National Academies Press: OpenBook
« Previous: Chapter 5 - Conclusions and Recommendations
Page 48
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2008. Analysis of Aircraft Overruns and Undershoots for Runway Safety Areas. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/14137.
×
Page 48
Page 49
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2008. Analysis of Aircraft Overruns and Undershoots for Runway Safety Areas. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/14137.
×
Page 49

Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

48 AEA Technology. London City Airport: Runway End Safety Area (RESA) Studies. London City Airport, February 2002. AEA Technology. Runway End Safety Area (RESA) Risk Assessment at Southampton International Airport.UK Airport Operator BAA, March 1999. Airbus. Takeoff and Departure Operations—Understanding Takeoff Speeds, Flight Operations Briefing Notes. August 2004. Aircraft Bluebook Price Digest. Overland Park, KS: Primedia, Summer 2003. Aircraft Hazards. Section 3.5.1.6, Standard Review Plan, Report No. NUREG-0800. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, D.C., 1981. Airport Design. AC 150/5300-13. Federal Aviation Administration, September 1989. Air Traffic Organization Safety Management System Manual, Version 2.0 (Draft). Federal Aviation Administration, March 2006. Ale, B. and Piers, M. The Use of Risk Information for the Development of a Safety Policy Around Airports. Safety Engineering and Risk Analysis (SERA) technical sessions. ASME, Vol. 10, 2000, pp.51–58. Ale, B., Smith, E. and Pitblado, R. Safety Around Airports— Developments in the 1990s and Future Directions. Presented at IBC Conference. Annex 14 to the Convention on International Civil Aviation–Airfields– International Standards and Recommended Practices, 3rd edition ed. Vol. I Aerodrome Design and Operations. International Civil Aviation Organization, Montreal, Canada, 1999. Appleyard, A., Caves, R., Pitfield, D., and Wong, K. Normalization of Aircraft Accident Data. Presented at Air Transport Research Soci- ety World Conference, Nagoya, Japan, May 2006. Ash, A. and Schwartz, M. R2: A Useful Measure of Model Performance When Predicting a Dichotomous Outcome. Statistics in Medicine, 18(4), 1999, pp. 375–384. Boeing Commercial Airplanes. Statistical Summary of Commercial Jet Airplane Accidents—Worldwide Operations 1959-2004. May 2005. California Airport Land Use Planning Handbook. Division of Aeronau- tics, California Department of Transportation, January, 2002. Caves, R. Control of Risk Near Airports. Built Environment, Vol. 22, No. 3, 1996, pp. 223. Caves, R. and Gosling, G.D. Strategic Airport Planning. Pergamon, Oxford, England, 1999. Cowell, P., Foot, P., Gerrard, R., Kent, D., Mason, S., and Rivoire, A. A Method for Calculating Individual Risk Due to Aircraft Accidents Near Airports. R&D Report 0007. National Air Traffic Services, London, 2000. Crash Cost Estimates by Maximum Police-Reported Injury Severity Within Selected Crash Geometries. FAA Publication No. FHWA- HRT-05-051. Federal Aviation Administration, October 2005. David, R. Location of Aircraft Accidents/Incidents Relative to Runways. DOT/FAA/AOV 90-1. Office of Safety Oversight, Federal Aviation Administration, 1990. DeGroh, B. Rink or Runway? Air Line Pilot, November/December, 2006, pp.14–19. Development of a Systems Risk Methodology for Single and Multi- Modal Transportation System. U.S. Department of Transporta- tion, Washington, D.C., 1979. Eddowes, M., Hancox, J., and MacInnes, A. Final Report on the Risk Analysis in Support of Aerodrome Design Rules. AEAT/RAIR/ RD02325/R/002, Issue 1, Dec. 2001. Eisenhut, D.G. Reactor Siting in the Vicinity of Airfields. Transaction of the American Nuclear Society. Vol. 16, 1973, pp. 210–211. Enders, J., Dodd, R., Tarrel, R., Khatwa, R., Roelen, A., and Karwal, A. Airport Safety: A Study of Accidents and Available Approach-and- Landing Aids. Flight Safety Digest, Vol. 15, No. 3, 1996. Flight Safety Foundation. ALAR Tool Kit. Flight Safety Digest, Vol. 19, No. 8–11, Aug-Nov 2000. Flight Safety Foundation. Controlled Flight into Terrain Takes Highest Toll in Business Jet Operations. Flight Safety Digest, Vol. 23, No. 5, May 2004. Flight Safety Foundation. Special FSF Report: Killers in Aviation: FSF Task Force Presents Facts About Approach-and-Landing and Controlled-Flight-into-Terrain Accidents. Flight Safety Digest, Vol. 17, No. 11–12, Nov.–Dec. 1998, Vol. 18, No. 1–2, Jan.–Feb. 1999. GAIN Working Group B. Analytical Methods and Tools, Guide to Methods & Tools for Airline Flight Safety Analysis, June 2003. Garbell, M. Airport Accident Potential and Safety Areas. M.G.G. Con- sultants, Inc., Society of Automotive Engineers, Inc., 1988. Garson, G. Logistic Regression: Statistical Notes from Quantitative Re- search in Public Administration. North Carolina State University, Raleigh, 1998. www2.chass.ncsu.edu/garson/pa765/logistic.htm, accessed 22/01/07. Giesman, P. Wet Runway, Physics, Certification, Application, Boeing Flight Operations Engineering. Presentation, 2005. GRA Inc. Economic Values for FAA Investment and Regulatory Decisions: A Guide. Office of Aviation Policy and Plans, Federal Aviation Administration, Dec 2004. Hagy, H. and Marthinsen, H. Compilations of Accidents/Incidents Involving Runway Overruns/Undershoots/Veeroffs. ALPA Accident References

