National Academies Press: OpenBook

Bridge Inspection Practices (2007)

Chapter: Appendix D - Information Resources and Respondents

« Previous: Appendix C - Bridge Inspection Practices of Canadian Transport Agencies
Page 90
Suggested Citation:"Appendix D - Information Resources and Respondents ." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2007. Bridge Inspection Practices. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/14127.
×
Page 90
Page 91
Suggested Citation:"Appendix D - Information Resources and Respondents ." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2007. Bridge Inspection Practices. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/14127.
×
Page 91
Page 92
Suggested Citation:"Appendix D - Information Resources and Respondents ." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2007. Bridge Inspection Practices. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/14127.
×
Page 92
Page 93
Suggested Citation:"Appendix D - Information Resources and Respondents ." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2007. Bridge Inspection Practices. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/14127.
×
Page 93

Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

90 APPENDIX D Information Resources and Respondents DOT Questionnaire Response Publications Used in This Synthesis Alabama Maintenance Manual (1995), Alabama DOT, 217 pp. Bridge Inspection Manual (2002), Alabama DOT, 390 pp. Bridge Inspection Program Compliance Review Questionnaire (2002), Alabama DOT, 15 pp. Alaska Yes Arizona Yes Arkansas Yes California Yes Element Level Inspection Manual (2000), California DOT, 93 pp. Colorado Pontis Bridge Inspection Coding Guide (1998), Staff Bridge Branch, Colorado DOT, 184 pp. Connecticut Bridge Inspection Manual (2005), Version 2.1, Connecticut DOT, 624 pp. Delaware Yes U.S. Dept. of Defense Bridge Inspection, Maintenance, and Repair, Army TM 5-600, Air Force AFJPAM 32-1088 (1994), Dept. of Defense, 186 pp. District of Columbia U.S.DOT Eastern Federal Lands BIP Policy and Guidance Manual (2006), U.S.DOT Eastern Federal Lands Highway Division, 58 pp. Florida Manual for Bridge and Other Structures Inspection and Reporting Procedures, 850-010-030-f, (2006), Florida DOT, 193 pp. Georgia Policy and Procedure Statement Governing the Qualifications of Professional Consultants to Perform Work for the State of Georgia Department of Transportation (2000), Georgia DOT, 47 pp. Hawaii Idaho Yes Idaho Bridge Inspection Coding Guide (2004), Idaho DOT, 171 pp. Illinois Bridge Condition Report Procedures & Practices (2004), Illinois DOT, 50 pp. Indiana Iowa Yes Bridge Inspection, Policies and Procedures Manual, 610.04 (2005), Iowa DOT, 8 pp. Kansas Kentucky Yes Quality Control/Quality Assurance Review for Kentucky NBIS Inspection Program (2006), Kentucky Transp. Cabinet, 3 pp. Louisiana Maine Yes Maryland Yes Massachusetts Quality Control and Quality Assurance, Dir 2.1.1 (1998), Massachusetts Highway Department, 6 pp. Inspection Team Field Evaluation, Dir 2.1.2 (1998), Massachusetts Highway Department, 1 p. Inspection Team Report Evaluation, Dir 2.1.3 (1998), Massachusetts Highway Department, 1 p. Michigan Yes Guidelines For Bridge Inspection Frequencies (2002), Michigan DOT, 1 p. Minnesota Bridge Inspection Manual, draft version 1.3 (2006), Minnesota DOT, 108 pp. Certification of Bridge Safety Inspection to the Commissioner of Transportation (2005), Minnesota DOT, 2 pp. Stehr, R.A., Guidelines for Bridge Inspection Frequency (2004), Minnesota DOT, 3 pp. Quality Assurance Review of Bridge Owners (n.d.), Minnesota DOT, 9 pp. Mississippi Missouri Yes Harms, M., Memorandum: Non-State Bridge Inspection Program, Oct. 6, 2004, Missouri DOT, 16 pp. Critical Inspection Findings (2000), Missouri DOT, 54 pp. Bridge Redundancy and Fracture Critical Members (1991), Missouri DOT 27 pp. Policy For Non-State System Bridge Inspection Program (2000), Missouri DOT, 71 pp. Montana Bridge Inspection Manual (1996) Montana DOT, web document: http://www3.mdt.mt.gov:7783/db-pub/pontis40_site.htm. Nebraska TABLE D1 U.S. INFORMATION SOURCES (continued )

