Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter.
Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.
Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.
OCR for page 64
64
APPENDIX E
Selected Bibliography
1. American Public Transportation Association, Letter to IRS re: tax- 14. Canadian Urban Transit Association, Provincial and Territorial
ation of lease revenues, August 11, 2006. Funding of Urban Transit in Canada, March 2005.
2. American Public Transportation Association, Passenger Transport, 15. Canzi, Michael, Innovations in Transit Funding, Canadian Urban
Vol. 64, No. 46, November 13, 2006, Vol. 64, No. 46, November Transit Association, STRP Report 20, November 2003.
20, 2006, Vol. 64, No. 50, December 18, 2006, Vol. 65, No. 1, 16. Cappe, Marni, Congestion Charging Helps London Get a Move On,
January 1, 2007, American Public Transportation Association, Plan, spring 2004.
Washington, DC. 17. Cappe, Marni, Congestion Charging: A Look at London, England,
3. American Public Transportation Association, A Survey of Local Prepared for Infrastructure Canada, September 2003.
Mechanisms for Financing Transit Operating Costs, August 1979, 18. Cappaert, Sylvie, "The Finance Dilemma," Public Transport Inter-
June 1982. national, No. 2, 2005.
4. Antos, Justin, Financial Devolution in Transport: How Others Do 19. Cascetta, Ennio, Who Should Pay for Public Transport? Pro-
It, and Does It Work? Case Studies from Western Europe and North ceedings, 2nd UITP International Conference on Public Transport
America, Paper prepared for Transport for London by the Mas- Financing--The Finance Dilemma: Growing Requirements versus
sachusetts Institute of Technology 2006. Declining Funds, Barcelona, Spain, 2005.
5. Antos, Justin, Subsidy Structures of Transit Agencies in North 20. Center for Transportation Excellence, Transportation Finance at
America, Paper prepared for the Chicago Transit Authority and the Ballot Box: Voter's Support Increased Investment and Choice, at
the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, August 2006. www.cfte.org.
6. Bellon, Philippe. Compétivité et Financement du Transport Collectif 21. Central Broward East-West Transit Analysis Feasibility Report,
au Canada, Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Appendix A: Summary of National Experience in Funding Transit
Urban and Periurban Transport, Paris, 910 September 2004. Capital and Operations, 2004.
7. Berger, Louis. Review of French Experience with Respect to Public 22. Cervero, Robert, et al., TCRP Research Results Digest Number 52:
Sector Financing of Urban Transport, Draft Final Report, World Transit-Oriented Development and Joint Development in the United
Bank Urban Transport Strategy Review, July 2000. States: a Literature Review, Transportation Research Board of the
8. Berry, Jim and Lee Sims, "North American Examples of Innovative National Academies, Washington, DC, October 2002.
Funding For Public Transport," Proceedings, UITP Seminar on 23. Cervero, Robert et al., TCRP Report 102: Transit-Oriented Develop-
Urban Public Transport Funding, Paris, October 1999. ment in the United States: Experiences, Challenges and Prospects,
9. Brown, Jeffery, "Paying for Transit in an Era of Federal Policy Transportation Research Board of the National Academies,
Change," Journal of Public Transportation, Volume 8, Number 3, Washington, DC, 2004.
Center for Urban Transportation Research, University of South 24. Chaigneau, Elisabeth, SYSTRA, Urban Public Transport in France:
Florida, Tampa, FL, 2005. Institutional Organization, CERTU, Ministčre de l'Equipement,
10. Cambridge Systematics, Inc. Future Financing Options to Meet des Transports, du Logement, du Tourisme et de la Mer, Paris,
Highway and Transit Needs, NCHRP Project 20-24(49), Interim France, January 2003.
Report, May 2006. 25. Chong, Gordon, Financing Public Transit in Canada: Ontario
11. Cambridge Systematics, Inc., Funding and Finance: Advancing Perspective, Presentation, Proceedings, Canadian Urban Transit
from Good to Great Practice in State DOTs, Briefing Paper, Association, Fall Conference, Montreal, Canada, November 2004.
