Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.
50 1. DeCorla-Souza, P., âValue Pricing Projects Around the United States,â Presented at 8th TRB Conference on the Application of Transportation Planning Methods, Corpus Christ, Tex., Apr. 22â26, 2001. 2. Polsby, N. and A. Wildavsky, Presidential Elections, 7th ed., The Free Press, New York, N.Y., 1988. 3. Key, V.O., Public Opinion and American Democracy, Knopf, New York, N.Y., 1961. 4. âFounding Fathers Home Page,â Documents, Federalist Papers [Online]. Available: www.foundingfathers.info/ federalistpapers/ [accessed Aug. 21, 2007]. 5. Gallup, G. and S. Rae, The Pulse of Democracy: The Public Opinion Poll and How It Works, Simon and Schuster, New York, N.Y., 1940. 6. Harsman, B., âUrban Road Pricing Acceptance,â Presented at IMPRINT-EUROPE seminar, Brussels, Belgium, 2001. 7. Zmud, J., âData Requirements to Support Road Pric- ing Analysis,â Proceedings of the Expert Forum on Road Pricing and Travel Demand Modeling, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Transportation Policy, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C., 2005. 8. Durrenberger, J.A., Turnpikes: A Study of the Toll Road Movement in the Middle Atlantic States and Maryland, Southern Stationery and Printing, Valdosta, Ga., 1981. 9. â2007 Toll Facilities in the United States,â Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C. [Online]. Available: www.fhwa.dot.gov./ohim/tollpage/history. htm [accessed Aug. 21, 2007]. 10. Lindsey, R., âDo Economists Reach a Conclusion on Road Pricing? The Intellectual History of an Idea,â Econ Journal Watch, Vol. 3, No. 2, 2006, pp. 292â379. 11. Hedlund, K. and R. Smith, âSAFETEA-LU Promotes Private Investment in Transportation,â 2005 [Online]. Available: www.ncppp.org/resources/papers/nossaman_ safetea.pd [accessed Aug. 21, 2007]. 12. âPoll Finds 58% Favor Foothill Extension,â Los Angeles Times, June 7, 2001. 13. âCandidates Differ on Best Solution to Traffic Crunch: The Public May Be Open to the Idea of Toll Roads,â Your Voice, Your Vote, News & Record (Greensboro, North Carolina), Oct. 1, 2000. 14. âTolls Not Big Issue, but the Traffic Is,â Chicago Tribune, May 16, 2001. 15. Regan, E., âThe View on Tolls: Political Perceptions vs. Public Opinion,â Presented at International Bridge Tunnel and Turnpike Association International Trans- port Finance Summit, Nice, France, 2005. 16. âPoll Shows Most Support Toll RoadâTCA Surveys Says 54 Percent of Residents Support Foothill South: Environmental Groups Question Poll,â Orange County Register, June 7, 2001. 17. âSupport Falls for 241 Extension,â Orange County Register, June 7, 2001. 18. âCalifornia: Toll Poll,â Bond Buyer, July 6, 2001. 19. âFar South Support for 241 Extension at 55%,â Orange County Register, June 10, 2001. 20. Baldassare, M., âPPIC Statewide Survey: Special Survey of Orange County,â Public Policy Institute of California, San Francisco, Sep. 2001. 21. Burris, M., M. Byers, and C. Swenson, âResults of Driver Survey Investigating Intersection Queue Jumps,â Transportation Research Record 1839, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washing- ton, D.C., 2003, pp. 25â33. 22. âOrange County; Build Foothill South, Voters Say in Survey,â Los Angeles Times, July 12, 2002. 23. âResidents Give Edge to Toll Road, Survey Says,â Orange County Register, July 18, 2002. 24. âHansonâs Toll-Road Statistics Wrong; Survey Quoted by Commission Does Not Say 98% Support Road,â Orlando Sentinel, April 4, 2002. 25. âHike Cigarette Taxes to Stop Kids from Smoking, New York State Voters Tell Quinnipiac University Poll; State Voters Oppose East River Tolls 3â1,â Quin- nipiac University, Feb. 28, 2002 [Online]. Available: www.quinnipiac.edu/x1318.xml?ReleaseID=440 [ac- cessed Aug. 21, 2007]. 26. âViews Vary on Survey for Parkway,â St. Petersburg Times, Sep. 1, 2002. 