Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter.
Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.
Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.
OCR for page 52
52
APPENDIX A
U.S. State Transportation Departments' Input on Federal Regulations
Departments of transportation (DOTs) were asked to com- · Specific inspections: Routine intensity inspections at 24
ment on changes or improvements to inspection practice and months can supplement hands-on inspections at longer
U.S. federal regulations for inspection programs. The most intervals.
frequent responses were no input or the comment that exist-
ing regulations are adequate. Other responses are listed here.
Certification of Inspectors
Bridge Routine Inspection Interval
Three comments:
Four comments by DOTs:
· There should be no certification of inspectors.
· The interval for routine inspection should be approxi- · Certification of inspectors should include testing of ap-
mately two years, and might be better stated as inspec- plicants.
tion of a bridge in every second calendar year. This · Certification should include an entry-level grade for in-
would make inspection scheduling easier. spectors assigned to simple bridges only.
· The interval for routine inspection of a bridge should be
24 months only. Culverts might be inspected at longer
intervals. Quality Control and Quality Assurance
· Inspectors should have the authority to set the interval Procedures
to the next inspection of each bridge, but only to a max-
imum interval of 24 months. Two points:
· The combination of bridge complexity and inspector
qualifications should determine a matrix of inspection · Procedures should be determined by state DOTs.
intervals. · Formal requirements should be developed at the federal
level.
Fracture-Critical Inspection Interval
Two comments, both proposing longer intervals for some Additional Comment on Regulations for
fracture-critical inspections: Bridge Inspection
· Specific bridges: A longer interval is appropriate for · DOTs indicate a need for a central source of infor-
bridges on low-volume roads, bridges with a low vol- mation and discussion of federal regulations and its
ume of truck traffic, and bridges that have low stresses. interpretation.