NCHRP Project 20-24(51) CEO Leadership Forum, Minneapolis, 26. Citizens Budget Commission of New York, How to Balance the
Minnesota, September 2006. MTA's Budget: A Report of the Citizens Budget Commission, New
12. Cambridge Systematics, Inc., New Ways to Implement New Trans- York, NY, June 27, 2006.
portation Revenue Sources, for the Washington Metropolitan Area 27. City of Lynwood, CA, An Ordinance of the City Council of the City
Council of Governments, 2002. of Lynnwood Adding a New Section 11-19 to Chapter 11 of the
13. Cambridge Systematics, Inc., Scan of Innovative Finance Tech- Lynnwood Municipal Code for the Purpose of Establishing a Develop-
niques for Pennsylvania, Final Report to PennDOT, Harrisburg, ment Impact Fee Program at www.lynwood.ca.us/documents/pdf/
Pennsylvania, January 2006. legislation/if_res_draft_041106.pdf.
OCR for page 65
65
28. City of Seattle, Transit Oriented Development Case Studies at www. Transportation Research Board 85th Annual Meeting, Purdue
ci.seattle.wa.us/transportation/SAP/TOD_Case_Studies/summary. University, Lafayette, ID, January 2006.
pdf. 46. Hanak, E., Rueben, K., Funding Innovations for California
29. Corbett, Sam, Goldman, Todd, and Wachs, Martin, Local Option Infrastructure: Promises and Pitfalls, Keston Institute for Public
Transportation Taxes in the United States, Institute of Transportation Finance and Infrastructure Policy, University of Southern
Studies, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, California, California, Los Angeles, CA Research Paper 06-01, March 2006.
March 2001 and http://repositories.cdlib.org/its/reports/UCB-ITS- 47. Henkin, Tamar, Financing Capital Investment: What are the Options
RR-2001-3/. and, as Transit Agency Managers, How Do You Decide What's Right
30. Crabbe, Amber et al., Local Transportation Sales Taxes: California's for You? Presentation to the 3rd National Transportation Finance
Experiment in Transportation Finance, University of California Conference, Chicago, Illinois, October 27, 2002.
Transportation Center Research Paper No. 552, 2002. 48. Hess, D. B. and Lombardi, P. A., "Government Subsidies for
31. Crabbe, Amber et al., Local Transportation Sales Taxes: California's Public Transit: History, Current Issues and Recent Evidence,"
Experiment in Transportation Finance--Detailed Research Findings, Public Works Management and Policy, Vol. 10, October 1, 2005,
University of California Transportation Center Research Paper American Society for Public Administration, Sage Publications,
No. 737, February 2005. Inc., Washington, DC
32. Delcan, Study of Alternative Revenue Sources for Ontario Transit 49. Higginson, Martin, UITP Position Statement: Public Transport
Systems, Ontario Urban Transit Association, September 1994. Finance, UITP, September 2002.
33. Development Planning and Financing Group, Inc., Comparison of 50. Hikichi, Lynda, Beimborn, E., Innovation at Transit Systems:
Improvement Districts and Community Facility Districts, November Survey Results Draft Report, Center for Urban Transportation
2, 2004 at www.dpfg.com/news/view_news.php?newsID=25. Studies, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Milwaukee, WI,
34. Dowell, David E., California's Infrastructure Policy for the 21st August 2004.
Century: Issues and Opportunities, Public Policy Institute of Califor- 51. HOT Lane Concept and Rationale, Federal Highway Administration
nia, San Francisco, CA, 2000. at http://www.its.dot.gov/jpodocs/repts_te/13668_files/chapter_1.
35. Doherty, Matthew, Funding Public Transport Development through htm.
Land Value Capture Programs, Eco Transit at http://www.ecotransit. 52. ICF Consulting and Institute of Transportation Studies, Berkeley,
or.au, 2004. Metropolitan-Level Transportation Funding Sources, for AASHTO
36. Federal Transit Administration, Procedures and Technical Methods Standing Committee on Planning, Washington, DC, December
for Transit Project Planning: Chapter 8, Financial Planning for Transit, 2005.
