Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter.
Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.
Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.
OCR for page 49
50
REFERENCES
1. DeCorla-Souza, P., "Value Pricing Projects Around the 17. "Support Falls for 241 Extension," Orange County
United States," Presented at 8th TRB Conference on Register, June 7, 2001.
the Application of Transportation Planning Methods, 18. "California: Toll Poll," Bond Buyer, July 6, 2001.
Corpus Christ, Tex., Apr. 2226, 2001. 19. "Far South Support for 241 Extension at 55%," Orange
2. Polsby, N. and A. Wildavsky, Presidential Elections, County Register, June 10, 2001.
7th ed., The Free Press, New York, N.Y., 1988. 20. Baldassare, M., "PPIC Statewide Survey: Special
3. Key, V.O., Public Opinion and American Democracy, Survey of Orange County," Public Policy Institute of
Knopf, New York, N.Y., 1961. California, San Francisco, Sep. 2001.
4. "Founding Fathers Home Page," Documents, Federalist 21. Burris, M., M. Byers, and C. Swenson, "Results of
Papers [Online]. Available: www.foundingfathers.info/ Driver Survey Investigating Intersection Queue Jumps,"
federalistpapers/ [accessed Aug. 21, 2007]. Transportation Research Record 1839, Transportation
5. Gallup, G. and S. Rae, The Pulse of Democracy: The Research Board, National Research Council, Washing-
Public Opinion Poll and How It Works, Simon and ton, D.C., 2003, pp. 2533.
Schuster, New York, N.Y., 1940. 22. "Orange County; Build Foothill South, Voters Say in
6. Harsman, B., "Urban Road Pricing Acceptance," Survey," Los Angeles Times, July 12, 2002.
Presented at IMPRINT-EUROPE seminar, Brussels, 23. "Residents Give Edge to Toll Road, Survey Says,"
Belgium, 2001. Orange County Register, July 18, 2002.
7. Zmud, J., "Data Requirements to Support Road Pric- 24. "Hanson's Toll-Road Statistics Wrong; Survey Quoted
ing Analysis," Proceedings of the Expert Forum on by Commission Does Not Say 98% Support Road,"
Road Pricing and Travel Demand Modeling, Office of Orlando Sentinel, April 4, 2002.
the Assistant Secretary for Transportation Policy, U.S. 25. "Hike Cigarette Taxes to Stop Kids from Smoking,
Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C., 2005. New York State Voters Tell Quinnipiac University
8. Durrenberger, J.A., Turnpikes: A Study of the Toll Road Poll; State Voters Oppose East River Tolls 31," Quin-
Movement in the Middle Atlantic States and Maryland, nipiac University, Feb. 28, 2002 [Online]. Available:
Southern Stationery and Printing, Valdosta, Ga., 1981. www.quinnipiac.edu/x1318.xml?ReleaseID=440 [ac-
9. "2007 Toll Facilities in the United States," Federal cessed Aug. 21, 2007].
Highway Administration, Washington, D.C. [Online]. 26. "Views Vary on Survey for Parkway," St. Petersburg
Available: www.fhwa.dot.gov./ohim/tollpage/history. Times, Sep. 1, 2002.
htm [accessed Aug. 21, 2007]. 27. "Big FoothillSouth EIR Is on Its Way/Toll Agency
10. Lindsey, R., "Do Economists Reach a Conclusion on Also Releases Survey," Orange County Register,
Road Pricing? The Intellectual History of an Idea," Econ Sep. 18, 2003.
