Click for next page ( 49


The National Academies | 500 Fifth St. N.W. | Washington, D.C. 20001
Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
Terms of Use and Privacy Statement



Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 48
48 References AEA Technology. London City Airport: Runway End Safety Area (RESA) Crash Cost Estimates by Maximum Police-Reported Injury Severity Studies. London City Airport, February 2002. Within Selected Crash Geometries. FAA Publication No. FHWA- AEA Technology. Runway End Safety Area (RESA) Risk Assessment at HRT-05-051. Federal Aviation Administration, October 2005. Southampton International Airport.UK Airport Operator BAA, David, R. Location of Aircraft Accidents/Incidents Relative to Runways. March 1999. DOT/FAA/AOV 90-1. Office of Safety Oversight, Federal Aviation Airbus. Takeoff and Departure Operations--Understanding Takeoff Administration, 1990. Speeds, Flight Operations Briefing Notes. August 2004. DeGroh, B. Rink or Runway? Air Line Pilot, November/December, Aircraft Bluebook Price Digest. Overland Park, KS: Primedia, Summer 2006, pp.1419. 2003. Development of a Systems Risk Methodology for Single and Multi- Aircraft Hazards. Section 3.5.1.6, Standard Review Plan, Report No. Modal Transportation System. U.S. Department of Transporta- NUREG-0800. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, tion, Washington, D.C., 1979. D.C., 1981. Eddowes, M., Hancox, J., and MacInnes, A. Final Report on the Risk Airport Design. AC 150/5300-13. Federal Aviation Administration, Analysis in Support of Aerodrome Design Rules. AEAT/RAIR/ September 1989. RD02325/R/002, Issue 1, Dec. 2001. Air Traffic Organization Safety Management System Manual, Version 2.0 Eisenhut, D.G. Reactor Siting in the Vicinity of Airfields. Transaction of (Draft). Federal Aviation Administration, March 2006. the American Nuclear Society. Vol. 16, 1973, pp. 210211. Ale, B. and Piers, M. The Use of Risk Information for the Development Enders, J., Dodd, R., Tarrel, R., Khatwa, R., Roelen, A., and Karwal, A. of a Safety Policy Around Airports. Safety Engineering and Risk Airport Safety: A Study of Accidents and Available Approach-and- Analysis (SERA) technical sessions. ASME, Vol. 10, 2000, pp.5158. Landing Aids. Flight Safety Digest, Vol. 15, No. 3, 1996. Ale, B., Smith, E. and Pitblado, R. Safety Around Airports-- Flight Safety Foundation. ALAR Tool Kit. Flight Safety Digest, Vol. 19, Developments in the 1990s and Future Directions. Presented at No. 811, Aug-Nov 2000. IBC Conference. Flight Safety Foundation. Controlled Flight into Terrain Takes Highest Annex 14 to the Convention on International Civil AviationAirfields Toll in Business Jet Operations. Flight Safety Digest, Vol. 23, No. 5, International Standards and Recommended Practices, 3rd edition ed. May 2004. Vol. I Aerodrome Design and Operations. International Civil Flight Safety Foundation. Special FSF Report: Killers in Aviation: FSF Aviation Organization, Montreal, Canada, 1999. Task Force Presents Facts About Approach-and-Landing and Appleyard, A., Caves, R., Pitfield, D., and Wong, K. Normalization of Controlled-Flight-into-Terrain Accidents. Flight Safety Digest, Aircraft Accident Data. Presented at Air Transport Research Soci- Vol. 17, No. 1112, Nov.Dec. 1998, Vol. 18, No. 12, Jan.Feb. ety World Conference, Nagoya, Japan, May 2006. 1999. Ash, A. and Schwartz, M. R2: A Useful Measure of Model Performance GAIN Working Group B. Analytical Methods and Tools, Guide to When Predicting a Dichotomous Outcome. Statistics in Medicine, Methods & Tools for Airline Flight Safety Analysis, June 2003. 