Section 8.5, Forecasting Revenue, Washington, DC at www.fta.dot. 53. Infrastructure Canada, Infrastructure Financing: A Literature Review
gov/planning/newstarts/planning_environment_2425.html. of Financing Mechanisms, Ottawa, Ontario, CA, January 2004.
37. "FasTrak Value Pricing Fact Sheet," San Diego Association of 54. International Association of Public Transport (UITP), Survey on
Governments at http://www.sandag.org/uploads/publicationid/ Public Transport Organization and Financing; Synthesis of Answers
publicationid_831_4185.pdf. to Questionnaires, Prepared by Mohamed Mezghani, Director
38. Furzer, Catherine, "Congestion Charging," Public Transport Inter- Programmes and Studies, UITP, Brussels, October 2002.
national, No. 5, 2006. 55. KFH Group, Inc., Chittenden County Transit Funding Report,
39. Gerau, Jurgen, Apports du Financement Privé dans des Structures Washington, DC, December 18, 2002.
de PPP--Exigences et Experiences, Presentation, Proceedings of the 56. KFH Group, Inc., "Employee Compensation Guidelines for
3rd International Conference on Urban and Periurban Transport, Transit Providers in Rural and Small Urban Areas," TCRP Project
Paris, 910 September 2004. F-12 survey results, Washington, DC, 2007.
40. Gwilliam, Ken, Financing Public Transport, Proceedings, UITP 57. Knight, Paul, Unconventional Charging and Taxation to Support
Seminar on Urban Public Transport Funding, Paris, October Public Transport and Taxation Disincentives in Commuter Tran-
1999. sport, Proceedings of the International Congress of the International
41. Goldman, T. Corbett, S. Wachs, M., Local Option Transportation Association of Public Transport (UITP), London, U.K., 2001.
Taxes in the United States, Part One: Issues and Trends, Institute 58. Kyte, Cheryl, Selected Options for Innovative Transit Financing,
of Transportation Studies, University of California at Berkeley, Virginia Transportation Research Council, Richmond, VA, 1997.
Berkeley, CA, March 2001. 59. McCormick Rankin Corporation, How Should the User Pay?
42. Goldman, T. Corbett, S. Wachs, M., Local Option Transportation Opportunities for Financing the Region of Ottawa-Carleton Trans-
Taxes in the United States, Part Two: State-by-State Findings, portation System, Prepared for the Region of Ottawa-Carleton
Institute of Transportation Studies, University of California at December 1998.
Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, March 2001. 60. McWilliams, Douglas, The Macroeconomic Framework, Proceedings,
43. Goldman, T., Wachs, M., "A Quiet Revolution in Transportation UITP Seminar on Urban Public Transport Funding, Paris, FR,
Finance: The Rise of Local Option Transportation Taxes," Trans- October 1999.
portation Quarterly, Vol. 57, No. 1, Winter 2003, pp. 1932, Eno 61. Meads, Richard, Use of Private Finance in London and the Prospects
Foundation, Inc. Washington, DC for Using Parking and Congestion Charging to Fund Public Transport
44. Hager, Wolfgang, Financial Innovation in Rail-Based Mass Transit, Investment, Proceedings, UITP Seminar on Urban Public Transport
Report Prepared for A UITP/Unife Working Group with the Funding, Paris, FR, October 1999.
Support of the European Commission Dg III. Main Report and 62. Mineta Transportation Institute, San José State University,
Case Studies, UITP--UNIFE, 1999. Lessons Learned: A Conference on Transit Referenda and Why They
45. Hamideh, A., Oh, J. E., Labi, S., Mannering, F., An Econometric Succeed or Fail, June 29July 31, 2001. San Jose, California.
Analysis of Post-Election Opinion Surveys: Understanding Public 63. Mullen, Clancy, Road Impact Fee Study, Lee County, FL, Duncan
Acceptance of Local Transportation Sales Taxes, Presentation to the Associates, Austin, TX, October 2006.
