National Academy of Sciences | 150 Year Anniversary

Questions? Call 800-624-6242

| Items in cart [0]

The National Academies Press

Rights & Permissions

topleft topright

TCRP Report 129: Local and Regional Funding Mechanisms for Public Transportation (2009)
Transit Cooperative Research Program (TCRP)

Citation Manager

Transportation Research Board. "5.2 Arguments for Increased Funding for Public Transportation." TCRP Report 129: Local and Regional Funding Mechanisms for Public Transportation. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2009.

Please select a format:

BibTeX EndNote RefMan


Page
52
bottomleft bottomright
Page
52
Front Matter (R1-R9)
S.2 A Typology of Local and Regional Funding Sources for Public Transportation (1-2)
S.3 Overview of Current Local and Regional Public Transportation Funding (3-3)
S.5 Local and Regional Public Transportation Funding by Type of Agency (4-4)
S.7 Steps in Enacting New Funding Sources for Public Transportation (5-6)
1.4 Organization of the Report (7-8)
2.2 Defining Local and Regional Funding Sources for Public Transportation (9-9)
2.3 Profile of Local and Regional Public Transportation Funding Sources - 2005 (10-13)
3.1 Local and Regional Public Transportation Funding Typology and Definitions (14-15)
3.2 Traditional Local and Regional Tax- and Fee-Based Funding Sources for Public Transportation (16-17)
3.3 Common Business, Activity, and Related Funding Sources for Public Transportation (18-19)
3.4 Current Examples of Traditional or Common Local and Regional Funding Sources (20-26)
3.6 Revenue Streams from Projects (27-33)
3.7 Public Transportation Funding Mechanisms Not in Widespread Use (34-38)
4.2 Contextual Issues in Local and Regional Funding for Public Transportation (39-41)
4.4 Criteria for Evaluating Potential Local and Regional Funding Sources (42-46)
4.5 Performance of Tax and Fee Mechanisms (47-49)
5.1 Steps for Successful Implementation of New or Enhanced Funding Mechanisms (50-51)
5.2 Arguments for Increased Funding for Public Transportation (52-52)
6.2 Updating Local and Regional Public Transportation Funding Resource Material (53-54)
Appendix A - Public Transportation Systems Interviewed (55-58)
Appendix B - Transit Agency Interview Guide (59-59)
Appendix C - Observations from the National Transit Database (60-61)
Appendix D - International Experiences with Local and Regional Public Transportation Funding (62-63)
Appendix E - Selected Bibliography (64-68)
Appendix F - Local Funding Measures Supporting Transit (20002006) (69-71)
Abbreviations used without definitions in TRB publications (72-72)

Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 52
52 further on essential steps in enacting new local and regional cies and programs. Public transportation benefits include the revenues for transportation in their 2005 report Local Trans- following:79 portation Sales Taxes: California's Experiment in Transportation Finance. In the study, they concluded the following: · Increased energy efficiency through reduced motor fuel consumption and reduced dependence on foreign oil; The four most important factors in the popularity of LTST's · Enhanced environment through reductions in motor vehi- [Local Transportation Sales Taxes] . . . are . . . specific lists of cle emissions--including carbon monoxide, carbon diox- transportation projects, control of the revenues by the counties in which the tax is collected, finite lives [fixed term for revenue- ide, volatile organic compounds (the precursors of smog), raising authority and collection], and direct approval by the nitrogen oxide, and particulate matter--and reduced con- voters.78 sumption of open space; · Reduced growth in traffic congestion from ever-increasing VMT; 5.2 Arguments for Increased · Increased freedom and personal mobility through in- Funding for Public creased transportation choices for all travel markets: choice Transportation riders, commuters, and those who may be transportation In recent years, greater attention has been paid to the ratio- disadvantaged; nales used to support initiatives aimed at expanding the fund- · Increased access to opportunity, including improved ac- ing for public transportation. The heightened attention is, to cess to jobs, to essential social and human services, to em- a large degree, emerging from the realization that (1) local, ployment, to education, and to training opportunities as state, and federal governments have a wide range of shared well as to shopping and personal business; goals and (2) increased investment and use of public trans- · Increased economic stimulus, including job creation, portation yields benefits that serve these goals. business sales, profitability and competitiveness; rising In planning and carrying out steps to enact new local and land and property values; and neighborhood revitalization; regional revenue sources for transit, it is crucial to understand all of which yield increased revenues to every layer of gov- and promote these benefits, recognizing that the importance ernment--local, state, and federal; of each will vary from community to community. · Increased safety and security through reductions in motor There is considerable documentation of the benefits of pub- vehicle incidents and accidents and enhanced options in lic transportation at all levels. Both APTA and CFTE, among response to human-made or natural disasters; and other organizations, have exhaustive informational materials · Increased personal health and well-being through greater and research on the benefits of transit that can be used to fash- emphasis on and opportunity for walking and nonmo- ion effective arguments for increasing support for transit fund- torized trip making amid more efficient development ing initiatives. patterns. These arguments are best crafted around individual com- munities' specific circumstances, needs, and goals. They The arguments and resources materials highlighted above must, however, appeal to a variety of stakeholders, including are being combined with observations on the advantages households, business and industry, and government agen- and disadvantages of specific funding sources (noted in Sec- tion 4.0) by transit systems and advocates around the coun- try and tailored in support of virtually all new local funding initiatives. 78 Crabbe, A., et al. Local Transportation Sales Taxes: California's Experiment in Transportation Finance--Detailed Research Findings. University of Cali- 79Sources for this material on transit benefits are http://www.apta.com and fornia Transportation Center, Berkeley, CA, 2002, p. 34. http://www.cfte.org.