National Academies Press: OpenBook

Refining the Simple Performance Tester for Use in Routine Practice (2008)

Chapter: Appendix B - Revised Simple Performance Test System Specification

« Previous: Appendix A - Proposed Standard Practices
Page 65
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B - Revised Simple Performance Test System Specification." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2008. Refining the Simple Performance Tester for Use in Routine Practice. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/14158.
×
Page 65
Page 66
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B - Revised Simple Performance Test System Specification." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2008. Refining the Simple Performance Tester for Use in Routine Practice. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/14158.
×
Page 66
Page 67
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B - Revised Simple Performance Test System Specification." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2008. Refining the Simple Performance Tester for Use in Routine Practice. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/14158.
×
Page 67
Page 68
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B - Revised Simple Performance Test System Specification." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2008. Refining the Simple Performance Tester for Use in Routine Practice. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/14158.
×
Page 68
Page 69
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B - Revised Simple Performance Test System Specification." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2008. Refining the Simple Performance Tester for Use in Routine Practice. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/14158.
×
Page 69
Page 70
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B - Revised Simple Performance Test System Specification." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2008. Refining the Simple Performance Tester for Use in Routine Practice. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/14158.
×
Page 70
Page 71
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B - Revised Simple Performance Test System Specification." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2008. Refining the Simple Performance Tester for Use in Routine Practice. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/14158.
×
Page 71
Page 72
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B - Revised Simple Performance Test System Specification." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2008. Refining the Simple Performance Tester for Use in Routine Practice. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/14158.
×
Page 72
Page 73
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B - Revised Simple Performance Test System Specification." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2008. Refining the Simple Performance Tester for Use in Routine Practice. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/14158.
×
Page 73
Page 74
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B - Revised Simple Performance Test System Specification." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2008. Refining the Simple Performance Tester for Use in Routine Practice. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/14158.
×
Page 74
Page 75
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B - Revised Simple Performance Test System Specification." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2008. Refining the Simple Performance Tester for Use in Routine Practice. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/14158.
×
Page 75
Page 76
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B - Revised Simple Performance Test System Specification." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2008. Refining the Simple Performance Tester for Use in Routine Practice. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/14158.
×
Page 76
Page 77
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B - Revised Simple Performance Test System Specification." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2008. Refining the Simple Performance Tester for Use in Routine Practice. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/14158.
×
Page 77
Page 78
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B - Revised Simple Performance Test System Specification." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2008. Refining the Simple Performance Tester for Use in Routine Practice. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/14158.
×
Page 78
Page 79
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B - Revised Simple Performance Test System Specification." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2008. Refining the Simple Performance Tester for Use in Routine Practice. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/14158.
×
Page 79
Page 80
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B - Revised Simple Performance Test System Specification." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2008. Refining the Simple Performance Tester for Use in Routine Practice. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/14158.
×
Page 80
Page 81
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B - Revised Simple Performance Test System Specification." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2008. Refining the Simple Performance Tester for Use in Routine Practice. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/14158.
×
Page 81
Page 82
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B - Revised Simple Performance Test System Specification." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2008. Refining the Simple Performance Tester for Use in Routine Practice. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/14158.
×
Page 82
Page 83
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B - Revised Simple Performance Test System Specification." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2008. Refining the Simple Performance Tester for Use in Routine Practice. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/14158.
×
Page 83
Page 84
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B - Revised Simple Performance Test System Specification." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2008. Refining the Simple Performance Tester for Use in Routine Practice. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/14158.
×
Page 84
Page 85
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B - Revised Simple Performance Test System Specification." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2008. Refining the Simple Performance Tester for Use in Routine Practice. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/14158.
×
Page 85
Page 86
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B - Revised Simple Performance Test System Specification." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2008. Refining the Simple Performance Tester for Use in Routine Practice. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/14158.
×
Page 86
Page 87
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B - Revised Simple Performance Test System Specification." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2008. Refining the Simple Performance Tester for Use in Routine Practice. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/14158.
×
Page 87
Page 88
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B - Revised Simple Performance Test System Specification." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2008. Refining the Simple Performance Tester for Use in Routine Practice. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/14158.
×
Page 88
Page 89
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B - Revised Simple Performance Test System Specification." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2008. Refining the Simple Performance Tester for Use in Routine Practice. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/14158.
×
Page 89
Page 90
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B - Revised Simple Performance Test System Specification." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2008. Refining the Simple Performance Tester for Use in Routine Practice. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/14158.
×
Page 90
Page 91
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B - Revised Simple Performance Test System Specification." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2008. Refining the Simple Performance Tester for Use in Routine Practice. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/14158.
×
Page 91
Page 92
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B - Revised Simple Performance Test System Specification." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2008. Refining the Simple Performance Tester for Use in Routine Practice. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/14158.
×
Page 92
Page 93
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B - Revised Simple Performance Test System Specification." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2008. Refining the Simple Performance Tester for Use in Routine Practice. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/14158.
×
Page 93
Page 94
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B - Revised Simple Performance Test System Specification." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2008. Refining the Simple Performance Tester for Use in Routine Practice. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/14158.
×
Page 94
Page 95
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B - Revised Simple Performance Test System Specification." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2008. Refining the Simple Performance Tester for Use in Routine Practice. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/14158.
×
Page 95
Page 96
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B - Revised Simple Performance Test System Specification." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2008. Refining the Simple Performance Tester for Use in Routine Practice. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/14158.
×
Page 96
Page 97
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B - Revised Simple Performance Test System Specification." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2008. Refining the Simple Performance Tester for Use in Routine Practice. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/14158.
×
Page 97
Page 98
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B - Revised Simple Performance Test System Specification." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2008. Refining the Simple Performance Tester for Use in Routine Practice. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/14158.
×
Page 98
Page 99
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B - Revised Simple Performance Test System Specification." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2008. Refining the Simple Performance Tester for Use in Routine Practice. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/14158.
×
Page 99
Page 100
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B - Revised Simple Performance Test System Specification." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2008. Refining the Simple Performance Tester for Use in Routine Practice. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/14158.
×
Page 100
Page 101
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B - Revised Simple Performance Test System Specification." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2008. Refining the Simple Performance Tester for Use in Routine Practice. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/14158.
×
Page 101
Page 102
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B - Revised Simple Performance Test System Specification." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2008. Refining the Simple Performance Tester for Use in Routine Practice. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/14158.
×
Page 102
Page 103
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B - Revised Simple Performance Test System Specification." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2008. Refining the Simple Performance Tester for Use in Routine Practice. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/14158.
×
Page 103
Page 104
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B - Revised Simple Performance Test System Specification." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2008. Refining the Simple Performance Tester for Use in Routine Practice. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/14158.
×
Page 104
Page 105
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B - Revised Simple Performance Test System Specification." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2008. Refining the Simple Performance Tester for Use in Routine Practice. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/14158.
×
Page 105
Page 106
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B - Revised Simple Performance Test System Specification." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2008. Refining the Simple Performance Tester for Use in Routine Practice. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/14158.
×
Page 106
Page 107
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B - Revised Simple Performance Test System Specification." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2008. Refining the Simple Performance Tester for Use in Routine Practice. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/14158.
×
Page 107
Page 108
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B - Revised Simple Performance Test System Specification." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2008. Refining the Simple Performance Tester for Use in Routine Practice. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/14158.
×
Page 108
Page 109
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B - Revised Simple Performance Test System Specification." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2008. Refining the Simple Performance Tester for Use in Routine Practice. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/14158.
×
Page 109
Page 110
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B - Revised Simple Performance Test System Specification." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2008. Refining the Simple Performance Tester for Use in Routine Practice. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/14158.
×
Page 110
Page 111
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B - Revised Simple Performance Test System Specification." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2008. Refining the Simple Performance Tester for Use in Routine Practice. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/14158.
×
Page 111
Page 112
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B - Revised Simple Performance Test System Specification." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2008. Refining the Simple Performance Tester for Use in Routine Practice. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/14158.
×
Page 112
Page 113
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B - Revised Simple Performance Test System Specification." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2008. Refining the Simple Performance Tester for Use in Routine Practice. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/14158.
×
Page 113
Page 114
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B - Revised Simple Performance Test System Specification." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2008. Refining the Simple Performance Tester for Use in Routine Practice. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/14158.
×
Page 114
Page 115
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B - Revised Simple Performance Test System Specification." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2008. Refining the Simple Performance Tester for Use in Routine Practice. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/14158.
×
Page 115
Page 116
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B - Revised Simple Performance Test System Specification." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2008. Refining the Simple Performance Tester for Use in Routine Practice. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/14158.
×
Page 116
Page 117
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B - Revised Simple Performance Test System Specification." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2008. Refining the Simple Performance Tester for Use in Routine Practice. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/14158.
×
Page 117
Page 118
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B - Revised Simple Performance Test System Specification." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2008. Refining the Simple Performance Tester for Use in Routine Practice. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/14158.
×
Page 118
Page 119
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B - Revised Simple Performance Test System Specification." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2008. Refining the Simple Performance Tester for Use in Routine Practice. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/14158.
×
Page 119
Page 120
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B - Revised Simple Performance Test System Specification." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2008. Refining the Simple Performance Tester for Use in Routine Practice. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/14158.
×
Page 120
Page 121
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B - Revised Simple Performance Test System Specification." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2008. Refining the Simple Performance Tester for Use in Routine Practice. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/14158.
×
Page 121
Page 122
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B - Revised Simple Performance Test System Specification." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2008. Refining the Simple Performance Tester for Use in Routine Practice. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/14158.
×
Page 122
Page 123
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B - Revised Simple Performance Test System Specification." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2008. Refining the Simple Performance Tester for Use in Routine Practice. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/14158.
×
Page 123
Page 124
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B - Revised Simple Performance Test System Specification." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2008. Refining the Simple Performance Tester for Use in Routine Practice. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/14158.
×
Page 124
Page 125
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B - Revised Simple Performance Test System Specification." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2008. Refining the Simple Performance Tester for Use in Routine Practice. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/14158.
×
Page 125
Page 126
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B - Revised Simple Performance Test System Specification." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2008. Refining the Simple Performance Tester for Use in Routine Practice. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/14158.
×
Page 126
Page 127
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B - Revised Simple Performance Test System Specification." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2008. Refining the Simple Performance Tester for Use in Routine Practice. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/14158.
×
Page 127
Page 128
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B - Revised Simple Performance Test System Specification." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2008. Refining the Simple Performance Tester for Use in Routine Practice. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/14158.
×
Page 128
Page 129
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B - Revised Simple Performance Test System Specification." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2008. Refining the Simple Performance Tester for Use in Routine Practice. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/14158.
×
Page 129
Page 130
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B - Revised Simple Performance Test System Specification." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2008. Refining the Simple Performance Tester for Use in Routine Practice. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/14158.
×
Page 130
Page 131
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B - Revised Simple Performance Test System Specification." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2008. Refining the Simple Performance Tester for Use in Routine Practice. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/14158.
×
Page 131
Page 132
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B - Revised Simple Performance Test System Specification." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2008. Refining the Simple Performance Tester for Use in Routine Practice. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/14158.
×
Page 132
Page 133
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B - Revised Simple Performance Test System Specification." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2008. Refining the Simple Performance Tester for Use in Routine Practice. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/14158.
×
Page 133
Page 134
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B - Revised Simple Performance Test System Specification." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2008. Refining the Simple Performance Tester for Use in Routine Practice. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/14158.
×
Page 134
Page 135
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B - Revised Simple Performance Test System Specification." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2008. Refining the Simple Performance Tester for Use in Routine Practice. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/14158.
×
Page 135
Page 136
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B - Revised Simple Performance Test System Specification." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2008. Refining the Simple Performance Tester for Use in Routine Practice. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/14158.
×
Page 136
Page 137
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B - Revised Simple Performance Test System Specification." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2008. Refining the Simple Performance Tester for Use in Routine Practice. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/14158.
×
Page 137

Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

65 A P P E N D I X B Revised Simple Performance Test System Specification

66 NCHRP 9-29 Equipment Specification for the Simple Performance Test System Version 2.0 March 26, 2004 Table of Contents Table of Contents .............................................................................................................. .....66 1.0 Summary ................................................................................................................. ......67 2.0 Definitions ............................................................................................................... .......71 3.0 Test Specimens ............................................................................................................ ...71 4.0 Simple Performance Test System ...................................................................................72 5.0 Compression Loading Machine ......................................................................................73 6.0 Loading Platens ........................................................................................................... ....74 7.0 Load Measuring System .................................................................................................75 8.0 Deflection Measuring System .........................................................................................75 9.0 Specimen Deformation Measuring System ....................................................................75 10.0 Confining Pressure System ...........................................................................................77 11.0 Environmental Chamber ...............................................................................................78 12.0 Computer Control and Data Acquisition ......................................................................78 13.0 Computations ............................................................................................................. ...88 14.0 Calibration and Verification of Dynamic Performance ................................................95 15.0 Verification of Normal Operation .................................................................................96 16.0 Documentation ............................................................................................................ ..97 17.0 Warranty ................................................................................................................. ......97 Annex A. Simple Performance Test System Flow Time Test ..............................................98 Annex B. Simple Performance Test System Flow Number Test ..........................................103 Annex C. Simple Performance Test System Dynamic Modulus Test ..................................109 Annex D. Procedure for Developing a Dynamic Modulus Master Curve for Pavement Structural Design Using The Simple Performance Test System. .............115 Annex E. Specification Compliance Test Methods for the Simple Performance Test System .............................................................................126 Annex F. Minimum Testing Program For Comparison of a Non-Standard Specimen Deformation Measuring System to the Standard Specimen Deformation Measuring System ......................................................................................................132

