State Highway Cost Allocation Studies (2008)

Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

41 1999 Highway Cost Allocation Study, Nevada Department of Transportation, Carson City, Sep. 1999. 1999 Update of the Arizona Highway Cost Allocation Study, Final Report, Report FHWA-AZ99-477(1), Arizona Department of Transportation, in cooperation with U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Admin- istration, Phoenix, Aug. 1999. 2002 Idaho Cost Allocation Study, Idaho Department of Transportation, Boise, 2002. Blincoe, L., et al., The Economic Cost of Motor Vehicle Crashes, 2000, Prepared for the National Highway Trans- portation Safety Administration, Washington, D.C., May 2002, 94 pp. Cambridge Systematics, Inc., Sydec Inc., and Pacific Rim Resources, Oregon Weight-Mile Tax Study, Prepared for the Oregon Legislative Revenue Office, Salem, Feb. 1996. Carey, J., 1999 Update of the Arizona Highway Cost Allocation Study, FHWA-AZ99-477(1), Prepared for the Arizona Department of Transportation, Phoenix, 1999. Carey, J., Implementation of the Simplified Arizona Highway Cost Allocation Study Model, FHWA-AZ-01-477 (3), Prepared for Arizona Department of Transportation, Phoenix, 2001. ECONorthwest with Jack Faucett Associates, HDR, Inc., and R.D. Mingo and Associates, Highway Cost Allocation Study: 2005–2007 Biennium, Prepared for Office of Eco- nomic Analysis, Oregon Department of Administrative Services, Portland, 2005. ECONorthwest, Highway Cost Allocation Study: 2007–2009 Biennium, Prepared for Office of Economic Analysis, Oregon Department of Administrative Services, Portland, 2007. Euriat, M., Texas Highway Cost Allocation Analysis and Estimates, 1993–1995, Prepared for Texas Department of Transportation, Austin, 1994. Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C., Addendum to the 1997 Federal Highway Cost Allocation Study Report, May 2000. Federal Highway Cost Allocation Study Final Report, Fed- eral Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Trans- portation, Washington, D.C., Aug. 1997. Final Environmental Impact Statement for the Central Phoenix/East Valley Corridor, Phoenix, Ariz., Nov. 2002. Final Environmental Impact Statement for the Central Phoenix/East Valley Corridor, U.S. Department of Trans- portation, Federal Transit Administration, and Regional Public Transportation Authority, Phoenix, Ariz., Nov. 2002. Jacoby, A.C., A Preliminary Pennsylvania Highway Cost Allocation Study, Prepared for the State Transportation Advisory Committee, Pennsylvania Department of Trans- portation, University Park, Feb. 16, 1990. Jack Faucett Associates with ECONorthwest, 2001 Oregon Highway Cost Allocation Study, Volume III: Specifications, Prepared for the Office of Economic Analysis, Oregon De- partment of Administrative Services, Portland, 2001. Luskin, D., A. Garcia-Diaz, D. Lee, Z. Zhang, and M. Walton, A Framework for the Texas Highway Cost Allocation Study, Research Report 0-1810-1, Prepared for the Texas Department of Transportation, Austin, Jan. 2001. Luskin, D., A. Garcia-Diaz, D. Lee, M. Walton, Z. Zhang, Texas Highway Cost Allocation Study, Research Report 0-1810-2, Prepared for the Texas Department of Trans- portation, Austin, Oct. 2002. Maine Highway Cost Allocation Study: Final Report, Maine Department of Transportation, Bangor, Feb. 1989. McCubbin, D.R. and M.A. Delucchi, The Annualized Social Cost of Motor-Vehicle Use in the U.S., Summary of The- ory, Data, Methods, and Results, Institute of Transporta- tion Studies, University of California, Davis, 1998. Oregon Legislative Assembly, Senate Joint Resolution 44, Salem, 1999. Osborne, M., J. Pigman, and E. Thompson, 2000 Highway Cost Allocation Updated, Performed for Kentucky Trans- portation Cabinet, Kentucky Transportation Center, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Mar. 2000. Result of the Minnesota Highway-User Cost Allocation Study, Minnesota Department of Transportation, St. Paul, Oct. 1990. Schrank, D.L. and T.J. Lomax, The 2005 Urban Mobility Report, Texas Transportation Institute, Austin, May 2005, 91 pp. Schultz, J., “National Weight-Distance Tax Study Recom- mended by GAO in New Report,” Traffic World, June 1994. Selle, B., Vermont Highway Cost Allocation Study, Memo Provided to Highway Transportation Committee and House Ways and Means Committee of the Vermont Leg- islature, Montpelier, Jan. 2006. Sinha, K., S. Saha, T. Fwa, A. Tee, and H. Michael, 1988 Update of the Indiana Highway Cost Allocation Study, Final Report, FHWA/IN/JHRP-89/4, Prepared for School of Civil Engineering, Joint Highway Research Project, Purdue University, Indiana Department of Transporta- tion, Mar. 1989. Stowers, J., P. Balducci, R. Mingo, and H. Cohen, Oregon Highway Cost Allocation Study: Issue Papers, Prepared for the Department of Administrative Services, Salem, Sep. 1998. Stowers, J., A. Reno, P. Balducci, R. Mingo, H. Wolff, H. Cohen, and D. Haling, Oregon Highway Cost Allocation Study, Prepared for the Department of Administrative Services, Salem, June 1, 1999. Sydec Inc., Cambridge Systematics, Inc., and R.D. Mingo and Associates, Cost Allocation Study Audit, Final Report, REFERENCES

Submitted to Nevada Department of Transportation, Carson City, Sep. 1994. Sydec, Inc., Draft Guidelines for State Highway Cost Allocation Studies Using Excel Spreadsheet Software: Appendix A—Example of Maintenance Cost Allocation Factors, Prepared for the Federal Highway Administra- tion, Washington, D.C., Apr. 2000. Sydec, Inc., R.D. Mingo and Associates, H. Cohen, and H. Wolff, Highway Cost Allocation Study and 42 Recommendations for Restructuring of Trailer Fees and Weight Fees, Report to Legislature submitted to California Department of Transportation, Sacramento, May 1999. Wheeler, P.K., “Transportation Cost Allocation: Applying Cost Allocation in a Multimodal Environment,” Trans- portation Research Record 1558, Transportation Re- search Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1996, pp. 8–15.