Cover Image

Not for Sale



View/Hide Left Panel
Click for next page ( 44


The National Academies | 500 Fifth St. N.W. | Washington, D.C. 20001
Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
Terms of Use and Privacy Statement



Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 43
43 BIBLIOGRAPHY 1981 Highway Cost Allocation Study, Final Report, Col- 1262, Transportation Research Board, National Research orado State Highway Commission, Colorado Department Council, Washington, D.C., 1990, pp. 111. of Highways, Denver, Oct. 1981. Garcia-Diaz, A. and A. Villarreal-Cavazos, "Two Alterna- 1992 Motor Vehicle Cost Responsibility Study: Final Report tive Approaches to the Highway Cost Allocation and Technical Appendum, Oregon Department of Trans- Problem," Proceedings of the North American Pavement portation, Salem, July 1993. Conference, Vol. 1, Ontario, Canada, 1985. Addendum to the 1997 Federal Highway Cost Allocation Study Gittings, G.L. and B.R. Narayan, "Federal Highway Final Report, Federal Highway Administration, U.S. De- Revenue Estimation: Cost Allocation Perspective," Trans- partment of Transportation, Washington, D.C., May 2000. portation Research Record 1558, Transportation Research Banks, F., State Highway Cost Allocation Methods, Highway Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., Cost Allocation Study Working Paper Number 15, Pre- 1996. pared for U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Greene, D., D. Jones, and M. Delucchi, The Full Costs and Highway Administration, Washington, D.C., Mar. 1982. Benefits of Transportation: Contributions to Theory, Beshers, E., External Costs of Automobile Travel and Method and Measurement, Springer Press, New York, Appropriate Policy Responses, Prepared for Highway N.Y., 1997. Users Federation, Washington, D.C., 1994. Hajek, J., S. Tighe, and B. Hutchinson, "Allocation of Pave- Bisson, B., J. Brander, and J. Innes, "Highway Cost Alloca- ment Damage Due to Trucks Using a Marginal Cost tion Methodology for Pavement Rehabilitation and Method," Transportation Research Record 1613, Trans- Capacity-Related Costs Occasioned by an Increment of portation Research Board, National Research Council, Heavy Truck Traffic," Transportation Research Record, Washington, D.C., 1998, pp. 5056. 1038, Transportation Research Board, National Research Henion, L. and J. Merriss, "An Equity Assessment of Federal Council, Washington, D.C., 1985, pp. 1016. Highway Users Charged," Transportation Research Boile, M., K. Ozbay, and P. Narayanan, Infrastructure Costs Record 967, Transportation Research Board, National Attributable to Commercial Vehicles, Prepared for New Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1984, pp. 2431. Jersey Department of Transportation, Piscataway, Dec. Henion, L. and R. Munford, Advantages of Weight-Distance 2001. Taxes, Presentation Before the Weight-Distance Tax Bramlett, K. and M. Johnson, State Highway Cost Allocation Meeting, Phoenix, Ariz., Dec. 1990. Studies, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, Hicks, A., A. Mokhtee, G. Comstock, R. McReynolds, and D.C., Nov. 1983. K. Stodgell, Kansas Highway Cost Allocation Study, Castano-Pardo, A. and A. Garcia-Diaz, "Highway Cost Topeka, Sep. 1985. Allocation: An Application of the Theory of Nonatomic Highway Cost Allocation Study Activity Report, Highway Games," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Subcommittee on Highway Transport, American Asso- Practice, Vol. 29, No. 3, Washington, D.C., 1995. ciation of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Cohen, H., Incorporation of External Cost Considerations in Harrisburg, Pa., Feb. 1989. Highway Cost Allocation, Interim Report, BATG-93-009, Highway Cost Allocation Study, Division of Planning, High- Prepared for U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal way and Transportation Department, Missouri Depart- Highway Administration, Washington, D.C., 1994. ment of Transportation, Jefferson City, Nov. 1984. Cost Responsibility Blue Ribbon Committee: Final Report, Highway Cost Allocation Study, Division of Planning, High- Oregon Department of Transportation, Salem, Feb. 1997. way and Transportation Department, Missouri Depart- Deacon, J., J. Pigman, and N. Stamatiadis, Review of High- ment of Transportation, Jefferson City, Nov. 1999. way Cost Allocation Methodologies, Research Report Highway Cost Allocation Study, Final Report, Department of KTC-92-6, Kentucky Transportation Center, University of Transportation, State of Wisconsin, Madison, 1982. Kentucky, Lexington, June 1992. Institute of Urban and Regional Research, University of Delaware Highway Cost Allocation Study, Delaware De- Iowa, Impact Analysis of a Cost-Based Approach to High- partment of Transportation, Division of Planning, Bureau way Financing in Iowa, Ames, Mar. 1984. of Economic Research, University of Delaware, Dover, Jones, J. and F. Nix, Survey of the Use of Highway Cost Mar. 1992. Allocation in Road Pricing Decisions, Transportation Final Report on the Federal Highway Cost Allocation Study, Association of Canada, Ottawa, ON, Canada, 1995. Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Laman, J. and J. Ashbaugh, "Fatigue Impacts on Bridge Cost Transportation, Washington, D.C., 1982. Allocation," Transportation Research Record 1624, Fwa, T., K. Sinha, and S. Saha, "Update Analysis of High- Transportation Research Board, National Research Coun- way Cost Allocation," Transportation Research Record cil, Washington, D.C., 1998, pp. 1627.

