| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Copyright © 2009. National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved. Terms of Use and Privacy Statement |
Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter.
Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.
Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.
OCR for page 48
48
Health Effects of Contraception
Nancy C. Lee, Herbert B. Peterson, and Susan Y. Chu
INTRODUCTION
Until the 1960s rhythm and barrier contraceptives were the only methods of
birth control widely available to couples desiring to plan the number and spacing
of their children. In the 1 960s oral contraceptives (OCs) were introduced and new
efficacious intrauterine devices (IUDs) became widely available, so that the
choice of effective methods of contraception increased substantially. Later, in the
1970s, female and male sterilization techniques became much more widely ac-
cepted and used. Couples were then able to choose from several different
temporary and permanent methods of contraception and to switch from one to
another. Worldwide, family planning programs expanded, and the prevalence of
contraceptive use increased.
As these methods of contraception became more widely used, anecdotal re-
ports of adverse health effects associated with their use began to appear. Since the
late 1960s and early l970s, epidemiologic studies have more rigorously evaluated
the health effects associated with the use of different contraceptive methods.
Most of these studies have been conducted in the United States and Europe. In the
process researchers have recognized that different contraceptive methods have
Nancy C. Lee and Herbert B. Peterson are deputy chief and chief, respectively, of the Epidemiologic
Studies Branch, Division of Reproductive Health, Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health
Promotion of the Centers for Disease Control. Susan Y. Chu is epidemiologist in the Special Projects
Section, Surveillance Branch, AIDS Program, Center for Infectious Diseases, of the Centers for
Disease Control.
48
OCR for page 49
IlEALTH EFFECTS OF CO=RACE"ION 49
important beneficial health effects, in addition to the desired effect of preventing
pregnancy. Although much research is still needed, especially targeted to the
developing world, a large body of information is now available to assess the
health effects of the venous contraceptive methods.
The various contraceptive methods have health risks, but pregnancy itself has
attendant risks of morbidity and mortality. In 1983, Ory et al. attempted to
quantify the mortality risks associated with using the various methods of contra-
ception. Those risks were compared with the risks associated with using no
method of contraception, which are actually the mortality risk associated with
pregnancy. These estimates are presented in Table 1. Using no method of
contraception cames a higher cumulative risk of death than using any contracep-
tive method except that of OCs by older women who smoke. The mortality risks
associated with using no contraception and with using OCs are higher in older
women than in younger women. For all other contraceptive methods, the mortal-
ity risk does not appear to vary by age. Although the estimates are not presented
in Table 1, vasectomy involves no mortality risk for women and virtually none for
the male partner (Ory et al., 1983~.
Below we will present in detail the health effects of the venous widely
available methods of contraception, limiting our discussion to those methods that
are considered moderately to highly effective. Most epidemiologic and clinical
studies of the health effects of contraceptives have been earned out in developed
counties. We recognize the difficulty in generalizing these results to the special
health and cultural situations in the less developed countnes. Furthermore, the
TABLE 1 Estimated Cumulative Number of Deaths per 100,000 Nonsterile Women Aged 17-44,
Aunbutablc to Contraceptive Method, by Age Group
Age Group
Method 17-34 35-44 Total (17-44)
No method 179 270 449
PilVnonsmoker 20 230 250
PilUsmoker 127 845 972
IUD 22 20 42
Condom 17 4 21
Diaphragm/spennicide 24 25 49
Rhythm 31 32 63
Tubal sterilizations - 4
Not available by age group.
Source: Modified from Ory et al., 1983, p. 36, Figure 16.
OCR for page 50
50 ~E, PETERSON, AND CHU
effects of the venous contraceptive methods on the risk of diseases generally
limited to less developed countries have had very little characterization. Because
of the expanding role of family planning programs and contraceptive use in these
countries, studies to evaluate the health effects of contraceptives in various
regions and cultures are needed.
Modern contraceptive methods vary substantially in how effectively they
prevent pregnancies. Because pregnancy itself has attendant health risks and
benefits, the rates of accidental pregnancy associated with the various methods of
contraception are one important aspect to consider when measuring the health
effects of these methods. In 198? Trussell and Kost published their comprehen-
sive review assessing failure rates for each method of contraception. After
reviewing all available studies, they estimated the rate of failure (i.e., accidental
pregnancy) in the first year of use associated with "perfect)' use of each con~ace~
five. They called this estimate the "lowest expected" failure rate; this rate should
reflect the frequency of failures caused by the contraceptive itself. They also
reported for each method a "typical" failure rate, defined as the rate of accidental
pregnancy in the first year of use among typical couples who use that method.
The typical failure rate is determined both by failures as a result of imperfect use
of a contraceptive and by failures directly related to the method itself. Most of the
typical failure rates were derived from national surveys of U.S. women. The
authors summarized these rates, by contraceptive method, in a single table (Trussell
and Kost, 1987, p. 271~. We present a modified version of that table here Cable
2~. In our table and throughout the text we have substituted the term method
failure rate for lowest expectedfailure rate and userfailure rate for typicalfailure
rate to follow more closely the terminology used in much of the existing litera-
ture. Note that the method failure rates are consistently low for most modern
contraceptives. However, user failure rates vary widely, a function of the degree
of acceptability and compliance required for successful use of each method.
ORAL CONTRACEPTIVES
OCs, a highly effective method of birth control, are available in two types.
Combination OCs, the most widely used, consist of both an estrogen and a
progestin component. Most combination OCs contain a fixed daily dose of an
estrogen and progestin and are talcen for 21 of 28 days of each menstrual cycle
(Hatcher et al., 1988~. Recently introduced, phasic combination OCs contain
varying doses of the estrogen and progestin components throughout the menstrual
cycle. The second type of OC is the progestin-only pill (often called the minipill),
which contains only a progestin. Combination OCs with fixed doses of estrogen
and progestin have been used much more frequently than phasic or progestin-only
pills; hence, most epidemiologic studies on the health effects of OCs are essen-
tially studies of the effects of this type of OC.
OCR for page 51
HE'UTH EFFECTS OF CONTRA CEPrION 5 ~
TABLE 2 Method Failure and User Failure Rata During the First Year of Use of a Contraceptive
Method, United States
Contraceplivc
Method
Percentagc of Women E'cpenencing an Accidental
Pregnancy in the First Year of Use
Method Failures User Failurc.
Pin
Combination 0.1
Progestin~y 0.5
IUD 6
Medicated 1
Non m cd ic at ed 2
Injectable progesiin
DMPA 0.3 0.3
NET 0.4 0.4
Implants ~ORP~9 0.2 0.2
Diaphragm with spcnnicidc 3 18
Condom 2 12
SpcmucidesC 3 21
Sponge (Todays)
Nulliparous 5 18
Parous >8 >28
Gp/spemucide 5 18
Periodic abstinence 20
Ovulation method 8
Symp~ermal 6
Calendar 10
Posto~rulation 2
Withdrawal 4 18
Female sterilization 0.2 0.4
Male sterilization 0.1 0.15
Among couples who use a method perfectly (both consistently and correctly), an estimate of the
percentage expected to c~cperience an accidents] pregnancy during the first year if they do not stop
use for any reason.
Among typical couples who use a method, the percentage who c~penence an accidental pregnancy
during Tic first year if they do not stop use for any reason. Idcludes failures due to the method itself
as well as failures due to imperfect use of the method.
Roams, creams, jellies, and vaginal suppositones.
Source: Modified from Tmsscll and Kost, 1987, p. 271.