67 NCHRP 9-29 Equipment Specification for the Simple Performance Test System Version 2.0 March 26, 2004 1.0 Summary 1.1 This specification describes the requirements for a testing system to conduct the following National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) Project 9-19 simple performance tests: Test Method For Static Creep/Flow Time of Asphalt Concrete Mixtures in Compression Test Method for Repeated Load Testing of Asphalt Concrete Mixtures in Uniaxial Compression Test Method for Dynamic Modulus of Asphalt Concrete Mixtures for Permanent Deformation Test Method for Dynamic Modulus of Asphalt Concrete Mixtures for Fatigue Cracking Test Methods for each of these tests using the equipment described in this specification are presented in Annexes A, B, and C of this equipment specification. The testing system can also be used in conjunction with AASHTO TP62 to develop a dynamic modulus master curve for pavement structural design using the reduced testing protocol described in Annex D. Note: This equipment specification represents a revision of the equipment requirements contained in NCHRP Report 465 and AASHTO TP62. The requirements of this specification supersede those contained in NCHRP Report 465 and AASHTO TP62. 1.2 The testing system shall be capable of performing three compressive tests on nominal 100 mm (4 in) diameter, 150 mm (6 in) high cylindrical specimens. The tests are briefly described below. 1.3 Flow Time Test. In this test, the specimen is subjected to a constant axial compressive load at a specific test temperature. The test may be conducted with or without confining pressure. The resulting axial strain is measured as a function of time and numerically differentiated to calculate the flow time. The flow time is defined as the time corresponding to the minimum rate of change of axial strain. This is shown schematically in Figure 1. 1.4 Flow Number Test. In this test, the specimen, at a specific test temperature, is subjected to a repeated haversine axial compressive load pulse of 0.1 sec every 1.0 sec. The test may be conducted with or without confining pressure. The resulting permanent axial strains are measured as a function of time and numerically differentiated to calculate the flow number. The flow number is defined as the

68 NCHRP 9-29 Equipment Specification for the Simple Performance Test System Version 2.0 March 26, 2004 number of load cycles corresponding to the minimum rate of change of permanent axial strain. This is shown schematically in Figure 2. a. Axial Strain in Flow Time Test. b. Rate of Change of Axial Strain. Figure 1. Schematic of Flow Time Test Data. 0.000 0.005 0.010 0.015 0.020 0.025 0 100 200 300 400 Time, Sec A xi al S tra in ( ), m m/ mm 0.0E+00 2.0E-05 4.0E-05 6.0E-05 8.0E-05 1.0E-04 0 100 200 300 400 Time, Sec d( )/d t

69 NCHRP 9-29 Equipment Specification for the Simple Performance Test System Version 2.0 March 26, 2004 a. Permanent Axial Strain in Flow Number Test. b. Rate of Change of Permanent Axial Strain. Figure 2. Schematic of Flow Number Test Data. 0.0E+00 2.0E-06 4.0E-06 6.0E-06 8.0E-06 1.0E-05 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 Load Pulse d( p)/ dt 0.000 0.005 0.010 0.015 0.020 0.025 0 1000 2000 3000 Load Pulse Pe rm an en t A xi al S tra in ( p), m m /m m

70 NCHRP 9-29 Equipment Specification for the Simple Performance Test System Version 2.0 March 26, 2004 1.5 Dynamic Modulus Test. In this test, the specimen, at a specific test temperature, is subjected to controlled sinusoidal (haversine) compressive stress of various frequencies. The applied stresses and resulting axial strains are measured as a function of time and used to calculate the dynamic modulus and phase angle. The dynamic modulus and phase angle are defined by Equations 1 and 2. Figure 3 presents a schematic of the data generated during a typical dynamic modulus test. o oE * (1) )360( p i T T (2) Where: E* = dynamic modulus = phase angle, degree o = stress amplitude o = strain amplitude Ti = time lag between stress and strain Tp = period of applied stress Figure 3. Schematic of Dynamic Modulus Test Data. 0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 TIME, SEC LO AD A XI A L ST RA IN TIME LAG, TI O O PERIOD, TP 2

71 NCHRP 9-29 Equipment Specification for the Simple Performance Test System Version 2.0 March 26, 2004 2.0 Definitions 2.1 Flow Time. Time corresponding to the minimum rate of change of axial strain during a creep test. 2.2 Flow Number. The number of load cycles corresponding to the minimum rate of change of permanent axial strain during a repeated load test. 2.3 Dynamic Modulus. Ratio of the stress amplitude to the strain amplitude for asphalt concrete subjected to sinusoidal loading (Equation 1). 2.4 Phase Angle. Angle in degrees between a sinusoidally applied stress and the resulting strain in a controlled stress test (Equation 2). 2.5 Resolution. The smallest change of a measurement that can be displayed or recorded by the measuring system. When noise produces a fluctuation in the display or measured value, the resolution shall be one-half of the range of the fluctuation. 2.6 Accuracy. The permissible variation from the correct or true value. 2.7 Error. The value obtained by subtracting the value indicated by a traceable calibration device from the value indicated by the measuring system. 2.8 Confining Pressure. Stress applied to all surfaces in a confined test. 2.9 Deviator Stress. Difference between the total axial stress and the confining pressure in a confined test. 2.10 Dynamic Stress. Sinusoidal deviator stress applied during the Dynamic Modulus Test. 2.11 Dynamic Strain. Sinusoidal axial strain measured during the Dynamic Modulus Test. 3.0 Test Specimens 3.1 Test specimens for the Simple Performance Test System will be cylindrical meeting the following requirements.

72 NCHRP 9-29 Equipment Specification for the Simple Performance Test System Version 2.0 March 26, 2004 Item Specification Note Average Diameter 100 mm to 104 mm 1 Standard Deviation of Diameter 0.5 mm 1 Height 147.5 mm to 152.5 mm 2 End Flatness 0.5 mm 3 Specimen Dimensions End Perpendicularity 1.0 mm 4 Notes: 1. Using calipers, measure the diameter at the center and third points of the test specimen along axes that are 90 apart. Record each of the six measurements to the nearest 0.1 mm. Calculate the average and the standard deviation of the six measurements. 2. Measure the height of the test specimen in accordance with Section 6.1.2 of ASTM D 3549. 3. Using a straightedge and feeler gauges, measure the flatness of each end. Place a straight edge across the diameter at three locations approximately 120 apart and measure the maximum departure of the specimen end from the straight edge using tapered end feeler gauges. For each end record the maximum departure along the three locations as the end flatness. 4. Using a combination square and feeler gauges, measure the perpendicularity of each end. At two locations approximately 90 apart, place the blade of the combination square in contact with the specimen along the axis of the cylinder, and the head in contact with the highest point on the end of the cylinder. Measure the distance between the head of the square and the lowest point on the end of the cylinder using tapered end feeler gauges. For each end, record the maximum measurement from the two locations as the end perpendicularity. Note: Test specimens will be fabricated using separate equipment. This information is provided for design of the Simple Performance Test system. 4.0 Simple Performance Test System 4.1 The Simple Performance Test System shall be a complete, fully integrated testing system meeting the requirements of these specifications and having the capability to perform the Flow Time, Flow Number, and Dynamic Modulus tests described in Annexes A, B, and C and AASHTO TP62. 4.2 Annex E summarizes the methods that will be used to verify that the Simple Performance Test System complies with the requirements of this specification. 4.3 The Simple Performance Test System shall include the following components: 1. Compression loading machine. 2. Loading platens. 3. Load measuring system. 4. Deflection measuring system. 5. Specimen deformation measuring system.

73 NCHRP 9-29 Equipment Specification for the Simple Performance Test System Version 2.0 March 26, 2004 6. Confining pressure system . 7. Environmental chamber. 8. Computer control and data acquisition system. 4.4 The load frame, environmental chamber, and computer control system for the Simple Performance Test System shall occupy a foot-print no greater than 1.5 m (5 ft) by 1.5 m (5 ft) with a maximum height of 1.8 m (6 ft). A suitable frame, bench or cart shall be provided so that the bottom of the test specimen, and the computer keyboard and display are approximately 90 cm (36 in) above the floor. 4.5 The load frame, environmental chamber and computer control system for the Simple Performance Test System shall operate on single phase 115 or 230 V AC 60 Hz electrical power. 4.6 If a hydraulic power supply is required, it shall be air-cooled occupying a foot-print no larger than 1 m (3 ft) by 1.5 m (5 ft). The noise level 2 m (6.5 ft) from the hydraulic power supply shall not exceed 70 dB. The hydraulic power supply shall operate on single phase 115 of 230 V AC 60 Hz electrical power. 4.7 When disassembled, the width of any single component shall not exceed 76 cm (30 in). 4.8 Air supply requirements shall not exceed 0.005 m 3 /s (10.6 ft 3 /min) at 850 kPa (125 psi). 4.9 The Simple Performance Test System shall include appropriate limit and overload protection. 4.10 An emergency stop shall be mounted at an easily accessible point on the system. 5.0 Compression Loading Machine 5.1 The machine shall have closed-loop load control with the capability of applying constant, ramp, sinusoidal, and pulse loads. The requirements for each of the simple performance tests are listed below. Test Type of Loading Capacity Rate Flow Time Ramp, constant 10 kN (2.25 kips) 0.5 sec ramp Flow Number Ramp, constant, pulse 8 kN (1.80 kips) 10 Hz pulse with 0.9 sec dwell Dynamic Modulus Ramp, constant, sinusoidal 13.5 kN (3.0 kips) 0.01 to 25 Hz

74 NCHRP 9-29 Equipment Specification for the Simple Performance Test System Version 2.0 March 26, 2004 5.2 For ramp and constant loads, the load shall be maintained within +/- 2 percent of the desired load. 5.3 For sinusoidal loads, the standard error of the applied load shall be less than 5 percent. The standard error of the applied load is a measure of the difference between the measured load data, and the best fit sinusoid. The standard error of the load is defined in Equation 3. o n i ii xn xx Pse ˆ %100 4 ˆ )( 1 2 (3) Where: se(P) = Standard error of the applied load xi = Measured load at point i ixˆ = Predicted load at point i from the best fit sinusoid, See Equation 16 oxˆ = Amplitude of the best fit sinusoid n = Total number of data points collected during test. 5.4 For pulse loads, the peak of the load pulse shall be within +/- 2 percent of the specified value and the standard error of the applied load during the sinusoidal pulse shall be less than 10 percent. 5.5 For the Flow Time and Flow Number Tests, the loading platens shall remain parallel during loading. For the Dynamic Modulus Test, the load shall be applied to the specimen through a ball or swivel joint. 6.0 Loading Platens 6.1 The loading platens shall be fabricated from aluminum and have a Brinell Hardness Number HBS 10/500 of 95 or greater. 6.2 The loading platens shall be at least 25 mm (1 in) thick. The diameter of the loading platens shall not be less than 105 mm (4.125 in) nor greater than 108 mm (4.25 in). 6.3 The loading platens shall not depart from a plane by more than 0.0125 mm (0.0005 in) across any diameter.

75 NCHRP 9-29 Equipment Specification for the Simple Performance Test System Version 2.0 March 26, 2004 7.0 Load Measuring System 7.1 The Simple Performance Test System shall include an electronic load measuring system with full scale range equal to or greater than the stall force for the actuator of the compression loading machine. 7.2 The load measuring system shall have an error equal to or less than +/- 1 percent for loads ranging from 0.12 kN (25 lb) to 13.5 kN (3.0 kips) when verified in accordance with ASTM E4. 7.3 The resolution of the load measuring system shall comply with the requirements of ASTM E4. 8.0 Deflection Measuring System 8.1 The Simple Performance Test System shall include a electronic deflection measuring system that measures the movement of the loading actuator for use in the Flow Time and Flow Number Tests 8.2 The deflection measuring system shall have a range of at least 12 mm (0.5 in). 8.3 The deflection measuring system shall have a resolution equal to or better than 0.0025 mm (0.0001 in). 8.4 The deflection measuring system shall have an error equal to or less than 0.03 mm (0.001 in) over the 12 mm range when verified in accordance with ASTM D 6027. 8.5 The deflection measuring system shall be designed to minimize errors due to compliance and/or bending of the loading mechanism. These errors shall be less than 0.25 mm (0.01 in) at 8 kN (1.8 kips) load. 9.0 Specimen Deformation Measuring System 9.1 The Simple Performance Test System shall include a glued gauge point system for measuring deformations on the specimen over a gauge length of 70 mm (2.76 in) 1 mm (0.04 in) at the middle of the specimen. This system will be used in the Dynamic Modulus Test, and shall include at least two transducers spaced equally around the circumference of the specimen.

76 NCHRP 9-29 Equipment Specification for the Simple Performance Test System Version 2.0 March 26, 2004 9.2 Figure 4 shows a schematic of the standard specimen deformation measuring system with critical dimensions. Other properties of the deformation measuring system are listed below. Property Value Gauge point contact area 80 mm2 10 mm2 Mass of mounting system and transducer 80 g max Transducer spring force 1 N max 9.3 The transducers shall have a range of at least 1 mm (0.04 in). 9.4 The transducers shall have a resolution equal to or better than 0.0002 mm (7.8 micro inch). 9.5 The transducers shall have an error equal to or less than 0.0025 mm (0.0001 in) over the 1 mm range when verified in accordance with ASTM D 6027. 9.6 The axial deformation measuring system shall be designed for rapid specimen installation and subsequent testing. Specimen instrumentation, installation, application of confining pressure, and temperature equilibration shall take no longer than 3 minutes over the complete range of temperatures. 9.7 Alternatives to the standard system described in this section will be considered provided the components meet the range, accuracy, and resolution requirements. Submit data showing the alternative system produces the same modulus and phase angles as the standard system on asphalt concrete specimens tested over the stiffness range of 150 to 10,000 MPa (20,000 to 2,200,000 psi). Annex F describes the minimum testing and analysis required for a non-standard system. Figure 4. Schematic of Standard Specimen Mounted Deformation Measuring System. 70 mm +/- 1 mm 10 mm(max) SPECIMEN GLUED GAGE POINT SEE 9.2 FOR AREA CL

77 NCHRP 9-29 Equipment Specification for the Simple Performance Test System Version 2.0 March 26, 2004 10.0 Confining Pressure System 10.1 The confining pressure system shall be capable of providing a constant confining pressure up to 210 kPa (30 psi) to the test specimen. The system shall include a pressure cell with appropriate pressure regulation and control, a flexible specimen membrane, a device or method for detecting leaks in the membrane, a pressure transducer, and a temperature sensing device that is mounted internal to the cell. 10.2 The confining pressure cell shall be designed to allow the operator to view the specimen, the specimen mounted deformation measuring system, and the specimen end platens during testing. 10.3 Confining pressure shall be controlled by the computer control and data acquisition system. The confining pressure control system shall have the capability to maintain a constant confining pressure throughout the test within +/- 2 percent of the desired pressure. 10.4 The specimen shall be enclosed in an impermeable flexible membrane sealed against the loading platens. 10.5 The pressure inside the specimen membrane shall be maintained at atmospheric pressure through vents in the loading platens. The system shall include a device or method for detecting membrane leaks. 10.6 The confining pressure system shall include a pressure transducer for recording confining pressure during the test. The pressure transducer shall have a range of at least 210 kPa, (30 psi) and a resolution of 0.5 kPa (0.07 psi). The pressure transducer shall have an error equal to or less than 1 percent of the indicated value over the range of 35 kPa (5 psi) to 210 kPa (30 psi) when verified in accordance with ASTM D5720. 10.7 A suitable temperature sensor shall be mounted at the mid-height of the specimen in the pressure cell between the specimen and the cell wall. This temperature sensor shall have a range of 0 to 60 oC (32 to 140 oF), and be readable and accurate to the nearest 0.25 oC. (0.5 oF). For confined tests this sensor shall be used to control the temperature in the chamber, and provide a continuous reading of temperature that will be sampled by the data acquisition system during the test. 10.8 The confining pressure system shall be designed for rapid installation of the test specimen in the confining cell and subsequent equilibration of the chamber temperature to the target test temperature. Specimen instrumentation, installation, application of confining pressure, and temperature equilibration shall take no longer than 3 minutes over the complete range of temperatures.

