Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.
Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.
OCR for page 106
APPENDIX 8 Shared-Track System Status Existing or Planned Operating Configurations Active or Planned Share Track with Joint Operation Non-Compliant Sharing Track in Recent Past Shared Track First Year of Track Miles Planning to Separation Night-time Operation Currently Temporal Vehicles Limited Shared Status System MTA Baltimore Light Rail, North 1988 10.9 Line, Baltimore, Md. OCTranspo Capital Railway 2003 5.0 "Ottawa O-Train", Ont. Operating Utah Transit Authority, TRAX Sandy 2001 12.0 Line, Salt Lake City, Utah NJ Transit, River LINE 2004 33.0 San Diego Trolley Inc., Blue & Orange 1981 31.1 Lines, San Diego, Calif. NJ Transit, Newark City Subway, 1999 0.2 n/a * Newark NJ North County Oceanside-Escondido 2006 22.0 Design Final SPRINTER, Calif. Capital Metro, Northwest Austin 2008 33.0 "Commuter Rail", Austin Tex. MARTA, Belt Line, Atlanta, Ga. n/a ~8 Madison, Wis. Transport 2020 Study n/a ~12 BART, I-80 "eBART" Feasibility Study n/a ? ~10 EIS BART, I-580 Corridor Transit Study n/a ? ~14 Sonoma-Marin Area Rail Transit, n/a ? ? ? ? Marin County, Calif. Denton County Transportation Feasibility n/a ~14 Authority, Denton to Carrollton, Tex. Five Town Rural Transit, Inc., n/a ? ? ? ? East End Shuttle, Suffolk County, NY Triangle Transit, 2008 0.0 Raleigh-Durham Regional Rail, N.C. Chose to Avoid Tri-Met, Washington County Commingling 2008 0.0 Commuter Rail, Ore. NJ Transit, Northern Branch Rail n/a 0.0 Project, North Bergen to Tenafly, N.J. FDOT, Central Florida Commuter 2009 0.0 Corridor Study, Fla. BART, State Route 4 Transit Study n/a 0.0 Active Planned Not active ? Not determined Source: E&K Analysis based on FRA Data, FRA Dockets, and local plans. * Newark City Subway has provisions for dynamic temporal separation. Light rail and freight trains do not operate on shared-track at the same time, but the track can be changed at any time between passenger and freight modes by having the freight train conductor request a mode change from the NJ Transit dispatcher. 106