State Transit Funding -50% -40% -30% -20% -10% 0% 10% 20% 2991 3991 4991 5991 6991 7991 8991 9991 0002 1002 2002 3002 4002 FTA CAGR State CAGR Iowa: Comparison of Compound Annual Growth Rates
61 Federal Transit and Highway Funding -30% -20% -10% 0% 10% 20% 30% 2991 3991 4991 5991 6991 7991 8991 9991 0002 1002 2002 3002 4002 FTA CAGR FHWA CAGR Federal and State Transit Funding -30% -20% -10% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 2991 3991 4991 5991 6991 7991 8991 9991 0002 1002 2002 3002 4002 FTA CAGR State CAGR Kansas: Comparison of Compound Annual Growth Rates
62 Federal Transit and Highway Funding -40% -20% 0% 20% 40% 60% 2991 3991 4991 5991 6991 7991 8991 9991 0002 1002 2002 3002 4002 FTA CAGR FHWA CAGR Federal and State Transit Funding -60% -40% -20% 0% 20% 40% 60% 2991 3991 4991 5991 6991 7991 8991 9991 0002 1002 2002 3002 4002 FTA CAGR State CAGR Kentucky: Comparison of Compound Annual Growth Rates
63 Federal Transit and Highway Funding -60% -45% -30% -15% 0% 15% 2991 3991 4991 5991 6991 7991 8991 9991 0002 1002 2002 3002 4002 FHWA CAGR FTA CAGR Louisiana: Comparison of Compound Annual Growth Rates
64 Federal Transit and Highway Funding -50% 0% 50% 100% 150% 200% 250% 2991 3991 4991 5991 6991 7991 8991 9991 0002 1002 2002 3002 4002 FTA CAGR FHWA CAGR Federal and State Transit Funding -50% 0% 50% 100% 150% 200% 250% 2991 3991 4991 5991 6991 7991 8991 9991 0002 1002 2002 3002 4002 FTA CAGR State CAGR Maine: Comparison of Compound Annual Growth Rates
65 Federal Transit and Highway Funding -60% -50% -40% -30% -20% -10% 0% 10% 20% 2991 3991 4991 5991 6991 7991 8991 9991 0002 1002 2002 3002 4002 FTA CAGR FHWA CAGR Federal and State Transit Funding -100% -80% -60% -40% -20% 0% 20% 2991 3991 4991 5991 6991 7991 8991 9991 0002 1002 2002 3002 4002 FTA CAGR State CAGR Maryland: Comparison of Compound Annual Growth Rates
66 Federal Transit and Highway Funding -60% -40% -20% 0% 20% 40% 60% 2991 3991 4991 5991 6991 7991 8991 9991 0002 1002 2002 3002 4002 FTA CAGR FHWA CAGR Federal and State Transit Funding -60% -40% -20% 0% 20% 40% 60% 2991 3991 4991 5991 6991 7991 8991 9991 0002 1002 2002 3002 4002 FTA CAGR State CAGR Massachusetts: Comparison of Compound Annual Growth Rates
67 Federal Transit and Highway Funding -50% -40% -30% -20% -10% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 2991 3991 4991 5991 6991 7991 8991 9991 0002 1002 2002 3002 4002 FTA CAGR FHWA CAGR Federal and State Transit Funding -50% -40% -30% -20% -10% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 2991 3991 4991 5991 6991 7991 8991 9991 0002 1002 2002 3002 4002 FTA CAGR State CAGR Michigan: Comparison of Compound Annual Growth Rates
68 Federal Transit and Highway Funding -60% -40% -20% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 2991 3991 4991 5991 6991 7991 8991 9991 0002 1002 2002 3002 4002 FTA CAGR FHWA CAGR Federal and State Transit Funding -60% -40% -20% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 2991 3991 4991 5991 6991 7991 8991 9991 0002 1002 2002 3002 4002 FTA CAGR State CAGR Minnesota: Comparison of Compound Annual Growth Rates
