National Academy of Sciences | 150 Year Anniversary

Questions? Call 800-624-6242

| Items in cart [0]

The National Academies Press

Rights & Permissions

topleft topright

NCHRP Report 627: Traffic Safety Evaluation of Nighttime and Daytime Work Zones (2008)
National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP)

Citation Manager

Finley, Melisa D, Ullman, Gerald L, Bryden, James E, Srinivasan, Raghavan, Council, Forrest M, Transportation Research Board. "Chapter 4 - Recommended Management Policies, Procedures, and Practices to Improve Nighttime and Daytime Work Zone Safety." NCHRP Report 627: Traffic Safety Evaluation of Nighttime and Daytime Work Zones. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2008.

Please select a format:

BibTeX EndNote RefMan


Page
34
bottomleft bottomright
Page
34
Front Matter (R1-R10)
Summary (1-3)
Work Zone Effects on Traffic Safety (4-4)
Nighttime versus Daytime Work Zone Crashes (5-5)
Implications for This Study (6-6)
Study Overview (7-7)
Data Reduction and Analysis (8-8)
Work Zone Traffic Crash Analysis (9-11)
Work Zone Construction Accident Analysis (12-12)
Summary of Findings (13-13)
Study Methodology (14-14)
Data Collection (15-17)
Data Analysis (18-18)
Increases in Traffic Crashes Occurring during Nighttime and Daytime Work Activities (19-25)
Types of Crashes Occurring during Nighttime and Daytime Work (26-29)
Summary (30-33)
Chapter 4 - Recommended Management Policies, Procedures, and Practices to Improve Nighttime and Daytime Work Zone Safety (34-34)
Improvements in Maintenance and Construction Practices (35-36)
Nighttime Work (37-37)
Transportation Demand Management Programs to Reduce Traffic Volumes Through Work Zones (38-39)
Strategies to Improve Work Zone Traffic Control Devices (40-42)
Strategies to Improve Work Zone Design Practices (43-44)
Strategies to Improve Driver Compliance with Work Zone Traffic Controls (45-46)
Strategies to Develop Procedures to Effectively Manage Work Zones (47-47)
Summary (48-49)
Categories of Critical Data Elements (50-50)
MMUCC Guideline-Based Enhancements to State Crash Reports (51-51)
Selecting a Work Zone Crash Data Source (52-53)
State Highway Agency-Based Crash Data Collection and Reporting (54-54)
MMUCC Guideline Data Elements and Attributes - 2003 Edition (55-55)
Suggested Revisions to MMUCC Guideline Definitions (56-56)
Inherent Limitations in the MMUCC Guideline (57-58)
Data Element Considerations of Highway-Agency-Based Crash Reporting Systems (59-60)
Recommended Work Zone Crash Data Analysis Methods (61-61)
Summary (62-64)
Nighttime and Daytime Work Zone Effects on Crashes and Worker Accidents (65-65)
Work Zone Crash Data Elements, Collection and Storage Techniques, and Analysis Methods (66-66)
Recommendations (67-67)
References (68-70)
Appendixes A, B, C, and F (71-71)
Appendix D - Suggested Revisions to MMUCC Guideline Definitions (72-73)
Appendix E - Florida, Louisiana, and Maryland Agency Work Zone Crash Reporting Forms (74-78)
Abbreviations used without definitions in TRB publications (79-79)

Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 34
34 CHAPTER 4 Recommended Management Policies, Procedures, and Practices to Improve Nighttime and Daytime Work Zone Safety FHWA and every state and local highway agency share a The critique in that report included an assessment of the fol- desire to improve safety in highway work zones. The findings lowing considerations for each strategy under those objectives: presented in the previous chapters of this report, as well as past studies, indicate that work zones have significant negative · Types of work zone crashes targeted; safety consequences. Agencies strive to minimize these adverse · Expected effectiveness; safety consequences as much as possible while maintaining · Keys to success; traffic mobility and accomplishing the tasks that necessitate · Potential difficulties; the need for the work zone in the first place. Simply put, work · Appropriate measures and data and associated needs; zones present competing objectives of maintaining a high · Organizational, institutional, and policy issues; level of safety for workers and the public, minimizing adverse · Implementation time considerations; traffic impacts, and accomplishing the work task on time, · Costs; within budget, and of appropriate quality standards. Agencies · Training and other personnel needs; attempt to address work zone safety concerns through the · Legislative needs; and development and adoption of various strategies. Typically, · Compatibility with other strategies. such strategies are implemented as work zone policies, pro- cedures, and/or practices to be followed during work zone In general, the expected effectiveness of these various planning, design, and implementation. strategies to reduce work zone crash risks was described in A recent comprehensive NCHRP publication recommended qualitative terms (52). Few, if any, of the strategies have been a systematic process intended to reduce the frequency and formally evaluated in terms of their ability to mitigate in- severity of traffic crashes during roadway work zone opera- creased work zone crash potential. The crash data collected as tions (52). The process was developed around the AASHTO part of this research were seen as an opportunity to further Strategic Highway Safety Plan, and utilizes a traditional assess the potential effectiveness of these strategies. problem-solving framework of problem identification, goal Given that this study relied on projects that had already and objective setting, identification and selection of alternatives, been implemented in the field, the opportunity to systemati- implementation, and evaluation (53). The NCHRP document cally evaluate the effects of any particular strategy or group of also summarizes and critiques a comprehensive list of strate- strategies was extremely limited. In many cases, it was not gies, organized under six main objectives, intended to reduce clear from the available project documentation which strategy work zone crashes. The specific strategies are organized under or strategies were in fact utilized for a particular project or the the following objectives: extent to which those that were in effect were properly and thoroughly applied. In other cases, data necessary to estimate · Reduce the number, duration, and impact of work zones, how the lack of a particular strategy would have impacted · Improve work zone traffic control devices, crashes were also not available. For example, an analysis of · Improve work zone design practices, the crash reduction potential of accelerated construction · Improve driver compliance with work zone traffic techniques would require information on the expected proj- controls, ect duration without the techniques applied as well as the · Increase knowledge and awareness of work zones, and actual duration that was achieved with the techniques used. · Develop procedures to effectively manage work zones. It would also require information on any changes in the