Click for next page ( 23

The National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine
500 Fifth St. N.W. | Washington, D.C. 20001

Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
Terms of Use and Privacy Statement

Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 22
22 Table 22. Rating of test methods' operational characteristics. Applicability to Ability to Ease of Aggregate Type and Estimated Readiness for Test Method Interpret Use by Portability (c) Size(d) Price ($) Implementation(a) Data(b) Technician (b) Coarse Fine Uncompacted Void Content of Fine 250 1 1 1 1 N/A 1 Aggregates AASHTO T 304 Uncompacted Void Content of Coarse 500 1 1 1 1 1 N/A Aggregates AASHTO T P56 Compacted Aggregate Resistance 500 1 1 1 1 N/A 1 (CAR) Percentage of Fractured Particles in 0 1 1 1 1 (N/A) 1 N/A Coarse Aggregate ASTM D 5821 Flat and Elongated Coarse Aggregates 250 1 1 1 1 1 N/A ASTM D 4791 Multiple Ratio Shape Analysis 1,500 2 2 2 1 1 N/A VDG-40 Videograder 40,000 - 50,000 2 3 2 2 1 1 Buffalo Wire Works PSSDA -Large 30,000 - 40,000 3 3 3 2 1 N/A Buffalo Wire Works PSSDA -Small 30,000 - 40,000 2 3 2 2 N/A 1 Camsizer 40,000 - 50,000 2 3 2 2 2 1 WipShape 30,000 - 40,000 2 3 3 2 1 N/A University of Illinois Aggregate Image 30,000 - 40,000 3 3 3 2 3 N/A Analyzer (UIAIA) Aggregate Imaging System (AIMS) 30,000 - 40,000 2 3 3 2 1 1 (a) Notes: 1: Available commercially. Wide use in laboratories. 2: Available commercially. Limited use in laboratories. 3: Not available commercially. Limited use in research laboratories. Can be made available commercially. (b) 1: Very Easy, 2: Easy, 3: Intermediate, 4: Difficult. (c) 1: Can be used in central and field laboratories. Requires less than 1 hr to move it. 2: Can be used in central and field laboratories. Requires less than 4 hrs to move it. 3: Not portable. Cannot be used in central and field laboratories. (d) 1: Measure all aggregate sizes and types, 2: Measure all aggregate types but not all sizes, 3: Measure all sizes but not very dark colored aggregates, N/A: Not Applicable. by the user based on a pairwise comparison judgment scale of column are divided by the sum of that column, and then 1 to 9 (also known as standard preference table). Then the user the elements in each resulting row are added and divided by calculates priorities, using a simple mathematical procedure, the sum of the numbers in that row. to arrive at overall priorities for the alternatives. The sum of The program uses a graphical interface environment; the all the criteria beneath a given parent criterion in each level of process is summarized in the following steps (for illustration, the model must equal one. Each priority list shows its relative fine aggregate angularity is used to describe the operation steps importance within the overall structure. From the overall pri- of the new program): (1) The user enters the number of testing ority list, the decision maker can choose among alternatives methods being compared and the characteristics determining by selecting the highest priority alternative. The mathematical the performance of the test method (Figure 5a). (2) Generic functions involved in AHP can be found in Saaty (21). text boxes are generated and the user inputs the names of each of the characteristics and testing methods (Figure 5b). (3) The user enters the weights assigned to test methods when Program Description pairwise comparison is conducted with respect to each char- Computational software was developed to make the calcula- acteristic (Figure 6a). Note that because the lower triangle of tion process easier and faster. The program provides the user these matrices is the reciprocal of the upper triangle with ones flexibility in changing objectives or selection criteria weights along the diagonal, the user inputs the upper half of the matrix before making the final selection from available alternatives. The and the other values are updated automatically. (4) The user software was created using VC++ programming language that is prompted to enter the weights comparing the various char- can be run on any computer irrespective of the operating system. acteristics with respect to overall satisfaction with a method The program uses the crude estimate, specified by Saaty (21), in a new interface (Figure 6b). (5) The program calculates the to calculate the priority vector through the process of averaging priority vectors for each of the matrices and displays them over normalized columns technique. The elements of each in a new interface window (Figure 7a). (6) The program also

OCR for page 22
23 (a) Number of Characteristics and Test Methods (b) Names of Characteristics and Test Methods Figure 5. Screens of interface to enter numbers and names of characteristics and test methods.

OCR for page 22
24 (a) Weights Comparing Test Methods to Characteristics (b) Weights Comparing Characteristics Figure 6. Screens of interface to enter weights comparing test methods to characteristics, and characteristics with respect to overall satisfaction with method.

OCR for page 22
25 (a) Priority Vectors (b) Overall Ranking Figure 7. Screens of priority vectors and overall ranking of test methods.