State Highway Cost Allocation Studies (2008)

Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

43 1981 Highway Cost Allocation Study, Final Report, Col- orado State Highway Commission, Colorado Department of Highways, Denver, Oct. 1981. 1992 Motor Vehicle Cost Responsibility Study: Final Report and Technical Appendum, Oregon Department of Trans- portation, Salem, July 1993. Addendum to the 1997 Federal Highway Cost Allocation Study Final Report, Federal Highway Administration, U.S. De- partment of Transportation, Washington, D.C., May 2000. Banks, F., State Highway Cost Allocation Methods, Highway Cost Allocation Study Working Paper Number 15, Pre- pared for U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C., Mar. 1982. Beshers, E., External Costs of Automobile Travel and Appropriate Policy Responses, Prepared for Highway Users Federation, Washington, D.C., 1994. Bisson, B., J. Brander, and J. Innes, “Highway Cost Alloca- tion Methodology for Pavement Rehabilitation and Capacity-Related Costs Occasioned by an Increment of Heavy Truck Traffic,” Transportation Research Record, 1038, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1985, pp. 10–16. Boile, M., K. Ozbay, and P. Narayanan, Infrastructure Costs Attributable to Commercial Vehicles, Prepared for New Jersey Department of Transportation, Piscataway, Dec. 2001. Bramlett, K. and M. Johnson, State Highway Cost Allocation Studies, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C., Nov. 1983. Castano-Pardo, A. and A. Garcia-Diaz, “Highway Cost Allocation: An Application of the Theory of Nonatomic Games,” Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Vol. 29, No. 3, Washington, D.C., 1995. Cohen, H., Incorporation of External Cost Considerations in Highway Cost Allocation, Interim Report, BATG-93-009, Prepared for U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C., 1994. Cost Responsibility Blue Ribbon Committee: Final Report, Oregon Department of Transportation, Salem, Feb. 1997. Deacon, J., J. Pigman, and N. Stamatiadis, Review of High- way Cost Allocation Methodologies, Research Report KTC-92-6, Kentucky Transportation Center, University of Kentucky, Lexington, June 1992. Delaware Highway Cost Allocation Study, Delaware De- partment of Transportation, Division of Planning, Bureau of Economic Research, University of Delaware, Dover, Mar. 1992. Final Report on the Federal Highway Cost Allocation Study, Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C., 1982. Fwa, T., K. Sinha, and S. Saha, “Update Analysis of High- way Cost Allocation,” Transportation Research Record 1262, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1990, pp. 1–11. Garcia-Diaz, A. and A. Villarreal-Cavazos, “Two Alterna- tive Approaches to the Highway Cost Allocation Problem,” Proceedings of the North American Pavement Conference, Vol. 1, Ontario, Canada, 1985. Gittings, G.L. and B.R. Narayan, “Federal Highway Revenue Estimation: Cost Allocation Perspective,” Trans- portation Research Record 1558, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1996. Greene, D., D. Jones, and M. Delucchi, The Full Costs and Benefits of Transportation: Contributions to Theory, Method and Measurement, Springer Press, New York, N.Y., 1997. Hajek, J., S. Tighe, and B. Hutchinson, “Allocation of Pave- ment Damage Due to Trucks Using a Marginal Cost Method,” Transportation Research Record 1613, Trans- portation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1998, pp. 50–56. Henion, L. and J. Merriss, “An Equity Assessment of Federal Highway Users Charged,” Transportation Research Record 967, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1984, pp. 24–31. Henion, L. and R. Munford, Advantages of Weight-Distance Taxes, Presentation Before the Weight-Distance Tax Meeting, Phoenix, Ariz., Dec. 1990. Hicks, A., A. Mokhtee, G. Comstock, R. McReynolds, and K. Stodgell, Kansas Highway Cost Allocation Study, Topeka, Sep. 1985. Highway Cost Allocation Study Activity Report, Highway Subcommittee on Highway Transport, American Asso- ciation of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Harrisburg, Pa., Feb. 1989. Highway Cost Allocation Study, Division of Planning, High- way and Transportation Department, Missouri Depart- ment of Transportation, Jefferson City, Nov. 1984. Highway Cost Allocation Study, Division of Planning, High- way and Transportation Department, Missouri Depart- ment of Transportation, Jefferson City, Nov. 1999. Highway Cost Allocation Study, Final Report, Department of Transportation, State of Wisconsin, Madison, 1982. Institute of Urban and Regional Research, University of Iowa, Impact Analysis of a Cost-Based Approach to High- way Financing in Iowa, Ames, Mar. 1984. Jones, J. and F. Nix, Survey of the Use of Highway Cost Allocation in Road Pricing Decisions, Transportation Association of Canada, Ottawa, ON, Canada, 1995. Laman, J. and J. Ashbaugh, “Fatigue Impacts on Bridge Cost Allocation,” Transportation Research Record 1624, Transportation Research Board, National Research Coun- cil, Washington, D.C., 1998, pp. 16–27. BIBLIOGRAPHY