27. âBig FoothillâSouth EIR Is on Its Way/Toll Agency Also Releases Survey,â Orange County Register, Sep. 18, 2003. 28. Holguin-Veras, J., K. Ozbay, and A. de Cerrano, Eval- uation Study of Port Authority of New York and New Jerseyâs Time of Day Pricing Initiative, Final Report, Mar. 2005. 29. Baldassare, M., PPIC Statewide Survey: Special Sur- vey of Orange County, Public Policy Institute of Cali- fornia, San Francisco, Dec. 2003 [Online]. Available: www.ppic.org/content/pubs/survey/S_1203MBS.pdf [accessed Aug. 21, 2007]. 30. Collier, T. and K. Womack, âPublic Perception Data Collection Regarding Tolling in a Small Urban/Rural Area: Some Surprising Findings,â Presented at the 84th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., Jan. 9â13, 2005. 31. âRoad Test; Poll: Voters Want Next Mayor to Fix Traffic,â Saturday State Times/Morning Advocate, May 29, 2004. 32. âSurvey Shows Support for Foothill-South,â Orange County Register, July 2, 2004. 33. âDecision Research,â Foothill-South Follow-up Public Opinion Survey Report, Prepared for the Transporta- REFERENCES
51 tion Corridor Agencies [Online]. Available: www. thetollroads.com/home/images/decision_research.pdf [accessed Aug. 21, 2007]. 34. âResidents Satisfied with State Highways; Seventy- Nine Percent Said They Think the State Is Maintaining Highway Systems Well,â Wisconsin State Journal, Aug. 12, 2004. 35. âField Poll: California Government: Support Broad for Review Plan,â Press Enterprise, Aug. 11, 2004. 36. NuStats, Austin, Tex., Texas Toll Road Study: Final Report, Prepared for the Texas Department of Trans- portation, Austin, Apr. 2005. 37. âLies, Damn Lies, and Statistics,â OC Weekly, Sep. 2, 2005. 38. âPublic Support Strong, Steady to Complete 241 Toll Road,â The Toll Roads, Irvine, Calif. [Online]. Available: www.thetollroads.com/home/news_press_ aug05a.htm [accessed Aug. 22, 2007]. 39. âEducation May Shift Toll Road Acceptance into Fast Lane,â San Antonio Express-News, Oct. 13, 2005. 40. NuStats, Austin, Tex., Central Texas Toll Road Base- line Marketing Survey: Final Report, Prepared for the Texas Department of Transportation, Austin, July 2005. 41. Wilson Research Strategies, Report on CTRMA Public Survey, Aug. 2005. 42. âToll Poll Puts Agency on Notice,â Austin American- Statesman, Sep. 29, 2005. 43. âMost Favor Toll RoadsâASAP,â Deseret Morning News, Feb. 20, 2006. 44. âMany in EP Oppose Toll Roads,â El Paso Times, Feb. 26, 2006. 45. âResults Are in for Cityâs 2nd Survey,â Orange County Register, July 13, 2006. 46. Pan Atlantic SMS Group, Report to the Maine Turn- pike Authority and Swardlick Marketing Groupâ Benchmarking Survey, Jan. 2007. 47. Sullivan, E., Evaluating the Impacts of the SR 91 Variable-Toll Express Lane Facility Final Report, May 1998 [Online]. Available: www.ceenve3.civeng. calpoly.edu/sullivan/SR91/final_rpt/finalrep_full.pdf [accessed Aug. 22, 2007]. 48. Sullivan, E., Continuation Study to Evaluating the Impacts of the SR 91 Variable-Toll Express Lane Facil- ity Final Report, Dec. 2000 [Online]. Available: ceenve. calpoly.edu/sullivan/SR91/final_rpt/FinalRep2000.pdf [accessed Aug. 22, 2007]. 49. Resource Systems Group, Summary Report: Orlando I-4 Express Lanes Focus Group Report, Prepared for Floridaâs Turnpike Enterprise, Florida Department of Transportation, Tallahassee, July 2000. 50. Resource Systems Group, Summary Report: Miami Value Pricing Focus Group Summary Report, Prepared for Miami Value Pricing Project, June 2002. 51. Buckeye, K. and L. Munnich, âValue Pricing Outreach and Education: Key Steps in Reaching High Occupancy Toll Lane Consensus in Minnesota,â Presented at the 83rd Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., Jan. 11â13, 2004. 52. âMinnesota Poll; 69 Percent Comfortable with Toll Roads,â Star Tribune, Jan. 28, 2004. 