National Academy of Sciences | 150 Year Anniversary

Questions? Call 800-624-6242

| Items in cart [0]

The National Academies Press

Rights & Permissions

topleft topright

NCHRP Report 525 Volume 15: Costing Asset Protection: An All-Hazards Guide for Transportation Agencies (CAPTA) (2009)
National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP)

Citation Manager

Transportation Research Board. "Background." NCHRP Report 525 Volume 15: Costing Asset Protection: An All-Hazards Guide for Transportation Agencies (CAPTA). Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2009.

Please select a format:

BibTeX EndNote RefMan


Page
6
bottomleft bottomright
Page
6
Front Matter (R1-R11)
Summary (1-4)
Part I - CAPTA Final Report (5-5)
Background (6-6)
Overview of the CAPTA Methodology (7-7)
Basic Definitions (8-8)
Risk Management Taxonomy (9-10)
Assumptions (11-11)
Risk and Consequence (12-12)
Institutional Context for Risk Management (13-14)
Alternative Approaches (15-15)
Development of the CAPTA Methodology (16-21)
Asset Categories (22-22)
Hazards/Threats (23-27)
Consequence Threshold (28-28)
Countermeasures (29-31)
General Countermeasure Attributes (32-33)
Chapter 4 - Results Summary (34-34)
Chapter 5 - Conclusion (35-35)
References (36-36)
Appendix A - Costing Asset Protection: An All Hazards Guide for Transportation Agencies (CAPTA) Test Preparation (37-45)
Appendix B - Summary Report for the CAPTA Pilot Test with Maryland DOT, October 17, 2007 (46-47)
Appendix C - Summary Report for the CAPTA Pilot Test with MBTA, November 16, 2007 (48-49)
Appendix D - Summary Report for the CAPTA Pilot Test with the Virginia DOT, February 13, 2008 (50-51)
Appendix E - List of Acronyms (52-52)
Appendix F - Glossary of Terms Used in CAPTA (53-55)
Appendix G - Recommended Further Reading (56-57)
Part II - CAPTool User Guide (58-58)
Preface (59-61)
Background (62-62)
Overview of the CAPTA Methodology (63-63)
Risk and Consequence (64-64)
Assumptions (65-65)
Basic CAPTool and Expanded CAPTool (66-67)
Example Agency (68-68)
Data Consistency (69-70)
Step 1: Relevant Risks (71-76)
Step 2: Thresholds (77-80)
Step 3: Asset and Asset Class Inventory (81-87)
Step 4: Inventory of High-Consequence Assets/Asset Classes (88-90)
Step 5: Countermeasure Opportunities (91-94)
Step 6: Results Summary (95-97)
Step 1a: Threat/Hazard Vulnerability Table (98-99)
Step 5a: Countermeasure Costs (100-101)
Step 5b: Selection of Additional Countermeasures (102-103)
Step 5c: Countermeasure Filter Selection (104-105)
Conclusion (106-106)
Appendix A - Countermeasure Unit Costs and Descriptions (107-109)
Appendix B - Threshold Equations (110-110)
Appendix C - CAPTool Initial Startup Instructions (111-111)
Appendix D - Countermeasures Dictionary (112-124)
Abbreviations used without definitions in TRB publications (125-125)

Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 6
CHAPTER 1 Project Rationale and Approach Background The CAPTA effort is a continuation of efforts begun following the attacks of September 11, 2001. That event prompted a series of risk assessment and management projects initiated through the cooperative research programs managed by the Transportation Research Board of the National Academies. Several risk management guides were prepared independently and were aimed at either state transportation agencies that own or operate specific assets, or at specific asset classes within the transportation system. They included guides to assess risk and vulnerability for highway assets, ferries, tunnels, and bridges. These asset-specific guides pro- vide valuable, current information to owners and operators. This multimodal guide builds upon these prior mode-specific efforts. Much of the transportation-focused risk assessment and risk management guidance avail- able today is asset or threat specific. These approaches to risk management have the following characteristics: · The analysis focuses on a specific asset or a select group of assets. · The approaches assume or require substantial knowledge of likely threat/hazard scenarios. · The approaches consider many possible scenarios that might disrupt transportation assets. These guides often require knowledge that the user may not possess or easily obtain and are typically specific to one transportation mode or asset class, such as bridges or tunnels. They are not designed to compare transportation assets across transportation modes, such as would be the case with vehicle fleets and tunnels. CAPTA, a strategic tool used to compare modes on an equitable basis for budgetary decisions, expands the tools available to transportation agencies to define their needs and determine an optimal distribution of funds. The CAPTA methodology provides a foundation for capital requests based on objective, transparent, defensible data and analysis. These well-thought-out requests made to a legislature or in response to a federal request for grant proposals will help transportation agencies acquire additional funding on the merits of the argument for assets that need resources. The CAPTA methodology helps manage internal resource allocation deci- sions among multiple modes by providing a means for analyzing needs through an equitable and transparent process that is applied consistently to all assets. The CAPTA methodology is designed primarily to be applied by practitioners at the state level. The spreadsheet through which CAPTA is implemented may be used separately, apart from this document. Part I of this report provides an overview of why this product was developed and the development process. The model is expected to be tested and improved through use. 7