69 Federal Transit and Highway Funding -30% -25% -20% -15% -10% -5% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 2991 3991 4991 5991 6991 7991 8991 9991 0002 1002 2002 3002 4002 FTA CAGR FHWA CAGR Mississippi: Comparison of Compound Annual Growth Rates
70 Federal Transit and Highway Funding -50% -40% -30% -20% -10% 0% 10% 20% 30% 2991 3991 4991 5991 6991 7991 8991 9991 0002 1002 2002 3002 4002 FTA CAGR FHWA CAGR Federal and State Transit Funding -50% -40% -30% -20% -10% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 2991 3991 4991 5991 6991 7991 8991 9991 0002 1002 2002 3002 4002 FTA CAGR State CAGR Missouri: Comparison of Compound Annual Growth Rates
71 Federal Transit and Highway Funding -30% -20% -10% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 2991 3991 4991 5991 6991 7991 8991 9991 0002 1002 2002 3002 4002 FTA CAGR FHWA CAGR Federal and State Transit Funding -30% -20% -10% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 2991 3991 4991 5991 6991 7991 8991 9991 0002 1002 2002 3002 4002 FTA CAGR State CAGR Montana: Comparison of Compound Annual Growth Rates
72 Federal Transit and Highway Funding -30% -20% -10% 0% 10% 20% 2991 3991 4991 5991 6991 7991 8991 9991 0002 1002 2002 3002 4002 FTA CAGR FHWA CAGR Federal and State Transit Funding -30% -20% -10% 0% 10% 20% 2991 3991 4991 5991 6991 7991 8991 9991 0002 1002 2002 3002 4002 FTA CAGR State CAGR Nebraska: Comparison of Compound Annual Growth Rates
73 Federal Transit and Highway Funding -30% -15% 0% 15% 30% 45% 60% 75% 90% 105% 2991 3991 4991 5991 6991 7991 8991 9991 0002 1002 2002 3002 4002 FTA CAGR FHWA CAGR Nevada: Comparison of Compound Annual Growth Rates
74 Federal Transit and Highway Funding -30% -20% -10% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 2991 3991 4991 5991 6991 7991 8991 9991 0002 1002 2002 3002 4002 FTA CAGR FHWA CAGR Federal and State Transit Funding -110% -90% -70% -50% -30% -10% 10% 30% 50% 2991 3991 4991 5991 6991 7991 8991 9991 0002 1002 2002 3002 4002 FTA CAGR State CAGR New Hampshire: Comparison of Compound Annual Growth Rates
75 Federal Transit and Highway Funding -75% -55% -35% -15% 5% 25% 45% 65% 85% 105% 125% 2991 3991 4991 5991 6991 7991 8991 9991 0002 1002 2002 3002 4002 FTA CAGR FHWA CAGR Federal and State Transit Funding -75% -50% -25% 0% 25% 50% 75% 100% 125% 2991 3991 4991 5991 6991 7991 8991 9991 0002 1002 2002 3002 4002 FTA CAGR State CAGR New Jersey: Comparison of Compound Annual Growth Rates
76 Federal Transit and Highway Funding -30% -15% 0% 15% 30% 45% 60% 75% 90% 2991 3991 4991 5991 6991 7991 8991 9991 0002 1002 2002 3002 4002 FTA CAGR FHWA CAGR New Mexico: Comparison of Compound Annual Growth Rates
77 Federal Transit and Highway Funding -80% -70% -60% -50% -40% -30% -20% -10% 0% 10% 20% 2991 3991 4991 5991 6991 7991 8991 9991 0002 1002 2002 3002 4002 FTA CAGR FHWA CAGR Federal and State Transit Funding -80% -70% -60% -50% -40% -30% -20% -10% 0% 10% 2991 3991 4991 5991 6991 7991 8991 9991 0002 1002 2002 3002 4002 FTA CAGR State CAGR New York: Comparison of Compound Annual Growth Rates
78 Federal Transit and Highway Funding -40% -30% -20% -10% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 2991 3991 4991 5991 6991 7991 8991 9991 0002 1002 2002 3002 4002 FTA CAGR FHWA CAGR Federal and State Transit Funding -40% -30% -20% -10% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 2991 3991 4991 5991 6991 7991 8991 9991 0002 1002 2002 3002 4002 FTA CAGR State CAGR North Carolina: Comparison of Compound Annual Growth Rates