53. Resource Systems Group, Summary Report: South Florida Managed Lanes Focus Groups, Prepared for MDX and Floridaâs Turnpike Enterprise, April 2005. 54. âExpress Toll Lanes Endorsed by Commuters,â The Tom Warne Report, Vol. 3, No. 17, Apr. 27, 2006 [Online]. Available: www.tomwarnereport.com/twr/twr_v3n17. html#a3 [accessed Aug. 26, 2007]. 55. Resource Systems Group, Summary Report: I-75 Express Lanes Focus Groups, Draft, Prepared for MDX and Floridaâs Turnpike Enterprise, Nov. 2006. 56. Above Water Public Relations Marketing, Collier County Citizen Survey 2007: Executive Summary & Methodology, Collier County, Florida, 2007. 57. Wilbur Smith Associates, I-15 Congestion Pricing Project Report, Task 3-AâBaseline Market Study, Pre- pared for the San Diego Association of Governments, Nov. 1996. 58. Godbe Research and Analysis, I-15 ExpressPass Focus Groups Conducted for the San Diego Association of Governments, July 1997. 59. Golob, J., J. Supernak, and T. Golob, I-15 Congestion Pricing Project Monitoring and Evaluation Services. Task 3.2.3. Phase I Attitudinal Panel Study, San Diego State University Foundation, Prepared for the San Diego Association of Governments, May 1998. 60. Golob, T., J. Golob, and J. Supernak, I-15 Congestion Pricing Project Monitoring and Evaluation Services. Task 8. Phase II Year 2 Attitudinal Panel Study, San Diego State University Foundation, Prepared for the San Diego Association of Governments, June 2000. 61. Godbe Research and Analysis, I-15 Focus Group Research for I-15 Commuters Conducted for the San Diego Association of Governments, Aug. 1998. 62. Golob, J., J. Supernak, and T. Golob, I-15 Congestion Pricing Project Monitoring and Evaluation Services. Task 8. Phase II Year 3 Attitudinal Panel Study, San Diego State University Foundation, Prepared for the San Diego Association of Governments, Feb. 2001. 63. Pacific Rim Resources, Parsons Brinckerhoff, Inc., and HS Public Affairs, Managed Lanes Public Opinion ResearchâDraft, Prepared for Washington State Depart- ment of Transportation, Olympia, May 2001. 64. Wilber Smith Associates, I-15 Managed Lanes Value Pricing Project Planning Study for San Diego Associa- tion of Government, Vol. 2: Public Outreach, Feb. 2002. 65. Ungemah, D. and C.D. Tighe, âYouâre Making Me Hot: Talking High Occupancy/Toll (HOT) Lanes with the Denver Public,â Presented at the 85th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., Jan. 22â26, 2006. 66. VTA Board of Directors Workshop Meeting Minutes, Friday, Nov. 7, 2003.
52 67. Illinois Tollway Value Pricing Focus Group Summary Report, Resource Systems Group, Chicago, Nov. 2003. 68. Li, J., S. Ardikani, S. Govind, S. Mattingly, J. Williams, and R. Cole, Developing a Comprehensive Pricing Eval- uation Model for Managed Lanes, Report for the Texas Department of Transportation, Austin, June 2005. 69. NuStats, Austin, Tex., MnPASS Evaluation Attitudinal Panel Survey: Wave 1. Final Report, Prepared for the Hubert H. Humphrey Institute of Public Affairs, Uni- versity of Minnesota, Minneapolis/St. Paul, Feb. 2005. 70. Sycamore Consulting and Parsons, Brinckerhoff, Quade & Douglas, High Occupancy Toll Lanes and Truck Only Toll Facilities: Potential for Implementation in the Atlanta Region, Draft Focus Group Report, Prepared for Georgia State Road and Tollway Authority, Atlanta, Sep. 2004. 71. Zmud, J., S. Peterson, and F. Douma, âPreliminary Before and After Results of the I-394 HOT Lane Panel Survey,â Presented at the 86th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., Jan. 21â25, 2007. 72. Wilbur Smith Associates with Kelley Swofford Roy, Inc., I-95 Managed Lane Focus Groups. Revised Exec- utive Recap, Prepared for the Florida Department of Transportation, Tallahassee, Apr. 2007. 73. Dan Jones & Associates, UDOT Image Update, 2005, Study conducted for Penna Powers Brian Haynes on behalf of the Utah Department of Transportation, Salt Lake City, July 2005. 