Investigation Department. Air Line Pilot Association, Washington D.C., 1987. Hosmer, D. and Lemeshow, S. Applied Logistic Regression. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, New Jersey, 2000. INECO. Informe de Riesgos Potenciales Aeropuerto de la Gomera, Spanish Airport Operator (AENA), AEA Technology, March 2006. INECO. Informe de Riesgos Potenciales Aeropuerto de los Rodeos (Tenerife Norte), Spanish Airport Operator (AENA), AEA Tech- nology, July 2005. INECO. Informe final de riesgos Aeropuerto de La Palma, Spanish Air- port Operator (AENA), AEA Technology, March 2004. Jerris, E., Gerafola, J., Dagen, H., and Brady, F. Analysis of Safety Aspects of Aircraft Landing Operations. Final Report 238-01-3-392. ARINC Research Corporation, Annapolis, Maryland, 1963. Khatwa, R. and Helmreich, R. Analysis of Critical Factors During Ap- proach and Landing in Accidents and Normal Flight. Flight Safety Digest. Vol. 17, No. 11–12, November 1998, Vol. 18, No. 1–2, February 1999, pp. 1–77. Khatwa, R., Roelen, A.L., Karwal, A.K., Enders, J.H., Dodd, R., and Tarrel, R. An Evaluation of Approach Landing Factors Influencing Air- port Safety. NLR-TP-96221U. Dutch National Aerospace Laboratory NLR, Amsterdam, Netherlands,1996. Kimura, C., Bennett, C., Sandquist, G., and Smith, S. Aircraft Accident Data Development for Aircraft Risk Evaluation to Ground Facili- ties Through the Use of G.I.S. Proc., ASME Joint Pressure Vessels & Piping Conference, Honolulu, Hawaii, Vol. 256, 1994, pp. 493–513. Kirkland, I. The Risk Assessment of Aircraft Runway Overrun Accidents and Incidents. PhD thesis. Loughborough University, United Kingdom, 2001. Kirkland, I., Caves, R.E., Hirst, M., and Pitfield, D.E. The Normaliza- tion of Aircraft Overrun Accident Data. Journal of Air Transport Management, Vol. 9, No. 6, 2003, pp. 333–341. Kirkland, I.D., Caves, R.E., Humphreys, I.M. and Pitfield, D.E. An Im- proved Methodology for Assessing Risk in Aircraft Operations at Airports, Applied to Runway Overruns. Safety Science, Vol. 42, No. 10, 2004, pp. 891–905. Landing Performance Assessments at Time of Arrival (Turbojets). Safety Alert for Operators. Flight Standards Service, Federal Avia- tion Administration, 2006. Li, G.I., Baker, S.P., Grabowski, J.G., and Rebok, G.W. Factors Associ- ated with Pilot Error in Aviation Crashes. Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine, Vol. 72, No. 1, 2001, pp.52–58. Manchester Airport Runway End Safety Assessment. Engineering, Safety & Risk (ESR) Technology, January 2007. Manual on the Use of the Collision Risk Model (CRM) for ILS Operations, 1st edition. Doc 9274-AN/904. International Civil Aviation Orga- nization, Montreal, Canada, 1980. Menard, S.W. Applied Logistic Regression Analysis, 2nd edition. Sage University Papers Series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences, 07-103. Sage, Thousand Oaks, Calif., 2001. Myers, R. Classical and Modern Regression with Applications, 2nd edi- tion. Duxbury, Boston, 1990. Nagelkerke, N., Smits, J., Le Cessie, S., and van Houwelingen, H. Test- ing the Goodness-of-Fit of the Logistic Regression Model in Case- Control Studies Using Sample Reweighting. Statistics in Medicine, Vol. 24, 2005, pp.121–130. Pampel, F. Logistic Regression: A Primer. Sage University Papers Series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences, 07-132. Sage, Thousand Oaks, Calif., 2000. Piers, M. The Development and Application of a Method for the As- sessment of Third Party Risk Due to Aircraft Accidents in the Vicinity of Airports. Proc., 19th International Council of Aeronauti- cal Sciences Congress, Anaheim, Calif., Vol. 19, 1994, pp.507–518. Piers, M. Methods