OCR for page 66
66
64. Multisystems, Inc. et al., TCRP Research Results Digest 14: Coordi- New York, Independent Budget Office, New York, New York,
nated Intermodal Transportation Pricing and Funding Strategies, June 1, 2007.
Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, 84. Rybeck, Rick, "Using Value Capture To Finance Infrastructure And
Washington, DC, October 1997. Encourage Compact Development," Public Works Management &
65. National Conference of State Legislatures, Surface Transportation Policy, Washington, DC, April 2004, pp. 249260, http://pwm.
Funding: Options for States, Washington, DC, May 2006. sagepub.com.
66. Nicholas, James, et al., Impact Fees in Florida: Their Evolution, 85. SFGov, San Francisco, Chapter 38: Transit Impact Development Fee,
Methodology, Current Issues and Comparisons with Other States, www.municode.com/content/4201/14131/HTML/ch038.html.
White Paper prepared for the Florida City and County Managers 86. SYSTRA, Review of French Experience in Private Financing of Public
Association, October 2005. Urban Transport, World Bank Urban Transport Strategy Review,
67. Northern Virginia Transit Funding Resource Guide, October December 2000.
2001. 87. San Francisco Planning + Urban Research Association, Planning
68. Oh, J. E., Labi, S., Sinha, K. C., Implementation and Evaluation of for Growth: A Proposal to Expand San Francisco's Transit Impact
Self-Financing Highway Pricing Schemes: A Case Study, Paper Development Fee, Recommendations of the SPUR Transportation
Prepared for the Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting Committee, June 20, 2001.
2007, No. 07-2258, Washington, DC, January 2007. 88. Schaller Bruce, TCRP Synthesis 51: Transit Advertising Sales
69. Ontario Ministry of Transportation, Municipal Office, Municipal Agreements, Transportation Research Board of the National Acade-
Transit Funding; Jurisdictional Review, Ontario MTO, June 1999. mies, Washington, DC, 2004.
70. Oregon Department of Revenue, Transit District Self-Employment 89. Schneck, D. C., Laver, R; Darido, G. B.; Diaz, R. B., Capital Funding
Taxes, www.oregon.gov/DOR/BUS/IC-102-406.shtml. Sources for Transit Projects, Prepared for U.S. Federal Transit
71. Parsons Brinckerhoff Quade and Douglas, Inc., and Cambridge Administration, Office of Research, Demonstration, and Innova-
Systematics, Inc., Innovative Finance In-Depth: Local Revenue- tion, Washington, DC, 2003.
Enhancing Options, PennDOT Work Order 13, August 2006. 90. Silverberg, Beverly R., TCRP Synthesis 32: Transit Advertising
72. Parsons Brinckerhoff Quade and Douglas, Inc., Enhanced Scan of Revenue: Traditional and New Sources and Structures, Transpor-
Innovative Finance Techniques for Public Transportation in Penn- tation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington,
sylvania, Work Order No. 16, Draft Report to PennDOT, Harris- DC, 1998.
burg, Pennsylvania, August 31, 2006. 91. Smith, Lauren, Benko, Marika, Services and Technologies: Conges-
73. Pennsylvania Transportation Funding and Reform Commission, tion Pricing, 2003/2007 at www.calccit.org/itsdecision/service_and_
Investing in Our Future: Addressing Pennsylvania's Transportation technology/Congestion_pricing/Congestion_pricing_summary.
Funding Crisis, Initial Findings, Harrisburg, PA, August 2006. html.
74. Philip, Christian et Nicolas Gauthier, Le Financement des Déplace- 92. Spock, Linda, Facts and Myths About Tolls: A Compilation of
ments Urbains, Ministčre de l'Equipement, des Transports, du Reference Materials, Prepared by Linda Spock Consulting, Inc. for
Logement, du Tourisme et de la Mer, France. Décembre 2003. the International Bridge, Tunnel and Turnpike Association,
75. Philip, Christian, Quelles Nouvelles Sources de Financement pour Washington, DC, May 2001.
les Déplacements Urbains? Proceedings of the 3rd International 93. Stocker II, Robert W., State LotteriesThe New Casinos? at www.