78 NCHRP 9-29 Equipment Specification for the Simple Performance Test System Version 2.0 March 26, 2004 11.0 Environmental Chamber 11.1 The environmental chamber shall be capable of controlling temperatures inside the chamber over the range from 4 to 60 oC (39 to 140 oF) within +/- 0.5 oC (1 F), when room temperature is between 15 and 27 C (60 and 80 F). 11.2 The environmental chamber need only be large enough to accommodate the test specimen. It is envisioned that specimens will be preconditioned in a separate chamber that is large enough to hold the number of specimens needed for a particular project along with one or more dummy specimens with internally mounted temperature sensors. 11.3 The environmental chamber shall be designed to allow the operator to view the specimen, the specimen mounted deformation measuring system, and the specimen end platens during testing. 11.4 The environmental chamber shall be designed for rapid installation of the test specimen and subsequent equilibration of the environmental chamber temperature to the target test temperature. Specimen instrumentation, installation, application of confining pressure, and temperature equilibration shall take no longer than 3 minutes over the complete range of temperatures. 11.5 A suitable temperature sensor shall be mounted in the environmental chamber within 25 mm (1 in) of the specimen at the mid-height of the specimen. This temperature sensor shall have a range of 0 to 60 oC (32 to 140 oF), and be readable and accurate to the nearest 0.25 oC (0.5 oF). This sensor shall be used to control the temperature in the chamber, and provide a continuous reading of temperature that will be sampled by the data acquisition system during the test. 12.0 Computer Control and Data Acquisition 12.1 The Simple Performance Test System shall be controlled from a Personal Computer operating software specifically designed to conduct the Flow Time, Flow Number, and Dynamic Modulus Tests described in Annexes A, B, C, and AASHTO TP62; and to analyze data in accordance with Section 13. 12.2 The Simple Performance Test System Software shall provide the option for user selection of SI or US Customary units. 12.3 Flow Time Test Control and Data Acquisition 12.3.1 The control system shall control the deviator stress, and the confining pressure within the tolerances specified in Sections 5 and 10.2

79 NCHRP 9-29 Equipment Specification for the Simple Performance Test System Version 2.0 March 26, 2004 12.3.2 The control system shall ramp the deviator stress from the contact stress condition to the creep stress condition in 0.5 sec. 12.3.3 Zero time for data acquisition and zero strain shall be defined as the start of the ramp from contact stress to creep stress. Using this time as a reference, the system shall provide a record of deviator stress, confining pressure, axial strain, and temperature at zero time and a user specified sampling interval, t, between (0.5 and 10 sec). The axial strains shall be based on the user provided specimen length and the difference in deflection at any time and the deflection at zero time. 12.3.4 The control system shall terminate the test and return the deviator stress and confining pressure to zero when the axial strain exceeds 5 percent or the maximum user specified test duration time is exceeded. Note: in Project 9-19, flow time criteria will be developed for mixtures as a function of climate, and traffic level. These criteria will be used by the user to determine the maximum duration of the test. 12.3.5 Figure 5 presents a schematic of the specified loading and data acquisition. Figure 5. Schematic of Loading and Data Acquisition. 12.3.6 The Flow Time Test Software shall include a screen to input test and file information including: 1. Project Name 2. Operating Technician 3. Specimen Identification 0.5 0 t CREEP DEVIATOR STRESS +/- 2% CONFINING PRESSURE +/- 2% CONTACT DEVIATOR STRESS +/- 2% TIME, SEC ST RE SS , k Pa 2t 3t t = sampling interval

80 NCHRP 9-29 Equipment Specification for the Simple Performance Test System Version 2.0 March 26, 2004 4. File Name 5. Specimen Diameter 6. Specimen Height 7. Target Test Temperature 8. Target Confining Stress 9. Target Contact Deviator Stress 10. Target Creep Deviator Stress 11. Specimen Conditioning Time 12. Sampling Interval 13. Test Duration 14. Remarks 12.3.7 The Flow Time Test Software shall prompt the operator through the Flow Time Test. 1. Test and file information screen. 2. Insert specimen. 3. Apply confining pressure and contact stress. 4. Wait for temperature equilibrium, check for confining system leaks. 5. Ramp to creep stress, collect and store data. 6. Post test remarks. 7. Remove tested specimen. 12.3.8 During the creep loading portion of the test, the Flow Time Test Software shall provide a real-time display of the time history of the deviator stress, the axial strain, and the rate of change of axial strain. The rate of change of axial strain shall be computed in accordance with the algorithm presented in Section 13. 12.3.9 If at any time during the creep loading portion of the test, the deviator stress, confining pressure, or temperature exceed the tolerances listed below, the Flow Time Test Software shall display a warning and indicate the parameter that exceeded the control tolerance. The test shall continue and the software shall include this warning in the data file and the hard copy output. Response Tolerance Deviator stress +/- 2 percent of target Confining pressure +/- 2 percent of target Temperature +/- 0.5 oC of target 12.3.10 Data files shall include the following information: 1. Test information supplied by the user in Section 12.3.6. 2. Date and time stamp. 3. Computed flow time. 4. Axial strain at the flow time.

81 NCHRP 9-29 Equipment Specification for the Simple Performance Test System Version 2.0 March 26, 2004 5. Average temperature during the test. 6. Average confining stress during the test. 7. Time and corresponding measured deviator stress, measured confining pressure, measured temperature, measured axial strain, and computed rate of change of strain. 8. Warnings 9. Post test remarks. 12.3.11 The Flow Time Test Software shall provide the capability of retrieving data files and exporting them to an ASCII comma delimited file for further analysis. 12.3.12 The Flow Time Test Software shall provide a one page hard copy output with the following: 1. Test information supplied by the user in Section 12.3.6. 2. Date and time stamp. 3. Computed flow time. 4. Axial strain at the flow time. 5. Average temperature during the test. 6. Average confining stress during the test. 7. Warnings 8. Post test remarks 9. Plot of axial strain versus time. 10. Plot of rate of change of axial strain versus time with the flow time indicated. 12.4 Flow Number Test Control and Data Acquisition 12.4.1 The control system shall control the deviator stress, and the confining pressure within the tolerances specified in Sections 5 and 10.2 12.4.2 The control system shall be capable of applying an initial contact stress, then testing the specimen with the user specified cyclic deviator stress. 12.4.3 The data acquisition and control system shall provide the user the ability to select the sampling interval as a whole number of load cycles. 12.4.4 Zero deflection shall be defined as that at the start of the first load pulse. At the user specified sampling interval, the control system shall provide a record of peak deviator stress, standard error of the applied load (See Section 5.3), contact stress, confining pressure, permanent axial strain at the end of the load cycle, and temperature. The axial strains shall be based on the user provided specimen length and the difference in deflection the end of any load cycle and the zero deflection.

82 NCHRP 9-29 Equipment Specification for the Simple Performance Test System Version 2.0 March 26, 2004 12.4.5 The control system shall terminate the test and return the deviator stress and confining pressure to zero when the axial strain exceeds 5 percent or the user specified test duration is reached. Note: in Project 9-19, flow number criteria will be developed for mixtures as a function of climate, and traffic level. These criteria will be used by the user to determine the maximum duration of the test. 12.4.6 Figure 6 presents a schematic of the specified loading and data acquisition. Figure 6. Schematic of Loading and Data Acquisition for Flow Time Test. 12.4.7 The Flow Number Test Software shall include a screen to input test and file information including: 1. Project Name 2. Operating Technician 3. Specimen Identification 4. File Name 5. Specimen Diameter 6. Specimen Height 7. Target Test Temperature 8. Target Confining Stress 0.1 CONFINING PRESSURE +/- 2% CONTACT DEVIATOR STRESS +/- 2% TIME, SEC ST RE SS , k Pa 0.9 REPEATED DEVIATOR STRESS +/- 2% P(1) P(2) CYCLE 1 CYCLE 2 D EF LE CT IO N, m m

83 NCHRP 9-29 Equipment Specification for the Simple Performance Test System Version 2.0 March 26, 2004 9. Target Contact Deviator Stress 10. Target Repeated Deviator Stress 11. Specimen Conditioning Time 12. Sampling Interval 13. Maximum Number of Load Cycles 14. Remarks 12.4.8 The Flow Number Test Software shall prompt the operator through the Flow Number Test. 1. Test and file information screen. 2. Insert specimen. 3. Apply confining pressure and contact stress. 4. Wait for temperature equilibrium, check for confining system leaks. 5. Test specimen, collect and store data. 6. Post test remarks. 7. Remove tested specimen. 12.4.9 During the test, the Flow Number Test Software shall provide the user the ability to select the following displays and the ability to change between displays: 1. Digital oscilloscope showing stress and strain as a function of time. 2. A display of the history of the peak deviator stress, permanent axial strain, and the rate of change of permanent axial strain as a function of the number of load cycles. The rate of change of permanent axial strain shall be computed in accordance with the algorithm presented in Section 13. 12.4.10 If at any time during the test, the peak deviator stress, standard error of the applied load, confining pressure, or temperature exceed the tolerances listed below, the Flow Number Test Software shall display a warning and indicate the parameter that exceeded the control tolerance. The test shall continue and the software shall include this warning in the data file and the hard copy output. Response Tolerance Peak deviator stress +/- 2 percent of target Load standard error 10 percent Confining pressure +/- 2 percent of target Temperature +/- 0.5 oC of target 12.4.11 Data files shall include the following information: 1. Test information supplied by the user in Section 12.4.7. 2. Date and time stamp. 3. Computed flow number.

84 NCHRP 9-29 Equipment Specification for the Simple Performance Test System Version 2.0 March 26, 2004 4. Axial strain at the flow number. 5. Average temperature during the test. 6. Average confining stress during the test. 7. Average peak deviator stress. 8. Average contact stress. 9. Maximum standard error of the applied load. 10. Cycle and corresponding measured peak deviator stress, computed load standard error, measured contact stress, measured confining pressure, measured temperature, measured permanent axial strain, and computed rate of change of permanent strain. 11. Warnings 12. Post test remarks. 12.4.12 The Flow Number Test Software shall provide the capability of retrieving data files and exporting them to an ASCII comma delimited file for further analysis. 12.4.13 The Flow Number Test Software shall provide a one page hard copy output with the following: 1. Test information supplied by the user in Section 12.4.7. 2. Date and time stamp. 3. Computed flow number. 4. Axial strain at the flow number. 5. Average temperature during the test. 6. Average confining stress during the test. 7. Average peak deviator stress. 8. Average contact stress. 9. Maximum load standard error. 10. Warnings. 11. Post test remarks. 12. Plot of permanent axial strain versus load cycles. 13. Plot of rate of change of axial strain versus load cycles with the flow number indicated. 12.5 Dynamic Modulus Test Control and Data Acquisition 12.5.1 The control system shall control the axial stress and the confining pressure. The confining pressure shall be controlled within the tolerances specified in Section 10.2. 12.5.2 The control system shall be capable of applying confining stress, an initial contact deviator stress, then conditioning and testing the specimen with a haversine loading at a minimum of 5 user selected frequencies.

85 NCHRP 9-29 Equipment Specification for the Simple Performance Test System Version 2.0 March 26, 2004 12.5.3 Conditioning and testing shall proceed from the highest to lowest loading frequency. Ten conditioning and ten testing cycles shall be applied for each frequency. 12.5.4 The control system shall have the capability to adjust the dynamic stress and contact stress during the test to keep the average dynamic strain within the range of 75 to 125 strain. Adjustment of the dynamic stress shall be performed during the ten conditioning cycles at each loading frequency. 12.5.5 A contact stress equal to 5 percent of the dynamic stress shall be maintained during conditioning and testing. 12.5.6 During the 10 testing cycles, record and store the load, specimen deformations from the individual transducers, confining pressure, and temperature as a function of time. The data acquisition rate shall be set to obtain 50 data points per loading cycle. 12.5.7 The Dynamic Modulus Test Software shall include a screen to input test and file information including: 1. Project Name 2. Operating Technician 3. Specimen Identification 4. File Name 5. Specimen Diameter 6. Specimen Height 7. Target Test Temperature 8. Target Confining Stress 9. Loading Rates 10. Specimen Conditioning Time 11. Remarks 12.5.8 The Dynamic Modulus Test Software shall prompt the operator through the Dynamic Modulus Test. 1. Test and file information screen. 2. Insert specimen and attach strain instrumentation. 3. Apply confining pressure and contact stress. 4. Wait for temperature equilibrium, check for confining system leaks. 5. Condition and test specimen. 6. Review dynamic modulus, phase angle, temperature, confining pressure, and data quality statistics (See Section 13) for each frequency tested. 7. Post test remarks. 8. Remove tested specimen.

