National Academies Press: OpenBook

Multimodal Level of Service Analysis for Urban Streets (2008)

Chapter: Chapter 10 - Accomplishment of Research Objectives

« Previous: Chapter 9 - Integrated Multimodal LOS Model Framework
Page 96
Suggested Citation:"Chapter 10 - Accomplishment of Research Objectives." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2008. Multimodal Level of Service Analysis for Urban Streets. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/14175.
×
Page 96
Page 97
Suggested Citation:"Chapter 10 - Accomplishment of Research Objectives." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2008. Multimodal Level of Service Analysis for Urban Streets. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/14175.
×
Page 97

Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

96 Exhibit 101 illustrates how the recommended modeling system meets the research objectives. C H A P T E R 1 0 Accomplishment of Research Objectives

97 Research Objectiv e Degree Accomplished By Proposed Model Sy stem 1. Produce updated chapter on multimodal LOS analysis for urban streets for Highway Capacity Manual. Produce sample problems. Produce software engine. Draft chapter, sample problems, and software engine delivered to panel in June 2007 and to Highway Capacity Committee in July 2007. Final Report delivered February 2008. 2. Establish a scientific basis for evaluating level of service as a function of traveler satisfaction. The research has established a measurable definition of level of service and a reproducible method for measuring it. The model system is based on video labs and field surveys conducted in several cities in the United States. 3. Create a consistent set of modal LOS models allowing for comparison of degrees of modal traveler satisfaction across of modes. The uniform definition of LOS used in the models provides a consistent basis for comparing levels of service across modes. 4. Provide a multimodal LOS system that takes into account interactions among modes in the urban street environment. The multimodal LOS system takes into account the impacts of autos, buses, bicycles, and pedestrians on the perceived LOS for each mode. Many cross- modal factors are taken into account directly, others are incorporated indirectly. Explicit numerical methodologies do not yet exist for incorporating the indirect effects into the LOS models, but the “hooks” are in place in the LOS models for future incorporation of new methods for estimating the indirect effects. 5. Create a multimodal LOS system that is applicable to arterials and major collectors The LOS system is applicable to arterials and major collectors. 6. Create a multimodal LOS system that addresses all vehicle and pedestrian movements. The multimodal LOS system concept allows the consideration of all movements by vehicles and pedestrians. The LOS models themselves have been implemented primarily for through travel along the arterial or collector. The pedestrian model, in addition, incorporates mid-block crossing. 7. Create a multimodal LOS system that can be used to evaluate micro-peaks (less than 15 minutes). The LOS system can be applied to peaks shorter than 15 minutes; however, the models that implement that system are designed for 15 minute peaks. 8. Incorporate safety and economic aspects only insofar as they influence perceptions of LOS. Safety and economic effects have not been explicitly included or excluded from the LOS models. Laboratory and field survey participants were allowed to consider any aspect of the service provided in determining their perceived levels of service. 9. Overcome the nine limitation of the HCM listed in Chapter 15 of the HCM. a. The presence or lack of parking is included in the bicycle and pedestrian LOS models. It indirectly affects the auto and transit LOS models. b. Driveway density and access control is included in the bicycle LOS model. c. Short lane additions and drops are not explicitly included in any of the LOS models. d. The impacts of road gradients are not included in the currently proposed LOS models, but could be added. e. Capacity constraints between intersections are taken into account to the extent they affect stops by autos or delay bus service. f. Two-way left turn lanes and medians are not explicitly included in the LOS models but can indirectly affect auto and bus LOS by reducing stops, or increasing bus speeds. g. High percentage turning movements explicitly affect pedestrian LOS. They indirectly affect auto and bus LOS. h. Multi-block queues will cause problems for the auto LOS model, which considers only stops . Under the recommended model, a single stop for a long queue gives better auto LOS than multiple stops for several short queues. i. Cross street congestion blocking through traffic will indirectly affect auto and bus LOS and will directly impact pedestrian LOS. Exhibit 101. Satisfaction of Research Objectives by the Recommended Modeling System.

Next: References »
Multimodal Level of Service Analysis for Urban Streets Get This Book
×
 Multimodal Level of Service Analysis for Urban Streets
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

TRB’s National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) Report 616: Multimodal Level of Service Analysis for Urban Streets explores a method for assessing how well an urban street serves the needs of all of its users. The method for evaluating the multimodal level of service (MMLOS) estimates the auto, bus, bicycle, and pedestrian level of service on an urban street using a combination of readily available data and data normally gathered by an agency to assess auto and transit level of service. The MMLOS user’s guide was published as NCHRP Web-Only Document 128.

Errata

In the printed version of the report, equations 36 (pedestrian segment LOS) and 37 (pedestrian LOS for signalized intersections) on page 88 have been revised and are available online. The equations in the electronic (dpf) version of the report are correct.

In June 2010, TRB released NCHRP Web-Only Document 158: Field Test Results of the Multimodal Level of Service Analysis for Urban Streets (MMLOS) that explores the result of a field test of the MMLOS in 10 metropolitan areas in the United States.

READ FREE ONLINE

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!