Conference on Urban and Periurban Transport, Paris, FR, 910 gaminglawmasters.com/articles/2004/stocker_newcasinos.htm.
September 2004. 94. Surface Transportation Policy Project (STPP) at www.transact.org.
76. TCRP Project B-33, "Practical Measures to Increase Transit 95. Simmonds, Keith C., Innovative Transit Financing in Florida,
Industry Advertising Revenues," Transportation Research Board, Florida Department of Transportation, Transit Office, Tallahassee,
Washington, DC, http://rip.trb.org/browse/dproject.asp?n=11725. FL, 2003.
77. Price Waterhouse LLP with Multisystems, Inc. and Mundle and 96. Sorenson, Paul, Cheaper Gas and More Expensive Shoes: California's
Associates, Inc., TCRP Report 31: Funding Strategies for Public Recent Transportation Finance Reform Proposal, Presentation to the
Transportation, Transportation Research Board, National Research TRB 85th Annual Meeting, Washington, DC, January 25, 2006.
Council, Washington, DC, 1998. 97. Szentgyörgyi, Tama, Overview of Public Transport Financing Issues
78. Public Policy Center, Project Overview: National Evaluation of a and Approaches, Proceedings, 2nd UITP International Conference
Mileage-Based Road User Charge, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, on Public Transport Financing--The Finance Dilemma: Growing
November 1, 2007, ppc.uiowa.edu/dnn4/Default.aspx?tabid=65. Requirements Versus Declining Funds, Barcelona, Spain, 2005.
79. Public Technology, Inc., Show Me the Money: A Decision-Maker's 98. Texas Senate Research Center, Research Spotlight: Oregon's Road
Funding Compendium for Transportation Systems Management User Fee Pilot Program, Austin, TX, April 2006.
and Operations, Washington, DC, December 2005. 99. Tischler and Associates, Inc., Transit Impact Fees, Teton County,
80. Puentes, Robert and Prince, Ryan, Fueling Transportation Finance: Wyoming, Bethesda, MD, July 2002.
A Primer on the Gas Tax, Center on Urban and Metropolitan 100. "Innovative Techniques in the Planning and Financing of Public
Policy, Transportation Reform Series, The Brookings Institution, Transportation Projects," TCRP Research Results Digest 77, Trans-
Washington, DC, March 2003. portation Research Board, Washington, D.C., May 2006.
81. Puentes, Robert and Warren, David, Today's Roads and Tomorrow's 101. Transportation Association of Canada, "Innovations in Financing
Dollars: Using GARVEE Bonds to Finance Transportation Projects, Urban Transportation," Briefing Paper, Ottawa, ON, June 2002.
The Brookings Institution, Washington, DC, March 2005. 102. Transportation Association of Canada, "Financing Urban Trans-
82. Retirement Living Information Center, Taxes by State, www. portation; Briefing Paper," Ottawa, ON, February 1997.
retirementliving.com/RLtaxaes.html. 103. "Report on Innovative Financing Techniques for Transit Agencies,"
83. A Review of the Metropolitan Transportation Authority's TCRP Legal Research Digest No. 13, Transportation Research
Financial Outlook and Options for Closing the Gaps, City of Board, Washington, D.C., August 1999.
OCR for page 67
67
104. "Transit Oriented Development and Joint Development in the United 123. Wetzel, Dave, "Innovative Ways of Financing the Backbone of
States: A Literature Review," TCRP Research Results Digest, an Integrated Mobility Policy," Proceedings, 2nd UITP Inter-
Number 52, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., national Conference on Public Transport Financing--The
October 2002. Finance Dilemma: Growing Requirements Versus Declining
105. TransTech Management, Inc., "Financing Capital Investment: A Funds, Barcelona, Spain, 2005.
Primer for the Transit Practitioner," TCRP Report 89, Transportation 124. Whitty, J., Svadlenak, J., and Capps, D., "Public Involvement and
Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2003. Road User Charge Development: Oregon's Experience," Oregon
106. Turner, Derek, "Central London Congestion Charging Scheme: Has Department of Transportation, Salem, OR, March 2006.
it Achieved its Objectives," Presentation, Proceedings, Canadian 125. Wolman, Harold and Reigeluth, George, Financing Urban Public
Urban Transit Association, Fall Conference, Toronto, Canada, Transportation: The U.S. and Europe. Transaction Books, New
November 2003. Brunswick, New Jersey, 1980.