Lee, D., Full Cost Pricing of Highways, Prepared for U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C., 1994. Lemaire, J., “An Application of Game Theory: Cost Alloca- tion,” Astin Bulletin, Vol. 14, No. 1, Brussels, Belgium, 1984, pp. 61–81. Mansour, N. and J. Semmens, The Value of Arizona’s State Highway System: A Corporate-Style Financial Analysis, Prepared for the Arizona Department of Transportation, Phoenix, Sep. 1999. Merriss, J., New Research on Pavement Damage Factors, Policy Notes, Oregon Department of Transportation, Salem, June 2003. Oregon Cost Responsibility Studies Compared to Other States, Legislative Revenue Office Research Report #4-96, Oregon Legislative Revenue Office, Salem, Sep. 1996. Parry, I., Should Fuel Taxes be Scrapped in Favor of Per- Mile Charges? RFF DP 05-36, Discussion Paper Pre- pared for Resources for the Future, Washington, D.C., Aug. 2005. Result of the Minnesota Highway-User Cost Allocation Study, Minnesota Department of Transportation, St. Paul, Minn., Oct. 1990. Rillett, L.R., B.G. Hutchinson, and R.C.G. Haas, “Cost Allo- cation Implications of Flexible Pavement Deterioration Models,” Transportation Research Record 1215, Trans- portation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1989, pp. 31–42. Samson, T., Surface Transport Costs and Charges: Great Britain, Institute for Transport Studies, University of Leeds, United Kingdom, 2001. Selle, B., Additional Information on the Vermont Highway Cost Allocation Study, Memo Provided to Highway Transportation Committee and House Ways and Means Committee of the Vermont Legislature, Montpelier, Jan. 2006. Sinha, K. and T. Fwa, “A Highway Cost Allocation Analysis at the State Level,” Transportation Quarterly, Vol. 41, No. 3, July 1987. Straus, S. and J. Semmens, Estimating the Cost of Overweight Vehicle Travel on Arizona Highways, Prepared for Arizona Department of Transportation, Phoenix, Jan. 2006. 44 Stephens, J., T. Barth, and W. Cloud, Cost Allocation Study for the Montana State Highway System, prepared for Montana Department of Highway Research Program in cooperation with U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Helena, July 1992. Sydec Inc., California Highway Cost Allocation Study: Technical Report, Washington, D.C., July 1987. Sydec Inc., Cambridge Systematics, Inc., and R.D. Mingo and Associates, Highway Cost Allocation Study, Prepared for Arizona Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C., July 1991. Sydec Inc., Cambridge Systematics, Inc., and R.D. Mingo and Associates, Highway Cost Allocation Study, Supple- mental Report, submitted to Vermont Legislative Council, Montpelier, Feb. 1993. Sydec Inc., Cambridge Systematics, Inc., and R.D. Mingo and Associates, Highway Cost Allocation Study, Final Re- port, Submitted to the Idaho Department of Transporta- tion, Feb. 1994. Task Force on Motor Carrier Taxation, Final Report and Technical Addendum, Oregon Department of Transporta- tion, Salem, Jan. 1987. Torbic, D., L. Elefteriadou, L.T. Ho, and Y. Wang, “Passen- ger Car Equivalents for Highway Cost Allocation,” Trans- portation Research Record 1576, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1997, pp. 37–45. Urban Institute and Sydec Inc., Rationalization of Proce- dures for Highway Cost Allocation Studies: Final Report, Prepared for the American Trucking Associations, Wash- ington, D.C., 1990. Weisman, J., R. Reed, and A. Feroze, “Incremental Bridge Construction Costs for Highway Cost Allocation,” Trans- portation Research Record 1460, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1994, pp. 19–24. Zongzhi, L., S. Kumares, and P. McCarthy, “Methodology to Determine Load- and Non-Load-Related Shares of Highway Pavement Rehabilitation Expenditures,” Transportation Research Record 1747, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2001.