and Models for the Assessment of Third Party Risk Due to Aircraft Accidents in the Vicinity of Airports and Their Im- plication for Societal Risk. Presentation at a Workshop on Societal Risk, Utrecht, Netherlands, May 22-23, 1996. Piers, M., Loog, M., Giesberts, M., Moek, G., Couwenberg, M., and Smeets, M. The Development of a Method for the Analysis of Societal and Individual Risk Due to Aircraft Accidents in the Vicin- ity of Airports. NLR-CR-93372L. Dutch National Aerospace Lab- oratory NLR, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 1993. Pikaar, A.J., Piers, M.A., and Ale, B. External Risk Around Airports: A Model Update. NLR-TP-2000-400. Dutch National Aerospace Laboratory NLR, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 2000. Risks from Aeroplanes Overrunning Aerodrome Runways. United King- dom Civil Aviation Authority Edition 1., London, 1998. Roelen, A., Bellamy, L., Hale, A. Molemaker, R., and van Paassen, M. A. Causal Model for the Assessment of Third Party Risk Around Air- ports. Ministerie van Verkeer en Waterstaat, Programmadirectie Ontwikkeling Nationale Luchthaven, April, 2000. Safety In and Around Airports. European Transport Safety Council, Brussels, Belgium, 1999. System Design and Analysis. AC 25.1309-1A. Federal Aviation Admin- istration, June 1988. Tabachnick, B. and Fidell, L. Using Multivariate Statistics. Harper Collins, New York, 1996. Third Party Risk Near Airports and Public Safety Zone Policy. Depart- ment for Transport, London, 1997. Winn, R. Probing the Causes of Aircraft Accidents. Aerospace America. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, September, 2006. Wong, D. The Modeling of Accident Frequency Using Risk Exposure Data for the Assessment of Airport Safety Areas. PhD thesis. Loughborough University, United Kingdom, 2007. Wong, D., Appleyard, A., Caves, R., and Pitfield, D. An Approach to Airport Risk Assessment Using Normal Operations Data with Bootstrapped Logistic Regression. Presented at 44th Annual Meet- ing of the Western Regional Science Association, San Diego, Calif., Feb 2005. Wong, D., Appleyard, A., Caves, R., and Pitfield, D. The Development of Models of the Frequency of Aircraft Accidents Near Airports. Presented at 9th ATRS World Conference, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, July 2005. Wong, D., Pitfield, D., Caves, R., and Appleyard, A. Identifying and Quantifying the Criticality of Aviation Accident Risk Factors. Pre- sented at Air Transport Research Society World Conference, Nagoya, Japan, May 2006. 49

Next: Appendices »
Analysis of Aircraft Overruns and Undershoots for Runway Safety Areas Get This Book
×
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

TRB's Airport Cooperative Research Program (ACRP) Report 3: Analysis of Aircraft Overruns and Undershoots for Runway Safety Areas explores overrun and undershoot accident and incident data conditions relating to these occurrences. The report also includes an assessment of risk in relation to the runway safety area and highlights a set of alternatives to the traditional runway safety area. The appendices to ACRP Report 3 are available online.

ACRP Report 50: Improved Models for Risk Assessment of Runway Safety Areas, which was released in July 2011, expands on the researc presented in ACRP Report 3. ACRP Report 50 analyses aircraft veer-offs, the use of declared distances, the implementation of the Engineered Material Arresting System, and the incorporation of a risk approach for consideration of obstacles in or in the vicinity of the runway safety area.

View the Impact on Practice related to this report.

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!