Click for next page ( 58


The National Academies | 500 Fifth St. N.W. | Washington, D.C. 20001
Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
Terms of Use and Privacy Statement



Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 57
57 References 2005 Development-Related Ridership Survey: Final Report. Washington Cervero, R. Ridership Impacts of Transit-Focused Development in Metropolitan Area Transit Authority, March 2006. California. Monograph 45, Institute of Urban and Regional Devel- Approved West Hyattsville Transit District Development Plan and opment, University of California, Berkeley, 2003. TDOZMA for the Transit District Overlay Zone. Prince Georges Cevero, R. Transit Oriented Development's Ridership Bonus: A Product County Planning Department, Marlboro, Maryland, 2006. of Self Selection and Public Policies. Environment and Planning A, Arrington, G. Transportation Research Circular E-C058: Light Rail and Vol. 39, 2007, pp. 20682085. the American City: State-of-the-Practice for Transit-Oriented Devel- Cervero, R. Built Environments and Mode Choice: Toward a Nor- opment. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, mative Framework, Transportation Research D, Vol. 7, 2002, Washington, D.C., 2003. pp. 265284. Arrington, G. Reinventing the American Dream of a Livable Community: Cervero, R., and Duncan, M. Residential Self-Selection and Rail Com- Light Rail and Smart Growth in Portland. Conference on Light Rail muting: A Nested Logit Analysis. Institute of Urban and Regional Transit Investment for the Future. Dallas, Texas, 2000. Development. Berkeley, California, 2002. AvalonBay Communities, Inc. A Developer's Perspective. APTA Rail Cervero, R., et al. TCRP Report 102: Transit Oriented Development in the Conference, June 2003. United States: Experiences, Challenges, and Prospects. Transporta- Belzer, D. and Autler, G. Transit Oriented Development: Moving from tion Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., Rhetoric to Reality. Great American Station Foundation and 2004. Brookings Center on Metropolitan Policy, Brookings Institution, Cervero, R., Golub, A., and Nee, B. City CarShare: Longer-Term Travel- Washington, D.C., June 2002. Demand and Car Ownership Impacts. In Transportation Research Ben-Akiva, M. and Bowman, J. Integration of an Activity-Based Model Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1992. System and a Residential Location Model. Urban Studies, Vol. 35, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, No. 7, 1998, pp. 12311253. Washingotn, D.C., 2007, pp. 7080. Bianco, M. J. Effective Transportation Demand Management: Com- Cervero, R. Off-Line Modeling of Transportation and Land Use Futures. bining Parking Pricing, Transit Incentives and Transportation Department of City and Regional Planning. University of California, Management in a Mixed-Use District in Portland, Oregon. Pre- Berkeley, May 2005. sented at 79th Annual Meeting of Transportation Research Board, Chatman, D. How the Built Environment Influences Non-Work Travel: Washington, D.C., 2000. Theoretical and Empirical Essays. PhD dissertation. University of Center for Transit-Oriented Development. Hidden in Plain Sight: Cap- California, Los Angeles, 2005. turing the Demand for Housing Near Transit. Oakland, California, Community Building Sourcebook, TriMet, Portland, OR (1999). September 2004. Davis, M. A., and Palumbo, M. The Price of Residential Land in Large Center for Transit-Oriented Development. Bringing TOD to Scale. U.S. Cities. Working paper No. 2006-26. June 2006. http://ssrn. http://www.reconnectingamerica.org/html/TOD/tod_to_scale.htm. com/abstract=943771. September 30, 2005. Dill, J. Survey of Merrick TOD Residents. Portland State University, Cervero, R. Research Monograph 45: Ridership Impacts of Transit-Focused Oregon, March, 2005. Development in California, Berkeley, Institute of Urban and Regional Dill, J. Travel and transit Use at Portland Area Transit-Oriented Devel- Development, 1994. opments (TODs). Transportation Northwest (TransNow), Portland, Cervero, R. TCRP Research Results Digest 4: Transit Ridership Initiative. Oregon, May 2006. Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Dittmar, H. and Ohland, G. The New Transit Town: Best-Practices in Washington, D.C., 1995. Transit Oriented Development. Island Press, Washington, D.C., 2004. Cervero, R. Mixed Land Uses and Commuting: Evidence from the Dueker, K., Strathman, J., and Bianco, M. TCRP Report 40: Strategies to American Housing Survey, Transportation Research Part A, Vol. 30, Attract Auto Users to Public Transportation. TRB, National Research No. 5, 1996, pp. 361377. Council, Washington, D.C., 1998. Cervero, R., and Kockelman, K. Travel Demand and the 3Ds: Density, ECONorthwest. Peak and Off-Peak Frequencies, Out-of-Pocket Costs: Design, and Diversity. Transportation Research D, Vol. 2, No. 3, A Framework for Developing and Evaluating Policies to Influence 1997, pp. 199219. Transit Ridership and Urban Form. 1991.