Journal Watch, Vol. 3, No. 2, 2006, pp. 292379. 28. Holguin-Veras, J., K. Ozbay, and A. de Cerrano, Eval-
11. Hedlund, K. and R. Smith, "SAFETEA-LU Promotes uation Study of Port Authority of New York and New
Private Investment in Transportation," 2005 [Online]. Jersey's Time of Day Pricing Initiative, Final Report,
Available: www.ncppp.org/resources/papers/nossaman_ Mar. 2005.
safetea.pd [accessed Aug. 21, 2007]. 29. Baldassare, M., PPIC Statewide Survey: Special Sur-
12. "Poll Finds 58% Favor Foothill Extension," Los Angeles vey of Orange County, Public Policy Institute of Cali-
Times, June 7, 2001. fornia, San Francisco, Dec. 2003 [Online]. Available:
13. "Candidates Differ on Best Solution to Traffic Crunch: www.ppic.org/content/pubs/survey/S_1203MBS.pdf
The Public May Be Open to the Idea of Toll Roads," [accessed Aug. 21, 2007].
Your Voice, Your Vote, News & Record (Greensboro, 30. Collier, T. and K. Womack, "Public Perception Data
North Carolina), Oct. 1, 2000. Collection Regarding Tolling in a Small Urban/Rural
14. "Tolls Not Big Issue, but the Traffic Is," Chicago Area: Some Surprising Findings," Presented at the 84th
Tribune, May 16, 2001. Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board,
15. Regan, E., "The View on Tolls: Political Perceptions Washington, D.C., Jan. 913, 2005.
vs. Public Opinion," Presented at International Bridge 31. "Road Test; Poll: Voters Want Next Mayor to Fix
Tunnel and Turnpike Association International Trans- Traffic," Saturday State Times/Morning Advocate,
port Finance Summit, Nice, France, 2005. May 29, 2004.
16. "Poll Shows Most Support Toll Road--TCA Surveys 32. "Survey Shows Support for Foothill-South," Orange
Says 54 Percent of Residents Support Foothill South: County Register, July 2, 2004.
Environmental Groups Question Poll," Orange County 33. "Decision Research," Foothill-South Follow-up Public
Register, June 7, 2001. Opinion Survey Report, Prepared for the Transporta-
OCR for page 50
51
tion Corridor Agencies [Online]. Available: www. 83rd Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research
thetollroads.com/home/images/decision_research.pdf Board, Washington, D.C., Jan. 1113, 2004.
[accessed Aug. 21, 2007]. 52. "Minnesota Poll; 69 Percent Comfortable with Toll
34. "Residents Satisfied with State Highways; Seventy- Roads," Star Tribune, Jan. 28, 2004.
Nine Percent Said They Think the State Is Maintaining 53. Resource Systems Group, Summary Report: South
Highway Systems Well," Wisconsin State Journal, Florida Managed Lanes Focus Groups, Prepared for
Aug. 12, 2004. MDX and Florida's Turnpike Enterprise, April 2005.
35. "Field Poll: California Government: Support Broad for 54. "Express Toll Lanes Endorsed by Commuters," The Tom
Review Plan," Press Enterprise, Aug. 11, 2004. Warne Report, Vol. 3, No. 17, Apr. 27, 2006 [Online].
36. NuStats, Austin, Tex., Texas Toll Road Study: Final Available: www.tomwarnereport.com/twr/twr_v3n17.
Report, Prepared for the Texas Department of Trans- html#a3 [accessed Aug. 26, 2007].
portation, Austin, Apr. 2005. 55. Resource Systems Group, Summary Report: I-75
37. "Lies, Damn Lies, and Statistics," OC Weekly, Sep. 2, Express Lanes Focus Groups, Draft, Prepared for MDX
2005. and Florida's Turnpike Enterprise, Nov. 2006.