OCR for page 52
52 ~E, PETERSON, AND CHU
OCs prevent pregnancy chiefly by~inhibiting ovulation in almost all menstrual
cycles, although OC-related changes in the cervical mucus and endometrium may
also have contraceptive effects. Failure rates associated with OC use are low.
The method failure rate for combination OCs is 0.1 percent per year and for
progestin-only OCs is 0.5 percent per year (Table 2~. The user failure rate cannot
be readily determined for the two types of OCs separately, but it is about 3 percent
per year for any type of OC. Because this user failure rate was derived from data
where the vast majority of women used combination OCs, the figure probably is
closest to the user failure rate for combination OCs. Most experts believe that the
progestin-only pill has a higher user failure rate.
The health risks and benefits of OC use have been extensively studied and
documented (Ory, 1982; Ory et al., 1983; Stadel, 1986; Prentice and Thomas,
1987~. For a recent extensive review and list of references, see Stadel (1986) or
Prentice and Thomas (1987~.
Because OCs are highly effective at preventing any pregnancy, they appear to
decrease greatly the risk of ectopic pregnancy. Results from a large case-control
study of ectopic pregnancies conducted in the United States showed that current
OC users had a relative riisk of ectopic pregnancy of 0.1 (95 percent confidence
interval, 0.1~.2) compared with women who were using no contraceptive method
(Ory, 1981~.
Noncontraceptive Benefits
An important benefit from OC use is a reduction in risk of two serious
reproductive system cancers, endometrial and ovarian cancers. This reduction
has been documented in at least 9 and 11 epidemiologic studies, respectively C1he
Cancer and Steroid Hormone Study [CASH], 1987a, 1987b). Although the
theoretical mechanisms that may explain these protective effects are quite differ-
ent for the two types of cancer, the magnitude and characteristics of the protective
effects are similar. The most detailed characterization of these protective effects
comes from the CASH Study, a large case-control study conducted in the United
States by the Centers for Disease Control, with support from the National Institute
of Child Health and Human Development (CASH, 1987a, 1987b). OC use was
associated with a 40 percent reduction in the risk of endometrial cancer as well as
a 40 percent reduction in the risk of ovarian cancer, regardless of the specific
formulation of combination OC used. The effect appeared to persist long after
OC use had been discontinued; furthermore, protection increased with increasing
cumulative duration of OC use.
The protective effect of OCs on endometrial cancer is most likely related to
direct effects on the endometrium. Among current OC users the carcinogenic
effect of unopposed estrogen on the endometrium is probably reduced because
combination OCs contain both estrogen and progestin. The continued protection
OCR for page 53
HEALTH EFFECTS OF CO=RACE~ION 53
seen among past OC users is less well understood. Perhaps the combination of
estrogen and progestin irreversibly changes endometrial cells so that they are not
susceptible to carcinogens or to malignant transformation (CASH, 1987a).
Suppression of ovulation and suppression of pituitary secretion of gonadotropins
have both been postulated as mechanisms by which OCs protect against ovarian
cancer (Weiss, 1982~. Two other factors that provide protection from ovarian
cancer, increasing parity and breastfeeding (Gwinn et al., submitted), may also
derive their protective effects from one of these two proposed mechanisms.
Available epidemiologic studies do not provide sufficient information to choose
one of these postulated mechanisms over the other.
Fourteen epidemiologic studies have found a decreased risk of benign breast
disease (RED) associated with OC use, including both case-control and cohort
studies (Stadel, 1986~. Evidence suggests that OCs decrease the risk of f~brocys-
tic disease and fibroadenoma diagnosed by biopsy as well as the risk of breast
lumps observed clinically but not biopsied. Results from a large cohort study
conducted in the United Kingdom by the Oxford Family Planning Association
have provided especially useful information about the relationship between OC
use and BBD (Brinton et al., 1981~. The decreased risk of BBD seen among
women who use OCs occurs primarily among current or recent users who have
used them for 2 years or longer. The relative risk among women who have used
OCs for more than 2 years compared with nonusers is about 0.6 for fibrocystic
disease and about 0.5 for unbiopsied breast lumps. The relative risk of fibroade-
noma among women who have used OCs for less than 2 years is about 0.4, which
is essentially the same as the relative risk of 0.3 among women who have used
OCs for 2 or more years. The decreased risk of BBD does not persist among past
OC users who have not used OCs for more than 1 year.
Many epidemiologic studies have found that a history of BBD increases a
woman's risk of breast cancer. Even though OCs decrease the risk of BBD,
epidemiologic studies have not found that OCs decrease the risk of breast cancer,
as might be suggested by the OCs-BBD relationship. The most likely explana-
tion for this paradox is that OCs probably decrease the risk of the large proportion
of BBD that is not closely linked to breast cancer risk but do not decrease the risk
of the types of BBD that increase a woman's risk of breast cancer (Stadel, 1986~.
Clearly, more information about the interrelationship between OC use, histologic
types of BBD, and breast cancer is needed.
Seven epidemiologic studies have found that current or recent OC use reduces
the risk of pelvic inflammatory disease (PID) (Stadel, 1986~. On average, these
studies have found that the risk of PID among OC users is about 40 percent lower
than the risk among women using no contraceptive method.
The most detailed analysis of this issue comes from the U.S.-based Women's
Health Study, a large hospital-based case-control study conducted from 1976 to
1978 (Rubin et al., 1982~. This study found that the overall relative risk of PID
OCR for page 54
54 r FE, PETERSON, AND CIlU
among current OC users was about 0.5 compared with women using no contra-
ception. However, this protective effect was limited to women who had been
using OCs for at least 1 year. Furthermore, women not currently using OCs but
who had used them in the past were no longer protected.
Two mechanisms have been proposed to explain how OCs protect against the
development of PID. First, OCs may change cervical mucus so that it prevents
pathogenic organisms from ascending into the upper genital tract. Second,
because OCs reduce menstrual blood flow, a decreased amount of medium may
be available for bacterial growth (Rubin et al., 1982~.
Most of the studies of the relationship between OCs and PID have been
hospital-based studies, so that case groups in these studies consisted of women
hospitalized for PID. Because many women diagnosed with acute PID are not
hospitalized, findings about women who are may not be generally extended to
women who develop asymptomatic PID or symptomatic PID that does not require
hospitalization (Washington et al., 1985~. Specifically, gonorrhea may be an
important cause of PID that requires hospitalization, whereas other bacterial
etiologies such as chlamydia may cause much of the PID among women who do
not require hospitalization. If OCs only protect against the bacterial etiologies of
PID that are likely to require hospitalization, using OCs may not protect against
some important causes of PID. Little epidemiologic evidence exists to clarify this
question.
Results from a large cohort study in the United Kingdom have provided clear
evidence that OC use decreases the risk of iron-deficiency anemia, in both current
and past OC users (Royal College of General Practitioners, [RCGPl, 1970~. The
protective effect provided by current OC use is probably due to the decrease in
menstrual blood flow routinely seen among OC users. An increase in iron
reserves probably accounts for the persistence of the decreased risk in past users.
In countries where the prevalence of iron-deficiency anemia is high, this benefit
to OC users may be especially important (Stadel, 1986~.
Three epidemiologic studies have found that OC use decreases the risk of
functional ovarian cysts, including follicular, granulosa lutein, and theca lutein
cysts (Stadel, 1986~. Decrease in risk appears to be confined to current OC users
and is probably related to the suppression of ovulation that occurs during OC use.