OCR for page 57
58 Evans, J., and Stryker, A. TCRP Project B-12B - Technical Report 1. Un- Parsons Brinckerhoff, J. Zupan, R. Cervero, and Stein-Hudson. TCRP published report. TCRP Transportation Research Board of the Report 16: Transit and Urban Form. Transportation Research Board, National Academies, Washington, D.C., March, 2005. National Research Council. Washington, D.C., 1996. Ewing, R., and Cervero, R. Travel and the Built Environment: A Syn- Peak and Off-Peak Fares: Effects of Fare Changes on Bus Ridership. APTA, thesis. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transporta- Washington, D.C., 1991. tion Research Board, No. 1780, TRB, National Research Council, Podobnik, B. The Social and Environmental Achievements of New Washington, D.C., 2001, pp. 87114. Urbanism: Evidence from Orenco Station. Lewis and Clark College, Ewing, R. Beyond Density, Mode Choice, and Single-Purpose Trips. Trans- Portland, Oregon, November 2002. portation Quarterly, Vol. 49, No. 4, Fall 1995. Pratt, R. H. TCRP Web Document 12: Traveler Response to Trans- Federal Transit Administration. FTA New Starts Workshop, San Jose, portation System Changes. Transit Cooperative Research Pro- California, June 12, 2003. gram. Transportation Research Board. Washington, D.C. March, Gossen, R. Travel Characteristics of TOD and Non-TOD Residents in 2000. the San Francisco Bay Area: Evidence from the 2000 Bay Area Travel Renne, J. Evaluation of the New Jersey Transit Village Initiative Executive Survey. Working Paper. Metropolitan Transportation Commission, Summary. Alan M. Voorhees Transportation Center, Edward J. Oakland, California, 2005. Bloustein School of Planning and Public Policy, Rutgers University, Gragg, R. No Kids on the Block. The Oregonian Newspaper, July 7, 2005. New Brunswick, New Jersey, December 2003. JHK and Associates. Development-Related Survey II. Washington Met- Renne, J. Transit Oriented Development: Measuring Benefits, Analyzing ropolitan Area Transit Authority, 1987 and 1989. Trends, and Evaluating Policy. Dissertation Submitted to Graduate Handy, S. Regional Versus Local Accessibility: Implications for Nonwork Program in Urban Planning and Policy Development, Rutgers Travel. In Transportation Research Record 1400, TRB, National University 2005. Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1993, pp. 5866. Ross, C. L. and Dunning, A. E. Land Use Transportation Interaction: An Holtzclaw, J., Clear, R., Dittmar, H., Goldstein, D., and Haas, P. Location Examination of the 1995 NPTS Data. U.S. Department of Trans- Efficiency: Neighborhood and Socio-Economic Characteristics De- portation Federal Highway Administration, October 1997. termine Auto ownership and UseStudies in Chicago, Los Angeles, Sastry, N., Ghosh-Dastidar, B., Adams, J., and Pebley, A. The Design of and San Francisco. Transportation Planning and Technology, a Multilevel Longitudinal Survey of Children, Families, and Com- Vol. 25, 2002, pp. 127. munities: The Los Angeles Family and Neighborhood Survey. RAND, Lapham, M. Transit Oriented Development - Trip Generation and Mode Santa Monica, California, 2000. Split in the Portland Metropolitan Region. Portland State University, Shoup, D. The High Cost of Free Parking. Planners Press, Chicago, Ill., Oregon, March 2001. 2005. Lee, R.W. Review of Literature on TOD Trip Generation Relevant to Shoup, D. C. In Lieu of Required Parking. Journal of Planning Educa- Hacienda Business Park. Memorandum Presented to Hacienda tion and Research, Vol. 18, No. 4, 1999, pp. 307320. Business Park Owners Association by Fehr & Peers. August 2004. Shoup, D. Truth in Transportation Planning. Journal of Transportation Lund, H. M., Cervero, R., and Willson, R. Travel Characteristics of and Statistics, Vol. 66, 2003, pp. 116. Transit-Focused Development in California. Oakland. Bay Area Rapid Surface Transportation Policy Partnership. http://www.transact.org/ Transit District and California Department of Transportation, 2004. Progress/jan01/table.htm. Metro, Travel Behavior/Activity Survey, 1994. Switzer, C. The Center Commons Transit Oriented Development: A Case Mildner, G., Strathman, J., and Bianco, M. Parking Policies and Study. Master of Urban and Regional Planning Thesis, Portland Commuting Behavior. Transportation Quarterly, Vol. 51, No.1, State University, Oregan, 2002. pp. 111125. Winter 1997. Ten Principles for Successful Development Around Transit. Urban Land New Urban News. "America Must Urbanize as the Population Ages." Institute, Washington, D.C., 2003. January/February 2003. Accessed March 28, 2003. http://www. Thompson, G., and Matoff, T. Network Philosophy Affects Performance newurbannews.com/housingmarketing.html. of Transit Investments in U.S. Urban Areas. Presented at 8th Joint Parking Spaces/Community Places: Finding the Balance Through Conference on Light Rail Transit, Dallas, Texas, November 2000. Smart Growth Solutions. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Trip Generation, 7th edition. Institution of Transportation Engineers, Washington, D.C., 2006. Washington, D.C., 2003. Parsons Brinckerhoff. Factors for Success in California's Transit-Oriented Whoriskey, P. Tysons Project Adds Dimension to Rail Proposal. Development. Sacramento: California Department of Transporta- Washington Post, June 22, 2003. tion, Statewide Transit-Oriented Development Study, 2002. Willson, R. Suburban Parking Requirements: A Tacit Policy for Auto- Parsons Brinckerhoff. Northwest Transit Corridor TOD implementation mobile Use and Sprawl. Journal of the American Planning Association, Guidebook. Northwest Municipal Conference, May 2003. Vol. 61, No. 1, 1995, pp. 2942.