86 NCHRP 9-29 Equipment Specification for the Simple Performance Test System Version 2.0 March 26, 2004 12.5.9 During the conditioning and testing, the Dynamic Modulus Test Software shall provide a real-time display of the axial stress, and the axial strain measured individually by the transducers. 12.5.10 If at any time during the conditioning and loading portion of the test, confining pressure, temperature, or average accumulated permanent strain exceed the tolerances listed below, the Dynamic Modulus Test Software shall display a warning and indicate the parameter that exceeded the control tolerance. The test shall continue and the software shall include this warning in the data file and the hard copy output. Response Tolerance Confining pressure +/- 2 percent of target Temperature +/- 0.5 o C of target Permanent Axial Strain 0.0050 mm/mm 12.5.11 At the end of the user selected sweep of frequencies, the Dynamic Modulus Test software shall display a summary listing the following data for each frequency tested: 1. Dynamic modulus. 2. Phase angle. 3. Average temperature during the test. 4. Average confining pressure. 5. Data quality measures (See Section 13) The drift for the applied load, P Y , % The standard error for the applied load, se ( P ), % The average drift for the deformations, D Y , % The average standard error for the deformations, se ( Y ), % The uniformity coefficient for the deformations, U A % The uniformity coefficient for the deformation phase angles, U degrees. The user should be provided options to save this data to data file and/or produce a hard copy output. 12.5.12 For each loading frequency, a separate data file shall be produced. This file shall include the test information supplied by the user in Section 12.5.7, a date and time stamp, and the following information: 1. Dynamic modulus. 2. Phase angle. 3. Strain amplitude 4. Average temperature during the test. 5. Average confining pressure. 6. Data quality measures (See Section 13)

87 NCHRP 9-29 Equipment Specification for the Simple Performance Test System Version 2.0 March 26, 2004 The drift for the applied load, PY , % The standard error for the applied load, se(P), % The average drift for the deformations, DY , % The average standard error for the deformations, se(Y ), % The uniformity coefficient for the deformations, UA % The uniformity coefficient for the deformation phase angles, U degrees. 7. Time and corresponding measured axial stress, individual measured axial strains, measured confining pressure, and measured temperature, 8. Warnings 9. Post test remarks. 12.5.13 The Dynamic Modulus Test Software shall provide the capability of retrieving data files and exporting them to an ASCII comma delimited file for further analysis. 12.5.14 For each loading frequency, the Dynamic Modulus Test Software shall provide a one page hard copy output with the following. Figure 7 presents an example one page output. 1. Test information supplied by the user in Section 12.5.7. 2. Date and time stamp. 3. Dynamic modulus. 4. Phase angle. 5. Strain amplitude. 6. Average temperature during the test. 7. Average confining pressure during the test. 8. Data quality measures (See Section 13) The drift for the applied load, PY , % The standard error for the applied load, se(P), % The average drift for the deformations, DY , % The average standard error for the deformations, se(Y ), % The uniformity coefficient for the deformations, UA % The uniformity coefficient for the deformation phase angles, U degrees. 10. Warnings 11. Post test remarks 12. Plot showing centered stress and centered strains as a function of time 13. Plot showing normalized stress and strains as a function of phase angle. This plot shall include both the measured and fit data. 14. Plot showing normalized stress as a function of normalized strain. This plot shall include both the measured and fit data.

88 NCHRP 9-29 Equipment Specification for the Simple Performance Test System Version 2.0 March 26, 2004 Figure 7. Example Dynamic Modulus Output. 13.0 Computations 13.1 Flow Time Test 13.1.1 The Flow Time is defined as the time corresponding to the minimum rate of change of axial strain during a creep test. To ensure that different laboratories produce comparable results for this test method, the procedure described in this section shall be followed in determining the flow time. The procedure consists of three steps: (1) numerical calculation of the creep rate ; (2) smoothing of the creep rate data; and (3) identification of the point at which the minimum creep rate occurs as the flow time. 13.1.2 The first step in determining the flow time is to estimate the rate of change (derivative) of the axial strain with respect to time t using a finite-difference DYNAMIC MODULUS STANDARD REPORT Data generated on : 4-Apr-01 Dynamic Modulus, ksi: 45.7 Data exported on : 4-Apr-01 Phase Angle, Deg.: 30.1 Sample ID: FHWA D0 Project: WO 621 System Configuration : Data Quality Indicators: Test Frequency (Hz): 0.50 Number Of Movers 2 RMS Cmd. Error, %: 7.9 Specimen Gauge Length (in.): 4.00 Number Of Channels 11 Load Std. Error, %: 7.2 Specimen Dia. (in.): 4.00 Disp. Avg. Std. Error, %: 7.8 Specimen Cross-Sec. Area (in.^2): 12.57 Points Acquired : 500 Disp. Uniformity, %: 3.4 Test Temperature C: 40.0 Scan Time : 20 Phase Uniformity, Deg.: 4.5 Time Between Scans : 40 Avg. Total Drift, %: -4.2 NORMALIZED LOAD AND DISPLACEMENTS -200 -150 -100 -50 0 50 100 150 200 -180 -90 0 90 180 Angle, degrees N or m al iz ed L oa d or D isp . Load Disp1 Load Fit Disp1 Fit Disp2 Disp2 Fit DATA TRACES -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 Lo ad , l bs -200 -100 0 100 200 300 D is p. , m icr o- in Load Disp1 Disp2 LOAD VS. DISPLACEMENT -200 -150 -100 -50 0 50 100 150 200 -200 -150 -100 -50 0 50 100 150 200 Normalized Displacement N or m al iz ed L oa d Disp 1 Disp1 Fit Disp2 Disp2 Fit

89 NCHRP 9-29 Equipment Specification for the Simple Performance Test System Version 2.0 March 26, 2004 formula. The rate of change of the strain with respect to time is estimated using the following equation: t dt d t i t i i 2 (4) Wh ere: d i /dt = rate of change of strain with respect to time or creep rate at i sec, 1/s i- t = strain at i- t sec i+ t = strain at i+ t sec t = sampling interval 13.1.3 The derivatives calculated in Section 13.1.2 shall then be smoothed by calculating the running average at each point, by adding to the derivative at that point the two values before and two values after that point, and dividing the sum by five: dt d dt d dt d dt i d dt d dt d t i t i t i t i i 2 2 5 1 ' (5) Wh ere: d ’ i /dt = smoothed creep rate at i sec, /s d i-2 t /dt = creep rate at i-2 t sec, 1/s d i- t /dt = creep rate at i- t sec, 1/s d i /dt = creep rate at i sec, 1/s d i+ t /dt = creep rate at i+ t sec, 1/s d i+2 t /dt = creep rate at i+2 t sec, 1/s 13.1.4 The flow time is reported as the time at which the minimum value of the smoothed creep rate occurs, and shall be reported to the nearest t seconds. If there is no minimum, then the flow time is reported as being greater than or equal to the length of the test. If more than one point share the minimum creep rate, the first such minimum shall be reported as the flow time.

90 NCHRP 9-29 Equipment Specification for the Simple Performance Test System Version 2.0 March 26, 2004 13.2 Flow Number Test 13.2.1 The Flow Number is defined as the number of load cycles corresponding to the minimum rate of change of permanent axial strain during a repeated load test. To ensure that different laboratories produce comparable results for this test method, the procedure described in this section shall be followed in determining the Flow Number. The procedure consists of three steps: (1) numerical calculation of the creep rate; (2) smoothing of the creep rate data; and (3) identification of the point at which the minimum creep rate occurs as the Flow Number. 13.2.2 The first step in determining the Flow Number is to estimate the rate of change (derivative) of the permanent axial strain, p, with respect to the number of load cycles, N, using a finite-difference formula. The rate of change of the permanent strain with respect to the number of cycles is estimated using the following equation: NdN d NipNipip 2 (6) Where: d( p)i/dN = rate of change of permanent axial strain with respect to cycles or creep rate at cycle i, 1/cycle ( p)i- N = permanent strain at i- N cycles ( p)i+ N = permanent strain at i+ N cycles N = sampling interval 13.2.3 The derivatives calculated in Section 12.2.3 shall then be smoothed by calculating the running average at each point, by adding to the derivative at that point the two values before and two values after that point, and dividing the sum by five: dN d dN d dN d dN d dN d dN d NipNipipNipNipip 22 )()()()()( 5 1')( (7) Where: d( p)’i/dN = smoothed creep rate at i sec, 1/cycle d( p)i-2 N/dN = creep rate at i-2 N cycles, 1/cycle d( p)i- N/dN = creep rate at i- N cycles, 1/cycle d( p)i/dN = creep rate at i cycles, 1/cycle d( p)i+ N/dN = creep rate at i+ N cycles, 1/cycle d( p)i+2 N/dN = creep rate at i+2 N cycles, 1/cycle

91 NCHRP 9-29 Equipment Specification for the Simple Performance Test System Version 2.0 March 26, 2004 13.2.4 The Flow Number is reported as the cycle at which the minimum value of the smoothed creep rate occurs. If there is no minimum, then the Flow Number is reported as being greater than or equal to the length of the test. If more than one point share the minimum creep rate, the first such minimum shall be reported as the Flow Number. 13.3 Dynamic Modulus Test 13.3.1 The data produced from the dynamic modulus test at frequency 0 will be in the form of several arrays, one for time [ti], one for each of the j = 1, 2, 3,…m transducers used [yj]. In the typical arrangement, there will be m = 3 transducers: the first transducer will be a load cell, and transducers 2 and 3 will be specimen deformation transducers. However, this approach is general and can be adapted to any number of specimen deformation transducers. The number of i = 1, 2, 3…n points in each array will be equal to 500 based on the number of cycles and acquisition rate specified in Section 12.5.6. It has been assumed in this procedure that the load will be given in Newtons (N), and the deformations in millimeters (mm). The analysis has been devised to provide complex modulus in units of Pascals (1 Pa = 1 N/m2) and phase angle in units of degrees. The general approach used here is based upon the least squares fit of a sinusoid, as described by Chapra and Canale in Numerical Methods for Engineers (McGraw-Hill, 1985, pp. 404-407). However, the approach used here is more rigorous, and also includes provisions for estimating drift of the sinusoid over time by including another variable in the regression function. Regression is used, rather than the Fast Fourier transform (FFT), because it is a simpler and more direct approach, which should be easier for most engineers and technicians in the paving industry to understand and apply effectively. The regression approach also lends itself to calculating standard errors and other indicators of data quality. This approach should however produce results essentially identical to those produced using FFT analysis. 13.3.2 The calculation proceeds as follows. First, the data for each transducer are centered by subtracting from the measured data the average for that transducer: jjiji YYY ' (8) Where: Yji’ = Centered data for transducer j at point i in data array Yji = Raw data for transducer j at point i in data array jY = Average for transducer j

92 NCHRP 9-29 Equipment Specification for the Simple Performance Test System Version 2.0 March 26, 2004 13.3.3 In the second step in the procedure, the [X’X] matrix is constructed as follows: n i i n i ii n i ii n i i n i ii n i i n i ii n i i n i ii n i ii n i i n i i n i i n i i n i i tttttt tttttt tttttt tttN XX 1 0 2 1 00 1 0 1 0 1 00 1 0 2 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 2 1 1 0 1 0 1 sinsincossinsin sincoscoscoscos sincos sincos ' (9) Where N is the total number of data points, 0 is the frequency of the data, t is the time from the start of the data array, and the summation is carried out over all points in the data array. 13.3.4 The inverse of this matrix, [X’X]-1, is then calculated. Then, for each transducer, the [X’Yj] array is constructed: n i ji n i ji n i ji n i ji j tY tY tY Y YX 1 0 1 0 1 1 sin' cos' ' ' ' (10) Where Yj represents the output from one of the three transducers (j=1 for the load cell, j=2 and 3 for the two deformation transducers). Again, the summation is carried out for all points in the data arrays. 13.3.5 The array representing the regression coefficients for each transducer is then calculated by multiplying the [X’X]-1 matrix by the [X’Yj] matrix: j j j j j YXXX B A A A '' 1 2 2 1 0 (11)

93 NCHRP 9-29 Equipment Specification for the Simple Performance Test System Version 2.0 March 26, 2004 Where the regression coefficients can be used to calculate predicted values for each of the j transducers using the regression function: jiijijijjji tBtAtAAY 020210 sincosˆ (12) Where jiYˆ is the predicted value for the i th point of data for the jth transducer, and ji represents the error term in the regression function. 13.3.6 From the regression coefficients, several other functions are then calculated as follows: 2 2 arctan j j j A B (13) 2 2 2 2* jjj BAY (14) %100 * 1 j Nj j Y tA Y (15) * %100 4 '' )( 2 1 ^ j n i jiji j Yn YY Yse (16) Where: j = Phase angle for transducer j, degrees |Yj*| = Amplitude for transducer j, N for load or mm for displacement jY = Drift for transducer j, as percent of amplitude. tN = Total time covered by data ' ^ jiY ’ = Predicted centered response for transducer j at point i, N or mm se(Yj) = Standard error for transducer j, % n = number of data points = 500 The calculations represented by Equations 13 through 16 are carried out for each transducer—typically the load cell, and two deformation transducers. This produces values for the phase angle, and standard errors for each transducer output. The phase angles given by Equation 13 represent absolute phase angles, that is, j is an arbitrary value indicating the angle at which data collection started.

