Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.
Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.
OCR for page 61
61 Data Element Considerations of Work Zone Modification to project diary pages to specifically request lane Exposure Information closure information, and the inclusion of this item in con- struction management software where project diary data are The previous discussion notes the importance of capturing kept, would be an important first step. roadway and certain work zone characteristic information present at the time of a crash; this information is typically not captured in agency roadway inventory databases because of Recommended Work Zone Crash the temporary nature of the work zone. In addition to these Data Analysis Methods types of event-based data elements, there is a need for agen- In the most general terms, work zone crash data can be cies to begin to establish mechanisms to gather and organize used for ongoing monitoring functions or for detailed after- data pertaining to work zone exposure information. These the-fact (post-hoc) investigations to quantify and/or test the exposure data elements are needed to properly normalize statistical significance of various crash-related hypotheses. crashes into appropriate rate-based measures so that they can The monitoring function can be for a particular project, or it be consolidated across multiple work zones and compared in can be for a particular crash type across a district, region, or various ways. even state. For example, project engineers often maintain an The data elements needed or desired for exposure estima- informal awareness of the crashes occurring in their particu- tion purposes include those pertaining to traffic and to specific lar project (either informally by discussions with local law characteristics of the work zone itself. Suggested elements and enforcement or by regularly obtaining actual hard copies of attributes include the following: crash reports occurring in the work zone) as a way of check- ing for any obvious safety problems that need immediate · Traffic volumes and characteristics (ADTs, hourly volumes, attention in the work zone. Likewise, some states maintain a and vehicle mix); running total of the number of fatalities or the number of cer- · Work zone length (overall and by sections with similar tain types of crashes occurring in work zones throughout the geometric features); year to compare against similar year-to-date totals in previ- · Work zone duration (duration of phases, hours of work ac- ous years. Meanwhile, post-hoc investigations are typically tivity, and times and durations of capacity restrictions); and carried out to determine the amount of crash increase occur- · Highway worker and equipment exposure (number of ring in work zones overall or of a particular type, to evaluate workers and equipment present, and location of workers/ the effect of a particular design feature or operating strategy equipment within the work zone). upon crashes, or to evaluate the effectiveness of a particular countermeasure implemented to address a particular crash Currently, few agencies actively collect work zone traffic issue. The analyses performed as part of this research are data, although the increased use of work zone ITS technologies examples of these post-hoc investigations. now provides an opportunity to do so with greater frequency. The Ohio Department of Transportation is one agency that On the other hand, much of the proposed data pertaining to has formalized its efforts to monitor crashes in its significant work zone exposure are already within the potential grasp of work zones (76). For those work zones selected for monitor- many highway agencies. Daily project diaries already provide ing, the agency divides the projects into 0.5-mi segments and spaces to document times of work activity, equipment and compares crashes occurring in each segment with the average workers present, locations of work activities, etc. As agencies rate of crashes that had occurred in those segments in the pre- move toward electronic storage of daily project information vious 3-year time period. Those segments where crashes ap- (using the AASHTO Trns·port SiteManager or other con- pear abnormally high are targeted for further assessments of struction management software), the opportunity does exist the possible underlying factors that may be contributing to the to more easily extract this type of data for use in exposure higher-than-normal crash frequencies. An example of the estimation. The challenge will be in ensuring adequate docu- type of analysis generated through this effort is provided in mentation levels of these data elements. As part of this re- Figure 29. Crashes are examined both by location and by time search, thousands of pages of such diaries were reviewed. The to identify unusual trends. A key component of this process extent to which those elements were consistently reported in is the commitment of personnel resources by the Ohio DOT the diaries varied widely. to manually collect hard-copy crash reports from the law en- Other data elements, most notably lane closures that tem- forcement office at each project every 2 weeks and to enter porarily restrict the capacity of the roadway, do not have a that data into the spreadsheets used for analysis. specific field in the inspector diary but are typically docu- A comparison of some of the opportunities and challenges mented in the narrative portion of the diary. Capturing these associated with monitoring and post-hoc investigations of data at the present time is thus extremely time consuming. work zone crashes is provided in Table 25. Review of the