Cover Image

Not for Sale



View/Hide Left Panel
Click for next page ( 72


The National Academies | 500 Fifth St. N.W. | Washington, D.C. 20001
Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
Terms of Use and Privacy Statement



Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 71
71 5.3 Performance of Model 2 (speed) matched 37% of the video clip mean LOS Auto LOS Models ratings. Model 2 ranges from LOS A to F, while Model 1 ranges Exhibit 81 shows how the mean LOS values produced by from LOS B to F. Model 1 fits the video clip data better but the recommended auto LOS model compare with the does not achieve LOS A for the streets in the video clip sam- mean LOS values reported by the video lab participants. ple. Model 2 has a significantly poorer fit with the data (but The HCM-predicted LOS is included as well. The HCM still better than the HCM); however, it does produce LOS A matched the video labs 26% of the time, while the for nine of the streets in the video clip sample. proposed auto LOS Model 1 (stops) matched the video Several different sections or time periods of the same street labs 69% of the time. The alternate proposed auto LOS were used for many of the clips. Exhibit 81. Evaluation of Proposed Auto LOS Models. Art Spd Lim Actual Stops Left Ln Med Video HCM Model Model Clip # Street Class (mph) (mph) (stps/mi) (%) (1,2,3) LOS LOS 1 LOS 2 LOS 61 Rt 50 1 50 28 1.4 100% 0.00 A C B C 56 Sunset Hills Rd 2 40 23 2.0 100% 3.00 A C B A 2 Gallows Road 3 35 35 0.0 100% 3.00 B A B A 65 Lee Hwy 2 40 36 0.0 100% 2.00 B A B A 63 Rt 50 1 50 42 0.0 100% 3.00 B A B A 5 Wilson Blvd 3 35 30 0.0 100% 3.00 B B B A 62 Rt 50 1 50 37 0.0 100% 0.00 B B B A 13 Washington Blvd 3 35 25 0.0 0% 0.00 B B B A 7 Wilson Blvd 3 35 20 0.0 100% 1.00 B C B B 54 Lee Hwy 2 40 25 3.3 100% 2.00 B C B A 53 Prosperity 2 40 19 1.7 100% 3.00 B D B B 6 Clarendon 3 35 18 2.3 100% 1.00 B D B B 10 Washington Blvd 3 35 17 3.8 0% 0.00 B D C C 20 Rt 50 1 50 16 1.8 100% 3.00 B E B C 64 Rt 50 1 50 20 2.0 100% 3.00 B E B B 58 Sunrise Valley Rd 2 40 11 1.7 100% 3.00 B F B C 1 Rt 234 1 50 15 2.0 100% 3.00 B F B C 29 Rt 234 2 40 23 2.0 100% 3.00 C C B A 19 23rd St 4 30 16 5.8 0% 0.00 C C C C 12 Wilson Blvd 3 35 14 4.3 0% 0.00 C D C D 60 Lee Hwy 2 40 15 2.0 100% 2.00 C E B C 21 Rt 50 1 50 20 4.0 100% 3.00 C E C B 8 Wilson Blvd 3 35 14 4.1 100% 1.00 C E C C 52 M St 4 30 8 7.3 0% 0.00 C E D E 55 Braddock Rd 2 40 13 2.2 100% 3.00 C F B C 59 Sunset Hills Rd 2 40 12 4.9 0% 0.00 C F C E 15 Glebe Road 2 40 8 6.0 100% 3.00 C F C D 14 Glebe Road 2 40 11 6.0 100% 3.00 C F C C 57 Sunset Hills Rd 2 40 17 3.3 0% 0.00 D D C D 16 Fairfax Drive 3 35 12 7.3 100% 3.00 D F C C 51 M St 4 30 7 9.1 0% 0.00 D F D E 25 M St 4 30 11 3.7 0% 0.00 E D C D 23 M St 4 30 8 5.6 0% 0.00 E E C E 30 M St 4 30 7 14.5 0% 0.00 F F F E 31 M St 4 30 4 18.0 0% 0.00 F F F F % Exact Match To Video 100% 26% 69% 37% % Within 1 LOS of Video 100% 46% 94% 89%