107. Ubbels, B., et al., "Alternative Ways of Funding Public Transport," 126. http://www.lightrailnow.org.
European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research. Vol. 1, 127. Eno Transportation Foundation, TCRP Research Results Digest 77:
No. 1, pp. 7389, Technische Universiteit Delft, Netherlands, 2001. Innovative Techniques in the Planning and Financing of Public
108. U.S. Department of the Treasury, "Fact Sheets: State and Local Transportation Projects, Transportation Research Board of the
Taxes," at http://www.treasury.gov/education/fact-sheets/taxes/state- National Academies, Washington, DC, May 2006.
local.shtml. 128. Transportation Association of Canada, Innovations in Financing
109. U.S. DOT, Bureau of Transportation Statistics, "Survey of State Urban Transportation, Briefing Paper, Ottawa, ON, June 2002.
Funding for Public Transportation, 2005," Washington, D.C., May 129. Transportation Association of Canada, Financing Urban Transpor-
2006. tation; Briefing Paper, Ottawa, ON, February 1997.
110. U.S. DOT, Federal Highway Administration, "Show Me the Money: 130. TCRP Legal Research Digest 13: Report on Innovative Financing
A Decision-Makers Funding Compendium for Transportation Systems Techniques for Transit Agencies, Transportation Research Board,
Management and Operations," Washington, D.C., December 2005. National Research Council, Washington, DC, August 1999.
111. U.S. DOT, Federal Transit Administration, "Annual Report on 131. TransTech Management, Inc., and PA Consulting, Inc., TCRP
Report 89: Financing Capital Investment: A Primer for the Transit
New Starts: Proposed Allocations of Funds for Fiscal Year 2007,"
Practitioner, Transportation Research Board of the National
Washington, D.C., 2006.
Academies, Washington, DC, 2003.
112. U.S. DOT, Federal Transit Administration, "Innovative Financing
132. Turner, Derek, Central London Congestion Charging Scheme: Has
Techniques for America's Transit Systems," Washington, D.C.,
it Achieved its Objectives, Presentation, Proceedings, Canadian
September 1998.
Urban Transit Association, Fall Conference, Toronto, Canada,
113. U.S. DOT, Federal Transit Administration, "Transit at the Table: A
November 2003.
Guide to Participation in Metropolitan Decision-Making," Washing-
133. Ubbels, B., et al., "Alternative Ways of Funding Public Transport,"
ton, D.C.
European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research, Vol. 1,
114. U.S. DOT, TRIS Online, "Value Pricing Homepage" at http://www.
No. 1, pp. 7389, Technische Universiteit Delft, Netherlands, 2001.
hhh.umn.edu/centers/slp/projects/conpric.
134. U.S. Department of the Treasury, Fact Sheets: State and Local
115. U.S. GAO, "Mass Transit: Issues Related to Providing Dedicated Taxes, http://www.treasury.gov/education/fact-sheets/taxes/state-
Funding for the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority," local.shtml.
GAO-06-516, Washington, D.C., May 2006. 135. U.S. DOT, Bureau of Transportation Statistics, Survey of State
116. U.S. GAO, "Highways and Transit: Private Sector Sponsorship of Funding for Public Transportation, 2005, Washington, DC, May
and Investment in Major Projects Has Been Limited," GAO-04-419, 2006.
Washington, D.C., March 2004. 136. U.S. DOT, Federal Highway Administration, Show Me the Money: A
117. Vaca, Erin and Kuzmyak, Richard, "Traveler Response to Trans- Decision-Makers Funding Compendium for Transportation Systems
portation System Changes: Chapter 13--Parking Pricing and Fees," Management and Operations, Washington, DC, December 2005.