94 NCHRP 9-29 Equipment Specification for the Simple Performance Test System Version 2.0 March 26, 2004 13.3.7 The phase angle of the deformation (response) relative to the load (excitation) is the important mechanical property. To calculate this phase angle, the average phase angle for the deformations must first be calculated: 1 2 m m j j D (17) Where D is the average absolute phase angle for the deformation transducers, and j is the phase angle for each of the j = 2, 3, …, m deformation transducers. For the typical case, there are one load cell and two deformation transducers, so m = 3, and Equation 17 simply involves summing the phase angle for the two deformation transducers and dividing by two. 13.3.8 The relative phase angle at frequency between the deformation and the load, ( ), is then calculated as follows: PD (18) Where P is the absolute phase angle calculated for the load. 13.3.9 A similar set of calculations is needed to calculate the overall modulus for the material. First, the average amplitude for the deformations must be calculated: 1 * * 2 m Y Y m j j D (19) Where *DY represents the average amplitude of the deformations (mm). 13.3.10 Then, the dynamic modulus |E*| at frequency is calculated using the following equation: AY LY E D gP * * * (20) Where |E*( )| is in Pa, Lg is the average gage length for the deformation transducers (mm), and A is the loaded cross-sectional area for the specimen, m2.

95 NCHRP 9-29 Equipment Specification for the Simple Performance Test System Version 2.0 March 26, 2004 13.3.11 The final part of the analysis involves calculation of several factors indicative of data quality, including the average drift for the deformations, the average standard error for the deformations, and uniformity coefficients for deformation amplitude and phase: %100 * 2 2 1 m j j m j Nj D Y tA Y (21) 1 2 m Yse Yse m j j D (22) * %100 1 ** 2 2 D m j Dj A Ym YY U (23) 1 2 2 m U m j Dj (24) Where: DY = Average deformation drift, as percent of average deformation amplitude se(YD) = Average standard error for all deformation transducers, % UA = Uniformity coefficient for deformation amplitude, % U = Uniformity coefficient for deformation phase, degrees 14.0 Calibration and Verification of Dynamic Performance 14.1 Prior to shipment, the complete Simple Performance Test System shall be assembled at the manufacturer’s facility and calibrated. This calibration shall include calibration of the computer control and data acquisition electronics/software, static calibration of the load, deflection, specimen deformation, confining pressure and temperature measuring systems; and verification of the dynamic performance of the load and specimen deformation measuring systems. 14.2 The results of these calibrations shall be documented, certified by the manufacturer, and provided with the system documentation.

96 NCHRP 9-29 Equipment Specification for the Simple Performance Test System Version 2.0 March 26, 2004 14.3 Static calibration of the load, deflection, specimen deformation, and confining pressure systems shall be performed in accordance with the following standards: System ASTM Standard Load ASTM E4 Deflection ASTM D 6027 Specimen Deformation ASTM D 6027 Confining Pressure ASTM D 5720 14.4 The calibration of the temperature measuring system shall be verified over the range that the testing system will be used. A NIST traceable reference thermal detector with resolution equal to or better than the temperature sensor shall be used. 14.5 Verification of the dynamic performance of the force and specimen deformation measuring systems shall be performed by loading a proving ring or similar verification device with the specimen deformation measuring system attached. The manufacturer shall be responsible for fabricating the verification device and shall supply it with the Simple Performance Test System. 14.6 The verification device shall have a static deflection of 0.007 mm 0.0005 mm (0.00028 in 0.00002 in) at a load of 1.2 kN (0.27 kips). 14.7 The verification shall include loads of 0.5, 4.5, 8.5, and 12.5 kN (0.1, 1.0, 1.9, and 2.8 kips) at frequencies of 0.1, 1, and 10 Hz. The verification shall include measurement of load, and displacement of the verification device using the specimen deformation measuring system. All of the resulting load versus deformation data shall be within 2 percent of that determined by static loading of the verification device. The phase difference between load and displacement measurements shall be less than 1 degree. 14.8 The Simple Performance System shall include a calibration mode for subsequent annual calibration in accordance with the standards listed in Section 14.3 and the method described in 14.4. It shall also include a dynamic verification mode to perform the verification test described in Section 14.5. Access points for calibration work shall be clearly shown in the system reference manual. 15.0 Verification of Normal Operation 15.1 The manufacturer shall develop and document procedures for verification of normal operation for each of the systems listed in Section 14.3, and the dynamic performance verification discussed in Section 14.5. It is anticipated that these verification procedures will be performed by the operating technician on a frequent basis. Equipment used in the verification process shall be provided as part of the Simple Performance Test System.

97 NCHRP 9-29 Equipment Specification for the Simple Performance Test System Version 2.0 March 26, 2004 16.0 Documentation 16.1 The Simple Performance Test System shall include an on-line help and documentation. 16.2 A reference manual completely documenting the Simple Performance Test System shall be provided. This manual shall include the following Chapters: 1. System Introduction. 2. Installation. 3. Loading System. 4. Confining Pressure System. 5. Environmental Chamber. 6. Control and Data Acquisition System. 7. Flow Time Test. 8. Flow Number Test. 9. Dynamic Modulus Test. 10. Calibration. 11. Verification of Dynamic Performance. 12. Verification of Normal Operation. 13. Preventative Maintenance. 14. Spare Parts List 15. Drawings. 17.0 Warranty 17.1 The Simple Performance Test System shall carry a one year on-site warranty.

98 NCHRP 9-29 Equipment Specification for the Simple Performance Test System Version 2.0 March 26, 2004 Annex A Simple Performance Test System Flow Time Test Adapted From Test Method for Static Creep/Flow Time of Asphalt Concrete Mixtures in Compression NCHRP Report 465, 2002

99 NCHRP 9-29 Equipment Specification for the Simple Performance Test System Version 2.0 March 26, 2004 1 Scope 1.1 This test method covers testing and measurement of the resistance to tertiary flow of cylindrical asphalt concrete specimens in a triaxial state of compressive loading using the Simple Performance Test System. 1.2 In this test, a cylindrical sample of bituminous paving mixture is subjected to a static axial load. Axial strains are recorded throughout the test. 1.3 The test is conducted at a single temperature using specific deviatoric and confining stresses. 1.4 This standard is applicable to laboratory prepared specimens 100 mm in diameter and 150 mm in height for mixtures with nominal maximum size aggregate less than or equal to 37.5 mm (1.5 in) tested in the Simple Performance Test System. 1.5 This standard may involve hazardous material, operations, and equipment. This standard does not purport to address all safety problems associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this procedure to establish appropriate safety and health practices and to determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use. 2 Referenced Documents 2.1 AASHTO Standards PPXX Standard Practice for Permanent Deformation and Fatigue Evaluation of HMA Using the Simple Performance Test System (To be developed). PPYY Standard Practice for Fabrication of Performance Test Specimens Using the Superpave Gyratory Compactor (To be developed). 2.2 Other NCHRP 9-29 Equipment Specification for the Simple Performance Test System 3 Definitions 3.1 Flow Time – Time corresponding to the minimum rate of change of axial strain during a creep test. 4 Summary of Method 4.1 A cylindrical sample of bituminous paving mixture is subjected to a static axial load. The test can be performed with or without confinement. The applied stress and the resulting axial deformation of the specimen is measured with the Simple Performance

100 NCHRP 9-29 Equipment Specification for the Simple Performance Test System Version 2.0 March 26, 2004 Test System and used to calculate the flow time. The flow time is the time corresponding to the minimum rate of change of axial strain during a creep test. 5 Significance and Use 5.1 The flow time can be used with the criteria in AASHTO PPXX to judge the acceptability of a mixture to resist permanent deformation. 5.2 The flow time can also be used to compare or rank the permanent deformation resistance of various bituminous paving mixtures. 6 Apparatus 6.1 An approved Simple Performance Test System meeting the requirements of NCHRP 9- 29 Equipment Specification for the Simple Performance Test System 6.2 An environmental chamber for conditioning the test specimens to the desired testing temperature. The environmental chamber shall be capable of controlling the temperature of the specimen over a temperature range from 30 to 60 C (85 to 140 F ) to an accuracy of 0.5 C (1 F). The chamber shall be large enough to accommodate three test specimens and a dummy specimen with temperature sensor mounted at the center for temperature verification. 6.3 Teflon sheeting, 0.25 mm thick to reduce friction between the specimen and the loading platens. 7 Test Specimens 7.1 Testing shall be performed on 100 mm (4 in) diameter by 150 mm (6 in) high test specimens fabricated in accordance with AASHTO PP YY Standard Practice for Fabrication of Performance Test Specimens Using the Superpave Gyratory Compactor. 7.2 Flow time shall be the average result obtained from three test specimens. 8 Procedure 8.1 Unconfined Tests 8.1.1 Assemble each specimen to be tested with platens in the following order from bottom to top. Bottom loading platen, bottom Teflon friction reducer, specimen, top Teflon friction, and top loading platen. 8.1.2 Place the specimen and platen assembly in the environmental chamber with the dummy specimen, and monitor the temperature of the dummy specimen to determine when testing can begin.

101 NCHRP 9-29 Equipment Specification for the Simple Performance Test System Version 2.0 March 26, 2004 8.1.3 Turn on the Simple Performance Test System, set the temperature control to the desired testing temperature and allow the testing chamber to equilibrate at the testing temperature for at least one hour. 8.1.4 When the dummy specimen and the testing chamber reach the target temperature, open the testing chamber, remove a test specimen and platen assembly, and quickly place it in the testing chamber. 8.1.5 Close the testing chamber and allow the chamber temperature to return to testing temperature. 8.1.6 Steps 8.1.4 and 8.1.5 including return of the test chamber to the target temperature shall be completed in 3 minutes. 8.1.7 Enter the required identification and control information into the Flow Time Software. 8.1.8 Follow the software prompts to begin the test. The Simple Performance Test System will automatically unload when the test is complete. 8.1.9 Upon completion of the test, open the test chamber, and remove the tested specimen. 8.1.10 Repeat steps 8.1.4 through 8.1.9 for the remaining test specimens. 8.2 Confined Tests 8.2.1 Assemble each specimen to be tested with platens and membrane as follows. Place the bottom friction reducer and the specimen on the bottom platen. Stretch the membrane over the specimen and bottom loading platen. Install the lower o- ring seal. Place the top friction reducer and top platen on top of the specimen, and stretch the membrane over the top platen. Install the upper o-ring seal. 8.2.2 Encase the dummy specimen in a membrane. 8.2.3 Place the specimen and platen assembly in the environmental chamber with the dummy specimen, and monitor the temperature of the dummy specimen to determine when testing can begin. 8.2.4 Turn on the Simple Performance Test System, set the temperature control to the desired testing temperature and allow the testing chamber to equilibrate at the testing temperature for at least one hour.

102 NCHRP 9-29 Equipment Specification for the Simple Performance Test System Version 2.0 March 26, 2004 8.2.5 When the dummy specimen and the testing chamber reach the target temperature, open the testing chamber, remove a test specimen and platen assembly, and quickly place it in the testing chamber. 8.2.6 Close the testing chamber and allow the chamber temperature to return to testing temperature. 8.2.7 Steps 8.2.5 and 8.2.6 including return of the test chamber to the target temperature shall be completed in 3 minutes. 8.2.8 Enter the required identification and control information into the Flow Time Software. 8.2.9 Follow the software prompts to begin the test. The Simple Performance Test System will automatically unload when the test is complete. 8.2.10 Upon completion of the test, open the test chamber, and remove the tested specimen. 8.2.11 Repeat steps 8.2.5 through 8.2.10 for the remaining test specimens. 9 Calculations 9.1 The calculation of the flow time for individual specimens is performed automatically by the Simple Performance Test System software. 9.2 Compute the average and standard deviation of the flow times for the three specimens tested. 10 Report 10.1 Test temperature. 10.2 Deviatoric and confining stress levels. 10.3 Average and standard deviation of flow time for three specimens. 10.4 Attach Simple Performance Test System standard reports for individual specimens.

103 NCHRP 9-29 Equipment Specification for the Simple Performance Test System Version 2.0 March 26, 2004 Annex B Simple Performance Test System Flow Number Test Adapted From Test Method for Repeated Load Testing of Asphalt Concrete Mixtures in Uniaxial Compression NCHRP Report 465, 2002

104 NCHRP 9-29 Equipment Specification for the Simple Performance Test System Version 2.0 March 26, 2004 1. Scope 1.1 This test method covers testing and measurement of the resistance to tertiary flow of cylindrical asphalt concrete specimens in a triaxial state of compressive loading using the Simple Performance Test System. 1.2 This test uses a loading cycle of 1.0 second in duration, consisting of applying 0.1- second haversine load followed by 0.9-second rest period. Permanent axial deformations are recorded throughout the test. 1.3 The test is conducted at a single using specific deviatoric and confining stresses. 1.4 This standard is applicable to laboratory prepared specimens 100 mm in diameter and 150 mm in height for mixtures with nominal maximum size aggregate less than or equal to 37.5 mm (1.5 in). 1.5 This standard may involve hazardous material, operations, and equipment. This standard does not purport to address all safety problems associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this procedure to establish appropriate safety and health practices and to determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use. 2. Referenced Documents 2.1 AASHTO Standards PPXX Standard Practice for Permanent Deformation and Fatigue Evaluation of HMA Using the Simple Performance Test System (To be developed). PPYY Standard Practice for Fabrication of Performance Test Specimens Using the Superpave Gyratory Compactor (To be developed). 2.2 Other NCHRP 9-29 Equipment Specification for the Simple Performance Test System 3. Definitions 3.1 Permanent Deformation – Non-recovered deformation in a repeated load test. 3.2 Flow Number - The number of load cycles corresponding to the minimum rate of change of permanent axial strain during a repeated load test.