Evidence from a case-control study that used data collected from the Oxford
Family Planning Association cohort study suggests that OC use protects a woman
from developing uterine fibroids (Ross et al., 1986~. The risk of fibroids de-
creased with increasing duration of OC use: each 5 years of OC use contributed
another 17 percent reduction in fibroid risk. The mechanism of the protective
effect is still speculative. The authors proposed that circulating estrogens, either
exogenous or endogenous, may promote the formation of fibroids and that the
decreased risk associated with OC use may be explained by the modifying effect
of the progestins in OCs.
OCR for page 55
I!EALTH EFFECTS OF CO=RACE~ION 55
Adverse Health Effects
Cardiovascular Effects
Most epidemiologic evidence suggests that OC use increases the risk of cardio-
vascular disease, in particular the risk of venous thromboembolism, myocardial
infarction (MI), and stroke (Stadel, 1986~. However, the risk of serious illness or
death from cardiovascular disease that can be attributed to OC use is apparently
concentrated among certain groups of women, primarily older women and women
who smoke cigarettes.
At least 11 case-control and 4 cohort studies have found that OC use increases
the risk of venous thromboembolism (Vessey, 1980~. Results from those studies
have shown that current OC use increases the risk of venous thromboembolism,
although the increased risk does not appear to persist among past users. Further-
more, the risk among current users remains constant with increasing duration of
OC use. The risk of both superficial and deep vein thrombosis among current OC
users is directly related to the estrogen content of OCs: the higher the estrogen
content of the OC, the greater the risk of venous thromboembolism (Stadel,
1986~. The pathogenesis of venous thromboembolism among OC users probably
involves an increase in the size of intravascular clots formed in response to
thrombotic stimuli, most likely a result of estrogen-induced decreases in an-
tithrombin III and plasminogen activators. Unlike the associations between OC
use and MI and stroke, available studies have not found any interrelationship
between OCs, venous thromboembolism, and cigarette smoking. The increased
risk of venous thromboembolism is an important source of illness attributable to
OC use but is a very infrequent cause of mortality (Stadel, 1986~.
In contrast to the low attributable risk of death from venous thromboembolism
associated with OC use, the increased risk of MI and stroke observed in women
currently using OCs has been demonstrated to be an important source of the
mortality risk attributable to OCs (Stadel, 1986~. Current OC use increases the
risk of MI, thrombotic stroke, and hemorrhagic stroke. The risk of MI and stroke
associated with current OC use is strongly influenced by age and by the presence
of other cardiovascular risk factors, such as cigarette smoking, hypertension, and
diabetes. For example, the risk of MI that is attributable to OCs among nonsmok-
ing women 30 to 39 years of age is about 4 cases per 100,000 current users per
year, but it increases to about 185 cases per 100,000 current users per year among
women aged 40 to 44 years who smoke heavily (Table 3~. The risk attributable to
past OC use appears also to be concentrated among older women and older
women who smoke heavily. The risk of adverse cardiovascular events among
current OC users appears to be directly related to the estrogen content of the OCs;
although less conclusive, risk may also be related to progestin content. The
pathogenesis of MI and stroke among current OC users may be related both to the
OCR for page 56
56 [ARE, PETERSON, AND CHU
TABLE 3 Current Use of Oral Contraceptives (OCs), Cigarette Smoking, and Risk of Myocardial
farcuon (MI)
MIs per 100,000
Current OC Users
MIs per 100,000 per Year
Cigarettes Women per Year Relative Attributable
Age per say OC Users Nonusers Riska Risk
30-39 yr All women 11 4 3 7
0-14 6 2 3 4
>15 30 1 1 3 19
40-44 yr All women 89 22 4 67
0-14 47 12 4 35
>15 246 61 4 185
aRelauve risk of ~ for OC users compared with nonusers.
Source: Modified from Stadel, 1986, p. 17.
intravascular coagulation system and to the effects of increased blood pressure
and metabolic changes.
Current OC use has been found to elevate blood pressure slightly in most
women about 1 to 2 mm Hg diastolic and 5 mm Hg systolic (Stadel, 1986~. OC
use leads to approximately a threefold to sixfold increased risk of overt hyperten-
sion. This risk has been observed to increase with increasing age and with
increasing duration of OC use. Whether other risk factors for hypertension may
be related to the increased risk attributable to OC use has not be established.
Metabolic Effects
The progestin component of OCs has been found to decrease the concentration
of high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (HDL-C), whereas the estrogen compo-
nent has been found to increase HDL-C concentration (Stadel, 1986~. lIence, the
effects of different OC formulations on HDL-C concentration apparently depend
on the specific estrogen-progestin content. A U.S. study provided information
about 10 combination OCs: 3 lowered HDL-C concentrations, 2 had no effect,
and 5 increased HDL-C levels (Bradley et al., 1978~. If the progestin component
has a strong anti-estrogen effect, the tendency of the estrogen component to
increase HDL-C concentration may be overpowered (Stadel, 1986~.
Current OC use has been found to decrease glucose tolerance among most
women, although this decrease appears to be small, unrelated to duration of use,
OCR for page 57
HEALTH EFFECTS OF CONTRACTION 57
and only additive to the effects of other risk factors for impaired glucose tolerance
(Stadel, 1986~. This decrease in glucose tolerance is directly related to the
estrogen content of the OCs, although there may be a relationship to the progestin
content also. More important, OCs containing relatively small amounts of estro-
gen-~ 50 micrograms of ethinyl estradiol-do not appear to decrease glucose
tolerance to any appreciable extent.
Neoplastic Diseases
Epidemiologic studies clearly indicate that OC use increases the risk of hepato-
cellular adenoma (HCA), a rare, benign neoplasm of the liver. Although benign,
HCA can cause serious abdominal hemorrhage and death, with a death-to-case
ratio of approximately ~ percent (Rooks et al., 1979~. Among women of repro-
ductive age who have never used OCs or who used them for a short time, HCA
develops at an annual rate of about 1.0 to 1.3 per million women 16 to 44 years of
age. However, OC use is a strong risk factor for HCA, with a relative risk greater
than 100 among women who have used OCs for 3 or more years compared with
women who have used OCs for 1 year or less. The increased risk appears to be
directly related to the duration of use, the age of the user, and the estrogen content
of the OC. However, the absolute risk of HCA associated with OC use is small
because of the rarity of the tumor. Among women who have used OCs for 5 years
or longer, the attributable risk is estimated to be about 2 cases of HCA per
100,000 users per year (Stadel, 1986~.
Epidemiologic studies have well demonstrated that OC use protects women
from developing endometrial and ovarian cancers. However, the effect OCs may
have on the risk for developing certain other malignancies remains unclear.
Hepatocellular carcinoma and malignant melanoma have both been associated
with OC use, although the strength of the associations has not been great. For this
reason as well as the fact that those tumors are quite rare, the public health impact
of a true positive association would not be great for either type of malignancy.
Conversely, the debate about whether OC use increases the risk of cervical and
breast cancers remains heated; some studies have found no effect on cancer risk,
while others have found disturbing increases in risk. Because breast and cervical
cancers are two of the most common cancers affecting women, contraceptive
providers and epidemiologists feel an urgent need to resolve these discrepant
results. However, as will be discussed subsequently, the possibility of a quick
resolution to the controversies is unlikely.
