Cover Image

Not for Sale



View/Hide Left Panel
Click for next page ( 42


The National Academies | 500 Fifth St. N.W. | Washington, D.C. 20001
Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
Terms of Use and Privacy Statement



Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 41
41 REFERENCES 1999 Highway Cost Allocation Study, Nevada Department of Jack Faucett Associates with ECONorthwest, 2001 Oregon Transportation, Carson City, Sep. 1999. Highway Cost Allocation Study, Volume III: Specifications, 1999 Update of the Arizona Highway Cost Allocation Study, Prepared for the Office of Economic Analysis, Oregon De- Final Report, Report FHWA-AZ99-477(1), Arizona partment of Administrative Services, Portland, 2001. Department of Transportation, in cooperation with U.S. Luskin, D., A. Garcia-Diaz, D. Lee, Z. Zhang, and M. Walton, Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Admin- A Framework for the Texas Highway Cost Allocation istration, Phoenix, Aug. 1999. Study, Research Report 0-1810-1, Prepared for the Texas 2002 Idaho Cost Allocation Study, Idaho Department of Department of Transportation, Austin, Jan. 2001. Transportation, Boise, 2002. Luskin, D., A. Garcia-Diaz, D. Lee, M. Walton, Z. Zhang, Blincoe, L., et al., The Economic Cost of Motor Vehicle Texas Highway Cost Allocation Study, Research Report Crashes, 2000, Prepared for the National Highway Trans- 0-1810-2, Prepared for the Texas Department of Trans- portation Safety Administration, Washington, D.C., May portation, Austin, Oct. 2002. 2002, 94 pp. Maine Highway Cost Allocation Study: Final Report, Maine Cambridge Systematics, Inc., Sydec Inc., and Pacific Rim Department of Transportation, Bangor, Feb. 1989. Resources, Oregon Weight-Mile Tax Study, Prepared for McCubbin, D.R. and M.A. Delucchi, The Annualized Social the Oregon Legislative Revenue Office, Salem, Feb. 1996. Cost of Motor-Vehicle Use in the U.S., Summary of The- Carey, J., 1999 Update of the Arizona Highway Cost Allocation ory, Data, Methods, and Results, Institute of Transporta- Study, FHWA-AZ99-477(1), Prepared for the Arizona tion Studies, University of California, Davis, 1998. Department of Transportation, Phoenix, 1999. Oregon Legislative Assembly, Senate Joint Resolution 44, Carey, J., Implementation of the Simplified Arizona Highway Salem, 1999. Cost Allocation Study Model, FHWA-AZ-01-477 (3), Osborne, M., J. Pigman, and E. Thompson, 2000 Highway Prepared for Arizona Department of Transportation, Cost Allocation Updated, Performed for Kentucky Trans- Phoenix, 2001. portation Cabinet, Kentucky Transportation Center, ECONorthwest with Jack Faucett Associates, HDR, Inc., and University of Kentucky, Lexington, Mar. 2000. R.D. Mingo and Associates, Highway Cost Allocation Result of the Minnesota Highway-User Cost Allocation Study: 20052007 Biennium, Prepared for Office of Eco- Study, Minnesota Department of Transportation, St. Paul, nomic Analysis, Oregon Department of Administrative Oct. 1990. Services, Portland, 2005. Schrank, D.L. and T.J. Lomax, The 2005 Urban Mobility ECONorthwest, Highway Cost Allocation Study: 20072009 Report, Texas Transportation Institute, Austin, May Biennium, Prepared for Office of Economic Analysis, 2005, 91 pp. Oregon Department of Administrative Services, Portland, Schultz, J., "National Weight-Distance Tax Study Recom- 2007. mended by GAO in New Report," Traffic World, June Euriat, M., Texas Highway Cost Allocation Analysis and 1994. Estimates, 19931995, Prepared for Texas Department of Selle, B., Vermont Highway Cost Allocation Study, Memo Transportation, Austin, 1994. Provided to Highway Transportation Committee and Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of House Ways and Means Committee of the Vermont Leg- Transportation, Washington, D.C., Addendum to the islature, Montpelier, Jan. 2006. 1997 Federal Highway Cost Allocation Study Report, Sinha, K., S. Saha, T. Fwa, A. Tee, and H. Michael, 1988 May 2000. Update of the Indiana Highway Cost Allocation Study, Federal Highway Cost Allocation Study Final Report, Fed- Final Report, FHWA/IN/JHRP-89/4, Prepared for School eral Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Trans- of Civil Engineering, Joint Highway Research Project, portation, Washington, D.C., Aug. 1997. Purdue University, Indiana Department of Transporta- Final Environmental Impact Statement for the Central tion, Mar. 1989. Phoenix/East Valley Corridor, Phoenix, Ariz., Nov. 2002. Stowers, J., P. Balducci, R. Mingo, and H. Cohen, Oregon Final Environmental Impact Statement for the Central Highway Cost Allocation Study: Issue Papers, Prepared Phoenix/East Valley Corridor, U.S. Department of Trans- for the Department of Administrative Services, Salem, portation, Federal Transit Administration, and Regional Sep. 1998. Public Transportation Authority, Phoenix, Ariz., Nov. Stowers, J., A. Reno, P. Balducci, R. Mingo, H. Wolff, H. 2002. Cohen, and D. Haling, Oregon Highway Cost Allocation Jacoby, A.C., A Preliminary Pennsylvania Highway Cost Study, Prepared for the Department of Administrative Allocation Study, Prepared for the State Transportation Services, Salem, June 1, 1999. Advisory Committee, Pennsylvania Department of Trans- Sydec Inc., Cambridge Systematics, Inc., and R.D. Mingo and portation, University Park, Feb. 16, 1990. Associates, Cost Allocation Study Audit, Final Report,

OCR for page 41
42 Submitted to Nevada Department of Transportation, Carson Recommendations for Restructuring of Trailer Fees City, Sep. 1994. and Weight Fees, Report to Legislature submitted to Sydec, Inc., Draft Guidelines for State Highway Cost California Department of Transportation, Sacramento, Allocation Studies Using Excel Spreadsheet Software: May 1999. Appendix A--Example of Maintenance Cost Allocation Wheeler, P.K., "Transportation Cost Allocation: Applying Factors, Prepared for the Federal Highway Administra- Cost Allocation in a Multimodal Environment," Trans- tion, Washington, D.C., Apr. 2000. portation Research Record 1558, Transportation Re- Sydec, Inc., R.D. Mingo and Associates, H. Cohen, search Board, National Research Council, Washington, and H. Wolff, Highway Cost Allocation Study and D.C., 1996, pp. 815.