Cover Image

Not for Sale



View/Hide Left Panel
Click for next page ( 15


The National Academies | 500 Fifth St. N.W. | Washington, D.C. 20001
Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
Terms of Use and Privacy Statement



Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 14
14 Exhibit 23. The Modal Operational Inter-Relationships in the TCQSM, Second Edition. Mode Auto Transit Bicycle Pedestrian Auto Not Higher auto volumes may reduce reliability, but Not Not Applicable no estimation method is available in the TCQSM. Applicable Applicable Reduced reliability affects passenger loads. Auto volumes, street width, and signal timing affect street crossing difficulty which can reduce service coverage. Higher auto volumes reduce bus speed, which affects transit-auto travel time, but no estimation method is available in the HCM or TCQSM. Transit Not Higher bus volumes reduce bus speed, which Not Not Applicable affects transit-auto travel time. High bus volumes Applicable Applicable relative to bus capacity affect reliability, but no estimation method is available in the TCQSM. Bicycle Not No estimation method is available in the HCM or Not Not Applicable TCQSM for the effect of bikes on bus speed or Applicable Applicable reliability. Pedestrian Not Pedestrian crossing volumes affect right-turn Not Not Applicable capacity, which affects bus lane capacity, which Applicable Applicable affects bus travel time and reliability, but no estimation method is available in the TCQSM. Shaded boxes indicate weak or non-existent inter-relationships. No effect means that a change in modal volume has no effect on LOS as computed per the TCQSM. HCM Limitations: The HCM limitations are irrelevant to through movement is the only function of the street. It may the TCQSM. be less applicable to collectors where both through move- ment and access are important functions of the street. Considers All Factors Within Right-of-Way: Like the Florida DOT Q/LOS Handbook HCM, the FDOT Q/LOS Handbook auto LOS methodology Exhibit 24 critiques the LOS criteria in the Florida DOT incorporates all geometric and signal operation factors con- Q/LOS Handbook. Exhibit 25 critiques the intermodal rela- sidered relevant to the prediction of auto speed. The transit tionships in the Florida DOT Q/LOS Handbook. LOS method does not yet have a methodology for incorpo- National Multimodal Application: The FDOT Q/LOS rating the effects of signal operation, traffic flow, and other Handbook is designed to be applied statewide for all four factors in the right-of-way that can influence bus service reli- modes (i.e., auto, transit, bicycle, and pedestrian). ability. The pedestrian and bicycle LOS methodologies Level of Service from a Traveler's Perspective: The Q/LOS incorporate all factors related to the right-of-way that were Handbook is a blend of local research on bicycle/pedestrian found to significantly affect perceived LOS. perceptions of LOS and the two national manuals--the HCM Safety and Economic Factors: Economic factors are not in- and TCQSM. The Q/LOS Handbook thus shares some of the cluded in any of the LOS methodologies. Perceived safety is an weaknesses of the national manuals. The HCM claim that underlying factor in the pedestrian and bicycle LOS methods. auto LOS accurately reflects traveler perception has not been Comparable Modal LOS: The FDOT Q/LOS Handbook verified. The TCQSM transit LOS is a blend of traveler per- measures for pedestrian and bicycle modes are probably ceptions and transit operator objectives. The pedestrian and comparable in terms of their measurement of degree of sat- bicycle LOS measures have been experimentally verified isfaction, but no actual tests of this conjecture have been against traveler perceptions. performed. The auto and transit LOS measures are gener- Applicable to Urban Streets: The FDOT Q/LOS Hand- ally not comparable with the pedestrian and bicycle LOS book is designed to be applied to urban arterials where the measures. Exhibit 24. FDOT LOS Criteria for Urban Street. Mode LOS Criterion Comments Auto Mean auto speed for through traffic Transit Frequency of Service Has modifiers for walk access and hours of service Bicycle Index Based on design and traffic volumes Pedestrian Index Based on design and traffic volumes