National Academies Press: OpenBook
« Previous: Section 4 - Treatment Descriptions
Page 62
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2008. Guidelines for Selection of Speed Reduction Treatments at High-Speed Intersections. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/14162.
×
Page 62
Page 63
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2008. Guidelines for Selection of Speed Reduction Treatments at High-Speed Intersections. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/14162.
×
Page 63
Page 64
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2008. Guidelines for Selection of Speed Reduction Treatments at High-Speed Intersections. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/14162.
×
Page 64

Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

62 Agent, K.R. “Transverse Pavement Markings for Speed Control and Accident Reduction.” Transportation Research Record: 773. Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1980. pp. 11–14. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO). A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets, 5th ed. AASHTO, Washington, D.C., 2004. Arndt, O.K. Geometric Design of Roundabouts for Optimum Safety – Use of the Software Program ‘ARNDT.’ Department of Main Roads: Brisbane, Queensland, Australia, 2000. Arnold, Jr., E.D. and K.E. Lantz, Jr. “Evaluation of Best Practices in Traffic Operations and Safety: Phase 1: Flash- ing LED Stop Sign and Optical Speed Bars.” Virginia Transportation Research Council, Charlottesville, 2007. Benekohal, R. F., L. M. Kastel, and M. I. Suhale. “Evaluation and Summary of Studies in Speed Control Meth- ods in Work Zones.” FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 1992. Bretherton Jr., W. M. “Do Speed Tables Improve Safety?” Paper presented at ITE 2003 Annual Meeting, Seattle, WA, 2003. Cochituate Rail Trail Design and Construction Issues, http://www.millermicro.com/crt-design.html (accessed August 2007). Corkle, J., M. Marti, and D. Montebello. “Synthesis on the Effectiveness of Rumble Strips.” Report No. MN/ RC-2002-07, Minnesota Department of Transportation, St. Paul, 2001. Cottrell, B.H. “Evaluation of Wide Edgelines on Two-Lane Rural Roads.” Transportation Research Record 1160. Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 1988. Elefteriadou, L., D. Torbic, M. El-Gindy, S. Stoffels, and M. Adolini. Rumble Strips for Roads with Narrow or Non- Existent Shoulders: Report No. PTI 2002 11. Pennsylvania Transportation Institute, Pennsylvania State Uni- versity, State College, 2001. Federal Highway Administration. Pavement Marking Demonstration Projects: States of Alaska and Tennessee, FHWA Project 475980-00001, http://ttiresearch.tamu.edu/b-kuhn/pmdemo/PMDemo-index.html (accessed August 2007). Federal Highway Administration. Vegetation Control for Safety: A Guide for Street and Highway Maintenance Per- sonnel. FHWA-RT-90-003. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 1990. Federal Highway Administration. Research and Technology. Rumble Strips, http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/ rnt4u/ti/rumblestrips.htm (accessed August 2007). Federal Highway Administration. Safety. Rumble Strips, http://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/programs/rumble.htm (accessed August 2007). Federal Highway Administration. Flexibility in Highway Design. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 2000a. Federal Highway Administration. Roundabouts: An Informational Guide. Report FHWA-RD-00-67. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 2000b. Federal Highway Administration. Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices. FHWA, U.S. Department of Trans- portation, 2003. Federal Highway Administration. FHWA Low-Cost Intersection Treatments on High-Speed Rural Roads. Power- Point Presentation. BMI-SG, FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 2006. Fehr & Peers Transportation Consultants. Traffic Calming, www.trafficcalming.org (accessed August 2007). Fitzpatrick, Kay, Paul Carlson, Marcus A. Brewer, Mark D. Wooldridge, and Shaw-Pin Miaou. NCHRP Report 504: Design Speed, Operating Speed, and Posted Speed Practices. Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2003. Fylan, Fiona, and Mark Conner. Effective Interventions for Speeding Motorists, Road Safety Research Report No. 66, Department for Transport: London, 2006. References