74. True North Research, San Diego Region Public Opinion Survey. Final Report, Comox, BC, Canada, July 2005. 75. Bradley, M. and J. Zmud, âValidating Willingness to Pay Estimates for Tolled Facilities Through Panel Survey Methods,â Presented at the 11th International Conference on Travel Behavior Research, Kyoto, Japan, Aug. 2006. 76. NuStats, Austin, Tex., MnPass Evaluation Attitudinal Panel Survey Wave 3 Final Report, Prepared for the Hubert H. Humphrey Institute of Public Affairs, Uni- versity of Minnesota, Minneapolis/St. Paul, Aug. 2006. 77. âPoll Finds Most Disapprove of Fee for Using HOT Lanes,â The Associated Press State and Local Wire, May 8, 2006. 78. NuStats, Austin, Tex., Interstate 75 Passenger Car Stated Preference Survey: Final Report, Prepared for the Georgia Department of Transportation, Atlanta, May 2006. 79. NuStats, Austin, Tex., SR400 Stated Preference Survey Final Report, Prepared for the Georgia Department of Transportation, Atlanta, Sep. 2006. 80. Burris, M., K. Sadabadi, S. Mattingly, M. Mahlawat, J. Li, I. Rasmidatta, and A. Saroosh, âReaction to the Managed Lane Concept by Various Groups of Travel- ers,â Presented at the 86th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., Jan. 21â25, 2007. 81. Summary Report. PRIMA: Pricing Measures Accep- tance [Online]. Available: ftp.cordis.europa.eu/pub/ transport/docs/summaries/road_prima_report.pdf [accessed Aug. 22, 2007]. 82. Government Office for London, Road Charging Options for LondonâA Technical Assessment, The Stationary Office, Norwich, United Kingdom, 2000. 83. Tfl World Review of Road Pricing: Phase 2 Case Studies, Nov. 2006. 84. Burris, M. and K.T. Lanan, âPredicted Driver Response to a Cordon Toll Around Fort Myers Beach, Florida,â Advances in Transportation Studies an International Journal, Section B 5, 2005. 85. Cain, A., âAchieving Majority Public Support for Urban Road PricingâPreserving the Driverâs Right to Choose,â Presented at the 84th Annual Meeting of the Transporta- tion Research Board, Washington, D.C., Jan. 9â13, 2005. 86. âLife in the Faster Lane,â Wall Street Journal, July 20, 2007. 87. Michaels Opinion Research, Congestion Pricing: Sup- port Among New York City Residents, Conducted for Tri-State Transportation Campaign, New York, N.Y., MayâJune 2006. 88. Quinnipiac University Poll, âNew York City Voters Oppose Congestion Pricing 2-1,â Press Release, Jan. 18, 2007. 89. âCongestion Pricing Gets Modest Support: Poll,â Crainâs New York Business [Online]. Available: www.newyork business.com [accessed Aug. 26, 2007]. 90. âPoll Shows Strong Congestion Concern,â Surface Transportation Newsletter, News Notes, Reason Foun- dation, Los Angeles, Calif., Mar. 2007. 91. Quinnipiac University Poll, âSpitzer Approval Bounces Back in New York, Quinnipiac University Poll Finds: State Voters Prefer Congestion Pricing to Fare Hike,â Press Release, June 19, 2007. 92. NuStats, Austin, Tex., Technical Report of Methods, Nov. 2005. 93. âPrivately Operated Toll Roads Get Thumbs-Down Vote in Alamo City, Poll Shows,â San Antonio Business Journal, Feb. 6, 2006. 94. âDanielâs Approval Down to 37 Percent; 30 Percent Against Lease,â Associated Press State and Local Wire, Mar. 5, 2006. 95. âPoll Finds Majority Against Indiana Toll Road Lease,â Associated Press State and Local Wire, Sep. 18, 2006. 96. âDo We Want State to Sell Its Toll Roads? No Way: 56% Oppose Plan, 19% Favor It in AAA Poll,â Record, Mar. 20, 2007. 97. NuStats, Austin, Tex., Technical Report of Methods, June 2007. 98. âPennsylvania Voters Back Rendell Plan to Hike Sales Tax, Quinnipiac University Poll Findsâ [Online]. Avail- able: www.quinnipiac.edu/x1327.xml?ReleaseID=1069 [accessed Aug. 23, 2007]. 99. RutgersâEagleton Poll, âCorzine Faces Uphill Climb to Sell Toll Road Idea,â Eagleton Institute of Politics, RutgersâThe State University of New Jersey, Aug. 2007.