Both case-control and cohort studies have assessed the relationship between
OC use and malignant melanoma. Generally, they have not found substantial
increases in the risk of melanoma associated with OC use (Stadel, 1986~. Certain
studies do suggest that O{ s may increase the risk among certain subgroups of
women, especially those who have used OCs for a long time (Ramcharan et al.,
1981; Bain et al., 1982; Holly et al., 1983; Beral et al., 1984~. Few studies have
OCR for page 58
58 l:FE, PETERSON, AND CIlU
adequately addressed the risk by histologic type of melanoma. Future studies of
this association will have 'several issues to consider, including the rarity of the
tumor among women, the different histologic subtypes of melanoma, and the
potentially confounding effects of exposure to sunlight.
The association between OC use and benign liver tumors, as well as a number
of case reports of liver cancer among OC users, have led to theoretical concerns
that OC use might increase the risk of malignant liver tumors. Three case-control
studies published since 1983 have found increased risks of hepatocellular carci-
noma among OC users (Henderson et al., 1983; Forman et al., 1986; Neuberger et
al., 1986~. Generally, the increased risk has been confined to women with a
history of long-term OC use. However, each of the studies had few women in the
case group ~30) and had methodological problems that may have biased the
results.
In developed countries hepatocellular carcinoma is extremely rare among
reproductive-aged women. In the United States in 1982 only 59 women died from
liver cancer among approximately 52 million women aged 15 to 44 years (Na-
hona1 Center for Health Statistics, 1982~. Hence, even if OC use substantially
increases the relative risk of liver cancer, the attributable risk would still be very
low.
In many developing countries -liver cancer is a much more common problem,
primarily because of the relationship between hepatocellular carcinoma and chronic
hepatitis B virus infection, which has a high prevalence in some regions. In those
areas the possible interrelationships between OC use, hepatitis B infection, and
liver cancer are more troublesome. Currently, the World Health Organization
(WHO) is conducting a multicenter case-control study to address the relationship
between OC use and liver cancer. Data are being collected from three developing
countries with high rates of hepatitis B infection and liver cancer. It is hoped that
results from this study will shed light on the relationship between OC use and this
· ~ .
serious malignancy.
The potentially positive association between OC use and cervical cancer has
added importance when considered in the setting of less developed countries.
Surveillance information from developing countries, although sometimes frag-
mentary and incomplete, suggests that cancer of the cervix is the most frequent
malignancy among women in those countries (Lunt, 1984~. Unfortunately, screen-
ing efforts in those countries usually reach very limited segments of the female
population. Unlike the situation in developed countries where provision of
contraceptive services is usually accompanied by routine Papanicolaou (Pap)
screening for cervical cancer, family planning programs in developing countries
often do not have the resources to provide Pap screening for their clients.
To date, no definite causal relationship has been established between OC use
and cervical cancer. Of 15 major epidemiologic studies, ~ have found no in-
creased risk of cervical neoplasia and 7 have found significantly increased risks
overall or increases among certain subgroups of users (Piper, 1985; Brinton et al.,
OCR for page 85
HEALTH EFFECTS OF CONTRACEPTION 535
REFERENCES
Affandi, B., S. S. I. Santoso, Djajadilaga, et al.
1987 Pregnancy after removal of Norplant~implants contraceptive. Contraception
36:203-209.
Alexander, N. J., and D. J. Anderson
1979 Vasectomy: consequences of autoimmunity to sperm antigens. Fertility & Sterility
32:253-260.
Alexander, N. J., B. J. Wilson, and B. D. Patterson
1974 Vasectomy: immunological effects on rhesus monkeys and men. Fertility & Sterility
25:149-156.
Anonymous
1986 Oral contraceptives and breast cancer. Uncut 2:665 666.
Ansbacher, R.
1971 Sperm-agglutinating and sperm-immobilizing antibodies In vasectorruzed men. Fer-
tility & Sterility 22:629-632.
Association for Voluntary Sterilization
1983 Minutes prepared for a Vasectomy Senunar. Science Committee, New York, June 6.
Austin, H., W. C. Louv, and W. J. Alexander
1984 A case-control study of spermicides and gonorrhea. Journal of the American Medical
Association 251:2822-2824.
BaeHer, E. A., W. P. Dillon, T. J. Cumbo, et al.
1982 Prolonged use of a diaphragm and toxic shock syndrome. Fertility & Sterility
38:248-250.
Bain, C., C. H. Hennekens, F. E. Speizer, et al.
1982 Oral contraceptive use and malignant melanoma. Journal of the National Cancer
Institute 68:537-539.
Barlow, D.
1977 The comedown and gcnonhea. L~ncet 2:811-813.
Beral, V., S. Evans, H. Shaw, et al.
1984 Oral contraceptive use and malignant melanoma in Australia. British Journal of
Cancer 50:681~85.
Bhiw&ndiwala, P. P., S. D. Mumford, and P. J. Feldblum
1982 A comparison of different laparoscopic sterilization occlusion techniques In 24,439
procedures. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 144:319-331.
Menstrual pattern changes following laparoscopic sterilization with different occlu
sion techniques: a review of 10,004 cases. American Journal of Obstetrics and
Gynecology 145:684-694.
Bhiwandiwala, P. P., S. D. Mumford, and K. I. Kennedy
1985 Canparison of the safety of open and conventional laparoscopic sterilization. Obstet-
rics and Gynecology 66:391-394.
Bradley, D. D., J. Wingerd, D. B. Petitti, et al.
1978 Serum high density lipoprotein cholesterol in women using oral contraceptives, estro-
gens, and progestins. New England Journal of Medicine 299:17-20.
Bnnton, L. A., M. P. Vessey, R. Flavel, et al.
1981 Risk factors for benign breast disease. American Journal of Epidemiology 113:203-214.
Bnnton, L. A., G. R. Huggins, H. F. I=ham, et al.
1986 I=ng-term use of oral contraceptives and risk of invasive cervical cancer. Interna-
tional Journal of Cancer 38:330344.
1983
OCR for page 86
86 LEE, PETERSON, AND CHU
The Cancer and Steroid Hormone Study of the Centers for Disease Control and the National Institute
of Child Health and Human Development
1986 Oral-contraceptive use and the risk of breast cancer. New England Journal of
Medicine 315:405-411.
The Cancer and Steroid Hormone Study of the Centers for Disease Control and the National Institute
of Child Health and Human Development
1987a Combination oral contraceptive use and the risk of endometnal cancer. Journal of the
American Medical Association 257:796-800.
The Cancer and Steroid Hormone Study of the Centers for Disease Control and the National Institute
of Child Health and Human Development
1987b The reduction in risk of ovarian cancer associated with oral-contracep~ve use. New
England Journal of Medicine 316:65~655
Celentano, D. D., A. C. Klassen, C. S. Weissman, et al.
1987 The role of contraceptive use in cervical cancer: the Maryland cervical cancer case-
control study. American Journal of Epidemiology 126:592 604.
Centers for Disease Control
1987 Antibody to human irnmunodeficiency virus in female prostitutes. Morbidity and
Mortality Weekly Report 36:157-161.
1988 Condoms for prevention of sexually transmitted diseases. Morbidity and Mortality
Weekly Report 37:133-137.
Chamberlain, G., and J. C. Brown, eds.
1978 Gynaecological Laparoscopy: The Report of the Working Party of the Confulential
Inquiry info Gynaecological Laparoscopy. London: The Royal College of Obstetri-
cians and Gynaecologists.