References 63 Gannett Fleming, Inc. Collision Avoidance System Evaluation Report. PennDOT, Harrisburg, 2004. Gates, T. J. and H. G. Hawkins. “The Use of Wider Longitudinal Pavement Markings in the United States.” Paper VIS2002-31. Texas Transportation Institute, College Station, 2002. Gates, T. J., S. T. Chrysler, and H. G. Hawkins. “Innovative Visibility-Based Measures of Effectiveness for Wider Longitudinal Pavement Markings.” Paper VIS2002-30. Texas Transportation Institute, College Station, 2002. Gattis, J. L. “Urban Street Cross Section and Speed Issues.” Urban Street Symposium, Dallas, TX, Proceedings in Transportation Research E-Circular E-C019. Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1999. Godley, S.T., T.J. Triggs, and B.N. Fildes. “Speed Reduction Mechanisms of Transverse Lines.” Transportation Human Factors, Vol. 6, No. 2, 2000. Griffin, L. I. and R. N. Reinhardt. “A Review of Two Innovative Pavement Marking Patterns That Have Been Developed to Reduce Speeds and Crashes.” Available at www.aaafoundation.org/resources/index.cfm? button=pavement. Texas Transportation Institute, College Station, 1995. Hallmark, S., K. Knapp, G. Thomas, and D. Smith. Temporary Speed Hump Impact Evaluation. Center for Trans- portation Research and Evaluation, Iowa State University, Ames, 2002. Hanscom, F. R. “Evaluation of the Prince William County Collision Countermeasure System.” Paper VTRC 01- CR5. Virginia Transportation Research Council, Charlottesville, 2001. Harder, K.A., J. Bloomfield, and B. Chihak. The Effects of In-Lane Rumble Strips on the Stopping Behavior of Attentive Drivers. Report No. MN/RC-2002-11. University of Minnesota/Minnesota Department of Transportation, 2001. Harwood, D. W. NCHRP Synthesis of Highway Practice 191: Use of Rumble Strips to Enhance Safety. Transporta- tion Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1993. Harwood, D.W., F.M. Council, E. Hauer, W.E. Hughes, and A. Vogt. Prediction of the Expected Safety Perfor- mance of Rural Two-Lane Highways, Report No. FHWA-RD-99-207. Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, 2000. Hauer, E. “Lane Width and Safety.” Available at http://www.roadsafetyresearch.com/, 2000. Hauer, E. Accidents, Overtaking and Speed Control. Elsevier, United Kingdom, 1971. Human Factors North, Inc., in association with TSH. Review of Freeway to Highway Transitions and Speed Reduc- ing Countermeasures for the Highway 7 Carleton Place Transition. Ministry of Transportation, 2002. Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE). Guidelines for the Design and Application of Speed Humps. ITE, Washington, D.C., 1993. Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE). Traffic Calming for Communities. www.ite.org/traffic/table.htm (accessed August 2007). Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE). Traffic Calming: State of the Practice. ITE/FHWA, Washington, D.C., 1999. Joerger, Mark. Adjustment of Driver Behavior to an Urban Multi-Lane Roundabout. Oregon Department of Trans- portation, Salem, 2007. Katz, B. J. Pavement Markings for Speed Reduction – Draft Report. Science Applications International Corpora- tion, Turner-Fairbank Highway Research Center, McLean, VA, 2003. Katz, B. J., T. Shafer, and G. Rousseau. “Perceptual Countermeasures to Speeding: Literature Review.” Prepared for A.J. Nedzesky and Davey Warren, June 2003. Kermit, M.L., and T.C. Hein. “Effect of Rumble Strips on Traffic Control and Behavior.” Highway Research Board, Vol. 41, 1962. Land Transport Safety Authority (LTSA) and Transit New Zealand and Local Authorities. Joint Crash Reduction Programme: Outcome Monitoring. New Zealand, 2001. Lerner, Neil. NCHRP Report 488: Additional Investigations on Driver Information Overload. Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2002. Maze, T., A. Kamyab and S. Schrock. “Evaluation of Work Zone Speed Reduction Measures.” Center for Trans- portation Research and Education, Iowa State University, Ames, 2000. Miles, J.D., P.J. Carlson, M.P. Pratt, and T.D. Thompson. Traffic Operational Impacts of Transverse, Centerline and Edgeline Rumble Strips. Report No. 0-4472-2. Texas Transportation Institute: College Station, 2005. Ministry of Equipment: Accommodations Planning, Land Development Planning, and Transportation Planning and SETRA. “Construction of Interurban Intersection Plans on Principal Roads.” 1998. Minnesota Department of Transportation. “Rumble Strips Installed to Reduce Chances of Fatal Crashes.” www.dot.state.mn.us/d3/newsrels/03/10/06_rumble_strips.html (accessed September 2004). Mok, Jeong-Hun, Harlow Landphair, and Jody Naderi. “Landscape Improvement Impacts on Roadside Safety Performance,” Landscape and Urban Planning, Vol. 78, No. 3, 2006. Morgan, R. L. and D. E. McAuliffe. “Effectiveness of Shoulder Rumble Strips: A Survey of Current Practice.” Spe- cial Report 127. Available at http://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/fourthlevel/rumble/state_ny.htm, FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 1997.