TCRP Report 95: Transportation Research Board, Washington, 137. U.S. DOT, Federal Transit Administration, Annual Report on New
D.C., 2005. Starts: Proposed Allocations of Funds for Fiscal Year 2007, Washing-
118. Volinsky, Joel, "Lessons Learned in Transit Efficiencies, Revenue ton, DC, 2006.
Generation, and Cost Reductions," National Center for Transit 138. U.S. DOT, Federal Transit Administration, Innovative Financing
Research, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, 2003. Techniques for America's Transit Systems, Washington, DC,
119. Wachs, Martin, "A Quiet Crisis in Transportation Finance Options September 1998.
for Texas," Testimony before the Texas Study Commission on 139. U.S. DOT, Federal Transit Administration, Transit at the Table: A
Transportation Finance, Austin, TX, April 19, 2006. Guide to Participation in Metropolitan Decision-Making, Washing-
120. Wachs, Martin, "Improving Efficiency and Equity in Transportation ton, DC.
Finance," Center on Urban and Metropolitan Policy, Transportation 140. U.S. DOT, TRIS Online, "Value Pricing Homepage" at http://
Reform Series, The Brookings Institution, Washington, D.C., April www.hhh.umn.edu/centers/slp/projects/conpric.
2003. 141. U.S. GAO, Mass Transit: Issues Related to Providing Dedicated
121. Washington Metropolitan Area Transportation Authority, "Dedi- Funding for the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority,
cated Revenue Sources for Major U.S. Transit Agencies," October 15, GAO-06-516, Washington, DC, May 2006.
2004. 142. U.S. GAO, Highways and Transit: Private Sector Sponsorship of and
122. Werner, Jan, "The Current State of Organization and Finance of Investment in Major Projects Has Been Limited, GAO-04-419,
Public Transport in Europe," Working Group on Competition Issues Washington, DC, March 2004.
of the Committee of Organizing Authorities in the International 143. Vaca, Erin and Kuzmyak, Richard, TCRP Report 95: Traveler
Association of Public Transport (UITP), 2001. Response to Transportation System Changes--Chapter 13: Parking
OCR for page 68
68
Pricing and Fees, Transportation Research Board of the National 148. Werner, Jan, The Current State of Organization and Finance of
Academies, Washington, DC, 2005. Public Transport in Europe, Working Group on Competition
144. Volinsky, Joel, Lessons Learned in Transit Efficiencies, Revenue Issues of the Committee of Organizing Authorities in the Inter-
Generation, and Cost Reductions, National Center for Transit national Association of Public Transport (UITP), 2001.
Research, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, 2003. 149. Wetzel, Dave, Innovative Ways of Financing the Backbone of an
145. Wachs, Martin, A Quiet Crisis in Transportation Finance" Integrated Mobility Policy, Proceedings, 2nd UITP International
Options for Texas, Testimony before the Texas Study Com- Conference on Public Transport Financing--The Finance
mission on Transportation Finance, Austin, TX, April 19, Dilemma: Growing Requirements Versus Declining Funds,
2006. Barcelona, Spain, 2005.
146. Wachs, Martin, Improving Efficiency and Equity in Transportation 150. Whitty, J., Svadlenak, J., and Capps, D., Public Involvement and
Finance, Center on Urban and Metropolitan Policy, Transportation Road User Charge Development: Oregon's Experience, Oregon
Reform Series, The Brookings Institution, Washington, DC, April Department of Transportation, Salem, OR, March 2006.
2003. 151. Wolman, Harold and Reigeluth, George, Financing Urban Public
147. Washington Metropolitan Area Transportation Authority, Dedi- Transportation: The U.S. and Europe. Transaction Books, New
cated Revenue Sources for Major U.S. Transit Agencies, October 15, Brunswick, New Jersey, 1980.
2004. 152. http://www.lightrailnow.org.
