Cover Image

Not for Sale



View/Hide Left Panel
Click for next page ( 41


The National Academies | 500 Fifth St. N.W. | Washington, D.C. 20001
Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
Terms of Use and Privacy Statement



Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 40
40 $70,000 Reduction in Crash Costs per 100 $60,000 $50,000 Hours per Mile $40,000 $30,000 $20,000 $10,000 $0 0 50000 100000 150000 200000 250000 Roadway AADT 10% TDM Reduction - Daytime 10% TDM Reduction - Nighttime 20% TDM Reduction - Daytime 20% TDM Reduction - Nighttime Figure 20. Example of reduction in crash costs by travel demand management strategies during work activity without temporary lane closures. occurs, the situation is more complex, as was described earlier when lane closures are required can yield fairly substantial regarding the impacts of the full roadway closure strategy. savings in excess crash costs during daytime hours but only minimal reductions for nighttime hours. Of course, the like- lihood of an agency actually performing work activity that Designing Future Work Zone Capacity requires lane closures during the day on higher-volume road- into New or Reconstructed Highways ways is fairly small. Consequently, it is probably more realistic Another technique to reduce the impact of work zones is to compare costs when work activity during the day does not to consider future work zone space needs in the design of new require temporary lane closures (because the roadway design or reconstructed highways (52). Analyses that consider the allows it) to the costs when work activity is done at night with potential impacts of work zone operations at various points temporary lane closures (because the roadway design did not in the future can be incorporated into trade-off analyses of allow the work to be done without closing a lane). This com- alternative designs during the highway planning process. parison is also illustrated in Figure 21 for the California data In some instances, it may be better to acquire greater right- as an example. As the graph indicates, if an agency is willing of-way widths and design a wider sub-base than is initially to do work at night that requires temporary lane closures, the planned for a roadway segment in order to allow for future safety benefits associated with roadway designs that reduce widening that will be faster and less challenging to accomplish the number of lane closures that are required will be fairly than if the sub-base had not already been established. negligible, regardless of the AADT of the roadway segment. Unfortunately, these types of design decisions and their In other words, an emphasis on design enhancements that re- ramifications upon work zone safety are highly site specific. duce the frequency and duration of work zones has more of No data are available upon which to base estimates of how a potential safety benefit than enhancements that reduce the these types of decisions affect work zone duration or the fre- number of work hours that travel lanes need to be closed. quency of future work zones. If such estimates were available, it would theoretically be a simple process to assess the impacts Strategies to Improve Work Zone of such strategies using the roadway AADT and additional Traffic Control Devices work zone crash costs graphs that are illustrated in Figure 6 through Figure 8. Traffic control devices are used to communicate with Whereas certain design decisions could ultimately reduce motorists in advance of and through work zones. Devices that the frequency and duration of work zones, others could allow are used to inform the driver of desired actions and correct those work zones that are still required to be accomplished travel paths through the work zone are especially important. with fewer lane closures (i.e., a roadway with full shoulders Traffic control devices, especially those that are used to convey could allow traffic to be shifted during pavement rehabilitation real-time information, can also significantly affect driver route work and still maintain the same number of lanes). Roadway choice decisions. Taken together, these devices are believed to designs that reduce the number of hours of work zone activity have a substantial impact on work zone safety.