Chi, I.-C., and P. J. Feldblum
1981 Luteal phase pregnancies in female sterilization patients. Contraception 23:10.
Oaricson, T. B., N. J. Alexander, and T. M. Morgan
1988 Atherosclerosis of cynomolgus monkeys hyper- and hyporesponsive to dietary cho-
lesterol: lack of an effect of vasectomy. Arteriosclerosis 8:488-498.
Cohen, M. M.
1987 Long-term risk of hysterectomy after tubal sterilization. American Journal of Epi
demiology 125:410-419.
Conant, M. A., D. W. Spicer, and C. D. Smith
1984 Herpes simplex virus transmission: condom studies. Sexually Transmitted Diseases
11 :94-95.
Conant, M., D. Hardy, J. Sematinger, et al.
1986 Condoms prevent transmission of AlDS-associated retrovirus. Journal of the Ameri-
can Medical Association 255:1706.
Cordero, J. F., and P. M. Layde
1983 Vaginal spermicides, chromosomal abnormalities and limb reduction defects. Family
Planning Perspective 15:16.
Cowan, M. E., and G. E. Cree
1973 A note on the susceptibility of N. gonorrhocae to contraceptive agent Nonyl-P. British
Journal of Venereal Diseases 49:65-66.
Cramer, D. W., I. Schiff, S. C. Schoenbaum, et al.
1985 Tubal infertility and the intrauterine device. New England Journal of Medicine
312:941-947.
Cramer, D. W., M. B. Goldman, I. Schiff, et al.
1987 The relationship of tubal infertility to barrier method and oral contraceptive use.
Journal of the American Medical Association 257:244~2450.
OCR for page 87
IlEALTH EFFECTS OF CONTRA CAPTION 557
Dating, J. R., N. S. Weiss, B. J. Metch, et al.
1985 Primary tubal infertility in relation to the use of an intraulennc device. New England
Journal of Medicine 312:937-941.
DeStefano, F., H. B. Peterson, P. M. Layde, et al.
1982 Risk of ectopic pregnancy following tubal sterilization. Obstetrics and Gynecology
60:32~330.
DeStefano, F., J. R. Greenspan, R. C. Dicker, et al.
1983a Complications of interval laparoscopic tubal sterilization. Obstetrics and Gynecology
61:153-158.
DeStefano, F., C. M. Huezo, H. B. Peterson, et al.
1983b Menstrual changes after tubal sterilization. Obstetrics and Gynecology 62:673-681.
DeStefano, F., J. A. Perlman, H. B. Peterson, et al.
1985 Long-term risk of menstrual disturbances after tubal sterilization. American Journal
of Obstetrics and Gynecology 152:835-841.
Diaz, S., M. Pavez, P. Miranda, et al.
1987 Long-term follow-up of women treated with Norplant,M implants. Contraception
35:551-567.
District Court of Appeals of Florida
1964 Dunn v. Campbell, Flonda, 166 SO. 2d217. July 1, Second Distnct.
Ebeling, K., P. Nischan, and C. Schindler
1987 Use of oral contraceptives and risk of invasive cervical cancer in previously screened
women. International Journal of Cancer 39:427~30.
Faich, G., K. Pearson, D. Fleming, et al.
1986 Toxic shock syndrome and the vaginal contraceptive sponge. Journal of the American
Medical Association 255:21~218.
Feldblum, P. J., and J. A. Fortney
1988 Condoms, speTmicides, and the transmission of human immunodeficiency virus: a
review of the literature. American Journal of Public Health 78:52-54.
Finn, S. D., R. H. Latham, P. Roberts, et al.
1985 Association between diaphragm use and urinary tract infection. Journal of the
American Medical Association 254:24~245.
Fischl, M. A., G. M. Dickinson, G. B. Scott, et al.
1987 Evaluation of heterosexual partners, children, and household contacts of adults with
AIDS. Journal of the Americar: Medical Association 257:64~44.
Forman, D., T. J. Vincent, and R. Doll
1986 Cancer of the liver and the use of oral contraceptives. British Medical Journal
292:1357-1361.
Fortney, J. A., L. P. Cole, and K. I. Kennedy
1983 A new approach to measuring menstrual pattern change after sterilization. American
Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology l4/:83~836.
Fothe~by, K., I. Trayner, I. Howard, et al.
1982 Effect of injectable norethisterone oenanthate ~origest) on blood lipid levels. Contra-
ception 2S:435~46.
Foulkes, J., and G. Chamberlain
1985 Effects of sterilization on menstruation. Southern Medical Journal 78:544.
Foxman, B., and R. R. Frerichs
1985 Epidemiology of urinary tract infections. I: Diaphragm use and sexual intercourse.
American Journal of Public Health 75:1308-1313.
Francis, D. P., and J. Chin
1987 1be prevention of acquired immunodeficiency syndrome in the United States. Jour-
nal of the American Medical Association 257:1357-1366.
OCR for page 88
8~3 ~E, PETERSON, AND CHU
Gallen, M. E., L Liskin, and N. Kak
1986 Men-new focus for family planning programs. Population Reports Series J. No. 33.
Goldacre, M. J., J. A. Clarke, M. A. Heasman, et al.
1978 Follownp of vasectomy using medical record linkage. American Journal of Epidemi-
ology 108: 176-180.
Goldacre, M., M. Vessey, J. Clarke, et al.
1979 Record linkage study of morbidity following vasectomy. Pp. 567-579 in I. H. Lepow
and R. Crazier, eds. Vasectomy: Immunologic and Pathophysiologic Effects in
Anunals and Man. New York: Academic Press.
Gray, R. H.
1985 Reduced risk of pelvic inflammatory disease with injectable contraceptives. Lancet
1:1046.
Grimes, D. A.
1987 Intrauterine devices and pelvic inflammatory disease: recent developments. Contra-
ception 36:97-109.
Grimes, D. A., H. B. Peterson, M. J. Rosenberg, et al.
1982a Sterilization-aunbutable deaths in Bangladesh. International Journal of Gynaecology
and Obstetrics 20:149-154.
Grimes D. A., A. P. Sattenhwaite, R. W. Rochat, et al.
1982b Deaths fran contraceptive sterilization in Bangladesh: rates, causes, and prevention.
Obstetrics and Gynecology 60:635~40.
Grubb, G. S., and H. B. Peterson
1985 Luteal phase pregnancy and tubal stenlization. Obstetrics and Gynecology 66:784-788.
Grubb, G. S., H. B. Peterson, P. M. Layde, et al.
1985 Regret after decision to have a tubal sterilization. Fertility & Sterility 44:248-253.
Gwinn, M. L., N. C. Lee, P. H. Rhodes, et al.
n.d. Pregnancy, breast feeding, and oral contraceptives and the risk of epithelial ovarian
cancer. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. (Submitted for publication)
Hams, R. W. C., L. A. Brinton, R. H. Cowdell, et al.
1980 Characteristics of women with dysplasia or carcinoma in situ of the cervix uteri.
British Journal of Cancer 42:35~369.
Hatcher, R. A., F. Guest, F. Stewart, et al.
1988 Contraceptive technology: 1988-1989. New York: Printed Matter, Inc./Irvington
Publisher, Inc.
Heartwell, S. F., and S. Schlesselman
1983 Risk of uterine perforation among users of intrauterine devices. Obstetrics and
Gynecology 61:31-36.
Henderson, B. E., S. Preston-Martin, H. A. Edmondson, et al.
1983 Hepatocellular carcinoma and oral contraceptives.
48:437 410.