38. "Public Support Strong, Steady to Complete 241 Toll 56. Above Water Public Relations Marketing, Collier
Road," The Toll Roads, Irvine, Calif. [Online]. County Citizen Survey 2007: Executive Summary &
Available: www.thetollroads.com/home/news_press_ Methodology, Collier County, Florida, 2007.
aug05a.htm [accessed Aug. 22, 2007]. 57. Wilbur Smith Associates, I-15 Congestion Pricing
39. "Education May Shift Toll Road Acceptance into Fast Project Report, Task 3-A--Baseline Market Study, Pre-
Lane," San Antonio Express-News, Oct. 13, 2005. pared for the San Diego Association of Governments,
40. NuStats, Austin, Tex., Central Texas Toll Road Base- Nov. 1996.
line Marketing Survey: Final Report, Prepared for the 58. Godbe Research and Analysis, I-15 ExpressPass Focus
Texas Department of Transportation, Austin, July 2005. Groups Conducted for the San Diego Association of
41. Wilson Research Strategies, Report on CTRMA Public Governments, July 1997.
Survey, Aug. 2005. 59. Golob, J., J. Supernak, and T. Golob, I-15 Congestion
42. "Toll Poll Puts Agency on Notice," Austin American- Pricing Project Monitoring and Evaluation Services.
Statesman, Sep. 29, 2005. Task 3.2.3. Phase I Attitudinal Panel Study, San Diego
43. "Most Favor Toll Roads--ASAP," Deseret Morning State University Foundation, Prepared for the San Diego
News, Feb. 20, 2006. Association of Governments, May 1998.
44. "Many in EP Oppose Toll Roads," El Paso Times, 60. Golob, T., J. Golob, and J. Supernak, I-15 Congestion
Feb. 26, 2006. Pricing Project Monitoring and Evaluation Services.
45. "Results Are in for City's 2nd Survey," Orange County Task 8. Phase II Year 2 Attitudinal Panel Study, San
Register, July 13, 2006. Diego State University Foundation, Prepared for the
46. Pan Atlantic SMS Group, Report to the Maine Turn- San Diego Association of Governments, June 2000.
pike Authority and Swardlick Marketing Group-- 61. Godbe Research and Analysis, I-15 Focus Group
Benchmarking Survey, Jan. 2007. Research for I-15 Commuters Conducted for the San
47. Sullivan, E., Evaluating the Impacts of the SR 91 Diego Association of Governments, Aug. 1998.
Variable-Toll Express Lane Facility Final Report, 62. Golob, J., J. Supernak, and T. Golob, I-15 Congestion
May 1998 [Online]. Available: www.ceenve3.civeng. Pricing Project Monitoring and Evaluation Services.
calpoly.edu/sullivan/SR91/final_rpt/finalrep_full.pdf Task 8. Phase II Year 3 Attitudinal Panel Study, San
[accessed Aug. 22, 2007]. Diego State University Foundation, Prepared for the
48. Sullivan, E., Continuation Study to Evaluating the San Diego Association of Governments, Feb. 2001.
Impacts of the SR 91 Variable-Toll Express Lane Facil- 63. Pacific Rim Resources, Parsons Brinckerhoff, Inc.,
ity Final Report, Dec. 2000 [Online]. Available: ceenve. and HS Public Affairs, Managed Lanes Public Opinion
calpoly.edu/sullivan/SR91/final_rpt/FinalRep2000.pdf Research--Draft, Prepared for Washington State Depart-
[accessed Aug. 22, 2007]. ment of Transportation, Olympia, May 2001.
49. Resource Systems Group, Summary Report: Orlando 64. Wilber Smith Associates, I-15 Managed Lanes Value
I-4 Express Lanes Focus Group Report, Prepared for Pricing Project Planning Study for San Diego Associa-
Florida's Turnpike Enterprise, Florida Department of tion of Government, Vol. 2: Public Outreach, Feb. 2002.
Transportation, Tallahassee, July 2000. 65. Ungemah, D. and C.D. Tighe, "You're Making Me Hot:
50. Resource Systems Group, Summary Report: Miami Talking High Occupancy/Toll (HOT) Lanes with the
Value Pricing Focus Group Summary Report, Prepared Denver Public," Presented at the 85th Annual Meeting
for Miami Value Pricing Project, June 2002. of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C.,
51. Buckeye, K. and L. Munnich, "Value Pricing Outreach Jan. 2226, 2006.
and Education: Key Steps in Reaching High Occupancy 66. VTA Board of Directors Workshop Meeting Minutes,
Toll Lane Consensus in Minnesota," Presented at the Friday, Nov. 7, 2003.