105 NCHRP 9-29 Equipment Specification for the Simple Performance Test System Version 2.0 March 26, 2004 4. Summary of Method 4.1 A cylindrical sample of bituminous paving mixture is subjected to a haversine axial load. The load is applied for duration of 0.1-second with a rest period of 0.9-second. The rest period has a load equivalent to the seating load. The test can be performed either with or without confinement. Cumulative permanent axial deformations are measured with the Simple Performance Test System and used to calculate the flow number. The flow number is the number of repetitions corresponding to the minimum rate of change of permanent deformation under repeated loading conditions. 5. Significance and Use 5.1 The flow number can be used with the criteria in AASHTO PPXX to judge the acceptability of a mixture to resist permanent deformation. 5.2 The flow number can also be used to compare or rank the permanent deformation resistance of various bituminous paving mixtures. 6. Apparatus 6.1 An approved Simple Performance Test System meeting the requirements of NCHRP 9-29 Equipment Specification for the Simple Performance Test System 6.2 An environmental chamber for conditioning the test specimens to the desired testing temperature. The environmental chamber shall be capable of controlling the temperature of the specimen over a temperature range from 30 to 60 C (85 to 140 F) to an accuracy of 0.5 C (1 F). The chamber shall be large enough to accommodate three test specimens and a dummy specimen with temperature sensor mounted at the center for temperature verification. 6.3 Teflon sheeting, 0.25 mm thick to reduce friction between the specimen and the loading platens. 7. Test Specimens 7.1 Testing shall be performed on 100 mm (4 in) diameter by 150 mm (6 in) high test specimens fabricated in accordance with AASHTO PP YY Standard Practice for Fabrication of Performance Test Specimens Using the Superpave Gyratory Compactor. 7.2 The flow number shall be the average result obtained from three test specimens.

106 NCHRP 9-29 Equipment Specification for the Simple Performance Test System Version 2.0 March 26, 2004 8. Procedure 8.1 Unconfined Tests 8.1.1 Assemble each specimen to be tested with platens in the following order from bottom to top. Bottom loading platen, bottom Teflon friction reducer, specimen, top Teflon friction, and top loading platen. 8.1.2 Place the specimen and platen assembly in the environmental chamber with the dummy specimen, and monitor the temperature of the dummy specimen to determine when testing can begin. 8.1.3 Turn on the Simple Performance Test System, set the temperature control to the desired testing temperature and allow the testing chamber to equilibrate at the testing temperature for at least one hour. 8.1.4 When the dummy specimen and the testing chamber reach the target temperature, open the testing chamber, remove a test specimen and platen assembly, and quickly place it in the testing chamber. 8.1.5 Close the testing chamber and allow the chamber temperature to return to testing temperature. 8.1.6 Steps 8.1.4 and 8.1.5 including return of the test chamber to the target temperature shall be completed in 3 minutes. 8.1.7 Enter the required identification and control information into the Flow Number Software. 8.1.8 Follow the software prompts to begin the test. The Simple Performance Test System will automatically unload when the test is complete. 8.1.9 Upon completion of the test, open the test chamber, and remove the tested specimen. 8.1.10 Repeat steps 8.1.4 through 8.1.9 for the remaining test specimens. 8.2 Confined Tests 8.2.1 Assemble each specimen to be tested with platens and membrane as follows. Place the bottom friction reducer and the specimen on the bottom platen. Stretch the membrane over the specimen and bottom loading platen. Install the lower o- ring seal. Place the top friction reducer and top platen on top of the specimen, and stretch the membrane over the top platen. Install the upper o-ring seal.

107 NCHRP 9-29 Equipment Specification for the Simple Performance Test System Version 2.0 March 26, 2004 8.2.2 Encase the dummy specimen in a membrane. 8.2.3 Place the specimen and platen assembly in the environmental chamber with the dummy specimen, and monitor the temperature of the dummy specimen to determine when testing can begin. 8.2.4 Turn on the Simple Performance Test System, set the temperature control to the desired testing temperature and allow the testing chamber to equilibrate at the testing temperature for at least one hour. 8.2.5 When the dummy specimen and the testing chamber reach the target temperature, open the testing chamber, remove a test specimen and platen assembly, and quickly place it in the testing chamber. 8.2.6 Close the testing chamber and allow the chamber temperature to return to testing temperature. 8.2.7 Steps 8.2.5 and 8.2.6 including return of the test chamber to the target temperature shall be completed in 3 minutes. 8.2.8 Enter the required identification and control information into the Flow Time Software. 8.2.9 Follow the software prompts to begin the test. The Simple Performance Test System will automatically unload when the test is complete. 8.2.10 Upon completion of the test, open the test chamber, and remove the tested specimen. 8.2.11 Repeat steps 8.2.5 through 8.2.10 for the remaining test specimens. 9. Calculations 9.1 The calculation of the flow number for individual specimens is performed automatically by the Simple Performance Test System software. 9.2 Compute the average and standard deviation of the flow numbers for the three specimens tested.

108 NCHRP 9-29 Equipment Specification for the Simple Performance Test System Version 2.0 March 26, 2004 10. Report 10.1 Test temperature. 10.2 Deviatoric and confining stress levels. 10.3 Average and standard deviation of flow number for three specimens. 10.4 Attach Simple Performance Test System standard reports for individual specimens.

109 NCHRP 9-29 Equipment Specification for the Simple Performance Test System Version 2.0 March 26, 2004 Annex C Simple Performance Test System Dynamic Modulus Test Adapted From Test Method for Dynamic Modulus of Asphalt Concrete Mixtures for Permanent Deformation and Test Method for Dynamic Modulus of Asphalt Concrete Mixtures for Fatigue Cracking NCHRP Report 465, 2002

110 NCHRP 9-29 Equipment Specification for the Simple Performance Test System Version 2.0 March 26, 2004 1. Scope 1.1 This test method covers testing of asphalt concrete mixtures to determine the dynamic modulus and phase angle. 1.2 In the test dynamic modulus and phase angle data are collected at a specified test temperature using various frequencies of loading. 1.3 This standard is applicable to laboratory prepared specimen 100 mm in diameter and 150 mm in height for mixtures with nominal maximum size aggregate less than or equal to 37.5 mm (1.5 in). 1.4 This standard may involve hazardous material, operations, and equipment. This standard does not purport to address all safety problems associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this procedure to establish appropriate safety and health practices and to determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use. 2. Referenced Documents 2.1 AASHTO Standards PPXX Standard Practice for Permanent Deformation and Fatigue Evaluation of HMA Using the Simple Performance Test System (To be developed). PPYY Standard Practice for Fabrication of Performance Test Specimens Using the Superpave Gyratory Compactor (To be developed). 2.2 Other NCHRP 9-29 Equipment Specification for the Simple Performance Test System 3. Definitions 3.1 Dynamic Modulus – |E*|, the absolute value of the complex modulus calculated by dividing the peak-to-peak stress by the peak-to-peak strain for a material subjected to a sinusoidal loading. 3.2 Phase angle – , the angle in degrees between a sinusoidally applied stress and the resulting strain in a controlled-stress test. 4. Summary of Method 4.1 A sinusoidal (haversine) axial compressive stress is applied to a cylindrical specimen of asphalt concrete at a given temperature using a sweep of frequencies. The applied

111 NCHRP 9-29 Equipment Specification for the Simple Performance Test System Version 2.0 March 26, 2004 stress and the resulting axial strain response of the specimen at each frequency is measured and used to calculate the dynamic modulus and phase angle for each frequency. The test can be performed either with or without confinement. 5. Significance and Use 5.1 The dynamic modulus can be used with the criteria in AASHTO PPXX to judge the acceptability of a mixture to resist permanent deformation and fatigue cracking. 5.2 The dynamic modulus can also be used to compare or rank the permanent deformation and fatigue resistance of various bituminous paving mixes. 6. Apparatus 6.1 An approved Simple Performance Test System meeting the requirements of NCHRP 9-29 Equipment Specification for the Simple Performance Test System 6.2 An environmental chamber for conditioning the test specimens to the desired testing temperature. The environmental chamber shall be capable of controlling the temperature of the specimen over a temperature range from 20 to 60 C (68 to 140 F ) to an accuracy of 0.5 C (1 F). The chamber shall be large enough to accommodate three test specimens and a dummy specimen with temperature sensor mounted at the center for temperature verification. 6.3 Teflon sheeting, 0.25 mm thick to reduce friction between the specimen and the loading platens. 7. Test Specimens 7.1 Testing shall be performed on 100 mm (4 in) diameter by 150 mm (6 in) high test specimens fabricated in accordance with AASHTO PP YY Standard Practice for Fabrication of Performance Test Specimens Using the Superpave Gyratory Compactor. 7.2 The dynamic modulus shall be the average result obtained from three test specimens. 8. Test Specimen Instrumentation (Standard Glued Gage Point System) 8.1 If the Simple Performance Test System uses the standard glued gage point system, attach the gage points to the specimen in accordance with the manufacturers instructions. 8.2 Confirm that the gage length is 70 mm 1 mm measured center to center of the gage points.

112 NCHRP 9-29 Equipment Specification for the Simple Performance Test System Version 2.0 March 26, 2004 9. Procedure 9.1 Unconfined Tests 9.1.1 Assemble each specimen to be tested with platens in the following order from bottom to top. Bottom loading platen, bottom Teflon friction reducer, specimen, top Teflon friction, and top loading platen. 9.1.2 Place the specimen and platen assembly in the environmental chamber with the dummy specimen, and monitor the temperature of the dummy specimen to determine when testing can begin. 9.1.3 Turn on the Simple Performance Test System, set the temperature control to the desired testing temperature and allow the testing chamber to equilibrate at the testing temperature for at least one hour. 9.1.4 When the dummy specimen and the testing chamber reach the target temperature, open the testing chamber, remove a test specimen and platen assembly, and quickly place it in the testing chamber. 9.1.5 Close the testing chamber and allow the chamber temperature to return to testing temperature. 9.1.6 Steps 9.1.4 and 9.1.5 including return of the test chamber to the target temperature shall be completed in 3 minutes. 9.1.7 Enter the required identification and control information into the Dynamic Modulus Software. 9.1.8 Follow the software prompts to begin the test. The Simple Performance Test System will automatically unload when the test is complete and display test data and data quality indicators. 9.1.9 Review the data quality indicators as discussed in Section 10 of this test method. Retest specimens with data quality indicators above the values specified in Section 10. 9.1.10 Once acceptable data have been collected, open the test chamber, and remove the tested specimen. 9.1.11 Repeat steps 9.1.4 through 9.1.10 for the remaining test specimens.

113 NCHRP 9-29 Equipment Specification for the Simple Performance Test System Version 2.0 March 26, 2004 9.2 Confined Tests 9.2.1 Assemble each specimen to be tested with platens and membrane as follows. Place the bottom friction reducer and the specimen on the bottom platen. Stretch the membrane over the specimen and bottom loading platen. Install the lower o- ring seal. Place the top friction reducer and top platen on top of the specimen, and stretch the membrane over the top platen. Install the upper o-ring seal. 9.2.2 Encase the dummy specimen in a membrane. 9.2.3 Place the specimen and platen assembly in the environmental chamber with the dummy specimen, and monitor the temperature of the dummy specimen to determine when testing can begin. 9.2.4 Turn on the Simple Performance Test System, set the temperature control to the desired testing temperature and allow the testing chamber to equilibrate at the testing temperature for at least one hour. 9.2.5 When the dummy specimen and the testing chamber reach the target temperature, open the testing chamber, remove a test specimen and platen assembly, and quickly place it in the testing chamber. 9.2.6 Close the testing chamber and allow the chamber temperature to return to testing temperature. 9.2.7 Steps 9.2.5 and 9.2.6 including return of the test chamber to the target temperature shall be completed in 3 minutes. 9.2.8 Enter the required identification and control information into the Dynamic Modulus Software. 9.2.9 Follow the software prompts to begin the test. The Simple Performance Test System will automatically unload when the test is complete and display test data and data quality indicators. 9.2.10 Review the data quality indicators as discussed in Section 10 of this test method. Retest specimens with data quality indicators above the values specified in Section 10. 9.2.11 Once acceptable data have been collected, open the test chamber, and remove the tested specimen. 9.2.12 Repeat steps 9.2.5 through 9.2.11 for the remaining test specimens.

114 NCHRP 9-29 Equipment Specification for the Simple Performance Test System Version 2.0 March 26, 2004 10. Data Quality Indicators and Calculations 10.1 The calculation of dynamic modulus, phase angle, and the data quality indicators is performed automatically by the Simple Performance Test System software. 10.2 Review the data quality indicators for each test frequency and compare them to the recommended maximum values listed below. Data Quality Indicator Allowable Maximum Value Load Standard Error 10 percent Deformation Standard Error 10 percent Load Drift 3 percent Deformation Drift 400 percent Deformation Uniformity 20 percent Phase Uniformity 3 degrees 10.3 Review the detailed modulus test report for those frequencies where the data quality indicators exceed the maximum allowable values. Repeat testing of specimens with data quality indicators exceeding the values listed in 10.2. 10.4 Compute the average and standard deviation of the modulus and flow numbers for the three specimens tested. 11. Report 11.1 Test temperature. 11.2 Confining stress level. 11.3 Average and standard deviation of dynamic modulus and phase angle for three specimens. 11.4 Attach Simple Performance Test System standard dynamic modulus summary report.

115 NCHRP 9-29 Equipment Specification for the Simple Performance Test System Version 2.0 March 26, 2004 Annex D Procedure for Developing a Dynamic Modulus Master Curve for Pavement Structural Design Using The Simple Performance Test System.

116 NCHRP 9-29 Equipment Specification for the Simple Performance Test System Version 2.0 March 26, 2004 INTRODUCTION This Annex describes an approach for using the Simple Performance Test system to develop a dynamic modulus master curve for an asphalt concrete mixture. The resulting master curve can be used to compare materials over a wide range of temperatures and loading rates or to generate Level 1 input data required for the 2002 Design Guide. The approach described here is very similar to that contained in AASHTO Provisional Standard TP62-03, “Standard Method of Test for Determining Dynamic Modulus of Hot-Mix Asphalt Concrete Mixtures,” except a reduced number of temperatures, an expanded range of frequencies, and an estimate of the limiting maximum modulus are used. The recommended test sequence in AASHTO TP62-03 consists of testing a minimum of 2 replicate specimens at temperatures of –10, 4.4, 21.1, 37.8, and 54.4 C (14, 40, 70, 100, and 130 F) at loading frequencies of 25, 10, 5, 1.0, 0.5, and 0.1 Hz. This testing provides a database of 60 dynamic modulus measurements from which the parameters of the master curve are determined by numerical optimization. In the approach described here, the Hirsch model (1) is used to estimate the limiting maximum modulus of the mixture based on volumetric properties and a limiting binder shear modulus of 1 GPa (145,000 psi). This limiting maximum modulus is then combined with test data from a minimum of 2 replicate specimens tested at temperatures of 4.4, 21.1, and 46.1 C (40, 70, and 115 F) at loading frequencies of 10, 1.0, 0.1, and 0.01 Hz. This testing provides a database of 24 measurements from which the parameters of the master curve are determined by numerical optimization. DYNAMIC MODULUS MASTER CURVES To account for temperature and rate of loading effects on the modulus of asphalt concrete, the 2002 Design Guide constructs a master curve at a reference temperature of 21.1 oC (70 oF). Master curves are constructed using the principle of time-temperature superposition. First a standard reference temperature is selected, in this case 21.1 oC (70 oF), then data at various temperatures are shifted with respect to time until the curves merge into a single smooth function. The master curve of modulus as a function of time formed in this manner describes the time dependency of the material. The amount of shifting at each temperature required to form the master curve describes the temperature dependency of the material. Thus, both the master curve and the shift factors are needed for a complete description of the rate and temperature effects. Figure 1 presents an example of a master curve constructed in this manner and the resulting shift factors.

