National Academy of Sciences | 150 Year Anniversary

Questions? Call 800-624-6242

| Items in cart [0]

The National Academies Press

Rights & Permissions

topleft topright

TCRP Report 129: Local and Regional Funding Mechanisms for Public Transportation (2009)
Transit Cooperative Research Program (TCRP)

Citation Manager

Transportation Research Board. "Appendix B - Transit Agency Interview Guide." TCRP Report 129: Local and Regional Funding Mechanisms for Public Transportation. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2009.

Please select a format:

BibTeX EndNote RefMan


Page
59
bottomleft bottomright
Page
59
Front Matter (R1-R9)
S.2 A Typology of Local and Regional Funding Sources for Public Transportation (1-2)
S.3 Overview of Current Local and Regional Public Transportation Funding (3-3)
S.5 Local and Regional Public Transportation Funding by Type of Agency (4-4)
S.7 Steps in Enacting New Funding Sources for Public Transportation (5-6)
1.4 Organization of the Report (7-8)
2.2 Defining Local and Regional Funding Sources for Public Transportation (9-9)
2.3 Profile of Local and Regional Public Transportation Funding Sources - 2005 (10-13)
3.1 Local and Regional Public Transportation Funding Typology and Definitions (14-15)
3.2 Traditional Local and Regional Tax- and Fee-Based Funding Sources for Public Transportation (16-17)
3.3 Common Business, Activity, and Related Funding Sources for Public Transportation (18-19)
3.4 Current Examples of Traditional or Common Local and Regional Funding Sources (20-26)
3.6 Revenue Streams from Projects (27-33)
3.7 Public Transportation Funding Mechanisms Not in Widespread Use (34-38)
4.2 Contextual Issues in Local and Regional Funding for Public Transportation (39-41)
4.4 Criteria for Evaluating Potential Local and Regional Funding Sources (42-46)
4.5 Performance of Tax and Fee Mechanisms (47-49)
5.1 Steps for Successful Implementation of New or Enhanced Funding Mechanisms (50-51)
5.2 Arguments for Increased Funding for Public Transportation (52-52)
6.2 Updating Local and Regional Public Transportation Funding Resource Material (53-54)
Appendix A - Public Transportation Systems Interviewed (55-58)
Appendix B - Transit Agency Interview Guide (59-59)
Appendix C - Observations from the National Transit Database (60-61)
Appendix D - International Experiences with Local and Regional Public Transportation Funding (62-63)
Appendix E - Selected Bibliography (64-68)
Appendix F - Local Funding Measures Supporting Transit (20002006) (69-71)
Abbreviations used without definitions in TRB publications (72-72)

Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 59
59 APPENDIX B Transit Agency Interview Guide Through the interview process, attempts were made to ­ Annual capital budget gather the following information elements for inclusion in the ­ Recent major service improvement initiatives database that accompanies this report. Agency "Profile" data were extracted from the then current National Transit Data- Local and Regional Funding Source Information base (2006) for systems reporting from Urbanized Areas. Pro- file data for systems serving Small Urban and Rural areas were 7. Specific local/regional funding sources/revenue streams requested during interviews and are generally current as of the in use? date of the interviews (2007). 8. Dedicated to transit or shared for other uses? Funding source data were gathered during the interviews 9. For each source noted, attempts were made to compile the and generally are current as of the date of the interviews following information: (2007). ­ Why was source selected (key factors; was there analysis of alternatives? Documentation?) ­ Rate (in the case of taxes) Profile Information ­ Base (who, what is taxed; what geographic area; exemp- tions, if any) 1. Agency name ­ Yield (how much money does this source yield annually 2. UZA name or city for transit) 3. Interviewee name ­ Use of revenues 4. Interview date Capital 5. 2000 population Operations 6. System size, operating characteristics, and trends Other uses ­ Modes (NTD definitions) ­ Latest date enacted ­ Fleet size (bus peak requirement) ­ Term of the tax (years effective without reauthorization) ­ Annual revenue vehicle-miles ­ Type of authorization/enactment (state statute; local ­ Annual revenue vehicle-hours legislation; popular referenda, etc.) ­ Annual ridership ­ Pros/cons; advantages/disadvantages of the source ­ Annual operating budget ­ Key issues in enactment, use