Owens, R.D. “Effect of Rumble Strips at Rural Stop Locations on Traffic Operation.” Highway Research Record 170. Highway Research Board, Washington, D.C., 1967. Persaud, B.N., R.A. Retting, and C.A. Lyon. “Crash Reduction Following Installation of Centerline Rumble Strips on Rural Two-Lane Roads.” Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 36, 2004. Porter, R.J., E.T. Donnell, and K.M. Mahoney. “Evaluation of Effects of Centerline Rumble Strips on Lateral Vehicle Placement.” Transportation Research Record 1862. Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2004. Rakha, Hesham Ahmed, Bryan Katz, and Dana Duke. Design and Evaluation of Peripheral Transverse Bars to Reduce Vehicle Speed. Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington D.C., 2006. Rodegerdts, L., M. Blogg, E. Wemple, E. Myers, M. Kyte, M. Dixon, G. List, A. Flannery, R. Troutbeck, W. Brilon, N. Wu, B. Persaud, C. Lyon, D. Harkey, and D. Carter. NCHRP Report 572: Roundabouts in the United States. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2007. Schermers, G. and P. van Vliet. Sustainable Safety – A Preventative Road Safety Strategy for the Future, 2nd ed. AVV Transport Research Centre: Rotterdam, The Netherlands, 2001. Shinar, D., E. McDowell, and T. H. Rockwell. Improving Driver Performance on Curves in Rural Highways through Perceptual Changes. Report EES428B. Ohio State University, Engineering Experiment Station: Columbus, 1974. Smiley, Alison. “Driver Speed Estimation: What Road Designers Should Know.” Presented at the Transporta- tion Research Board 78th Annual Meeting, 1999. Straub, A.L., P.F. Dudden, and F.T. Moorhead. “Frost Penetration and Moisture Changes Related to Highway Pavement Shoulder Color, Abstract,” Highway Research Record No. 276, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1969. Taylor, W.C. and T.J. Foody. “Speed Zoning: A Theory and Its Proof.” Institute of Transportation Engineers, Washington, D.C., 1965. Texas Transportation Institute, “Evaluation of Edge-Line and Centerline Rumble Strips,” Project 0-4472, Texas Transportation Institute, College Station, 2006. Torbic, D.J., D.W. Harwood, D.K. Gilmore, R. Pfefer, T.R. Neuman, K.L. Slack, and K.K. Hardy. NCHRP Report 500: Guidance for Implementation of the AASHTO Strategic Highway Safety Plan—Volume 7: A Guide for Reducing Collisions on Horizontal Curves. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2004. Transportation Research Board. Highway Capacity Manual. Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2000. Transportation Research Board. Special Report 209: Highway Capacity Manual. Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 1985. Transportation Research Board. Special Report 209: Highway Capacity Manual. Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 1994. Transportation Research Board. NCHRP Project 3-46 Final Report: Capacity and Level of Service at Unsignalized Intersections. Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 1996. Ullman, Gerald L., and Elisabeth R. Rose. Effectiveness of Dynamic Speed Display Signs in Permanent Applications. Texas Transportation Institute, College Station, 2004. Vest, Adam, Nikiforos Stamatiadis, Adam Clayton and Jerry Pigman. Effect of Warning Signs on Curve Operat- ing Speeds. Research Report KTC-05-20/ SPR-259-03-1F. Kentucky Transportation Center, University of Kentucky, Lexington, 2005. Walls, A. “A Silver Bullet: Shoulder Texture Treatments.” Public Roads, Vol. 62, No. 4, 1999. Zaidel, D., A.S. Hakkert, and R. Barkan. “Rumble Strips and Paint Stripes at a Rural Intersection.” Transporta- tion Research Record 1069, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1986. Zegeer, C.V., C. Seiderman, P. Lagerwey, M. Cynecki, M. Ronkin, and B. Schneider. Pedestrian Facilities Users Guide: Providing Safety and Mobility. FHWA-RD-01-102. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 2002. 64 Guidelines for Selection of Speed Reduction Treatments at High-Speed Intersections

Next: Appendix A - Treatment Implementation Process Framework »
Guidelines for Selection of Speed Reduction Treatments at High-Speed Intersections Get This Book
×
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

TRB's National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) Report 613: Guidelines for Selection of Speed Reduction Treatments at High-Speed Intersections explores the effectiveness of geometric design features as well as signage and pavement markings to reduce vehicle speeds at high-speed intersections. A final report documenting the entire research effort is available online as NCHRP Web-Only Document 124.

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!