91 DOT Questionnaire Response Publications Used in This Synthesis New Jersey Forum—Bridge Inspection Clarifications (2006), New Jersey DOT, 26 pp. Pontis Coding Guide (2003), New Jersey DOT, 246 pp. How to Review Pontis Data (n.d.), New Jersey DOT, 7 pp. Recording and Coding Guide for Structure Inventory and Appraisal of New Jersey Bridges (2003), New Jersey DOT, 347 pp. First-Cycle Report for Consultant (2006), New Jersey DOT, 47 pp. How to Review SI&A Data (n.d.), New Jersey DOT, 9 pp. Underwater Inspection and Evaluation of New Jersey Bridges Guidelines Manual (1997), New Jersey DOT, 105 pp. Structural Evaluation Explanation Of NBIS Scope of Work Consultant Contracts (2006), New Jersey DOT, 20 pp. Special Inspection—Pin/Hanger Assemblies Scope of Work (n.d.), New Jersey DOT, 5 pp. Scope of Work for Consultant Inspections Type I (n.d.), New Jersey DOT, 14 pp. Scope of Work for Consultant Inspections Type II (2002), New Jersey DOT, 12 pp. Scope of Work for Consultant Inspections Type III (2001), New Jersey DOT, 1 pp. New Mexico Yes New York Yes Bridge Inspection Manual (1997), New York State DOT, 518 pp. Bridge Inventory Manual (2004), New York State DOT, 240 pp. Overhead Sign Structure Inventory And Inspection Manual (1999), New York State DOT, 42 pp. North Carolina Yes North Dakota Yes Ohio Yes Manual of Bridge Inspection (2006), Ohio DOT, 179 pp. Oklahoma Pontis Bridge Inspection Manual for Oklahoma Bridges (2004), Bridge Division, Oklahoma DOT, 183 pp. Quality Control and Quality Assurance Plan for State and Local Jurisdiction Bridge Safety Inspections (n.d.), Oklahoma DOT, 4 pp. Oregon Yes Bridge Inspection Pocket Coding Guide (2006), Oregon DOT, 119 pp. Local Agency Guidelines (2006), Oregon DOT: http://www.oregon.gov/ODOT/HWY/LGS/lagmanual.shtml. ODOT Bridge Inspection Program QA Review (n.d.), Oregon DOT, 3 pp. Pennsylvania Yes Bridge Safety Inspection Manual, Pub. 238, (2002), Pennsylvania DOT, 316 pp. Puerto Rico Rhode Island Yes South Carolina South Dakota Yes Tennessee Bridge Inspection Program Procedures Manual (2006), Structures Division, Tennessee DOT, 210 pp. Texas Yes Bridge Inspection Manual (2002), Texas DOT, 147 pp. Elements—Field Inspection and Coding Manual (2001) Texas DOT, 74 pp. Utah Yes Vermont Yes Virginia Yes Bridge Safety Inspections, instructional and informational memo, S&B 27.5 (2005), Virginia DOT, 32 pp. Washington Yes Washington State Bridge Inspection Manual, M36-64 (2002), Washington State DOT, 412 pp. Transportation Structures Preservation Manual (1998), Washington State DOT, 29 pp. West Virginia Yes Wisconsin Level I—Review Record, DT2002 (2003), Wisconsin DOT, 8 pp. Level II—Review Record, DT2003 (2007), Wisconsin DOT, 3 pp. SI&A Field Review, DT2006 (2003), Wisconsin DOT, 1 p. Wyoming Nevada Yes New Hampshire TABLE D1 (Continued) U.S. INFORMATION SOURCES