18(4), 1999, pp. 375384. Garbell, M. Airport Accident Potential and Safety Areas. M.G.G. Con- Boeing Commercial Airplanes. Statistical Summary of Commercial Jet sultants, Inc., Society of Automotive Engineers, Inc., 1988. Airplane Accidents--Worldwide Operations 1959-2004. May 2005. Garson, G. Logistic Regression: Statistical Notes from Quantitative Re- California Airport Land Use Planning Handbook. Division of Aeronau- search in Public Administration. North Carolina State University, tics, California Department of Transportation, January, 2002. Raleigh, 1998. www2.chass.ncsu.edu/garson/pa765/logistic.htm, Caves, R. Control of Risk Near Airports. Built Environment, Vol. 22, No. accessed 22/01/07. 3, 1996, pp. 223. Giesman, P. Wet Runway, Physics, Certification, Application, Boeing Caves, R. and Gosling, G.D. Strategic Airport Planning. Pergamon, Flight Operations Engineering. Presentation, 2005. Oxford, England, 1999. GRA Inc. Economic Values for FAA Investment and Regulatory Decisions: Cowell, P., Foot, P., Gerrard, R., Kent, D., Mason, S., and Rivoire, A. A A Guide. Office of Aviation Policy and Plans, Federal Aviation Method for Calculating Individual Risk Due to Aircraft Accidents Administration, Dec 2004. Near Airports. R&D Report 0007. National Air Traffic Services, Hagy, H. and Marthinsen, H. Compilations of Accidents/Incidents London, 2000. Involving Runway Overruns/Undershoots/Veeroffs. ALPA Accident

OCR for page 48
49 Investigation Department. Air Line Pilot Association, Washington Control Studies Using Sample Reweighting. Statistics in Medicine, D.C., 1987. Vol. 24, 2005, pp.121130. Hosmer, D. and Lemeshow, S. Applied Logistic Regression. John Wiley Pampel, F. Logistic Regression: A Primer. Sage University Papers Series & Sons, Hoboken, New Jersey, 2000. on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences, 07-132. Sage, INECO. Informe de Riesgos Potenciales Aeropuerto de la Gomera, Thousand Oaks, Calif., 2000. Spanish Airport Operator (AENA), AEA Technology, March 2006. Piers, M. The Development and Application of a Method for the As- INECO. Informe de Riesgos Potenciales Aeropuerto de los Rodeos sessment of Third Party Risk Due to Aircraft Accidents in the (Tenerife Norte), Spanish Airport Operator (AENA), AEA Tech- Vicinity of Airports. Proc., 19th International Council of Aeronauti- nology, July 2005. cal Sciences Congress, Anaheim, Calif., Vol. 19, 1994, pp.507518. INECO. Informe final de riesgos Aeropuerto de La Palma, Spanish Air- Piers, M. Methods and Models for the Assessment of Third Party Risk port Operator (AENA), AEA Technology, March 2004. Due to Aircraft Accidents in the Vicinity of Airports and Their Im- Jerris, E., Gerafola, J., Dagen, H., and Brady, F. Analysis of Safety Aspects plication for Societal Risk. Presentation at a Workshop on Societal of Aircraft Landing Operations. Final Report 238-01-3-392. ARINC Risk, Utrecht, Netherlands, May 22-23, 1996. Research Corporation, Annapolis, Maryland, 1963. Piers, M., Loog, M., Giesberts, M., Moek, G., Couwenberg, M., and Khatwa, R. and Helmreich, R. Analysis of Critical Factors During Ap- Smeets, M. The Development of a Method for the Analysis of proach and Landing in Accidents and Normal Flight. Flight Safety Societal and Individual Risk Due to Aircraft Accidents in the Vicin- Digest. Vol. 17, No. 1112, November 1998, Vol. 18, No. 12, ity of Airports. NLR-CR-93372L. Dutch National Aerospace Lab- February 1999, pp. 177. oratory NLR, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 1993. Khatwa, R., Roelen, A.L., Karwal, A.K., Enders, J.H., Dodd, R., and Pikaar, A.J., Piers, M.A., and Ale, B. External Risk Around Airports: A Tarrel, R. An Evaluation of Approach Landing Factors Influencing Air- Model Update. NLR-TP-2000-400. Dutch National Aerospace port Safety. NLR-TP-96221U. Dutch National Aerospace Laboratory Laboratory