79 Federal Transit and Highway Funding -20% -10% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 2991 3991 4991 5991 6991 7991 8991 9991 0002 1002 2002 3002 4002 FTA CAGR FHWA CAGR Federal and State Transit Funding -20% -10% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 2991 3991 4991 5991 6991 7991 8991 9991 0002 1002 2002 3002 4002 FTA CAGR State CAGR North Dakota: Comparison of Compound Annual Growth Rates
80 Federal Transit and Highway Funding -60% -45% -30% -15% 0% 15% 30% 45% 2991 3991 4991 5991 6991 7991 8991 9991 0002 1002 2002 3002 4002 FTA CAGR FHWA CAGR Federal and State Transit Funding -60% -45% -30% -15% 0% 15% 30% 45% 2991 3991 4991 5991 6991 7991 8991 9991 0002 1002 2002 3002 4002 FTA CAGR State CAGR Ohio: Comparison of Compound Annual Growth Rates
81 Federal Transit and Highway Funding -50% -40% -30% -20% -10% 0% 10% 2991 3991 4991 5991 6991 7991 8991 9991 0002 1002 2002 3002 4002 FTA CAGR FHWA CAGR Federal and State Transit Funding -50% -40% -30% -20% -10% 0% 10% 2991 3991 4991 5991 6991 7991 8991 9991 0002 1002 2002 3002 4002 FTA CAGR State CAGR Oklahoma: Comparison of Compound Annual Growth Rates
82 Federal Transit and Highway Funding -60% -30% 0% 30% 60% 90% 120% 150% 180% 210% 2991 3991 4991 5991 6991 7991 8991 9991 0002 1002 2002 3002 4002 FTA CAGR FHWA CAGR Federal and State Transit Funding -60% -30% 0% 30% 60% 90% 120% 150% 180% 210% 2991 3991 4991 5991 6991 7991 8991 9991 0002 1002 2002 3002 4002 FTA CAGR State CAGR Oregon: Comparison of Compound Annual Growth Rates
83 Federal Transit and Highway Funding -70% -60% -50% -40% -30% -20% -10% 0% 10% 20% 2991 3991 4991 5991 6991 7991 8991 9991 0002 1002 2002 3002 4002 FTA CAGR FHWA CAGR Federal and State Transit Funding -70% -60% -50% -40% -30% -20% -10% 0% 10% 20% 2991 3991 4991 5991 6991 7991 8991 9991 0002 1002 2002 3002 4002 FTA CAGR State CAGR Pennsylvania: Comparison of Compound Annual Growth Rates
84 Federal Transit and Highway Funding -40% -30% -20% -10% 0% 10% 20% 30% 2991 3991 4991 5991 6991 7991 8991 9991 0002 1002 2002 3002 4002 FTA CAGR FHWA CAGR Federal and State Transit Funding -40% -30% -20% -10% 0% 10% 20% 30% 2991 3991 4991 5991 6991 7991 8991 9991 0002 1002 2002 3002 4002 FTA CAGR State CAGR Rhode Island: Comparison of Compound Annual Growth Rates
85 Federal Transit and Highway Funding -40% -30% -20% -10% 0% 10% 20% 30% 2991 3991 4991 5991 6991 7991 8991 9991 0002 1002 2002 3002 4002 FTA CAGR FHWA CAGR South Carolina: Comparison of Compound Annual Growth Rates
86 Federal Transit and Highway Funding -20% -10% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 2991 3991 4991 5991 6991 7991 8991 9991 0002 1002 2002 3002 4002 FTA CAGR FHWA CAGR Federal and State Transit Funding -20% -10% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 2991 3991 4991 5991 6991 7991 8991 9991 0002 1002 2002 3002 4002 FTA CAGR State CAGR South Dakota: Comparison of Compound Annual Growth Rates
