Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.
Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.
OCR for page 69
CHAPTER 5 Findings of Data Flows Between Agencies This chapter identifies the data that need to reside on a smartcard and the information that needs to be exchanged between participating agencies. There are two types of information flows in an interoperable smartcard system: · Institutional Information-Related to the business rules and policies that provide the guide- lines for participation in the smartcard system. The institutional information is discussed in detail in Chapter 2. · Transaction Processing Information-Consists of the following data as depicted in Figure 12: Resides on the card, Flows between the card and reader, Flows between the reader and agency, Flows between the agency and clearinghouse, and Flows between clearinghouses. To prepare the transaction-processing information flows, the following tasks must be completed: · Development of a conceptual fare payment system architecture, · Identification of the data types, and · Analysis of the data flows. 5.1 Development of Conceptual Fare Payment System Architecture A smartcard fare payment system architecture consists of the following five functional tiers: 1. Card or Data Input Tier-Data repository for holding the value required to acquire the ser- vices desired; 2. Device Tier-Reads the card and conducts the transaction according to the business rules embedded in the software; 3. Station or Local (Garage or Depot) Tier-Manages the assigned devices and consolidates and transfers the transactions to the next tier; 4. Agency Tier-Manages the transfers of device configuration data and the transactions with the central system and may also be used as the agency interface with the central system for sys- tem management and reporting; and 5. Central System Tier-Primarily responsible for clearing and settlement; the database also sup- ports the card services operation. This five-tier model is referenced for most of the standards development efforts in the United States and Canada, particularly the APTA Universal Transit Farecard Standards UTFS). Figure 13 illustrates the five tiers of an interoperable regional smartcard fare payment system. 69