NLR, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 2000. NLR, Amsterdam, Netherlands,1996. Risks from Aeroplanes Overrunning Aerodrome Runways. United King- Kimura, C., Bennett, C., Sandquist, G., and Smith, S. Aircraft Accident dom Civil Aviation Authority Edition 1., London, 1998. Data Development for Aircraft Risk Evaluation to Ground Facili- Roelen, A., Bellamy, L., Hale, A. Molemaker, R., and van Paassen, M. A. ties Through the Use of G.I.S. Proc., ASME Joint Pressure Vessels & Causal Model for the Assessment of Third Party Risk Around Air- Piping Conference, Honolulu, Hawaii, Vol. 256, 1994, pp. 493513. ports. Ministerie van Verkeer en Waterstaat, Programmadirectie Kirkland, I. The Risk Assessment of Aircraft Runway Overrun Accidents and Ontwikkeling Nationale Luchthaven, April, 2000. Incidents. PhD thesis. Loughborough University, United Kingdom, Safety In and Around Airports. European Transport Safety Council, 2001. Brussels, Belgium, 1999. Kirkland, I., Caves, R.E., Hirst, M., and Pitfield, D.E. The Normaliza- System Design and Analysis. AC 25.1309-1A. Federal Aviation Admin- tion of Aircraft Overrun Accident Data. Journal of Air Transport istration, June 1988. Management, Vol. 9, No. 6, 2003, pp. 333341. Tabachnick, B. and Fidell, L. Using Multivariate Statistics. Harper Kirkland, I.D., Caves, R.E., Humphreys, I.M. and Pitfield, D.E. An Im- Collins, New York, 1996. proved Methodology for Assessing Risk in Aircraft Operations at Third Party Risk Near Airports and Public Safety Zone Policy. Depart- Airports, Applied to Runway Overruns. Safety Science, Vol. 42, No. ment for Transport, London, 1997. 10, 2004, pp. 891905. Winn, R. Probing the Causes of Aircraft Accidents. Aerospace America. Landing Performance Assessments at Time of Arrival (Turbojets). American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, September, Safety Alert for Operators. Flight Standards Service, Federal Avia- 2006. tion Administration, 2006. Wong, D. The Modeling of Accident Frequency Using Risk Exposure Data Li, G.I., Baker, S.P., Grabowski, J.G., and Rebok, G.W. Factors Associ- for the Assessment of Airport Safety Areas. PhD thesis. Loughborough ated with Pilot Error in Aviation Crashes. Aviation, Space, and University, United Kingdom, 2007. Environmental Medicine, Vol. 72, No. 1, 2001, pp.5258. Wong, D., Appleyard, A., Caves, R., and Pitfield, D. An Approach to Manchester Airport Runway End Safety Assessment. Engineering, Safety Airport Risk Assessment Using Normal Operations Data with & Risk (ESR) Technology, January 2007. Bootstrapped Logistic Regression. Presented at 44th Annual Meet- Manual on the Use of the Collision Risk Model (CRM) for ILS Operations, ing of the Western Regional Science Association, San Diego, Calif., 1st edition. Doc 9274-AN/904. International Civil Aviation Orga- Feb 2005. nization, Montreal, Canada, 1980. Wong, D., Appleyard, A., Caves, R., and Pitfield, D. The Development Menard, S.W. Applied Logistic Regression Analysis, 2nd edition. Sage of Models of the Frequency of Aircraft Accidents Near Airports. University Papers Series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Presented at 9th ATRS World Conference, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, Sciences, 07-103. Sage, Thousand Oaks, Calif., 2001. July 2005. Myers, R. Classical and Modern Regression with Applications, 2nd edi- Wong, D., Pitfield, D., Caves, R., and Appleyard, A. Identifying and tion. Duxbury, Boston, 1990. Quantifying the Criticality of Aviation Accident Risk Factors. Pre- Nagelkerke, N., Smits, J., Le Cessie, S., and van Houwelingen, H. Test- sented at Air Transport Research Society World Conference, ing the Goodness-of-Fit of the Logistic Regression Model in Case- Nagoya, Japan, May 2006.