53 116. PRR, Traffic Choices Pilot Project Focus Group Sum- mary Report, Prepared for the Puget Sound Regional Council, May 2006. 117. Cambridge Systematics, Public Attitudes Research Syn- opsis, Prepared for the Washington State Transportation Commission, Olympia, 2006. 118. Weinstein, A. and J. Dill, âHow to Pay for Transporta- tion? A Survey of Public Preferences in California,â Journal of Transport Policy, Vol. 14, No. 4, July 2007, pp. 346â356. 119. Transportation Omnibus âPockets of Painâ Survey, AAA Market Research, Nov. 2006. 120. Monroe, A., âConsistency Between Public Preferences and National Policy Decisions,â American Politics Quar- terly, Vol. 7, 1979, pp. 3â19. 121. Page, B. and R. Shapiro, âEffectiveness of Public Opinion on Public Policy,â American Political Science Review, Vol. 77, 1983, pp. 175â190. 122. Evans, A.M., E. Gougherty, M. Morris, and M. Smith, âPolitics, Public Opinion, and Project Design in Califor- nia Road Pricing,â Presented at the 87th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., Jan. 13â17, 2008. 123. Buttons, K. and E. Verhoef, Road Pricing, Traffic Con- gestion and the Environment: Issues of Efficiency and Social Feasibility, Elgar, Cheltenham, England, 1985. 124. Groves, R., âResearch on Survey Data Quality,â Public Opinion Quarterly, Vol. 51, Summer 1987, pp. 158â172. 125. Zmud, J., âInstrument Design: Decisions and Proce- dures,â In Travel Survey Methods: Quality and Future Directions, P. Stopher and C. Stecher, Eds., Elsevier Science, London, United Kingdom, 2006. 126. Zmud, J., âDesigning Instruments to Improve Response,â In Transport Survey Quality and Innovation, P. Stopher and D. Jones, Eds., Pergamon Press, London, United Kingdom, 2003. 127. Zmud, J. and C. Arce, âItem Non-Response in Travel Surveys: Causes and Solutions,â In Conference Proceed- ings, Transport Surveys: Raising the Standard, Inter- national Conference on Transport Survey Quality and Innovation, Grainau, Germany, May 1997. 128. Higgins, T., âCongestion Pricing: Public Polling Per- spective,â Transportation Quarterly, Vol. 51, No. 2, Spring 1997, pp. 97â104. 129. Habermas, J., The Structural Transformation of the Pub- lic Sphere, Ploity Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom, 1989. 100. âLatest Poll: Turnpike Lease Idea Loses Steam,â Post- Gazette, Harrisburg Bureau, Aug. 24, 2007. 101. âAtlanta Drivers Want Better Roads, but Donât Want Higher Gas Tax, Poll Finds,â Atlanta Journal and Constitution, Jan. 14, 2002. 102. Elway Research, Pierce County Public Opinion Surveyâ State and Regional Transportation Plans, Mar. 2002. 103. [Online]. Available: www.rtid.dst.wa.us/2-20-03%20 Summary%20Opinion%20Polls.pdf [accessed Aug. 26, 2007]. 104. âMost Against Hike in Fuel Tax,â Tulsa World, July 5, 2005. 105. âPoll Finds Strong Opposition to Proposed Fuel Tax Increase,â Tulsa World, Sep. 4, 2005. 106. âPoll: Wyoming Residents Oppose Raising Fuel Tax for Roads,â Associated Press State and Local Wire, Jan. 8, 2007. 107. âStudy Suggests Tolls Instead of Gas Tax,â Oregonian, Dec. 25, 2000. 108. Podgorski, K. and K. Kockelman, âPublic Perceptions of Toll Roads: A Survey of the Texas Perspective,â Presented at the 85th Annual Meeting of the Transporta- tion Research Board, Washington, D.C., Jan. 22â26, 2006. 109. JMM Research, TransNet Public Opinion Survey, Pre- pared for SANDAG, 2006. 110. âNew Tolls, Not Taxes, Favored for Area Roads,â Washington Post, Feb. 16, 2005. 111. Results of San Antonio Focus Groups: Public Accept- ability of Express Lane Options for I-35, Texas Trans- portation Institute, College Station, Sep. 2005. 112. San Antonio Northeast Corridor (IH35): Value Priced Express Lanes Traffic Estimate. Draft Final Report, Texas Transportation Institute, College Station, Sep. 2005. 113. Vrtic, M., N. Schuessler, A. Erath, and K. Axhausen, âDesign Elements of Road Pricing Schemes and Their Acceptability,â Presented at the 86th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., Jan. 13â17, 2007. 114. MarketLine Research, Minnesota Department of Trans- portation Statewide Omnibus Study 2005, Prepared for Mn/DOT Market Research, Mar. 2006. 115. Lawrence Research, A Two-Phase Study of Attitudes of Washington State Voters Toward Transportation Issues, Prepared for Washington State Transportation Com- mission, Apr. 11, 2006.