87 Federal Transit and Highway Funding -40% -20% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 2991 3991 4991 5991 6991 7991 8991 9991 0002 1002 2002 3002 4002 FTA CAGR FHWA CAGR Federal and State Transit Funding -40% -20% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 2991 3991 4991 5991 6991 7991 8991 9991 0002 1002 2002 3002 4002 FTA CAGR State CAGR Tennessee: Comparison of Compound Annual Growth Rates
88 Federal Transit and Highway Funding -100% -50% 0% 50% 100% 150% 200% 250% 2991 3991 4991 5991 6991 7991 8991 9991 0002 1002 2002 3002 4002 FTA CAGR FHWA CAGR Federal and State Transit Funding -100% -50% 0% 50% 100% 150% 200% 250% 2991 3991 4991 5991 6991 7991 8991 9991 0002 1002 2002 3002 4002 FTA CAGR State CAGR Texas: Comparison of Compound Annual Growth Rates
89 Federal Transit and Highway Funding -40% -20% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 120% 2991 3991 4991 5991 6991 7991 8991 9991 0002 1002 2002 3002 4002 FTA CAGR FHWA CAGR Utah: Comparison of Compound Annual Growth Rates Federal Transit and Highway Funding -25% 0% 25% 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 225% 2991 3991 4991 5991 6991 7991 8991 9991 0002 1002 2002 3002 4002 FTA CAGR FHWA CAGR Vermont: Comparison of Compound Annual Growth Rates
90 Federal Transit and Highway Funding -40% -30% -20% -10% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 2991 3991 4991 5991 6991 7991 8991 9991 0002 1002 2002 3002 4002 FTA CAGR FHWA CAGR Federal and State Transit Funding -40% -30% -20% -10% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 2991 3991 4991 5991 6991 7991 8991 9991 0002 1002 2002 3002 4002 FTA CAGR State CAGR Virginia: Comparison of Compound Annual Growth Rates
91 Federal Transit and Highway Funding -45% -30% -15% 0% 15% 30% 45% 60% 75% 2991 3991 4991 5991 6991 7991 8991 9991 0002 1002 2002 3002 4002 FTA CAGR FHWA CAGR Federal and State Transit Funding -45% -30% -15% 0% 15% 30% 45% 60% 75% 2991 3991 4991 5991 6991 7991 8991 9991 0002 1002 2002 3002 4002 FTA CAGR State CAGR Washington: Comparison of Compound Annual Growth Rates
92 Federal Transit and Highway Funding -40% -20% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 120% 140% 160% 2991 3991 4991 5991 6991 7991 8991 9991 0002 1002 2002 3002 4002 FTA CAGR FHWA CAGR Federal and State Transit Funding -40% -20% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 120% 140% 160% 2991 3991 4991 5991 6991 7991 8991 9991 0002 1002 2002 3002 4002 FTA CAGR State CAGR West Virginia: Comparison of Compound Annual Growth Rates
93 Federal Transit and Highway Funding -40% -30% -20% -10% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 2991 3991 4991 5991 6991 7991 8991 9991 0002 1002 2002 3002 4002 FTA CAGR FHWA CAGR Federal and State Transit Funding -40% -30% -20% -10% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 2991 3991 4991 5991 6991 7991 8991 9991 0002 1002 2002 3002 4002 FTA CAGR State CAGR Wisconsin: Comparison of Compound Annual Growth Rates
94 Federal Transit and Highway Funding -30% -15% 0% 15% 30% 45% 60% 75% 2991 3991 4991 5991 6991 7991 8991 9991 0002 1002 2002 3002 4002 FTA CAGR FHWA CAGR Federal and State Transit Funding -30% -15% 0% 15% 30% 45% 60% 75% 2991 3991 4991 5991 6991 7991 8991 9991 0002 1002 2002 3002 4002 FTA CAGR State CAGR Wyoming: Comparison of Compound Annual Growth Rates