OCR for page 40
41 $40,000 Costs per 100 Hours per Mile Difference in Excess Crash $30,000 $20,000 $10,000 $0 0 50000 100000 150000 200000 250000 -$10,000 Roadway AADT Lane Closure vs No Lane Closure: Daytime Lane Closure vs No Lane Closure: Nighttime No Lane Closure Daytime vs Lane Closure Nighttime Figure 21. Reduction in crash costs by avoiding daytime lane closures through roadway design enhancements versus closing lanes at night. The NCHRP guidance document identifies the following economically worthwhile. Unfortunately, it is not possible to four main strategies under this particular safety improvement realistically assess the potential crash cost reduction or safety objective (52): benefit associated with this particular strategy at this time. Similarly, inadequately delineated work zone personnel Improvements in visibility of work zone traffic control and vehicles are believed to be at a higher crash risk than devices, those that have been adequately delineated, although the Improvements in visibility of work zone personnel and extent of any changes in crash risk that are achieved by visibil- vehicles, ity improvements has not been quantified. Because of these Reductions in flaggers' exposure to traffic, and constraints, it is not feasible to use the crash data from this Implementation of ITS strategies to improve safety. study to assess the potential safety benefits of this strategy. Techniques that improve the visibility of flagger stations or The extent to which improvements in traffic control device replace the flaggers entirely (i.e., temporary traffic signals or visibility and work zone personnel and vehicle visibility can automated flagger technologies) are another identified strat- result in reduced crash costs for a particular work zone depends egy that is believed to have the potential for improving safety. both on the highway agency's current traffic control device Flaggers are not typically used at work zone operations on standards (required grade of sheeting, whether fluorescent freeway or expressway facilities during the day or at night, sheeting is used, types of pavement markings used, etc.) and and so the potential effects of this strategy upon safety cannot work zone inspection practices (frequency, level of diligence be assessed with the data collected and analyzed for this study. applied, etc.) to ensure that the devices are adequately main- The final strategy listed is the use of ITS which allows for tained. A work zone that has high-quality devices that are improved real-time information about conditions in and positioned properly and maintained during the project may around a work zone to be collected, collated, analyzed, and not experience any safety benefits through the installation of then disseminated to drivers. This information can improve additional devices (in fact, too many devices or even brighter safety by alerting drivers to the presence of the work zone as devices may have a detrimental effect if an information over- well as providing information that can be used to make load situation is created). On the other hand, work zones realtime decisions regarding speed or travel route choices. where the traffic control devices are worn, have poor Consequently, these systems allow agencies to better target retroreflectivity at night, are misaligned or otherwise out of those work zone crashes that are congestion related or are the position, etc., may experience substantial improvements in result of other violations of driver expectancy, namely rear-end safety by improving those devices. Devices in poorer condi- collisions and sideswipes (52). tion at night, confounded with higher percentages of impaired From the data illustrated in Figure 9 and Table 18, the drivers, a lack of other visual cues, etc., could result in percentage of crashes that involve rear-end collisions increases higher crash costs, making efforts to improve those devices as roadway AADT increases to a point, whereas sideswipe

OCR for page 40
42 $15,000 Sideswipe Crash Costs per Reduction in Rear-End and 100 Hours per Mile $10,000 $5,000 $0 0 50000 100000 150000 200000 250000 Roadway AADT Work Zone Active with Temporary Lane Closures Work Zone Active without Temporary Lane Closures Work Zone Inactive Figure 22. Estimated reduction in crash costs due to a 10 percent reduction in rear-end and sideswipe collisions: daytime conditions. collisions tend to comprise a fairly constant percentage of the numbers since an ITS deployment could potentially re- work zone crashes across a wide range of AADTs. Therefore, duce some of those crashes that would have occurred even if the crash costs that are expected to occur because of rear-end the work zone were not present. As a result, the effects of and sideswipe collisions combined also increase as a function work activity (with or without lane closures) are not as sub- of AADT. Although the actual crash reduction potential of a stantial upon crash costs as they are for other strategies. In fact, work zone ITS deployment is currently not known, it is pos- the expected reduction that would be achieved during times sible to assess what crash cost savings could be achieved if the of work inactivity could serve as a conservative estimate of system were able to reduce these types of crashes by some the potential crash cost savings during the work zone, re- amount. Again using California data as an example, Figure 22 gardless of whether or not work activity and lane closures illustrates the estimated reductions in crash costs that would were present. The reduction in crash costs when the work be achieved if the system were able to reduce rear-end and zone is inactive ranges from about $1,000 per 100 hours per sideswipe collisions by 10 percent during daytime conditions mile during the day on 5,000 vpd roadways to about $11,000 (the crash costs during nighttime conditions are shown in per 100 hours per mile on 250,000 vpd roadways. Figure 23). All rear-end and collision crashes, not just the At night, the values range from as little as $500 per 100 hours additional crashes due to work zone presence, are included in per mile at 5,000 vpd up to approximately $3,000 per 100 hours $15,000 Sideswipe Crash Costs per Reduction in Rear-End and 100 Hours per Mile $10,000 $5,000 $0 0 50000 100000 150000 200000 250000 Roadway AADT Work Zone Active with Temporary Lane Closures Work Zone Active without Temporary Lane Closures Work Zone Inactive Figure 23. Estimated reduction in crash costs due to a 10 percent reduction in rear-end and sideswipe collisions: nighttime conditions.