OCR for page 51
52
67. Illinois Tollway Value Pricing Focus Group Summary transport/docs/summaries/road_prima_report.pdf
Report, Resource Systems Group, Chicago, Nov. 2003. [accessed Aug. 22, 2007].
68. Li, J., S. Ardikani, S. Govind, S. Mattingly, J. Williams, 82. Government Office for London, Road Charging Options
and R. Cole, Developing a Comprehensive Pricing Eval- for London--A Technical Assessment, The Stationary
uation Model for Managed Lanes, Report for the Texas Office, Norwich, United Kingdom, 2000.
Department of Transportation, Austin, June 2005. 83. Tfl World Review of Road Pricing: Phase 2 Case Studies,
69. NuStats, Austin, Tex., MnPASS Evaluation Attitudinal Nov. 2006.
Panel Survey: Wave 1. Final Report, Prepared for the 84. Burris, M. and K.T. Lanan, "Predicted Driver Response
Hubert H. Humphrey Institute of Public Affairs, Uni- to a Cordon Toll Around Fort Myers Beach, Florida,"
versity of Minnesota, Minneapolis/St. Paul, Feb. 2005. Advances in Transportation Studies an International
70. Sycamore Consulting and Parsons, Brinckerhoff, Quade Journal, Section B 5, 2005.
& Douglas, High Occupancy Toll Lanes and Truck Only 85. Cain, A., "Achieving Majority Public Support for Urban
Toll Facilities: Potential for Implementation in the Road Pricing--Preserving the Driver's Right to Choose,"
Atlanta Region, Draft Focus Group Report, Prepared Presented at the 84th Annual Meeting of the Transporta-
for Georgia State Road and Tollway Authority, Atlanta, tion Research Board, Washington, D.C., Jan. 913, 2005.
Sep. 2004. 86. "Life in the Faster Lane," Wall Street Journal, July 20,
71. Zmud, J., S. Peterson, and F. Douma, "Preliminary 2007.
Before and After Results of the I-394 HOT Lane Panel 87. Michaels Opinion Research, Congestion Pricing: Sup-
Survey," Presented at the 86th Annual Meeting of the port Among New York City Residents, Conducted for
Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., Tri-State Transportation Campaign, New York, N.Y.,
Jan. 2125, 2007. MayJune 2006.
72. Wilbur Smith Associates with Kelley Swofford Roy, 88. Quinnipiac University Poll, "New York City Voters
Inc., I-95 Managed Lane Focus Groups. Revised Exec- Oppose Congestion Pricing 2-1," Press Release, Jan.
utive Recap, Prepared for the Florida Department of 18, 2007.
Transportation, Tallahassee, Apr. 2007. 89. "Congestion Pricing Gets Modest Support: Poll," Crain's
73. Dan Jones & Associates, UDOT Image Update, 2005, New York Business [Online]. Available: www.newyork
Study conducted for Penna Powers Brian Haynes on business.com [accessed Aug. 26, 2007].
behalf of the Utah Department of Transportation, Salt 90. "Poll Shows Strong Congestion Concern," Surface
Lake City, July 2005. Transportation Newsletter, News Notes, Reason Foun-
74. True North Research, San Diego Region Public Opinion dation, Los Angeles, Calif., Mar. 2007.
Survey. Final Report, Comox, BC, Canada, July 2005. 91. Quinnipiac University Poll, "Spitzer Approval Bounces
75. Bradley, M. and J. Zmud, "Validating Willingness to Pay Back in New York, Quinnipiac University Poll Finds:
Estimates for Tolled Facilities Through Panel Survey State Voters Prefer Congestion Pricing to Fare Hike,"
Methods," Presented at the 11th International Conference Press Release, June 19, 2007.