117 NCHRP 9-29 Equipment Specification for the Simple Performance Test System Version 2.0 March 26, 2004 a. Master Curve. b. Shift Factors. Figure 1. Schematic of Master Curve and Shift Factors. 1000 10000 100000 1000000 10000000 -10 -8 -6 -4 -2 0 2 4 6 8 10 LOG REDUCED TIME D YN A M IC M O DU LU S, P SI -6 -4 -2 0 2 4 6 8 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 TEMPERATURE, F LO G S HI FT F AC TO R

118 NCHRP 9-29 Equipment Specification for the Simple Performance Test System Version 2.0 March 26, 2004 In the 2002 Design Guide, the sigmodial function in Equation 1 is used to describe the rate dependency of the modulus master curve. log( *) (log )E e tr1 (1) where: E* = dynamic modulus tr = reduced time = minimum value of E* = maximum value of E* = parameters describing the shape of the sigmodial function The fitting parameters and depend on aggregate gradation, binder content, and air void content. The fitting parameters and depend on the characteristics of the asphalt binder and the magnitude of and . The temperature dependency of the modulus is incorporated in the reduced time parameter, tr, in Equation 1. Equation 2 defines the reduced time as the actual loading time divided by the time-temperature shift factor, a(T). )(Ta t tr (2a) log( ) log( ) log ( )t t a Tr (2b) where: tr = reduced time t = time of loading a(T) = shift factor as a function of temperature T = temperature The shift factors are a function of temperature. In the 2002 Design Guide, the shift factors were expressed as a function of the binder viscosity to allow aging over the life of the pavement to be considered using the Global Aging Model developed by Mirza and Witczak (2). Equation 3 presents the shift factor relationship used in the 2002 Design Guide. )log()log()(log 70RTFOTcTa (3) where: a(T) = shift factor as a function of temperature and age = viscosity at the age and temperature of interest

119 NCHRP 9-29 Equipment Specification for the Simple Performance Test System Version 2.0 March 26, 2004 RTFOT70 = viscosity at the reference temperature of 70 F and RTFO aging c = fitting parameter For the development of dynamic modulus master curves, it is assumed that short-term oven aging for 4 hours at 135 C is equivalent to RTFOT aging. For these conditions, the viscosity as a function of temperature can be expressed using the ASTM viscosity-temperature relationship given in Equation 4. TVTSA logloglog (4) where: viscosity, cP T = temperature, Rankine ( F + 459.67 ) A = regression intercept VTS = regression slope of viscosity-temperature relationship Combining Equations 3 and 4 yields the shift factor as a function of temperature relationship used in the 2002 Design Guide for the construction of dynamic modulus master curves from laboratory test data. )67.529log(log 1010)(log VTSATVTSAcTa (5) where: a(T) = shift factor as a function of temperature T = temperature, Rankine A, VTS= viscosity-temperature relationship parameters for RTFOT aging c = fitting parameter Substituting Equation 5 into Equation 2b and the result into Equation 1 yields the form of the dynamic modulus master curve relationship used in the 2002 Design Guide for the development of master curves from laboratory test data. )67.529log(log 1010)log(1 *)log( VTSATVTSActe E (6) where: E* = dynamic modulus t = loading time T = temperature, Rankine A, VTS= viscosity-temperature relationship parameters for RTFOT aging c = fitting parameter

120 NCHRP 9-29 Equipment Specification for the Simple Performance Test System Version 2.0 March 26, 2004 = minimum value of E* = maximum value of E* = parameters describing the shape of the sigmodial function The fitting parameters ( , , , , and c) are determined through numerical optimization of Equation 6 using mixture test data collected in accordance with AASHTO TP62-03. Through the numerical optimization, the test data are essentially extrapolated to define the limiting minimum and maximum moduli. When information concerning the viscosity-temperature relationship for the binder is not available, a master curve can still be constructed and used to compare materials or used in pavement structural design methods other than the 2002 Design Guide. In this case, the shift factors can be described by an Arrhenius function given as Equation 7 (3). r a TTR ETa 11 303.2 )(log (7) where: a(T) = shift factor as a function of temperature T = temperature, K ( C + 273.15 ) Tr = reference temperature, K aE = activation energy, approximately equal to 200,000 J/mol R =universal gas constant = 8.314 J/ K-mol Simplifying Equation 7, substituting it into Equation 2b and then substituting the result into Equation 1 yields an alternative form of the dynamic modulus master curve equation that can be used when information on the viscosity-temperature relationship of the binder is not available. Note that the reference temperature for Equation 8 is 21.1 C. 25.295 11 14714.19 )log( 1 *)log( T E t a e E (8) Where: E* = dynamic modulus t = loading time T = temperature, K aE = activation energy, J/mol = minimum value of E* = maximum value of E* = parameters describing the shape of the sigmodial function

121 NCHRP 9-29 Equipment Specification for the Simple Performance Test System Version 2.0 March 26, 2004 Again, the fitting parameters ( , , , , and aE ) are determined through numerical optimization of laboratory test data. REDUCED TEMPERATURE RANGE To properly fit the master curves in Equations 6 and 8, test data are needed over a range of temperatures. Particularly troublesome is the collection of dynamic modulus test data at low temperatures to define the upper bound of the sigmoidal function (limiting maximum modulus). Testing over this range of temperatures requires expensive environmental chambers with humidity control, and high load levels. In NCHRP Project 9-29, it was determined that a reasonable estimate of the limiting maximum modulus could be obtained from the Hirsch model (1), and combined with test data over a narrower range of temperatures to develop a dynamic modulus master curve. Equations 9 and 10 present the Hirsch model, which allows estimation of the modulus of the mixture from binder stiffness data and volumetric properties of the mixture. binder c bindercmix GVFA VMA VMA PVMAxVFAGVMAPE |*|3000,200,4 100 1 1 000,10 |*|3 100 1000,200,4|*| (9) where: 58.0 58.0 |*|3650 |*|320 VMA GxVFA VMA GxVFA P binder binder c (10) VMA = Voids in mineral aggregates, % VFA: Voids filled with asphalt, % |G*|binder = shear complex modulus of binder, psi Based on research conducted during the Strategic Highway Research Program (SHRP) by Christensen and Andersen (4), a good engineering estimate of the maximum shear modulus for all binder is approximately 1 GPa or 145,000 psi. Substituting this value into Equations 9 and 10 yields the recommended equation for estimating the limiting maximum modulus of asphalt concrete mixtures from volumetric data.

122 NCHRP 9-29 Equipment Specification for the Simple Performance Test System Version 2.0 March 26, 2004 )(000,435000,200,4 100 1 1 000,10 000,435 100 1000,200,4|*| max VFA VMA VMA PVMAxVFAVMAPE cc (11) where 58.0 58.0 )(000,435650 )(000,43520 VMA VFA VMA VFA Pc (12) E* max = limiting maximum mixture dynamic modulus VMA = Voids in mineral aggregates, % VFA = Voids filled with asphalt, % Figure 2 presents limiting maximum moduli computed using Equation 11 for VMA ranging from 10 to 20 percent, and VFA ranging from 55 to 85 percent. For this wide range of volumetric properties, the limiting maximum modulus varies from about 3,000,000 psi to 3,800,000 psi. These limiting maximum modulus values appear very rational. For conditions with low VMA and high VFA, the limiting maximum modulus approaches the 4,000,000 psi often assumed for Portland cement concrete. Figure 2. Limiting Maximum Dynamic Modulus Values From the Hirsch Model. 3,000,000 3,100,000 3,200,000 3,300,000 3,400,000 3,500,000 3,600,000 3,700,000 3,800,000 3,900,000 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 VMA, % Li m iti ng D yn am ic M od ul us , p si VFA = 55% VFA = 70 % VFA = 85 %

123 NCHRP 9-29 Equipment Specification for the Simple Performance Test System Version 2.0 March 26, 2004 For a known limiting maximum modulus, the 2002 Design Guide master curve relationship given in Equation 6 reduces to: )67.529log(log 1010)log(1 *)log( VTSATVTSActe MaxE (13) where: E* = dynamic modulus t = loading time T = temperature, Rankine A, VTS = viscosity-temperature relationship parameters for RTFOT aging Max = limiting maximum modulus , , and c = fitting parameters And the alternative master curve relationship given in Equation 8 reduces to: 25.295 11 14714.19 )log( 1 *)log( T E t a e MaxE (14) Where: E* = dynamic modulus t = loading time T = temperature, K Max = limiting maximum modulus , , and aE = fitting parameters The four unknown fitting parameters are still estimated using numerical optimization of the test data, but since the limiting maximum modulus is known, data at low test temperatures are no longer needed. MASTERSOLVE WORKBOOK The computations needed to develop a dynamic modulus master curve are easily performed using the Solver function in Mircosoft EXCEL . A workbook, called MASTERSOLVE, was developed during NCHRP Project 9-29 for solving Equations 13 and 14. It is available from NCHRP. This section describes the data needed for the solution, and the general flow of computations.

124 NCHRP 9-29 Equipment Specification for the Simple Performance Test System Version 2.0 March 26, 2004 Input Data The input data that are need to develop a dynamic modulus master curve using the approach described in this Annex are: 1. Average voids in the mineral aggregate (VMA) for the specimens tested. 2. Average voids filled with asphalt (VFA) for the specimens tested. 3. Dynamic modulus and phase angle measured on replicate specimens at temperatures of 4.4, 21.1, and 46.1 C (40, 70, and 115 F) at loading frequencies of 10, 1.0, 0.1, and 0.01 Hz. A total of 24 dynamic modulus and phase angle measurements are needed. 4. If shift factors will be developed using the 2002 Design Guide approach, then the coefficients A, and VTS of the viscosity-temperature relationship for the binder are needed. These coefficients should represent the aging condition of the binder in the specimens being tested. Normally this will be RTFOT conditions. Computations 1. From the average VMA and VFA for the specimens tested compute the limiting maximum modulus using Equations 11 and 12. 2. Compute the average of the dynamic modulus and the average of the phase angle measurements for each of the 12 temperature/frequency combinations. 3. Compute the logarithm of the 12 average dynamic modulus measurements. 4. Compute the time of loading for each of the 12 temperature/frequency combinations as 1/frequency. 5. Use the Solver function in Microsoft EXCEL to determine the fitting parameters in Equations 13 and/or 14. This is done by setting up a spreadsheet to compute the sum of the squared errors between the logarithm of the average measured dynamic moduli and the value predicted by Equations 13 or 14. The Solver function is used to minimize the sum of the squared errors. The following initial estimates are recommended: Parameter 2002 Design Guide Equation 13 Arrhenius Shift Factors Equation 14 0.5 0.5 -1.0 -1.0 .5 0.5 C 1.2 NA aE NA 1000 6. Generate plots showing: (1) the fitted master curve and the shifted average modulus data as a function of reduced loading time, (2) the shifted average phase angle data as a function of reduced loading time, (3) the shift factors as a function of temperature.

125 NCHRP 9-29 Equipment Specification for the Simple Performance Test System Version 2.0 March 26, 2004 ANNEX D REFERENCES 1. Christensen, D.W., Pellinen, T.K., Bonaquist, R.F., “Hirsch Model for Estimating the Modulus of Asphalt Concrete,” Journal of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists, Volume 72, 2003, pp. 97-121. 2. Mirza, M. W. and Witczak, M.W., “Development of a Global Aging System for Short and Long Term Aging of Asphalt Cements,” Journal of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists, Vol. 64, 1995. 3. Pellinen, T. K. “Investigation of the Use of Dynamic Modulus as An Indicator of Hot-Mix Asphalt Performance,” Ph.D. Dissertation, Arizona State University, May, 2001. 4. Christensen, D.W., and Anderson, D.A., “Interpretation of Dynamic Mechanical Test Data for Paving Grade Asphalt Cements,” Journal of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists, Vol. 61, 1992.