Henshaw, S. K., and S. Singh
British Journal of Cancer
1986 Sterilization regret among U.S. couples. Family Planning Perspectives 18:23~240.
Hicks, D. R., L. S. Martin, J. P. Getchell, et al.
1985 Inactivation of HTLV-m/LAV-infected cultures of normal human lymphocytes by
nonoxynol-9 in vitro. Lancet 1422-1423.
Holly, E. A., N. S. Weiss, and J. M. Liff
1983 Cutaneous melanoma in relation to exogenous hormones and reproductive factors.
Journal of the National Cancer Institute 70:827-831.
Hopper, R. R., G. H. Reynolds, O. G. Jones, et al.
1978 Cohort study of venereal disease. I. The risk of gonorrhea transmission from infected
women to men. American Journal of Epidemiology 108:13~144.
OCR for page 89
HEALTH EFFECTS OF CONTRACEPTION 539
Horsburgh, C. R., J. M. Douglas, and F. M. LaForce
1987 Preventive strategies in sexually transmitted diseases for the primary care physician.
Journal of the American Medical Association 258:815-821.
Huggins, G., M. Vessey, R. Flavd, et al.
1982 Vaginal spennicides and outcome of pregnancy: findings in a large cohort study.
Contraception 25:219.
Hulks, J. F., H. B. Peterson, M. Surrey, ct al.
1987 American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists' 1985 membership surrey.
Journal of Reproductive Medicine 32:732-73S.
Hymowitz, E. E.
1981 Toxic shock syndrome and the diaphragm. New England Journal of Medicine 305:834.
Indian Council of Medical Research
1982 Collaborative Study on Scquelae of Tubal Sterilization. Monograph. New Delhi.
Twin, K. L., L. Rosero-Bixby, M. W. Oberlc, ct al.
1988 Oral contraceptives and cervical cancer risk in Costa Rica: Detection bias or causal
association? Journal of He American Medical Association 259:59 64.
Tick, H., A. M. Walker, K. J. Rothman, et al.
1981 Vaginal spennicides and congenital disorders. Journal of the American Medical
Association 245:1329-1332.
Tick, H., M. T. Hannan. A. Sterzachis, et al.
1982
Vaginal spermicides and gonorrhea. Journal of the American Medical Association
248:1619-1621.
Judson, F. N., J. M. Enret, G. M. Bodin, et al.
in In vitro evaluations of condoms with and without nonoxynol-9 as
physical and chemical barriers against Chlamydia trachomatis, herpes simplex virus
type 2, and human ~mmunodeficiency Virus. Set lly Transmitted Diseases (Suppl.)
Katmelson, S., W. L. Drew, and ~ Mintz
1984 Efficacy of the condom as a barrier to the transmission of cytomegalo virus. Journal
of Infectious Diseases 150:155-1S7.
Kelaghan, J., G. ~ Rubin, H. W. Ory, et al.
1982 gamer-method contraceptives and pelvic inflammatory disease. Journal of the Ameri-
can Medical Association 248:180187.
Kenduck, J. S., E. P. Rhodenhiser, G. L. Rubin, et al.
1985 Charactenstics of vasectomy performed in selected outpatient facilities in the United
States, 1980. Journal of Reproductive Medicine 30:93~938.
Kendnclc, J. S., B. Gonzales, D. H. Huber, ct al.
1987 Complications of vasectomy in the United States. Journal of Family Practice
25:245-248.
Krorunal, R. A., J. N. Krieger, J. W. Kennedy, et al.
1988 Vasectomy and urolithiasis. Lancet 1:22-23.
Layde, P. M., M. P. Vessey, and D. Yeates
1982 Risk factors for gallbladder disease: a cohort study of young women attending family
planning clinics. Journal a] Epidemiology and Corrvrumity Health 36:27~278.
Ike, N. C., L. Rosero Bixby, M. W. Oberle, et al.
1987 A case control study of breast cancer and hormonal contraception in Costa Rica.
Journal of the National Canecr Institute 79:1247-1254.
Lee, N. C., G. L. Rubin, and R. Borucki
1988 The intrauterine device and pelvic inflammatory disease revisited: new results from
the Women's Health Study. Obstetrics and Gynecology 72:1~.
Lewis, E. L., C. K. Brazil, and J. W. Overstrcet
1984 Human sperm function in the ejaculate following vasectomy. Fertility & Sterility
42:895-898.
press
OCR for page 90
90 ~ FE, PETERSON, AND CH[J
Liang, A. P., A. G. Levenson, P. M. Layde, et al.
1983 Risk of breast, uterine Corpus, and ovarian cancer in women receiving medro~cypro-
gesterone injections. Journal of the American Medical Association 249:2909-2912.
Liskin, L., and G. Fox
1982 IUDS: an appropriate contraceptive for many women. Population Reports Series B.
No. 4.
Liskin, L., and W. F. Quillin
1982 Long-acung progestins: promise and prospects. Population Reports Series K, No. 2.
Liskin, L., J. M. Pile, and W. F. Quillin
1983 Vasectomy-safe and simple. Population Reports Series D, No. 4.
Liskin, L., W. Rinehart, R. Blackburn, et al.
1985 Minilaparotomy and laparoscopy: safe, effective and widely used. Population Re-
ports Series C, No. 9.
Liskin, L., R. Blackbum, and R. Ghani
1987 Honnmal contraception: new long-acting methods. Population Reports Series K,
No. 3.
Lunt, R.
1984 Worldwide early detection of cervical cancer. Obstetrics and Gvn~oloa~v f~1~7nP~711
Mann, J., T. C. Quinn, and P. Plot
1987 Condom use and HIV infection among prostitutes-Zaire (Issuer). New England
Journal of Medicate 316:345.
Massey, F. J., G. S. Bemstein, W. M. O'Fallon, et al.
1984 Vasectomy and health: results from a large cohort study. Journal of the American
Medical Association 252:1023-1029.
McPherson, K., and J. O. Dnfe
1986 The pill and breast cancer: Why the unce~nty? British Medical Journal 293:709-710.
McPherson, K., A. Neil, M. P. Vessey, et al.
1983 Oral contraceptives and breast cancer. Lancet 2:1414-1415.
McPherson, K., P. A. Coope, and M. P. Vessey
1986 Early oral contraceptive use and breast cancer: theoretical effects of latency. Journal
of Epidemiology and Community [lealth 40:289-294.
Meirik, O., E. Lund, H.-O. Adami, et al.
1986 Oral contraceptive use and breast cancer in young women. Locket 2:650 654.
Mills, J. L., E. E. Harley, G. F. Reed, et al.
1982 Are spermicides teratogenic? Journal of the American Medical Association 248:2148.
Mintz, M.
1977
_,, - vies, v - ., it, A.
Risk and prophylaxis in laparoscopy: a survey of 100,000 cases. Journal of Renro-
ductive Medicine 18:269-272.
Mumford, S. D., P. P. Bhiwandiwala, and I.-C. Chi
1980 Laparoscopic and minilaparotomy female sterilization compared in 15,167 cases.
Lancet 2:10~1070.
National Center for Health Statistics
1982 Vital Statistics of the United States. Vol. 2. Mortality Part A. Hyattsville, Md.:
National Center for Health Statistics.
Neuberger, J., D. Forman, R. Doll, et al.
1986 Oral contraceptives and hepatocellular carcinoma. British Medical Journal
292:1355-1357.
Oberle, M. W., L. Rosero-Bixby, K. L Irwin, et al.