92 State DOT Respondent Alaska Alaska Department of Transportation and Public Facilities Drew Sielbach, Bridge Management Engineer Arizona Arizona Department ofTransportation Shafi Hasan, Assistant State Bridge Engineer Sunil Athalye, P.E., Bridge Management Leader Arkansas Arkansas Highway and Transportation Department Garland Land, Heavy Bridge Maintenance Engineer David Ball, Staff Structures Engineer California California Department of Transportation Barton Newton, State Bridge Maintenance Engineer Pete J. Whitfield, Office Chief—Investigations North Delaware Delaware Department ofTransportation Jason Arndt, Bridge Inspection Engineer/Program Manager Idaho Idaho Transportation Department Kathleen Slinger, Bridge Inspection Engineer Iowa Iowa Department of Transportation Bruce L. Brakke, P.E., Bridge Maintenance Engineer Kentucky Kentucky Transportation Cabinet Jeffrey T. Sams, Chief Bridge Inspector Maine Maine Department of Transportation John E. Buxton, P.E., Assistant Bridge Maintenance Engineer Maryland Maryland State Highway Administration Joseph R. Miller, Chief, Bridge Inspection and Remedial Engineering Division Ryan M. Hughes, Assistant Division Chief, Bridge Inspection and Remedial Engineering Division Michigan Michigan Department of Transportation Richard M. Smith, Bridge Inspection Program Manager Missouri Missouri Department of Transportation Ken Foster, Supervising Bridge Inspection Engineer Mike Harms, Structural Services Engineer Nevada Nevada Department of Transportation Dave Severns, Manager I, Registered Professional Engineer Marc S Grunert, Administrator I, Registered Professional Engineer New Mexico New Mexico Department ofTransportation Jeff V. Vigil, Bridge Management Engineer Jimmy Camp, State Bridge Engineer New York New York State Department of Transportation Peter McCowan, Civil Engineer III (Structures)—Bridge Inspection Unit Supervisor North Carolina North Carolina Department of Transportation, Bridge Maintenance Unit Henry A. Black, Jr., Assistant State Bridge Maintenance Engineer/Inspection North Dakota North Dakota Department ofTransportation Gary L. Doerr, P.E., Bridge Management Section Leader Ohio Ohio Department of Transportation Mike Loeffer, Bridge Inspection and Maintenance Engineer Oregon Oregon Department of Transportation Gary L. Bowling, Bridge Operations Engineer Jeff Swanstrom, Senior Bridge Inspector Pennsylvania Pennsylvania Department ofTransportation Harold C. Rogers, P.E., Assistant Chief Bridge Engineer for Bridge Inspection & Management Nevin L. Myers, P.E., Bridge Inspection Quality Assurance Manager Rhode Island Rhode Island Department ofTransportation Richard Snow, P.E., Chief Civil Engineer— Bridge Design Patrick Vu, P.E., Senior Civil Engineer South Dakota South Dakota Department ofTransportation Tom Gilsrud, Bridge Maintenance Engineer Todd Thompson, Special Assignments Engineer Texas Texas Department of Transportation Alan Kowalik, Inspection Engineering Supervisor Utah Federal Highway Administration,Salt Lake City Russell Robertson, ITS/Bridge Engineer Vermont Vermont Agency of Transportation—Structures Section Pamela Maza Thurber, Bridge Management and Inspection Engineer Virginia Virginia Department of Transportation John Coleman, Engineer II Washington Washington State Department ofTransportation Harvey L. Coffman, P.E., S.E., Bridge Preservation Engineer Grant D. Griffin, Local Agency Bridge Inspector, Local Agency Program Manager West Virginia West Virginia Department of Highways Frank C. Liss, Bridge Evaluation Engineer TABLE D2 RESPONDENTS FOR U.S. AGENCIES

93 Nation Agency Respondent Denmark Danish National Roads Directorate Arne Henriksen, Project Manager Finland Finnish Road Administration Marja-Kaarina Söderqvist, Bridge Management Systems Engineer France Laboratoire Central des Ponts et Chaussées Bruno Godart, Head of Division “Behavior and Durability of Bridges” Germany Federal Highways Research Institute (BASt) Ralph Holst, Maintenance of Engineering Structures South Africa South African National Roads Agency Limited Edwin Kruger, Bridge Network Manager Sweden Swedish Roads Administration Susanne Troive, Bosse Eriksson United Kingdom Highways Agency Brian Hill, Senior Technical Adviser Awtar Jandu, Team Leader Bridge Management Alberta Alberta Infrastructure and Transportation Lloyd Atkin, Bridge Preservation Specialist Edmonton City of Edmonton Shiraz Kanji, Bridge Engineer New Brunswick New Brunswick Department of Transportation Ron Joyce, Bridge Maintenance Technician Ralph Campbell, Research Engineer Ontario Ministry of Transportation of Ontario Dino Bagnariol, Head Evaluation and Inspection Engineer Ottawa City of Ottawa Wim Jellema, Needs and Programming Engineer— Structures Quebec Ministère des Transports du Québec Guy Richard, Directeur des structures TABLE D3 FOREIGN RESPONDENTS

Next: Appendix E - Details for Program Inspection Personnel »
Bridge Inspection Practices Get This Book
×
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

TRB's National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) Synthesis 375: Bridge Inspection Practices examines bridge inspection practices in the United States and selected foreign countries. The report explores inspection personnel (staff titles and functions, qualifications, training and certification, inspection teams, and the assignment of teams to bridges), inspection types (focus, methods, and frequency), and inspection quality control and quality assurance. The report also reviews the uses agencies make of information gathered from bridge inspections, what triggers repairs, and plans for future development of inspection programs.

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!