126 NCHRP 9-29 Equipment Specification for the Simple Performance Test System Version 2.0 March 26, 2004 Annex E Specification Compliance Test Methods for the Simple Performance Test System

127 NCHRP 9-29 Equipment Specification for the Simple Performance Test System Version 2.0 March 26, 2004 Table E1. Summary of Specification Compliance Tests. Item Section Method Assembled Size 4.4 and 4.6 Measure Specimen and Display Height 4.4 Measure Component Size 4.7 Measure Electrical Requirements 4.5 and 4.6 Documentation and trial Air Supply Requirements 4.8 Documentation and trial Limit Protection 4.9 Documentation and trial Emergency Stop 4.10 Documentation, visual inspection, trial Loading Machine Capacity 5.1 Independent force verification (See verification procedures below) Load Control Capability 5.2 through 5.4 Trial tests on asphalt specimens and manufacturer provided dynamic verification device. Platen Configuration 5.5 Visual Platen Hardness 6.1 Test ASTM E10 Platen Dimensions 6.2 Measure Platen Smoothness 6.3 Measure Load Cell Range 7.1 Load cell data plate Load Accuracy 7.2 Independent force verification (See verification procedures below) Load Resolution 7.3 Independent force verification (See verification procedures below) Configuration of Deflection Measuring System 8.1 Visual Transducer Range 8.2 Independent deflection verification (See verification procedures below) Transducer Resolution 8.3 Independent deflection verification (See verification procedures below) Transducer Accuracy 8.4 Independent deflection verification (See verification procedures below) Load Mechanism Compliance and Bending 8.5 Measure on steel specimens with various degrees of lack of parallelism Configuration of Specimen Deformation Measuring System 9.1 Visual Gauge Length of Specimen Deformation Measuring System 9.1 Measure Transducer Range 9.2 Independent deflection verification (See verification procedures below)

128 NCHRP 9-29 Equipment Specification for the Simple Performance Test System Version 2.0 March 26, 2004 Table E1. Summary of Specification Compliance Tests (Continued). Item Section Method Transducer Resolution 9.3 Independent deflection verification (See verification procedures below) Transducer Accuracy 9.4 Independent deflection verification (See verification procedures below) Specimen Deformation System Complexity 9.5 Trial Confining Pressure Range 10.1 and 10.5 Independent pressure verification (See verification procedures below) Confining Pressure Control 10.2 Trial tests on asphalt specimens Confining Pressure System Configuration 10.3 and 10.4 Visual Confining Pressure Resolution and Accuracy 10.5 Independent pressure verification (See verification procedures below) Temperature Sensor 10.6 and 11.4 Independent temperature verification (See verification procedures below) Specimen Installation and Equilibration Time 9.5, 10.7 and 11.3 Trial Environmental Chamber Range and Control 11.1 Independent temperature verification (See verification procedures below) Control System and Software 12 Trial Data Analysis 13 Independent computations on trial test Initial Calibration and Dynamic Performance Verification 14 Certification and independent verification Calibration Mode 14.6 Trial Verification of Normal Operation Procedures and Equipment 15 Review On-line Documentation 16.1 Trial Reference Manual 16.2 Review

129 NCHRP 9-29 Equipment Specification for the Simple Performance Test System Version 2.0 March 26, 2004 INDEPENDENT VERIFICATION PROCEDURES FOR SIMPLE PERFORMANCE TESTING MACHINE 1.0 General 1.1 The testing machine shall be verified as a system with the load, deflection, specimen deformation, confining pressure, and temperature measuring systems in place and operating as in actual use. 1.2 System verification is invalid if the devices are removed and checked independently of the testing machine. 2.0 Load Measuring System Static Verification 2.1 Perform load measuring system verification in accordance with ASTM E-4. 2.2 All calibration load cells used for the load calibration shall be certified to ASTM E-74 and shall not be used below their Class A loading limits. 2.3 When performing the load verification, apply at least two verification runs of at least 5 loads throughout the range selected. 2.4 If the initial verification loads are within +/- 1% of reading, these can be applied as the “As found” values and the second set of verification forces can be used as the final values. Record return to zero values for each set of verification loads. 2.5 If the initial verification loads are found out of tolerance, calibration adjustments shall be made according to manufacturers specifications until the values are established within the ASTM E-4 recommendations. Two applications of verification loads shall then be applied to determine the acceptance criteria for repeatability according to ASTM E-4. 2.6 At no time will correction factors be utilized to corrected values that do not meet the accuracy requirements of ASTM E-4. 3.0 Deflection and Specimen Deformation Measuring System Static Verification 3.1 Perform verification of the deflection and specimen deformation measuring systems in accordance with ASTM D 6027 Test Method B. 3.2 The micrometer used shall conform to the requirements of ASTM E-83.

130 NCHRP 9-29 Equipment Specification for the Simple Performance Test System Version 2.0 March 26, 2004 3.3 When performi ng verification of the deflection and strain measuring system, each transducer and associated electronics must be verified individually throughout it’s intended range of use. 3.4 Mount the appropriate transducer in the micrometer stand and align it to prevent errors caused by angular application of measurements. 3.5 Apply at least 5 verification measurements to the transducer throughout it’s range. Re-zero and repeat the verification measurements to determine repeatability. 3.6 If the readings of the first verification do not meet the specified error tolerance, perform calibration adjustments according to manufacturer’s specifications and repeat the applications of measurement to satisfy the error tolerances. 4.0 Confining Pressure Measuring System Verification 4.1 Perform verification of the confining pressure measuring system in accordance with ASTM D-5720. 4.2 All calibrated pressure standards shall meet the requirements of ASTM D-5720. 4.3 Attach the pressure transducer to the pressure standardizing device. 4.4 Apply at least 5 verification pressures to the device throughout it’s range recording each value. Determine if the verification readings fall within +/- 1 % of the value applied. 4.5 If the readings are within tolerance, apply a second set of readings to determine repeatability. Record the return to zero values for each set of verification pressures. 4.6 If readings are beyond tolerance, adjust the device according to manufacturer’s specifications and repeat the dual applications of pressure as described above to complete verification. 5.0 Temperature Measuring System Verification 5.1 Verification of the temperature measuring system will be performed using a using a NIST traceable reference thermal detector that is readable and accurate to 0.1 o C. 5.2 A rubber band or O-ring will be used to fasten the reference thermal detector to the system temperature sensor.

131 NCHRP 9-29 Equipment Specification for the Simple Performance Test System Version 2.0 March 26, 2004 5.3 Comparisons of the temperature from the reference thermal detector and the system temperature will be made at 6 temperatures over the operating range of the environmental chamber. 5.4 Once equilibrium is obtained at each temperature setting, record the temperature of the reference thermal detector and the system temperature sensor. 5.5 Also check stability of the environmental chamber by noting the maximum and minimum temperatures during cycling at the set temperature. 6.0 Dynamic Performance Verification 6.1 The verification of the dynamic performance of the equipment will be performed after static verification of the system. 6.2 The dynamic performance verification will be performed using the verification device provided with the system by the manufacturer. 6.3 First, the verification device will be loaded statically to obtain the static relationship between force and displacement. This relationship will be compared to that provided by the manufacturer in the system documentation. 6.4 The verification device will then be used to simulate dynamic modulus test conditions. Load and displacement data will be collected on the verification device using loads of 0.5, 4.5, 8.5, and 12.5 kN (0.1, 1.0, 1.9, and 2.8 kips) at frequencies of 0.1, 1, and 10 Hz. The peak load and displacements will be determined and plotted along with the static data. The data shall plot within +/- 2 percent of the static force displacement relationship. 6.5 The verification device will also be used to check the phase difference between the load and specimen deformation measuring system. The phase difference shall be less than 1 degree.

132 NCHRP 9-29 Equipment Specification for the Simple Performance Test System Version 2.0 March 26, 2004 Annex F Minimum Testing Program For Comparison of a Non-Standard Specimen Deformation Measuring System to the Standard Specimen Deformation Measuring System

133 NCHRP 9-29 Equipment Specification for the Simple Performance Test System Version 2.0 March 26, 2004 1.0 Summary 1.1 This Annex describes the minimum testing, analysis, and reporting required to demonstrate that a nonstandard specimen deformation measuring system produces the same dynamic modulus and phase angle results as the standard glued gauge point system specified in Section 9.0 of the these specifications. 1.2 The basic approach is to collect dynamic modulus and phase angle data on a single mixture using the simple performance test system with the standard glued gauge point system and the proposed alternative. Standard statistical hypothesis tests are then performed on the resulting data to verify that there is no difference in the mean and variance of the dynamic modulus and phase angles measured with the two systems. 1.3 To provide data over a wide range of modulus and phase angles, the testing will be performed for the conditions listed in Table F-1. Table F-1. Testing Conditions. Temperature, C ( F) Confinement, kPa (psi) Frequencies, Hz 25 (77) Unconfined 10, 1, and 0.1 45 (113) Unconfined 10, 1, and 0.1 45 (113) 140 (20 psi) 10, 1, and 0.1 1.4 Tests on twelve independent specimens will be performed with each specimen deformation measuring system. Thus a total of 24 specimens will be fabricated and tested. 2.0 Test Specimens 2.1 The testing shall be performed on simple performance test specimens meeting the dimensional tolerances of Section 3.0 of these specifications. 2.2 Use a coarse-graded 19.0 mm nominal maximum aggregate size mixture with a PG 64-22 binder. The mixture shall meet the requirements of AASHTO MP2 for a surface course with a design traffic level of 10 to 30 million ESALs. The percent passing the 2.36 mm sieve shall be less than 35 percent. Prepare test specimens at the optimum asphalt content determined in accordance with AASHTO PP28 for a traffic level of 3 to <30 million ESALs. Mixtures shall be short term oven aged for 2 hours at the compaction temperature in accordance with AASHTO R30. 2.3 Prepare 24 test specimens within the air void content range of 3.5 to 4.5 percent. Rank the test specimens based on air void content. Group the test specimens into two subsets such that the average and standard deviation of the air void contents are approximately equal.

134 NCHRP 9-29 Equipment Specification for the Simple Performance Test System Version 2.0 March 26, 2004 3.0 Dynamic Modulus Testing 3.1 Perform the dynamic modulus testing with the Simple Performance Test System in accordance with Annex C of these specifications. Repeat tests as needed to ensure that the data quality indicators are within their allowable ranges. 3.2 Perform the testing in blocks of three specimens in the order listed in Table F-2. Plan the testing such that all testing in a block will be completed on the same day. Table F-2. Block Order Testing. Block Temperature, C ( F) Confinement, kPa (psi) Specimen Deformation System Standard1 25 (77) 0 Proposed Standard2 25 (77) 0 Proposed Standard3 25 (77) 0 Proposed Standard4 25 (77) 0 Proposed Standard5 45 (113) 140 (20) Proposed Standard6 45 (113) 140 (20) Proposed Standard7 45 (113) 140 (20) Proposed Standard8 45 (113) 140 (20) Proposed Standard9 45 (113) 0 Proposed Standard10 45 (113) 0 Proposed Standard11 45 (113) 0 Proposed Standard12 45 (113) 0 Proposed

135 NCHRP 9-29 Equipment Specification for the Simple Performance Test System Version 2.0 March 26, 2004 4.0 Data Analysis 4.1 For each combination of device, temperature, confining pressure, and frequency, prepare summary tables listing the measured dynamic modulus and phase angles, and the data quality indicators. A total of 18 summary tables, 9 for each measuring system will be prepared. Each of these summary tables will represent a specific combination of temperature, confining pressure, and frequency of loading. 4.2 For each summary table, compute the mean and variance of the dynamic modulus and phase angle measurements using Equations F-1 and F-2. 12 12 1i iy y (F-1) 11 )( 2 12 12 i i yy s (F-2) where: y = sample mean s 2 = sample variance yi = measured values 5.0 Statistical Hypothesis Testing 5.1 For each combination of temperature, confining pressure, and frequency of loading test the equality of variances between the standard specimen deformation system and the proposed specimen deformation measuring system using the F-test described below. In the description below, the subscript s refers to the standard system and the subscript p refers to the proposed system. Null Hypothesis: Variance of proposed system equals that of standard system, 22 sp Alternative Hypothesis: Variance of proposed system is greater than that of standard system, 22 sp Test Statistic: 2 2 s p s s F

136 NCHRP 9-29 Equipment Specification for the Simple Performance Test System Version 2.0 March 26, 2004 where sp 2 = computed sample variance for the proposed system ss 2 = computed sample variance for the standard system Region of Rejection: For the sample sizes specified, the test statistic must be less than 2.82 to conclude that the variances are equal. 5.2 Summarize the resulting test statistics for dynamic modulus and phase angle. 5.3 If the results conclude the variance is greater for the proposed measuring for any of the combinations of temperature, confinement, and loading frequency tested, then the proposed measuring system is unacceptable. 5.4 For combinations of temperature, confinement, and loading frequency where equality of variances is confirmed by the hypothesis test in Item 5.1, test the equality of means between the standard specimen deformation system and the proposed specimen deformation measuring system using the t-test described below. In the description below, the subscript s refers to the standard system and the subscript p refers to the proposed system. Null Hypothesis: Mean from the proposed system equals that from the standard system, 22 sp Alternative Hypothesis: Mean from the proposed system is not equal to that from the standard system, 22 sp Test Statistic: 6 n yy t sp where: 2 22 sp ss s py = computed sample mean from the proposed system sy = computed sample mean from the standard system

137 NCHRP 9-29 Equipment Specification for the Simple Performance Test System Version 2.0 March 26, 2004 sp 2 = computed sample variance for the proposed system ss 2 = computed sample variance for the standard system Region of Rejection: For the sample sizes specified, the absolute value of the test statistic must be less than 2.07 to conclude that the means are equal. 5.5 Summarize the resulting test statistics for dynamic modulus and phase angle. 5.6 If the results conclude the means are not equal for any of the combinations of temperature, confinement, and loading frequency tested, then the proposed measuring system is unacceptable. 6.0 Report 6.1 Design data for the mixture used in the evaluation. 6.2 Air void contents for individual specimens and the average and standard deviations of the air void contents for the two subsets. 6.3 Tabular chronological summary of the block testing showing starting date and time and completion date and time for each block. 6.4 Summary tables of dynamic modulus, phase angle, and data quality indicators for each combination of temperature, confining pressure, and loading frequency for the two measuring systems. 6.5 Summary tables of the mean and variance of the dynamic modulus and phase angle for each combination of temperature, confining pressure, and loading frequency for the two measuring systems. 6.6 Summary tables of the hypothesis tests for the variance and mean of the dynamic modulus and phase angle for each combination of temperature, confining pressure, and loading frequency. 6.7 Conclusions concerning the acceptability of the proposed measuring system.

Next: Appendix C - Simple Performance Test Specimen Fabrication System Specification »
Refining the Simple Performance Tester for Use in Routine Practice Get This Book
×
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

TRB's National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) Report 614: Refining the Simple Performance Tester for Use in Routine Practice explores the develop of a practical, economical simple performance tester (SPT) for use in routine hot-mix asphalt (HMA) mix design and in the characterization of HMA materials for pavement structural design with the Mechanistic-Empirical Pavement Design Guide.

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!