OCR for page 43
44 Lee, D., Full Cost Pricing of Highways, Prepared for U.S. Stephens, J., T. Barth, and W. Cloud, Cost Allocation Study for Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C., 1994. the Montana State Highway System, prepared for Montana Lemaire, J., "An Application of Game Theory: Cost Alloca- Department of Highway Research Program in cooperation tion," Astin Bulletin, Vol. 14, No. 1, Brussels, Belgium, with U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway 1984, pp. 6181. Administration, Helena, July 1992. Mansour, N. and J. Semmens, The Value of Arizona's State Sydec Inc., California Highway Cost Allocation Study: Highway System: A Corporate-Style Financial Analysis, Technical Report, Washington, D.C., July 1987. Prepared for the Arizona Department of Transportation, Sydec Inc., Cambridge Systematics, Inc., and R.D. Mingo Phoenix, Sep. 1999. and Associates, Highway Cost Allocation Study, Prepared Merriss, J., New Research on Pavement Damage Factors, for Arizona Department of Transportation, Washington, Policy Notes, Oregon Department of Transportation, D.C., July 1991. Salem, June 2003. Sydec Inc., Cambridge Systematics, Inc., and R.D. Mingo Oregon Cost Responsibility Studies Compared to Other and Associates, Highway Cost Allocation Study, Supple- States, Legislative Revenue Office Research Report #4-96, mental Report, submitted to Vermont Legislative Council, Oregon Legislative Revenue Office, Salem, Sep. 1996. Montpelier, Feb. 1993. Parry, I., Should Fuel Taxes be Scrapped in Favor of Per- Sydec Inc., Cambridge Systematics, Inc., and R.D. Mingo Mile Charges? RFF DP 05-36, Discussion Paper Pre- and Associates, Highway Cost Allocation Study, Final Re- pared for Resources for the Future, Washington, D.C., port, Submitted to the Idaho Department of Transporta- Aug. 2005. tion, Feb. 1994. Result of the Minnesota Highway-User Cost Allocation Task Force on Motor Carrier Taxation, Final Report and Study, Minnesota Department of Transportation, St. Paul, Technical Addendum, Oregon Department of Transporta- Minn., Oct. 1990. tion, Salem, Jan. 1987. Rillett, L.R., B.G. Hutchinson, and R.C.G. Haas, "Cost Allo- Torbic, D., L. Elefteriadou, L.T. Ho, and Y. Wang, "Passen- cation Implications of Flexible Pavement Deterioration ger Car Equivalents for Highway Cost Allocation," Trans- Models," Transportation Research Record 1215, Trans- portation Research Record 1576, Transportation Research portation Research Board, National Research Council, Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., Washington, D.C., 1989, pp. 3142. 1997, pp. 3745. Samson, T., Surface Transport Costs and Charges: Great Urban Institute and Sydec Inc., Rationalization of Proce- Britain, Institute for Transport Studies, University of dures for Highway Cost Allocation Studies: Final Report, Leeds, United Kingdom, 2001. Prepared for the American Trucking Associations, Wash- Selle, B., Additional Information on the Vermont Highway ington, D.C., 1990. Cost Allocation Study, Memo Provided to Highway Weisman, J., R. Reed, and A. Feroze, "Incremental Bridge Transportation Committee and House Ways and Means Construction Costs for Highway Cost Allocation," Trans- Committee of the Vermont Legislature, Montpelier, portation Research Record 1460, Transportation Research Jan. 2006. Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., Sinha, K. and T. Fwa, "A Highway Cost Allocation Analysis 1994, pp. 1924. at the State Level," Transportation Quarterly, Vol. 41, Zongzhi, L., S. Kumares, and P. McCarthy, "Methodology to No. 3, July 1987. Determine Load- and Non-Load-Related Shares of Highway Straus, S. and J. Semmens, Estimating the Cost of Overweight Pavement Rehabilitation Expenditures," Transportation Vehicle Travel on Arizona Highways, Prepared for Arizona Research Record 1747, Transportation Research Board, Department of Transportation, Phoenix, Jan. 2006. National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2001.