on Travel Behavior Research, Kyoto, Japan, Aug. 2006. 92. NuStats, Austin, Tex., Technical Report of Methods,
76. NuStats, Austin, Tex., MnPass Evaluation Attitudinal Nov. 2005.
Panel Survey Wave 3 Final Report, Prepared for the 93. "Privately Operated Toll Roads Get Thumbs-Down
Hubert H. Humphrey Institute of Public Affairs, Uni- Vote in Alamo City, Poll Shows," San Antonio Business
versity of Minnesota, Minneapolis/St. Paul, Aug. 2006. Journal, Feb. 6, 2006.
77. "Poll Finds Most Disapprove of Fee for Using HOT 94. "Daniel's Approval Down to 37 Percent; 30 Percent
Lanes," The Associated Press State and Local Wire, Against Lease," Associated Press State and Local Wire,
May 8, 2006. Mar. 5, 2006.
78. NuStats, Austin, Tex., Interstate 75 Passenger Car 95. "Poll Finds Majority Against Indiana Toll Road Lease,"
Stated Preference Survey: Final Report, Prepared for Associated Press State and Local Wire, Sep. 18, 2006.
the Georgia Department of Transportation, Atlanta, 96. "Do We Want State to Sell Its Toll Roads? No Way:
May 2006. 56% Oppose Plan, 19% Favor It in AAA Poll," Record,
79. NuStats, Austin, Tex., SR400 Stated Preference Survey Mar. 20, 2007.
Final Report, Prepared for the Georgia Department of 97. NuStats, Austin, Tex., Technical Report of Methods,
Transportation, Atlanta, Sep. 2006. June 2007.
80. Burris, M., K. Sadabadi, S. Mattingly, M. Mahlawat, 98. "Pennsylvania Voters Back Rendell Plan to Hike Sales
J. Li, I. Rasmidatta, and A. Saroosh, "Reaction to the Tax, Quinnipiac University Poll Finds" [Online]. Avail-
Managed Lane Concept by Various Groups of Travel- able: www.quinnipiac.edu/x1327.xml?ReleaseID=1069
ers," Presented at the 86th Annual Meeting of the [accessed Aug. 23, 2007].
Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 99. RutgersEagleton Poll, "Corzine Faces Uphill Climb
Jan. 2125, 2007. to Sell Toll Road Idea," Eagleton Institute of Politics,
81. Summary Report. PRIMA: Pricing Measures Accep- Rutgers--The State University of New Jersey, Aug.
tance [Online]. Available: ftp.cordis.europa.eu/pub/ 2007.
OCR for page 52
53
100. "Latest Poll: Turnpike Lease Idea Loses Steam," Post- 116. PRR, Traffic Choices Pilot Project Focus Group Sum-
Gazette, Harrisburg Bureau, Aug. 24, 2007. mary Report, Prepared for the Puget Sound Regional
101. "Atlanta Drivers Want Better Roads, but Don't Want Council, May 2006.
Higher Gas Tax, Poll Finds," Atlanta Journal and 117. Cambridge Systematics, Public Attitudes Research Syn-
Constitution, Jan. 14, 2002. opsis, Prepared for the Washington State Transportation
102. Elway Research, Pierce County Public Opinion Survey-- Commission, Olympia, 2006.
State and Regional Transportation Plans, Mar. 2002. 118. Weinstein, A. and J. Dill, "How to Pay for Transporta-
103. [Online]. Available: www.rtid.dst.wa.us/2-20-03%20 tion? A Survey of Public Preferences in California,"
Summary%20Opinion%20Polls.pdf [accessed Aug. 26, Journal of Transport Policy, Vol. 14, No. 4, July 2007,
2007]. pp. 346356.