1988 Cervical cancer risk and use of depot-medroxyprogesterone acetate in Costa Rica.
International Journal of Epidemiology 17:718-723.
Ory, H. W.
1981 The Women's Health Study. Ectopic pregnancy and intrauterine contraceptive de
vices: new perspectives. Obstetrics and Gynecology 57:137-144.
, . . .
OCR for page 91
HEALTH EFFECTS OF CONTRACEPTION 91
1982 the noncontraceptive health benefits from oral contraceptive use. Family Planning
Perspective 14:182-184.
Only, H. W., J. D. Forrest, and R. Lincoln
1983 Making Choices: Evaluating the Health Risks and Benef Is of Birth Control Methods.
New York: lye Alan Guttrnacher Institute.
Pardthaisong, T., R. H. Gray, and E. B. McDaniel
1980 Return of fertility after discontinuation of depot-medroxyprogesterone acetate and
intra-uterine devices in Northem Thailand. Lancet 1:509-512.
Pasquale, S. A., V. Brandeis, R. I. Cruz, et al.
1987 NorplantTM contraceptive implants: rods versus capsules. Contraception 36:305-316.
Paul, C., D. C. G. Skegg, G. F. S. Spears, et al.
1986 Oral contraceptives and breast cancer: a national study. British Journal of Medicine
293:723-726.
Perrin, E. B., J. S. Woods, and N. Tsukasu, et al.
1984 Long-tenn effect of vasectomy on coronary heart disease. American Journal of
Public Health 74:128-132.
Peterson, H. B., H. W. Ory, J. R. Greenspan, et al.
1981a Deaths associated with laparoscopic sterilization by unipolar coagulating devices,
1978-1979. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 139:141.
Peterson, H. B., D. A. Grimes, W. Cates, et al.
1981b Comparative risk of death from induced abortion at 12 weeks gestation performed
with local vs. general anesthesia. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
141:763.
Peterson, H. B., F. DeStefano, J. R. Greenspan, et al.
1982a Mortality risk associated with tubal sterilization in United States hospitals. American
Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 143:125-129.
Peterson, H. B., J. R. Greenspan, and H. W. Ory
1982b Death following puncture of the aorta during laparoscopic sterilization. Obstetrics
and Gynecology 59:133.
Peterson, H. B., F. DeStefano, G. L. Rubin, et al.
1983 Deaths attributable to tubal sterilization in the United States, 1977-1981. American
Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 146: 131-136.
Petitii, D. B., R. Klein, H. Kipp, et al.
1982 A survey of personal habits, symptoms of illness, and histories of disease in men with
and without vasectomies. American Journal of Public Health 72:476-480.
Petitti, D. B., R. Klein, H. Kipp, et al.
1983 Vasectomy and the incidence of hospitalized illness. Journal of Urology 129:76~762.
Philp, T., J. Guillebaud, and B. Budd
1984 Late failure of vasectomy after 2 documented analyses showing azoosperrnic semen.
British Medical Journal 289:77-79.
Pike, M. C., B. E. Henderson, M. D. Krailo, et al.
1983 Breast cancer in young women and the use of oral contraceptives: possible modifying
effects of formulation and age at use. Lancet 2:92~930.
Piotrow, P. T., W. Rinehart, and J. C. Schmidt
1979 IUDs-update on safety, effectiveness, and research. Population Reports Series B.
No. 3.
Piper, I. N.
1985 Oral contraceptives and cervical cancer. Gynecologic Oncology 22:1-14.
Prentice, R. L., and D. B. Thomas
1987 On the epidemiology of oral contraceptives and disease. Advances in Cancer Re-
search 49:285~01.
OCR for page 92
92 [FE, PETERSON, AND CHU
Quinn, R. W., and K. R. O'Reilly
1985 Contraceptive practices of women attending the sexually transmitted diseases clinic in
Nashville, Tennessee. Sexually Transmitted Diseases 12:99-102.
Rameharan, S., F. A. Pellegrin, R. Ray, et al.
1981 We Walnut Creek contraceptive drug study. A prospective study of the side effects of
oral eontraeeptives, Vol. m. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.
Reingold, A. ~
1986 Toxic shock syndrome and the contraceptive sponge. Journal of the American
Medical Association 255:242-243.
Rietmeijer, C. A. M., J. W. Krebs, P. M. Feorino, et al.
1988 Condoms as physical and chemical barriers against human immunodefieieney virus.
Journal of the American Medical Association 259:1851-1853.
Rooks, J. B., H. W. Ory, K. G. Ishak, et al.
1979 Epidemiology of hepatoeellular adenoma: the role of oral contraceptive use. Journal
of the American Medical Association 242:644 648.
Rosenberg, L., P. J. Sehwingel, D. W. Kaufmann, et al.
1986 Ihe risk of myoeardial infarction 10 or more years after vasectomy in men under 55
years of age. American Journal of Epidemiology 123:1049-1056.
Rosenberg, M. J., W. Rojanapithayakom, P. J. Feldblum, and J. E. Higgins
1987 Effect of the contraceptive sponge on ehlamydial infection, gonorrhea, and eandidiasis.
Journal of the American Medical Association 257:2308-2312.
Rosenfield, A., D. Maine, R. Roehat, et al.
1983 We Food and Drug Administration and medroxyprogesterone acetate. Journal of the
American Medical Association 249:2922-2928.
Ross, J. A., and D. H. Huber
1983 Acceptance and prevalence of vasectomy in developing countnes. Studies in Family
Planning 14:67-72.
Ross, J. A., S. Hong, and D. H. Huber
1985 Voluntary Sterilization: An International Fact Book New York: Association for
Voluntary Sterilization.
Ross, R. K., M. C. Pike, M. P. Vessey, et al.
1986 Risk factors for uterine fibroids: reduced risk associated with oral contraceptives.
British Medical Journal 293:359-362.
Royal College of General Practitioners
1970 Oral eontraeepiives and health. London: Pitman Medical.
Royal College of General Practitioners Oral Contraception Study
1982 Oral eontraeepiives in gallbladder disease. Lancet 2:957-959.
Rubin, G. L., H. W. Ory, and P. M. Layde
1988
1982 Oral contraceptives and pelvic inflammatory disease. American Journal of Obstetrics
and Gynecology 144:630-635.
Ryden, G., L. Fahraeus, L. Molin, et al.
1979 Do contraceptives influence the incidence of acute pelvic inflammatory disease in
women with gonorrhea? Contraception 20:149-157.
Salah, M., A. M. Ahmed, M. Abo-Eloyoun, et al.
1987 Five-year experience with NorplantlM implants in Assiut, Egypt. Contraception
35:543-550.
Sehlesselman, J. J., B. V. Stadel, P. Mullay, et al.
1987 Consistency and plausibility in epidemiologic analyses: application to breast cancer
in relation to use of oral contraceptives. Journal of Chronic Diseases 40:1033-1039.
Breast cancer in relation to early use of oral contraceptives: no evidence of a latent
effect. Journal of the American Medical Association 259:1828-1833.
OCR for page 93
IlEALTW EFFECTS OF CONTRA CEPI ION 93
Schmidt, S. S.
1975 Complications of vas surgery. Pp. 78-88 in J. J. Sciarra, C. Markland, and J. J. Speidel,
eds. Control of Male Fertility. Hagerstown, Md.: Harper & Row.
