National Academy of Sciences | 150 Year Anniversary

Questions? Call 800-624-6242

| Items in cart [0]

The National Academies Press

Rights & Permissions

topleft topright

NCHRP Report 525 Volume 15: Costing Asset Protection: An All-Hazards Guide for Transportation Agencies (CAPTA) (2009)
National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP)

Citation Manager

Transportation Research Board. "Conclusion." NCHRP Report 525 Volume 15: Costing Asset Protection: An All-Hazards Guide for Transportation Agencies (CAPTA). Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2009.

Please select a format:

BibTeX EndNote RefMan


Page
106
bottomleft bottomright
Page
106
Front Matter (R1-R11)
Summary (1-4)
Part I - CAPTA Final Report (5-5)
Background (6-6)
Overview of the CAPTA Methodology (7-7)
Basic Definitions (8-8)
Risk Management Taxonomy (9-10)
Assumptions (11-11)
Risk and Consequence (12-12)
Institutional Context for Risk Management (13-14)
Alternative Approaches (15-15)
Development of the CAPTA Methodology (16-21)
Asset Categories (22-22)
Hazards/Threats (23-27)
Consequence Threshold (28-28)
Countermeasures (29-31)
General Countermeasure Attributes (32-33)
Chapter 4 - Results Summary (34-34)
Chapter 5 - Conclusion (35-35)
References (36-36)
Appendix A - Costing Asset Protection: An All Hazards Guide for Transportation Agencies (CAPTA) Test Preparation (37-45)
Appendix B - Summary Report for the CAPTA Pilot Test with Maryland DOT, October 17, 2007 (46-47)
Appendix C - Summary Report for the CAPTA Pilot Test with MBTA, November 16, 2007 (48-49)
Appendix D - Summary Report for the CAPTA Pilot Test with the Virginia DOT, February 13, 2008 (50-51)
Appendix E - List of Acronyms (52-52)
Appendix F - Glossary of Terms Used in CAPTA (53-55)
Appendix G - Recommended Further Reading (56-57)
Part II - CAPTool User Guide (58-58)
Preface (59-61)
Background (62-62)
Overview of the CAPTA Methodology (63-63)
Risk and Consequence (64-64)
Assumptions (65-65)
Basic CAPTool and Expanded CAPTool (66-67)
Example Agency (68-68)
Data Consistency (69-70)
Step 1: Relevant Risks (71-76)
Step 2: Thresholds (77-80)
Step 3: Asset and Asset Class Inventory (81-87)
Step 4: Inventory of High-Consequence Assets/Asset Classes (88-90)
Step 5: Countermeasure Opportunities (91-94)
Step 6: Results Summary (95-97)
Step 1a: Threat/Hazard Vulnerability Table (98-99)
Step 5a: Countermeasure Costs (100-101)
Step 5b: Selection of Additional Countermeasures (102-103)
Step 5c: Countermeasure Filter Selection (104-105)
Conclusion (106-106)
Appendix A - Countermeasure Unit Costs and Descriptions (107-109)
Appendix B - Threshold Equations (110-110)
Appendix C - CAPTool Initial Startup Instructions (111-111)
Appendix D - Countermeasures Dictionary (112-124)
Abbreviations used without definitions in TRB publications (125-125)

Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 106
Conclusion Properly used, CAPTool allows users to compare multiple modes of transportation assets on a common basis. CAPTool identifies assets and asset classes that are of highest consequence and thus most important to the functionality of the transportation mission. CAPTool provides an effective means to analyze assets in an objective, transparent manner. CAPTool results depend upon the quality of the information and judgments used in applying it. Missing or unsubstantiated data concerning asset characteristics--such as length, cost, and usage--skew results inappropriately. Inconsistent input data also cause assets to be identified as more or less consequential than they should be. Efforts should be made to ensure consistent inputs to the CAPTool. CAPTool is designed to be iterative. Users can apply different consequence thresholds to assets and consider various countermeasures. CAPTool is more effective when the user alters thresh- olds and reviews results of these scenarios. This iterative process allows the user to determine the assets of highest consequence for further evaluation. CAPTool makes the iterative process easy by supplying informative summary reports that allow a decision maker to choose between dif- ferent threshold settings and countermeasure selections. CAPTool provides a summary report designed for submission and presentation to decision makers. The summary report, displayed at the end of CAPTool, provides the thresholds chosen, results, and allocation of resources by mode. Various iterations of consequence threshold and countermeasures can be chosen and summarized, such that a range of alternatives can be dis- played. This iterative approach allows the decision maker to make the best decision. The Basic CAPTool is designed to suit the needs of a majority of transportation officials. The embedded equations and data are drawn from practical experience, and engineering judgments. Costs are based on national averages. The CAPTool recognizes that transportation agencies have access to data and resources to identify costs applicable to the area and assets of interest. The Enhanced CAPTool allows the user to alter costs and to apply countermeasure screening judgments. Used properly, the CAPTool provides decision support to the difficult task of resource allo- cation across multiple modes. CAPTA combines a transparent means to capture management judgments on consequence thresholds with the objective characteristics of the assets analyzed to produce a list of high-consequence assets that merit further examination. CAPTool identifies high-consequence assets and links them to objective data and user choices. 108