104. "Most Against Hike in Fuel Tax," Tulsa World, July 5, 119. Transportation Omnibus "Pockets of Pain" Survey, AAA
2005. Market Research, Nov. 2006.
105. "Poll Finds Strong Opposition to Proposed Fuel Tax 120. Monroe, A., "Consistency Between Public Preferences
Increase," Tulsa World, Sep. 4, 2005. and National Policy Decisions," American Politics Quar-
106. "Poll: Wyoming Residents Oppose Raising Fuel Tax terly, Vol. 7, 1979, pp. 319.
for Roads," Associated Press State and Local Wire, 121. Page, B. and R. Shapiro, "Effectiveness of Public
Jan. 8, 2007. Opinion on Public Policy," American Political Science
107. "Study Suggests Tolls Instead of Gas Tax," Oregonian, Review, Vol. 77, 1983, pp. 175190.
Dec. 25, 2000. 122. Evans, A.M., E. Gougherty, M. Morris, and M. Smith,
108. Podgorski, K. and K. Kockelman, "Public Perceptions "Politics, Public Opinion, and Project Design in Califor-
of Toll Roads: A Survey of the Texas Perspective," nia Road Pricing," Presented at the 87th Annual Meeting
Presented at the 85th Annual Meeting of the Transporta- of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C.,
tion Research Board, Washington, D.C., Jan. 2226, Jan. 1317, 2008.
2006. 123. Buttons, K. and E. Verhoef, Road Pricing, Traffic Con-
109. JMM Research, TransNet Public Opinion Survey, Pre- gestion and the Environment: Issues of Efficiency and
pared for SANDAG, 2006. Social Feasibility, Elgar, Cheltenham, England, 1985.
110. "New Tolls, Not Taxes, Favored for Area Roads," 124. Groves, R., "Research on Survey Data Quality," Public
Washington Post, Feb. 16, 2005. Opinion Quarterly, Vol. 51, Summer 1987, pp. 158172.
111. Results of San Antonio Focus Groups: Public Accept- 125. Zmud, J., "Instrument Design: Decisions and Proce-
ability of Express Lane Options for I-35, Texas Trans- dures," In Travel Survey Methods: Quality and Future
portation Institute, College Station, Sep. 2005. Directions, P. Stopher and C. Stecher, Eds., Elsevier
112. San Antonio Northeast Corridor (IH35): Value Priced Science, London, United Kingdom, 2006.
Express Lanes Traffic Estimate. Draft Final Report, 126. Zmud, J., "Designing Instruments to Improve Response,"
Texas Transportation Institute, College Station, Sep. In Transport Survey Quality and Innovation, P. Stopher
2005. and D. Jones, Eds., Pergamon Press, London, United
113. Vrtic, M., N. Schuessler, A. Erath, and K. Axhausen, Kingdom, 2003.
"Design Elements of Road Pricing Schemes and Their 127. Zmud, J. and C. Arce, "Item Non-Response in Travel
Acceptability," Presented at the 86th Annual Meeting Surveys: Causes and Solutions," In Conference Proceed-
of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., ings, Transport Surveys: Raising the Standard, Inter-
Jan. 1317, 2007. national Conference on Transport Survey Quality and
114. MarketLine Research, Minnesota Department of Trans- Innovation, Grainau, Germany, May 1997.
portation Statewide Omnibus Study 2005, Prepared for 128. Higgins, T., "Congestion Pricing: Public Polling Per-
Mn/DOT Market Research, Mar. 2006. spective," Transportation Quarterly, Vol. 51, No. 2,
115. Lawrence Research, A Two-Phase Study of Attitudes of Spring 1997, pp. 97104.
Washington State Voters Toward Transportation Issues, 129. Habermas, J., The Structural Transformation of the Pub-
Prepared for Washington State Transportation Com- lic Sphere, Ploity Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom,
mission, Apr. 11, 2006. 1989.