Schmidt, S. S., and N. J. Free
1978 Cite bipolar needle for vasectomy. 1. E'cpenence with the first 1,000 cases. Fertility
& Sterility 29:676~580.
Schmidt, S. S., and R. R. Moms
1973 Spermatie granuloma: the complication of vasectomy. Fertility & Sterility 24:941-947.
Schulman, S., E. Zappi, U. Ahmed, et al.
1972 Immunologic consequences of vasectomy. Contraception 5:269-278.
Schwartz, B., S. Gaventa, C. V. Broome, et al.
1989 Nonmenstrual toxic shock syndrome associated with bamer contraceptives: report of
a ease-control study. Review of Infectious Diseases 11 (Suppl. 1):S43-S49.
Shain, R. N., W. B. Miller, and A. E. C. Holden
1986 Married wanen's dissatisfaction with tubal sterilization and vasectomy at first-year
follow-up: effects of perceived spousal dominance. Fertility & Sterility 45:808-819.
Shapiro, S., D. Stone, O. P. Heinonen, et al.
1982 Birth defects and vaginal spermieides. Journal of the American Medical Association
247:2381.
Shems, J. D., S. H. Moore, and G. Fox
1984 New developments in vaginal contraception. Population Reports Series H. No. 7.
Silber, S. J.
1978 Vasectomy and vaseetcxny reversal. Fertility & Sterility 29:125-140.
Singh, B., J. C. Cutler, and A. M. Utidjian
1972 II. Effect in vitro of vaginal contraceptive and noncontracepiive preparation on
Treponema pallidum and Neisseria gonorrhoeae. British Journal of Venereal Dis-
eases 48:57~4.
Singh, B., B. Postie, and J. C. Cutler
1976 Virucial effect of certain chemical contraceptives on type 2 herpes virus. American
Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 126:422~25.
sivin, I., and J. Stem
1979 Long acting, more effective Copper T IUD's: a summary of U.S. experience,
197~1975. Studies in Family Planning 10:263-281.
Skegg, D. C.
1988 Potential for bias in ease-control studies of oral contraceptives and breast cancer.
American Journal of Epidemiology 127:205-212.
Smith,G.L.,andK.F.Smith
1986 Lack of HIV infection and condom use in licensed prostitutes (Lever). Lancet 2:1392.
Spring, S. B., and J. Gruber
1985 Relationship of DNA viruses and cervical carcinoma. Journal of the National Cancer
Institute 75:589-590.
Stadel, B.
1986 Oral contraceptives and the occurrence of disease: clinical overview. Pp. 3~1 in A.
T. Gregoire and R. G. Blye, eds. Coniraceptive Steroids~harmacology and Safety.
New York: Plenum Press.
Stadel, B. V., G. L. Rubin, L. A. Webster, et al.
1985 Oral contraceptives and breast cancer in young women. Lancet 2:97~973.
Stone,K.M.,D. A.Grimes,and L.S.Magder
1986 Personal protection against sexually transmitted diseases. American Journal of Ob
stetrics and Gynecology 155:18~188.
Sun, M.
1984 Panel says Depo-Provera not proved safe. Science 226:95~951.
OCR for page 94
94 ~E, PETERSON, AND ClIU
Swan, S. H., and D. B. Petitti
1982 A rewew of problems of bias and confounding in epidemiologic studies of cervical
neoplasia and oral contraceptives. American Journal of Epidemiology 115:1~18.
Swenson, I., A. R. Khan, and F. A. Jahan
1980 A randomized, single blind comparative trial of norethindrone enanthate and depot-
medroxyprogesterone acetate in Bangladesh. Contraception 2:207-215.
Treirnan, K., and L. Iiskin
1988 IUDs a new look. Population Reports Series B. No. 5.
Trussell, J., and K. Kost
1987 Contraceptive failure in the United States: a critical review of the literature. Studies
in Family Planning 18:237-283.
Vessey, M. P.
1980 Female hormones and vascular disease-an epidemiological overview. British Jour-
nal of Family Planning 6:1-12.
Vessey, M. P., N. H. Wnght, K. McPherson, et al. ~
1978 Fertility after stopping different methods of contraception. British Medical Journal
(6108) February:265-267.
, D. Yeates, R. Flavel, et al.
~, . . ~.. . .. . . . . . . ^. .. . ~.
Vessey, M. P.,
1981 Pelvic inflammatory disease and the intrauterine device: findings in a large cohort
study. British Medical Journal 282:855-857.
Vessey, M., G. Huggins, M. Lawless, et al.
1983 Tubal stenlization: findings in a large prospective study. British Journal of Obstet-
rics and Gynaecology 90:203-209.
Vessey, M. P., M. A. Metcalfe, K. McPherson, et al.
1987 Urinary tract infection in relation to diaphragm use and obesity. International Journal
of Epidemiology 16:441~44.
Walker, A. M., H. Jick, J. R. Hunter, et al.
1981
Vasectomy and nonfatal myocardial infarction. Lancet 1:13-15.
Washington, A. E., S. Gove, J. Schachter, et al.
1985 Oral contraceptives, chlamydia trachomatis infection, and pelvic inflammatory dis
ease: a word of caution about protection. Journal of the American Medical Associa
tion 253:224~2250.
Weiss, N. S.
1982 Ovary. Pp. 871-880 in D. Schottenfeld and J. F. Fraumeni, Jr., eds. Cancer Epidemi
ologyand Prevention. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders.
Westrom, L.
1987 Pelvic inflammatory disease. Bacteriology and sequelae. Contraception 36:111-128.
World Federation of Health Agencies for the Advancement of Voluntary Surgical Contraception
1984 Safety of Voluntary Surgical Contraception. New York.
World Health Organization Task Force on Long-Acting Systemic Agents for the Regulation of
Fertility
Multinational comparative clinical evaluation of two long-acting injectable contracep-
tive steroids: norethisteronc oenanthate and medroxyprogesterone acetate. 2. Bleed-
ing patterns and side effects. Contraception 17:395~06.
World Health Organization Task Force on Female Sterilization
1982a ' ' ' - ~
World Health
1982b
1978
mmllaparotomy or laparoscopy tor sterll~zat~on: a multicenter, multinational random-
ized study. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 143:645~52.
Organization Task Force on Female Sterilization
Randomized comparative study of culdoscopy and minilaparotomy for surgical contra-
ception in women. Contraception 26:587-593.
OCR for page 95
"~~ EFFECTS OF C ~93
Wodd Hat Org~i~d~
198~ ~~ed~=eslemne (SPA) and Manor: memorandum _ s WHO mung.
8~ Iffy -~ IDA C~;~ ~:37~S2.
Wodd Heat 0~1-on Task fog on ~ng~c~g Agent for Feat Region
198~ ~ sideman of Became de-~ed~x~mgesm~ne aceme, l5-g ~me-
mo~, ~ undem~shed lacing then. B~ ~ -~6 O~-
'^ ~87~94.
Wow Heat OF Task ate ~ -At physic Acts for Feat Regular
1987 A ma ~= ~ ~m~mdve cb~c~ ~ ~ de~t-medmx~esm~ne
~ ~ an_ ~ ~- ~ lag ~ If: Hi.
Bang prams. ~f~ 33:591~10.
Wail, N. H., a. P. Valley, B. Kiowas, ~ a.
1978 Ne~ssia ad dysplasia of He cent umd ad coon: a Passive prove
each of He ~aph~gm. Bri'bA WHIZ ~r 38:~3~9.
Representative terms from entire chapter:
breast cancer